The current paradigm for biologic initiation: a mixed-methods exploration of practices, unmet needs, and innovation opportunities in self-injection training

References

• Tran V-T, Montori VM, Ravaud P. Is my patient overwhelmed? Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(3):504–512.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartzman S, Morgan GJ. Does route of administration affect the outcome of TNF antagonist therapy? Arthritis Res Ther. 2004;6(S2). DOI:10.1186/ar996
   Google Scholar
• Navarro-Millán I, Herrinton LJ, Chen L, et al. Comparative effectiveness of etanercept and adalimumab in patient reported outcomes and injection-related tolerability. Bamias G, ed. Plos One. 2016;11(3):e0149781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch LJ, Strauss KW. The injection technique factor: what you don’t know or teach can make a difference. Clin Diabetes. 2019;37(3):227–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oleen-Burkey M, Pardo G. Examining the influence of behavioral factors on compliance and persistence with glatiramer acetate injection for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurophysiol. 2014;05:03.
   Google Scholar
• Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices: guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Weinhold T, Del Zotto M, Rochat J, et al. Improving the safety of disposable auto-injection devices: a systematic review of use errors. AAPS Open. 2018;4(1). DOI:10.1186/s41120-018-0027-z
   Google Scholar
• Potera C. Misuse of Autoinjectors and Inhalers. AJN Am J Nurs. 2015;115(3):17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIMZIA (certolizumab pegol) [package insert]. Smyrna, GA: UCB, Inc. 2019. cited 2021 Feb 3. Available from: https://www.cimzia.com/themes/custom/cimzia/docs/CIMZIA_full_prescribing_information.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FASENRA (benralizumab) [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lang VA, Nalan D Combination product patient training: how are patients trained and who conducts the training? In: 2018 Design of Medical Devices Conference. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2018. doi:10.1115/DMD2018-6956
   Google Scholar
• Brod M, Rousculp M, Cameron A. Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008;2:129–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider A, Kolrep H, Jordi C, et al. How to prevent medication errors: a multidimensional scaling study to investigate the distinguishability between self-injection platform device variants. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2019;16(8):883–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff M, Saunderson S, Mountian I, et al. Chronic disease and self-injection: ethnographic investigations into the patient experience during treatment. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4(2):445–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer PA, Braun LT, Fraser R, et al. Promoting success in self-injection: listening to patients. Medsurg Nurs Off J Acad Med-Surg Nurses. 2015;24(4):279–282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tallman K. Communication practices of physicians with high patient-satisfaction ratings. Perm J. 2007;11(1). DOI:10.7812/TPP/06-106
   Google Scholar
• Mohr DC, Cox D, Epstein L, et al. Teaching patients to self-inject: pilot study of a treatment for injection anxiety and phobia in multiple sclerosis patients prescribed injectable medications. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2002;33(1):39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox D, Stone J. Managing self-injection difficulties e page in patients with relapsing-remitting CE multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2006;38(3):5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits: time allocation in primary care. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(5):1871–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young RA, Burge SK, Kumar KA, et al. A time-motion study of primary care physicians’ work in the electronic health record era. Fam Med. 2018;50(2):91–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung JM, Bhutani M, Leigh R, et al. Empowering family physicians to impart proper inhaler teaching to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Can Respir J. 2015;22(5):266–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottak N, Tesser J, Leibowitz E, et al. Ethnographic observational study of the biologic initiation conversation between rheumatologists and biologic-naive rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res. 2018;70(7):997–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicherer SH, Forman JA, Noone SA. Use assessment of self-administered epinephrine among food-allergic children and pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2000;105(2):359–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers E, Yost K, Rosedahl J, et al. Validating the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-Management (PETS), a patient-reported measure of treatment burden, in people with diabetes. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2017;8:143–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keininger D, Coteur G. Assessment of self-injection experience in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: psychometric validation of the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9(1):2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran G, Dube B, Kingsbury SR, et al. Investigating the patient acceptable symptom state cut-offs: longitudinal data from a community cohort using the shoulder pain and disability index. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40(4):599–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldiabat KM, Navenec C-L-L. Data saturation: the mysterious step in grounded theory method. Qual Rep. 2018;23(1):19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Leeman J. Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1404–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Baggott C, Chan A, Hurford S, et al. Patient preferences for asthma management: a qualitative study. BMJ Open Access. 2020;10:e037491. Published online.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ridgeway JL, Egginton JS, Tiedje K, et al. Factors that lessen the burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Mar 19;8:339-51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala A qmethod: a package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. R J. 2014;6:11.
   Google Scholar
• Lautenschlager GJ. A comparison of alternatives to conducting monte carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivar Behav Res. 1989;24(3):365–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys LG Jr. An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivar Behav Res. 1975;10(2):193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SE. Training decay selection for usability validation. Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Health Care. 2016;5(1):76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Nakatani Y, Matsumura M, Monden T, et al. Improvement of glycemic control by re-education in insulin injection technique in patients with diabetes mellitus. Adv Ther. 2013;30(10):897–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur W Jr, Bennett W Jr, Stanush PL, et al. Factors that influence skill decay and retention: a quantitative review and analysis. Hum Perform. 1998;11(1):57–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garafalo J, Li H, Lau M. The impact of a training device on perception and performance by novice users of an autoinjector. Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Health Care. 2019;8(1):192–196.
   Google Scholar
• Niles D, Sutton RM, Donoghue A, et al. “Rolling Refreshers”: a novel approach to maintain CPR psychomotor skill competence. Resuscitation. 2009;80(8):909–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng A, Brown LL, Duff JP, et al. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a CPR feedback device and refresher simulations (CPR CARES study): a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(2):137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler D, Pusic M, Chang TP, et al. Impact of Just-in-Time and Just-in-Place Simulation on Intern Success With Infant Lumbar Puncture. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):e1237–e1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grgurich E, Arnemann C, Amon K, et al. Just-in-Time video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for neonatal intubation. Neonatal Nurs. 2016;(4):367-371. Published online.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivieri LJ, Su L, Hynes CF, et al. “Just-In-Time” simulation training using 3-D printed cardiac models after congenital cardiac surgery. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2016;7(2):164–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzetti JB, Adedipe AA, Gittinger MJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial to assess the effect of a Just-in-Time training on procedural performance: a proof-of-concept study to address procedural skill decay. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(11):881–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelhorn HL, Balantac Z, Ambrose CS, et al. Patient and physician preferences for attributes of biologic medications for severe asthma. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:1253–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Brenneman S, Carter C, et al. Patient-reported treatment satisfaction and choice of dosing frequency with biologic treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 June;777. Published online. DOI:10.2147/PPA.S85773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y-R, Jo A, Cardel M, et al. Patient-provider communication with teach-back, patient-centered diabetes care, and diabetes care education. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(12):2443–2450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan RL, Kreuter MW, Brownson RC. Integrating adult learning principles into training for public health practice. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10(4):557–563.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yen PH, Leasure AR. Use and effectiveness of the teach-back method in patient education and health outcomes. Fed Pract. 2019 Jun; 36(6): 284–289.
   Google Scholar
• Kessels RPC Patients’ memory for medical information. 2003;96:4.
   Google Scholar
• Murre JMJ, Dros J. Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve. Chialvo DR, ed. Plos One. 2015;10(7):e0120644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu SG, Liu Y, Chen TP, et al. Emulating the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve of the human brain with a NiO-based memristor. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;103(13):133701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala DJ, Lenzmeier Broz S. Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills: physician communication skills training: theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1004–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner L. Beyond vaccines: pharmacists improve patient access to injectable medications. Pharm Today. 2018;24(2):34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lin C, Strauss R, Hong J, et al. Impact of a pharmacist-administered long-acting injectable antipsychotic service in a supermarket-based community pharmacy on medication adherence. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2019;2(4):343–348.
   Google Scholar
• Katz SJ, Leung S. Teaching methotrexate self-injection with a web-based video maintains patient care while reducing healthcare resources: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35(1):93–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberg R, Dissanayake T, Katz SJ. A qualitative analysis of methotrexate self-injection education videos on YouTube. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(5):1329–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard S, Levine C, Samis S Home alone: family caregivers providing complex chronic care. AARP Public Policy Institute and The United Hospital Fund; 2012:50.
   Google Scholar
• Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A, et al. Special article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2019;71(1):5–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar