Revisiting techniques to evaluate drug permeation through skin

References

• Mohammed D, Matts PJ, Hadgraft J, et al. In vitro-in vivo correlation in skin permeation. Pharm Res. 2014;31(2):394–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveque N, Makki S, Hadgraft J, et al. Comparison of Franz cells and microdialysis for assessing salicylic acid penetration through human skin. Int J Pharm. 2004;269(2):323–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dandamudi S. In vitro bioequivalence data for a topical product: bioequivalence review perspective fda public workshop topical dermatological generic drug products: overcoming barriers to development and improving patient Access. 2017; Accessed 11 July 2021. www.fda.gov
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood A, Rapalli VK, Gorantla S, et al. Dermatokinetic assessment of luliconazole-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) for topical delivery: qbD-driven design, optimization, and in vitro and ex vivo evaluations. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021;24:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ilić T, Pantelić I, Savić S. The implications of regulatory framework for topical semisolid drug products: from critical quality and performance attributes towards establishing bioequivalence. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(5):710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):101–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luís A, Ruela M, Perissinato AG, et al. Evaluation of skin absorption of drugs from topical and transdermal formulations. Brazilian J Pharm Sci. 2016;52:527–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos LL, Swofford NJ, Santiago BG. In vitro permeation test (IVPT) for pharmacokinetic assessment of topical dermatological formulations. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2020;91(1):e79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oh L, Yi S, Zhang D, et al. In vitro skin permeation methodology for over-the-counter topical dermatologic products. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020;693–700. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-019-00104-3.
   Google Scholar
• Patel P, Schmieder S, Krishnamurthy K. Research techniques made simple: drug delivery techniques, part 2: commonly used techniques to assess topical drug bioavailability. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(5):e43–e49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma G, Devi N, Thakur K, et al. Lanolin-based organogel of salicylic acid: evidences of better dermatokinetic profile in imiquimod-induced keratolytic therapy in BALB/c mice model. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018;8(2):398–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medawar PB. Sheets of pure epidermal epithelium from human skin. Nature. 1941;148(3765):783.
   Google Scholar
• Felsher Z. Studies on the adherence of the epidermis to the corium. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1946;62(2):213–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Scott EJ. Mechanical separation of the epidermis from the corium. J Invest Dermatol. 1952;18(5):377–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank IH, Miller OG. A method for the separation of the epidermis from the dermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1950;15(1):9–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts D, Marks R. The determination of regional and age variations in the rate of desquamation: a comparison of four techniques. J Invest Dermatol. 1980;74(1):13–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snorradóttir BS, Gudnason PI, Thorsteinsson F, et al. Experimental design for optimizing drug release from silicone elastomer matrix and investigation of transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2011;42(5):559–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley WJ, Chavda-Sitaram S, Mader KT, et al. The effects of esterified solvents on the diffusion of a model compound across human skin: an ATR-FTIR spectroscopic study. Int J Pharm. 2013;447(1–2):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godin B, Touitou E. Transdermal skin delivery: predictions for humans from in vivo, ex vivo and animal models. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59(11):1152–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasti BR, Abraham W, Ghosh TK. Transdermal and topical drug delivery systems. Theory Pract Contemp Pharm. 2021:423–454. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nair A, Jacob S, Al-Dhubiab B, et al. Basic considerations in the dermatokinetics of topical formulations. Brazilian J Pharm Sci. 2013;49(3):423–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhorn J, Melching-Kollmuß S, Mangelsdorf I. Dermal absorption− environmental health criteria 235. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Michaels AS, Chandrasekaran SK, Shaw JE. Drug permeation through human skin: theory and invitro experimental measurement. AIChE J. 1975;21(5):985–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarmi S, Roa W, Löbenberg R. Current perspectives in dissolution testing of conventional and novel dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2007;328(1):12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters L. Recent developments in skin mimic systems to predict transdermal permeation. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(20):2725–2732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi V, Brewster D, Colonero P. In vitro diffusion studies in transdermal research: a synthetic membrane model in place of human skin. Drug Dev Deliv. 2012;12:40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Vizserálek G, Berkó S, Tóth G, et al. Permeability test for transdermal and local therapeutic patches using Skin PAMPA method. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;76:165–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo M, Avdeef A, Ruiz A, et al. PAMPA - A drug absorption in vitro model: 7. Comparing rat in situ, Caco-2, and PAMPA permeability of fluoroquinolones. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;21(4):429–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neupane R, Boddu SHS, Renukuntla J, et al. Alternatives to biological skin in permeation studies: current trends and possibilities. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(2):152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi CT, Lee MH, Weng CF, et al. In silico prediction of PAMPA effective permeability using a two-QSAR approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaviani G, Martel S. Chemistry PC-J of medicinal, et al. Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay: a new membrane for the fast prediction of passive human skin permeability. J Med Chem. 2006;49:3948–3954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkó B, Garrigues TM, Balogh GT, et al. Skin–PAMPA: a new method for fast prediction of skin penetration. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012;45(5):698–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo L, Patel A, Sinko B, et al. A comparative study of the in vitro permeation of ibuprofen in mammalian skin, the PAMPA model and silicone membrane. Int J Pharm. 2016;505(1–2):14–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kansy M, Senner F, Gubernator K. Physicochemical high throughput screening:  parallel artificial membrane permeation assay in the description of passive absorption processes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1998;41(7):1007–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer UF, Hansen S, Schneider M, et al. Models for skin absorption and skin toxicity testing. Drug Absorpt Stud. 2007:3–33. Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Flaten GE, Palac Z, Engesland A, et al. In vitro skin models as a tool in optimization of drug formulation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;75:10–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz C, Pfeiffer R, Tigges J, et al. Xenobiotic metabolism capacities of human skin in comparison with a 3D epidermis model and keratinocyte-based cell culture as in vitro alternatives for chemical testing: activating enzymes (Phase I). Exp Dermatol. 2012;21(5):358–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thotakura N, Kumar P, Wadhwa S, et al. Dermatokinetics as an important tool to assess the bioavailability of drugs by topical nanocarriers. Curr Drug Metab. 2017;18(5): 404–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson CI. The use of an “internal standard” for control of the recovery in microdialysis. Life Sci. 1991;49(13):73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanfer I. Strategies for the bioequivalence assessment of topical dermatological dosage forms. JBB, an Open Access J. 2010;2010(2):110.
   Google Scholar
• Stoughton RB. The vasoconstrictor assay in bioequivalence testing: practical concerns and recent developments. Int J Dermatol. 1992;31(s1):26–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herkenne C, Alberti I, Naik A, et al. In vivo methods for the assessment of topical drug bioavailability. Pharm Res. 2008;25(1):87–103. Springer.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdo F, Hashimoto N, Karvaly G, et al. Critical evaluation and methodological positioning of the transdermal microdialysis technique. A review. J Control Release. 2016;233:147–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhle L, Segersvärd S, Ungerstedt U. A comparison between three methods for estimation of extracellular concentrations of exogenous and endogenous compounds by microdialysis. J Pharmacol Methods. 1991;25(1):41–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanley M, Walt H, Joseph BJ. In vivo calibration of microdialysis probes for exogenous compounds. Anal Chem. 1992;64:577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenken JA. Methods and issues in microdialysis calibration. Anal Chim Acta. 1999;379(3):337–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Langer O. Microdialysis versus other techniques for the clinical assessment of in vivo tissue drug distribution. AAPS J. 2006;8(2):E263–E271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casamonti M, Piazzini V, Bilia AR, et al. Evaluation of skin permeability of resveratrol loaded liposomes and nanostructured lipid carriers using a skin mimic artificial membrane (skin-PAMPA). Drug Deliv Lett. 2019;9(2):134–145.
   Google Scholar
• Dobričić V, Marković B, Nikolic K, et al. 17β-carboxamide steroids – in vitro prediction of human skin permeability and retention using PAMPA technique. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;52:95–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campani V, Scotti L, Silvestri T, et al. Skin permeation and thermodynamic features of curcumin-loaded liposomes. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020;31(2):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alalaiwe A, Lin C-F, Hsiao C-Y, et al. Development of flavanone and its derivatives as topical agents against psoriasis: the prediction of therapeutic efficiency through skin permeation evaluation and cell-based assay. Int J Pharm. 2020;581:119256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang Y, Murnane KS, Blough BE, et al. Transdermal delivery of the free base of 3-fluoroamphetamine: in vitro skin permeation and irritation potential. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21(3):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadwal A, Mishra N, Rawal RK, et al. Development and characterisation of clobetasol propionate loaded Squarticles as a lipid nanocarrier for treatment of plaque psoriasis. J Microencapsul. 2020;51(7):1037-1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Lin L, Choi Y, et al. Development and in-vitro evaluation of co-loaded berberine chloride and evodiamine ethosomes for treatment of melanoma. Int J Pharm. 2020;581:119278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soriano-Ruiz JL, Suñer-Carbó J, Calpena-Campmany AC, et al. Clotrimazole multiple W/O/W emulsion as anticandidal agent: characterization and evaluation on skin and mucosae. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2019;175:166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa AI, Costa Lima SA, Reis S. Development of methotrexate loaded fucoidan/chitosan nanoparticles with anti-inflammatory potential and enhanced skin permeation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;124:1115–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai F, Sinico C, De Logu A, et al. SLN as a topical delivery system for Artemisia arborescens essential oil: in vitro antiviral activity and skin permeation study. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2(3):419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au WL, Skinner M, Kanfer I. Bioequivalence assessment of topical clobetasol propionate products using visual and chromametric assessment of skin blanching. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2008;11(1):160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benfeldt, Serup, Menne. Effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous salicylic acid penetration in human skin: in vivo pharmacokinetics using microdialysis and non-invasive quantification of barrier function. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140:739–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ault JM, Lunte CE, Meltzer NM, et al. Microdialysis sampling for the investigation of dermal drug transport. Pharm Res An Off J Am Assoc Pharm Sci. 1992;9:1256–1261.
   Google Scholar
• Nii R, Tettey-Amlalo O, Kanfer I, et al. Application of dermal microdialysis for the evaluation of bioequivalence of a ketoprofen topical gel. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2009;36:219–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma G, Dhankar G, Thakur K, et al. Benzyl benzoate-loaded microemulsion for topical applications: enhanced dermatokinetic profile and better delivery promises. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2016;17(5):1221–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negi P, Singh B, Sharma G, et al. Biocompatible lidocaine and prilocaine loaded-nanoemulsion system for enhanced percutaneous absorption: qbD-based optimisation, dermatokinetics and in vivo evaluation. J Microencapsul. 2015;32(5):419–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lane ME, Hadgraft J, et al. A comparison of the in vitro permeation of niacinamide in mammalian skin and in the Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeation Assay (PAMPA) model. Int J Pharm. 2019;556:142–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bock U, Krause W, Otto J, et al. Vergleichende In-vitro- und In-vivo-Studien zur Permeation und Penetration von Ketoprofen und Ibuprofen an humaner Haut. Arzneimittelforschung. 2011;54:522–529.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl J, Blume B, Bienas S, et al. The comparability of in vitro and ex vivo studies on the percutaneous permeation of topical formulations containing ibuprofen. Altern to Lab Anim. 2012;40(2):91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klang V, Schwarz J, Lenobel B, et al. In vitro vs. in vivo tape stripping: validation of the porcine ear model and penetration assessment of novel sucrose stearate emulsions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2012;80(3):604–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waghule T, Patil S, Rapalli VK, et al. Improved skin-permeated diclofenac-loaded lyotropic liquid crystal nanoparticles: qbD-driven industrial feasible process and assessment of skin deposition. Liq Cryst. 2020;0:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rapalli VK, Kaul V, Waghule T, et al. Curcumin loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for enhanced skin retained topical delivery: optimization, scale-up, in-vitro characterization and assessment of ex-vivo skin deposition. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;152:105438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsheddi L, Ananthapadmanabhan K, Li SK. Influence of skin furrows on tape stripping in characterizing the depth of skin penetration. Int J Pharm. 2020;576:118903.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hafeez F, Chiang A, Hui X, et al. Stratum corneum reservoir as a predictive method for in vitro percutaneous absorption. J Appl Toxicol. 2016;36(8):1003–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lademann J, Jacobi U, Surber C, et al. The tape stripping procedure – evaluation of some critical parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;72(2):317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Chávez JJ, Merino-Sanjuán V, López-Cervantes M, et al. The tape-stripping technique as a method for drug quantification in skin. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2008;11(1):104–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser K, Kriwet K, Naik A, et al. Passive skin penetration enhancement and its quantification in vitro. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2001;52:103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Jain S, Varshney M, et al. AOT water-in-oil microemulsions as a penetration enhancer in transdermal drug delivery of 5-fluorouracil. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2005;41(1):25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf M, Halper M, Pribyl R, et al. Distribution of phospholipid based formulations in the skin investigated by combined ATR-FTIR and tape stripping experiments. Int J Pharm. 2017;519(1–2):198–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binder L, Valenta C, Lunter D. Determination of skin penetration profiles by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: evaluation of interindividual variability and interlab comparability. J Raman Spectrosc. 2020 51 7 ;1037–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen L, Selzer D, Fluhr JW, et al. Towards drug quantification in human skin with confocal Raman microscopy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;84(2):437–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tfayli A, Piot O, Pitre F, et al. Follow-up of drug permeation through excised human skin with confocal Raman microspectroscopy. Eur Biophys J. 2007;36(8):1049–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspers PJ, Bruining HA, Puppels GJ, et al. In vivo confocal Raman microspectroscopy of the skin: noninvasive determination of molecular concentration profiles. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;116(3):434–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajadhyaksha M, Grossman M, Esterowitz D, et al. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin: melanin provides strong contrast. J Invest Dermatol. 1995;104(6):946–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajadhyaksha M, González S, Zavislan JM, et al. In Vivo Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy of Human Skin II: advances in Instrumentation and Comparison With Histology11The authors have declared conflict of interest. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;113(3):293–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng L, Zhao Z, Yang Y, et al. Novel skin permeation enhancers based on amino acid ester ionic liquid: design and permeation mechanism. Int J Pharm. 2020;576:119031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Lunter DJ. Systematic investigation of the effect of non-ionic emulsifiers on skin by confocal Raman spectroscopy—a comprehensive lipid analysis. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(3):223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippavajhala VK, de Oliveira Mendes T, Martin AA. In vivo human skin penetration study of sunscreens by confocal Raman spectroscopy. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(2):753–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tfaili S, Josse G, Angiboust J-F, et al. Monitoring caffeine and resveratrol cutaneous permeation by confocal Raman microspectroscopy. J Biophotonics. 2014;7(9):676–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Schaffzin JK, Carson J, et al. Analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate in skin using tape stripping and ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020;183:113111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy MB, Stinchcomb AL, Guy RH, et al. Determining dermal absorption parameters in vivo from tape strip data. Pharm Res. 2002;19(3):292–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brain KR, Green DM, Lalko J, et al. In-vitro human skin penetration of the fragrance material geranyl nitrile. Toxicol Vitr. 2007;21(1):133–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellanda C, Ottiker E, Strub C, et al. Topical bioavailability of triamcinolone acetonide: effect of dose and application frequency. Arch Dermatol Res. 2006;298(5):221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti I, Kalia YN, Naik A, et al. Effect of ethanol and isopropyl myristate on the availability of topical terbinafine in human stratum corneum, in vivo. Int J Pharm. 2001;219(1–2):11–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pershing LK, Nelson JL, Corlett JL, et al. Assessment of dermatopharmacokinetic approach in the bioequivalence determination of topical tretinoin gel products. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(5):740–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signor C, Woodworth M, Denoble L, et al. Macroscopic investigations of the human stratum corneum evaluating a method for heat separation of the epidermis from the dermis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;529:118–121.
   Google Scholar
• Raza K, Singh B, Singla S, et al. Nanocolloidal Carriers of Isotretinoin: antimicrobial Activity against Propionibacterium acnes and Dermatokinetic Modeling. Mol Pharm. 2013;10(5):1958–1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg NK, Sharma G, Singh B, et al. Quality by Design (QbD)-enabled development of aceclofenac loaded-nano structured lipid carriers (NLCs): an improved dermatokinetic profile for inflammatory disorder(s). Int J Pharm. 2017;517(1–2):413–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapalli VK, Singhvi G. Dermato-pharmacokinetic: assessment tools for topically applied dosage forms. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020;0:1–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahmood A, Rapalli VK, Waghule T, et al. Luliconazole loaded lyotropic liquid crystalline nanoparticles for topical delivery: qbD driven optimization, in-vitro characterization and dermatokinetic assessment. Chem Phys Lipids. 2021;234:105028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning A, Schaefer UF, Neumann D. Potential pitfalls in skin permeation experiments: influence of experimental factors and subsequent data evaluation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;72(2):324–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapalli VK, Waghule T, Gorantla S, et al. Psoriasis: pathological mechanisms, current pharmacological therapies, and emerging drug delivery systems. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25(12):2212–2226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Derendorf H. Clinical microdialysis: current applications and potential use in drug development. Trends Anal Chem. 2006;25(7):674–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, et al. Dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems: current and future prospects. Drug Deliv. 2006;13(3):175–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar