References
- Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res [Internet]. 2010;89(3):219–229. doi: 10.1177/0022034509359125
- Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Jensen PØ, et al. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound repair regen off publ wound heal soc [and] eur tissue repair soc. 2008;16(1):2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00283.x
- Ferreira MC, Tuma PJ, Carvalho VF, et al. Complex wounds. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2006;61(6):571–578. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322006000600014
- Marques R, Lopes M, Ramos P, et al. Prognostic factors for delayed healing of complex wounds in adults: a scoping review. Int Wound J. 2023;20(7):2869–2886. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14128
- Wernick B, Nahirniak P, Stawicki SP. Impaired Wound Healing. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482254/
- Avishai E, Yeghiazaryan K, Golubnitschaja O. Impaired wound healing: facts and hypotheses for multi-professional considerations in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine. EPMA J. 2017;8(1):23–33. doi: 10.1007/s13167-017-0081-y
- Davis FM, Kimball A, Boniakowski A, et al. Dysfunctional wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers: new crossroads. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(1):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-0970-z
- Demidova-Rice TN, Hamblin MR, Herman IM. Acute and impaired wound healing: pathophysiology and current methods for drug delivery, part 1: normal and chronic wounds: biology, causes, and approaches to care. Adv Skin Wound Care [Internet]. 2012;25. (7):304–314. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/aswcjournal/Fulltext/2012/07000/Acute_and_Impaired_Wound_Healing__Pathophysiology.6.aspx
- Greaves NS, Ashcroft KJ, Baguneid M, et al. Current understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms in fibroplasia and angiogenesis during acute wound healing. J Dermatol Sci [Internet]. 2013;72:206–217. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.07.008
- Cañedo-Dorantes L, Cañedo-Ayala M. Skin acute wound healing: a comprehensive review. Int J Inflam. 2019;2019:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2019/3706315
- Frykberg RG, Banks J. Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care [Internet]. 2015;4:560–582. 10.1089/wound.2015.0635
- Mudigonda J, Chenicheri S, Ramachandran R. Chronic wounds and tissue engineering: Prospective and promise. In: Sharma CP, Chandy T, Thomas V, et al, editors. Tissue Engineering Current Status and Challenges. Academic Press; 2022. p. 101–122. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-824064-9.00001-0
- Carvalho MTB, Araújo-Filho HG, Barreto AS, et al. Wound healing properties of flavonoids: a systematic review highlighting the mechanisms of action. Phytomedicine. 2021;90:153636. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153636
- Opriessnig E, Luze H, Smolle C, et al. Epidemiology of burn injury and the ideal dressing in global burn care–regional differences explored. Burns. 2023;49(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.06.018
- Wang G, Lin Z, Li Y, et al. Colonizing microbiota is associated with clinical outcomes in diabetic wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;194:114727. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114727
- Mieczkowski M, Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska B, Kowara M, et al. The problem of wound healing in diabetes—from molecular pathways to the design of an animal model. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14):7930. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147930
- McDermott K, Fang M, Boulton AJM, et al. Etiology, epidemiology, and disparities in the burden of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(1):209–221. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0043
- Benhamed A, Batomen B, Boucher V, et al. Epidemiology, injury pattern and outcome of older trauma patients: a 15-year study of level-I trauma centers. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(1):e0280345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280345
- Pandey M, Choudhury H, Fern JLC, et al. 3D printing for oral drug delivery: a new tool to customize drug delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res [Internet]. 2020;10(4):986–1001. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00737-0
- Fayyazbakhsh F, Leu MC. A brief review on 3D bioprinted skin substitutes. Procedia Manuf [Internet]. 2020;48:790–796. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978920315675
- Wu D, Yu Y, Tan J, et al. 3D bioprinting of gellan gum and poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate based hydrogels to produce human-scale constructs with high-fidelity. Mater Des [Internet]. 2018;160:486–495. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127518307421
- Elomaa L, Pan C-C, Shanjani Y, et al. Three-dimensional fabrication of cell-laden biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol-co-depsipeptide) hydrogels by visible light stereolithography. J Mater Chem B [Internet]. 2015;3:8348–8358. 10.1039/C5TB01468A
- van Koppen CJ, Hartmann RW. Advances in the treatment of chronic wounds: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2015;25(8):931–937. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2015.1045879
- Spear M. Acute or chronic? What’s the difference? Plast Aesthetic Nurs. 2013;33(2):98–100. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0b013e3182965e94
- Mills SJ, Hofma BR, Cowin AJ. Pathophysiology of Wound Healing. In: Fitridge R, editor. Mechanisms of Vascular Disease: A Textbook for Vascular Specialists. Springer Cham; 2020. p. 541–561. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43683-4_25
- Vowden K, Vowden P. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surg. 2017;35(9):489–494. doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2017.06.005
- Rezvani Ghomi E, Khalili S, Nouri Khorasani S, et al. Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136(27):47738. doi: 10.1002/app.47738
- Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL, El-Kafrawi HY, et al. Povidone iodine in wound healing: A review of current concepts and practices. Int J Surg. 2017;44:260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.073
- Bolton L, Fattu A-J. Topical agents and wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 1994;12(1):95–120. doi: 10.1016/0738-081X(94)90261-5
- Hermans MHE, Cutting K. NPWT or HRT-dressing? Results of an expert panel and a Delphi panel analysis. J Wound Care. 2013;22(11):573–581. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.11.573
- Miyanaga A, Miyanaga T, Sakai K, et al. Patient experience of negative pressure wound therapy: a qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2023;10(3):1415–1425. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1392
- Oliveira A, Simoes S, Ascenso A, et al. Therapeutic advances in wound healing. J DermatolTreat. 2022;33(1):2–22. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1730296
- Dai C, Shih S, Khachemoune A. Skin substitutes for acute and chronic wound healing: an updated review. J DermatolTreat. 2020;31(6):639–648. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1530443
- MacKay BJ, Dardano AN, Klapper AM, et al. Multidisciplinary application of an external tissue expander device to improve patient outcomes: a critical review. Adv Wound Care. 2020;9(9):525–538. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1112
- Tong X, Lu J, Zhang W, et al. Efficacy and safety of external tissue expansion technique in the treatment of soft tissue defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complication rates. Burn Trauma. 2022;10:tkac045. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkac045
- Gupta S, Mujawdiya P, Maheshwari G, et al. Dynamic role of oxygen in wound healing: a microbial, immunological, and biochemical perspective. Arch Razi Inst. 2022;77(2):513. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.357230.2003
- Otterço AN, Andrade AL, Brassolatti P, et al. Photobiomodulation mechanisms in the kinetics of the wound healing process in rats. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2018;183:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.04.010
- Mustoe TA, O’shaughnessy K, Kloeters O. Chronic wound pathogenesis and current treatment strategies: a unifying hypothesis. plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2006;117(SUPPLEMENT):35S–41S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000225431.63010.1b
- Gowda BHJ, Mohanto S, Singh A, et al. Nanoparticle-based therapeutic approaches for wound healing: a review of the state-of-the-art. Mater Today Chem [Internet]. 2023;27:101319. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468519422005481
- Zhao R, Liang H, Clarke E, et al. Inflammation in chronic wounds. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12):2085. doi: 10.3390/ijms17122085
- Jung K, Covington S, Sen CK, et al. Rapid identification of slow healing wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2016;24(1):181–188. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12384
- Butzelaar L, Ulrich MMW, Van Der Molen ABM, et al. Currently known risk factors for hypertrophic skin scarring: a review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2016;69(2):163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.015
- Fujio K, Komai T, Inoue M, et al. Revisiting the regulatory roles of the TGF-β family of cytokines. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15(9):917–922. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.07.007
- Arno AI, Gauglitz GG, Barret JP, et al. Up-to-date approach to manage keloids and hypertrophic scars: a useful guide. Burns. 2014;40(7):1255–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.02.011
- Raina N, Rani R, Pahwa R, et al. Biopolymers and treatment strategies for wound healing: an insight view. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater [Internet]. 2022;71:359–375. doi: 10.1080/00914037.2020.1838518
- Ashammakhi N, Ahadian S, Xu C, et al. Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs. Mater Today Bio [Internet]. 2019;1:100008. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590006419300146
- Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings–a review. Biomedicine. 2015;5(4):22. doi: 10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9
- Martin L, Wilson CG, Koosha F, et al. The release of model macromolecules may be controlled by the hydrophobicity of palmitoyl glycol chitosan hydrogels. J Control Release. 2002;80(1–3):87–100. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00005-6
- Ramos-E-Silva M, de Castro MCR. New dressings, including tissue-engineered living skin. Clin Dermatol. 2002;20(6):715–723. doi: 10.1016/S0738-081X(02)00298-5
- Thomas A, Harding KG, Moore K. Alginates from wound dressings activate human macrophages to secrete tumour necrosis factor-α. Biomaterials. 2000;21(17):1797–1802. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00072-7
- Supp DM, Boyce ST. Engineered skin substitutes: practices and potentials. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23(4):403–412. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.07.023
- Zeng R, Lin C, Lin Z, et al. Approaches to cutaneous wound healing: basics and future directions. Cell Tissue Res. 2018;374(2):217–232. doi: 10.1007/s00441-018-2830-1
- Martin PM, Maux A, Laterreur V, et al. Enhancing repair of full-thickness excisional wounds in a murine model: impact of tissue-engineered biological dressings featuring human differentiated adipocytes. Acta Biomater. 2015;22:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.036
- Tabriz AG, Douroumis D. Recent advances in 3D printing for wound healing: a systematic review. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;74:103564. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103564
- Uchida DT, Bruschi ML. 3D printing as a technological strategy for the personalized treatment of wound healing. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2023;24(1):41. doi: 10.1208/s12249-023-02503-0
- Cui H, Cai J, He H, et al. Tailored chitosan/glycerol micropatterned composite dressings by 3D printing for improved wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;255:127952. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127952
- Teoh JH, Tay SM, Fuh J, et al. Fabricating scalable, personalized wound dressings with customizable drug loadings via 3D printing. J Control Release. 2022;341:80–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.11.017
- Fayyazbakhsh F, Khayat MJ, Leu MC. 3D-Printed gelatin-alginate hydrogel dressings for burn wound healing: a comprehensive study. Int J Bioprinting. 2022;8(4):618. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i4.618
- Zou F, Jiang J, Lv F, et al. Preparation of antibacterial and osteoconductive 3D-printed PLGA/Cu(I)@ZIF-8 nanocomposite scaffolds for infected bone repair. J Nanobiotechnology [Internet]. 2020;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12951-020-00594-6
- Jang MJ, Bae SK, Jung YS, et al. Enhanced wound healing using a 3D printed VEGF-mimicking peptide incorporated hydrogel patch in a pig model. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(4):045013. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/abf1a8
- Zhang K, Bai X, Yuan Z, et al. Layered nanofiber sponge with an improved capacity for promoting blood coagulation and wound healing. Biomaterials [Internet]. 2019;204:70–79. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961219301462
- Tsegay F, Hisham M, Elsherif M, et al. 3D printing of pH indicator auxetic hydrogel skin wound dressing. Molecules. 2023;28(3):1339. doi: 10.3390/molecules28031339
- El-Nahhal IM, Zourab SM, Kodeh FS, et al. Behaviour of phenol red pH-sensors in the presence of different surfactants using the sol-gel process. Int J Environ Anal Chem [Internet]. 2010;90:644–656. doi: 10.1080/03067310902903738
- Zhang R, Ruan H, Fu Q, et al. A high strain, adhesive, self-healable poly(acrylic acid) hydrogel with temperature sensitivity as an epidermal sensor. Mater Adv. 2020;1(3):329–333. doi: 10.1039/D0MA00282H
- Stenlund P, Enstedt L, Gilljam KM, et al. Development of an all-marine 3D printed bioactive hydrogel dressing for treatment of hard-to-heal wounds. Polymers. 2023;15(12):2627. doi: 10.3390/polym15122627
- Zhao X, Liu L, An T, et al. A hydrogen sulfide-releasing alginate dressing for effective wound healing. Acta Biomater [Internet]. 2020;104:85–94. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706119308736
- Kumar R, Kehr NS. 3D-Printable oxygen- and drug-carrying nanocomposite hydrogels for enhanced cell viability. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(8):1304. doi: 10.3390/nano12081304
- Motealleh A, Schäfer AH, Fromm O, et al. 3D-Printed oxygen-carrying nanocomposite hydrogels for enhanced cell viability under hypoxic and normoxic conditions. Biomacromolecules [Internet]. 2021;22(11):4758–4769. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01067
- Wang X, Yang C, Yu Y, et al. In situ 3D bioprinting living photosynthetic scaffolds for autotrophic wound healing. Research [Internet]. 2024;2022. doi: 10.34133/2022/9794745
- LuTheryn G, Glynne-Jones P, Webb JS, et al. Ultrasound-mediated therapies for the treatment of biofilms in chronic wounds: a review of present knowledge. Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;13(3):613–628. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13471
- Karavasili C, Tsongas K, Andreadis II, Andreadis II, et al. Physico-mechanical and finite element analysis evaluation of 3D printable alginate-methylcellulose inks for wound healing applications. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2020;247:116666. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861720308407
- Shukla SK, Sharma AK, Gupta V, et al. Challenges with wound infection models in drug development. Curr Drug Targets. 2020;21(13):1301–1312. doi: 10.2174/1389450121666200302093312
- van Charante F, Martínez-Pérez D, Guarch-Pérez C, et al. 3D-printed wound dressings containing a fosmidomycin-derivative prevent Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation. iScience [Internet]. 2023;26(9):107557. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223016346
- Fahimipour F, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Dashtimoghadam E, et al. 3D printed TCP-based scaffold incorporating VEGF-loaded PLGA microspheres for craniofacial tissue engineering. Dent Mater [Internet]. 2017;33(11):1205–1216. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564117300271
- Haryanto H, Arisandi D, Suriadi S, et al. Relationship between maceration and wound healing on diabetic foot ulcers in Indonesia: a prospective study. Int Wound J. 2017;14(3):516–522. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12638
- Cutting KF, White RJ. Avoidance and management of peri-wound maceration of the skin. Prof Nurse. 2002;18(33):35–36.
- Ramadan Q, Zourob M. 3D bioprinting at the frontier of regenerative medicine, pharmaceutical, and food industries [Internet]. Front Med Technol. 2021. 2. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmedt.2020.607648
- Wang H, Yu H, Zhou X, et al. An overview of extracellular matrix-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting [Internet]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. 10. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.905438
- Rabiee N, Dokmeci MR, Zarrabi A, et al. Green Biomater [Internet]: fundamental principles. Green Biomaterials. 2023;1(1):1–4. doi: 10.1080/29934168.2023.2268943
- Raina N, Haque S, Tuli HS, et al. Optimization and characterization of a novel antioxidant naringenin-loaded hydrogel for encouraging re-epithelization in chronic diabetic wounds: a preclinical study. ACS Omega [Internet]. 2023;8(38):34995–35011. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04441
- Liu H, Wang C, Li C, et al. A functional chitosan-based hydrogel as a wound dressing and drug delivery system in the treatment of wound healing. RSC Adv. 2018;8(14):7533–7549. doi: 10.1039/C7RA13510F
- Dovedytis M, Liu ZJ, Bartlett S. Hyaluronic acid and its biomedical applications: a review. Eng Regen [Internet]. 2020;1:102–113. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666138120300128
- Okur ME, Karantas ID, Şenyiğit Z, et al. Recent trends on wound management: new therapeutic choices based on polymeric carriers. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;15(6):661–684. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.008
- Lehmann T, Vaughn AE, Seal S, et al. Silk fibroin-based therapeutics for impaired wound healing. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(3):651. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030651
- Jain P, Kathuria H, Dubey N. Advances in 3D bioprinting of tissues/organs for regenerative medicine and in-vitro models. Biomaterials [Internet]. 2022;287:121639. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961222002794
- Antezana PE, Municoy S, Álvarez-Echazú MI, et al. The 3D bioprinted scaffolds for wound healing. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(2):14. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020464
- Maturavongsadit P, Narayanan LK, Chansoria P, et al. Cell-laden nanocellulose/chitosan-Based Bioinks for 3D bioprinting and enhanced osteogenic cell differentiation. ACS Appl Bio Mater [Internet]. 2021;4:2342–2353. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.0c01108
- Intini C, Elviri L, Cabral J, et al. 3D-printed chitosan-based scaffolds: An in vitro study of human skin cell growth and an in-vivo wound healing evaluation in experimental diabetes in rats. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2018;199:593–602. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861718308488
- Fan F, Saha S, Hanjaya-Putra D. Biomimetic hydrogels to promote wound healing [Internet]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.718377
- Xu J, Zheng S, Hu X, et al. Advances in the research of bioinks based on natural collagen, polysaccharide and their derivatives for skin 3D bioprinting. Polymers. 2020;12(6):1237. doi: 10.3390/polym12061237
- Sultan MT, Lee OJ, Lee JS, et al. Three-dimensional digital light-processing bioprinting using silk fibroin-based bio-ink: recent advancements in biomedical applications. Biomedicines. 2022;10(12):3224. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123224
- Yao X, Zou S, Fan S, et al. Bioinspired silk fibroin materials: From silk building blocks extraction and reconstruction to advanced biomedical applications. Mater Today Bio [Internet]. 2022;16:100381. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259000642200179X
- Lee H, Kim J, Choi Y, et al. Application of gelatin bioinks and cell-printing technology to enhance cell delivery capability for 3D liver fibrosis-on-a-chip development. ACS Biomater Sci Eng [Internet]. 2020;6:2469–2477. Available from 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01735
- Chen EP, Toksoy Z, Davis BA, et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized tissues for in vitro and in vivo applications [Internet]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021. 9. Available from:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.664188
- Verdi J, Shirian S, Saleh M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells regenerate diabetic foot ulcers: a review article. World J Plast Surg. 2022;11(1):12–22. doi: 10.52547/wjps.11.1.12
- Bîrcă AC, Chircov C, Niculescu AG, et al. H2O2-PLA-(Alg)2Ca hydrogel enriched in matrigel® promotes diabetic wound healing. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(3):15. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030857
- Zhang J, Wehrle E, Rubert M, et al. 3D bioprinting of human tissues: biofabrication, bioinks, and bioreactors. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8):22. doi: 10.3390/ijms22083971
- Kirillova A, Bushev S, Abubakirov A, et al. Bioethical and Legal Issues in 3D Bioprinting. Int J Bioprinting. 2020;6(3):7–16. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v6i3.272
- Ghosh S, H-G Y. A review on bioinks and their application in plant bioprinting. Int J Bioprinting. 2022;8(4):612. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i4.612
- Hospodiuk-Karwowski M, Bokhari SMQ, Chi K, et al. Dual-charge bacterial cellulose as a potential 3D printable material for soft tissue engineering. Compos Part B Eng [Internet]. 2022;231:109598. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836821009641
- Metwally WM, El-Habashy SE, El-Hosseiny LS, et al. Bioinspired 3D-printed scaffold embedding DDAB-nano ZnO/nanofibrous microspheres for regenerative diabetic wound healing. Biofabrication. 2023;16(1):015001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acfd60
- Wolcott R. Disrupting the biofilm matrix improves wound healing outcomes. J Wound Care [Internet]. 2015;24(8):366–371. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.8.366
- Umur E, Bayrak E, Arslan F, et al. Advances in three dimensional bioprinting for wound healing: a comprehensive review. Appl Sci. 2023;13(18):10269. doi: 10.3390/app131810269
- Yuk H, Zhao X. A new 3D printing strategy by harnessing deformation, instability, and fracture of viscoelastic inks. Adv Mater [Internet]. 2018;30:1704028. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704028
- Zhang Y, Shi G, Qin J, et al. Recent progress of direct ink writing of electronic components for advanced wearable devices. ACS Appl Electr Mater [Internet]. 2019;1:1718–1734. doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.9b00428
- Chen C, Xi Y, Weng Y. Recent advances in cellulose-based hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Polymers. 2022;14(16):3335. doi: 10.3390/polym14163335
- Gao G, Ahn M, Cho W-W, et al. 3D printing of pharmaceutical application: drug screening and drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(9):1373. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091373
- Randall MJ, Jüngel A, Rimann M, et al. Advances in the biofabrication of 3D skin in vitro: healthy and pathological models [Internet]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00154
- Zhao W, Hu C, Xu T. In vivo bioprinting: broadening the therapeutic horizon for tissue injuries. Bioact Mater. 2023;25:201–222. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.01.018
- Zhao YM, Currie EH, Kavoussi L, et al. Laser scanner for 3D reconstruction of a wound’s edge and topology. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg [Internet]. 2021;16:1761–1773. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02459-1
- Wang S, Xiong Y, Chen J, et al. Three dimensional printing bilayer membrane scaffold promotes wound healing [Internet]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00348
- Wu Z, Hong Y. Combination of the silver–ethylene interaction and 3D printing to develop antibacterial superporous hydrogels for wound management. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Internet]. 2019;11:33734–33747. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b14090
- Hossain MI, Zahid MS, Chowdhury MA, et al. Smart bandage: a device for wound monitoring and targeted treatment. Results Chem [Internet]. 2024;7:101292. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211715623005313
- Wulle F, Gorke O, Schmidt S, et al. Multi-axis 3D printing of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels on a non-planar surface obtained from magnetic resonance imaging. Addit Manuf [Internet]. 2022;50:102566. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860421007132
- Chen H, Shi Q, Shui H, et al. Degradation of 3D-printed porous polylactic acid scaffolds under mechanical stimulus [Internet]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.691834
- Panja N, Maji S, Choudhuri S, et al. 3D bioprinting of human hollow organs. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2022;23(5):139. doi: 10.1208/s12249-022-02279-9
- Vijayavenkataraman S. 3D bioprinting: challenges in commercialization and clinical translation. J 3D Print Med [Internet]. 2023;7(2):3DP8. doi: 10.2217/3dp-2022-0026
- Shi G, Wang Y, Derakhshanfar S, et al. Biomimicry of oil infused layer on 3D printed poly(dimethylsiloxane): non-fouling, antibacterial and promoting infected wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C [Internet]. 2019;100:915–927. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928493117346131
- Chen S, Wang H, Su Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-laden, personalized 3D scaffolds with controlled structure and fiber alignment promote diabetic wound healing. Acta Biomater [Internet]. 2020;108:153–167. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706120301768
- Zhao M, Wang J, Zhang J, et al. Functionalizing multi-component bioink with platelet-rich plasma for customized in-situ bilayer bioprinting for wound healing. Mater Today Bio [Internet]. 2022;16:100334. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590006422001326
- Albanna M, Binder KW, Murphy SV, et al. In situ bioprinting of autologous skin cells accelerates wound healing of extensive excisional full-thickness wounds. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2019;9(1):1856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38366-w
- Skardal A, Mack D, Kapetanovic E, et al. Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1(11):792–802. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0088
- Maver T, Smrke DM, Kurečič M, et al. Combining 3D printing and electrospinning for preparation of pain-relieving wound-dressing materials. J SoL-Gel Sci Technol [Internet]. 2018;88(1):33–48. doi: 10.1007/s10971-018-4630-1
- Fang H, Xu J, Ma H, et al. Functional materials of 3D bioprinting for wound dressings and skin tissue engineering applications: a review. Int J Bioprinting. 2023;9(5):757. doi: 10.18063/ijb.757
- Shopova D, Yaneva A, Bakova D, et al. (Bio)printing In personalized medicine—opportunities and potential benefits. Bioengineering. 2023;10(3):287. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030287
- Angelini TE, Sawyer WG, Rowe KG, et al. High speed 3D printing system for wound and tissue replacement. 2023. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2016130953A1/en
- Skardal A. Bioink compositions and methods of preparing and using the same [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11629329B2/en?oq=US11629329B2
- Tumey D, Berriman S. Skin printing and auto-grafting [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9545302B2/en?q=(Skin+printing+and+auto-grafting)&oq=Skin+printing+and+auto-grafting
- Xu T, Xuecheng H, Xueji Z. Preparation method of 3D-printed wound customized band-aid [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN110664541A/en?oq=CN110664541A
- Gatenholm P, Backdahl H, Tzavaras TJ, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of biosynthetic cellulose (BC) implants and scaffolds for tissue engineering [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8691974B2/en?oq=US8691974B2
- Althabhawi NM, Zainol ZA. The patent eligibility of 3D bioprinting: towards a new version of living inventions’ patentability. Biomolecules. 2022;12(1):124. doi: 10.3390/biom12010124
- Ebrahim T, Ryu S-M, Ebrahim T. [Plastic Surgical Correction of Buried Penis]. Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie: Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V. 2017;49(2):85–90. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-124613
- Li PH. 3D bioprinting technologies: patents, innovation, and access. Law Innovation Technol. 2014;6(2):282–304. doi: 10.5235/17579961.6.2.282
- Varkey M, Visscher DO, van Zuijlen PPM, et al. Skin bioprinting: the future of burn wound reconstruction? Burn Trauma. 2019;7:4. Available from 10.1186/s41038-019-0142-7
- Tan CT, Liang K, Ngo ZH, et al. Application of 3D Bioprinting technologies to the management and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Biomedicines. 2020;8(10):8. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8100441
- Armstrong DG, Harris SG, Rasor Z, et al. Autologous minimally manipulated homologous adipose tissue (AMHAT) for treatment of nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers. Plast Reconstr surgery Glob open. 2022;10(10):e4588. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004588
- Glover K, Mathew E, Pitzanti G, et al. 3D bioprinted scaffolds for diabetic wound-healing applications. Drug Deliv Transl Res [Internet]. 2023;13:2096–2109. Available from 10.1007/s13346-022-01115-8
- Bajuri MY, Kim J, Yu Y, et al. New Paradigm in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Grafting Techniques Using 3D-Bioprinted Autologous Minimally Manipulated Homologous Adipose Tissue (3D-AMHAT) with Fibrin Gel Acting as a Biodegradable Scaffold. Gels. 2023;9(1):66. doi: 10.3390/gels9010066
- Wei Q, Zhou J, An Y, et al. Modification, 3D printing process and application of sodium alginate based hydrogels in soft tissue engineering: a review. Int j biol macromol [Internet]. 2023;232:123450. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141813023003422
- Alonso-Fernández I, Haugen HJ, López-Peña M, et al. Use of 3D-printed polylactic acid/bioceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering in preclinical in vivo studies: a systematic review. Acta Biomater [Internet]. 2023;168:1–21. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706123003999
- Nasiri G, Ahmadi S, Shahbazi M-A, et al. 3D printing of bioactive materials for drug delivery applications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv [Internet]. 2022;19:1061–1080. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2022.2112944
- Jahangiri S, Rahimnejad M, Nasrollahi Boroujeni N, et al. Viral and non-viral gene therapy using 3D (bio)printing. J Gene Med [Internet]. 2022;24:e3458. doi: 10.1002/jgm.3458