References

• Attard, K. (2014). Self-study as professional development. In A. Ovens & T. Fletcher (Eds.), Self-study in physical education teacher education: Exploring the interplay of practice and scholarship (pp. 29–43). London: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-05663-0
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). Developing focus group research. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208857
   Google Scholar
• Barker, D. (2017). Ninjas, zombies and nervous wrecks? Academics in the neoliberal world of physical education and sport pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 22(1), 87–104.10.1080/13573322.2016.1195360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. D. (2011). More than glimpses in the mirror: An argument for self-study in the professional learning of physical education teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/18377122.2011.9730341
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, S. M., & Ritter, J. K. (2011). Exploring the transition into academia through collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 7(2), 171–181. doi:10.1080/17425964.2011.591173
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. (2001). International experiences of teaching reform. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 777–800). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., & Erickson, G. (2004). Self-study: The fifth commonplace. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 199–211.10.1177/000494410404800208
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. (2008). Joseph Schwab, self-study of teaching and teacher education practices proponent? A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1993–2001.10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1900). The school and society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• East, K., & Fitzgerald, L. (2006). Collaboration over the long term. In L. M. Fitzgerald, M. L. Heston, & D. L. Tidwell (Eds.), Collaboration and community: Pushing boundaries through self-study (Proceedings of the sixth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices, pp. 72–75). Cedar Falls, IA: University of Northern Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, A. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 26–28.10.3102/0013189X032003026
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L., East, K., Heston, M., & Miller, C. (2002). Professional intimacy: Transforming communities of practice. In C. Kosnik, A. Freese, & A. P. Smaras (Eds.), Making a difference in teacher education through self-study (Proceedings of the fourth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices, Vol. 1, pp. 77–80). Toronto, ON: OISE/University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T., Ní Chróinín, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2016). A layered approach to critical friendship as a means to support pedagogical innovation in pre-service teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 12(3), 302–319. doi:10.1080/17425964.2016.1228049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, T., Griffin, S., Ciuffetelli Parker, D., Kitchen, J., & Figg, C. (2011). Establishing and sustaining teacher educator professional development in a self-study community of practice: Pre-tenure teacher educators developing professionally. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 880–890. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gora, J., & Whelan, A. (2010). Invasion of the aca-zombies. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/opinion/invasion-of-aca-zombies/story-e6frgcko-1225946869706
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L. (2002). Change, social justice, and re-liability: Reflections of a secret (change) agent. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 176–189). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2013). A topography of collaboration: Methodology, identity and community in self-study of practice research. Studying Teacher Education, 9(1), 74–89.10.1080/17425964.2013.771572
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. J. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In S. Kemmis & T. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 37–62). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 551–567. doi:10.1080/00220270010016874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, J., & Ciuffetelli Parker, D. (2009). Self-study communities of practice: Developing community, critically inquiring as community. In C. A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators (pp. 107–128). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, J., Ciuffetelli Parker, D., & Gallagher, T. (2008). Authentic conversation as faculty development: Establishing a self-study group in a faculty of education. Studying Teacher Education, 4(2), 157–171. doi:10.1080/17425960802433637
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3
   Google Scholar
• Lighthall, F. (2004). Fundamental features and approaches of the S-STEP enterprise. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 193–245). Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., & Northfield, J. (1998). A framework for the development of self-study practice. In M. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 7–18). London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2015). Maneuvering together to develop new practices: Examining our collaborative processes. Studying Teacher Education, 11(1), 3–15.10.1080/17425964.2014.1001356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. K., & Russell, T. (2016). A self-study of two teacher educators responding to program change. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Enacting self-study as methodology for professional inquiry (Proceedings of the 11th international conference on self-study of teacher education practices, pp. 257–262). Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Misco, T. (2012). The importance of context for teaching controversial issues in international settings. International Education, 42(1). Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/internationaleducation/vol42/iss1/5
   Google Scholar
• Openshaw, R., & Ball, T. (2008). New Zealand. In T. O’Donoghue & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Teacher education in the English-speaking world: Past, present and future (pp. 155–172). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, H. G. (1995). Professionalization, partnership and power: Building professional development schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pithouse-Morgan, K., Muthukrishna, N., Pillay, D., Laren, L. V., Chisanga, T., Meyiwa, T., … Stuart, J. (2015). Learning about co-flexivity in a transdisciplinary self-study research supervision community. In K. Pithouse-Morgan & A. P. Samaras (Eds.), Polyvocal professional learning through self-study research (pp. 145–171). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6300-220-2
   Google Scholar
• Pithouse-Morgan, K., & Samaras, A. P. (2015). The power of “We” for professional learning. In K. Pithouse-Morgan & A. P. Samaras (Eds.), Polyvocal professional learning through self-study research (pp. 1–20). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6300-220-2
   Google Scholar
• Pyle, A., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2014). Looking beyond the academic and developmental logics in kindergarten education: The role of Schwab’s commonplaces in classroom-based research. Early Child Development and Care, 184(12), 1960–1977. doi:10.1080/03004430.2014.897945
   Google Scholar
• Reid, M. J. (2010). Commonplaces in practitioner curriculum deliberation. Research in the Schools, 17(2), 54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, J. K. (2016). The tension-fraught enterprise of teaching self-study. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Enacting self-study as methodology for professional inquiry (Proceedings of the 11th international conference on self-study of teacher education practices, pp. 37–44). Auckland: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism: Essays, 1972–1980. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, V., & Chan, E. (2008). Chapter 1: Schwab’s call for a renaissance. Action in Teacher Education, 29(5–6), 4–24. doi:10.1080/01626620.2008.10519430
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1970/2013). The practical: A language for curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 591–621. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.798838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1971). The practical 2: Arts of eclectic. The School Review, 79, 493–542.10.1086/442998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81, 508–522. doi:10.1086/443100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1947–1957. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, J., & Shacklock, G. (1998). Re-making teaching: Ideology, policy and practice. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203272251
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., Fink, D., & Earl, L. (2003). It’s about learning (and it’s about time). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar