Publication Cover
Studying Teacher Education
A journal of self-study of teacher education practices
Volume 15, 2019 - Issue 3
678
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Handmaid’s Tale: Using Literature and Online Journaling to Facilitate a Self-Study of Feminist Identity in an International Research Collective

El Cuento de la Empleada: el uso de la literatura y las bitácoras en línea para facilitar un self-study de identidad femenina en un colectivo de investigación internacional

, , , &
Pages 334-354 | Received 17 Sep 2018, Accepted 11 Feb 2019, Published online: 20 Sep 2019

References

  • Abt-Perkins, D., Dale, H., & Hauschildt, P. (1998). Letters of intent: Collaborative self-study as reform in teacher education. In A. Cole, R. Elijah, & J. Knowles (Eds.), The heart of the matter (pp. 81–100). San Francisco: Caddo Gap Press.
  • Atwood, M. (1985/1998). The handmaid’s tale. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Atwood, M. (2017). Margret Atwood on what ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ means in the age of Trump. New York Times, Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/books/review/margaret-atwood-handmaids-tale-age-of-trump.html
  • Beck, C., Freese, A., & Kosnik, C. (2004). The preservice practicum: Learning through self-study in a professional setting. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1253–1259). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1971). Systems of education and systems of thought. In M.F.D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education, (pp. 189–207). London: Collier-Macmillan.
  • Brubaker, N. (2014). Gendered discourse in the evangelical south: Fashioning a conservatively critical pedagogy of teacher education. In M. Taylor & L. Coia (Eds.), Gender, feminism, and queer theory in the self-study of teacher education practices (pp. 111–126). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. E. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (Eds.). (2015). Qualitative inquiry-Past, present, and future: A critical reader. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative material. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Diaz, J. (2016). Radical hope. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2916/11/21/under-president-trump-radical-hope-is-our-best-weapon
  • Forgasz, R., & Clemans, A. (2014). Feeling: Feminist? A self-study of emotion as a feminist epistemology in education practice. In M. Taylor & L. Coia (Eds.), Gender, feminism, and queer theory in the self-study of teacher education practices (pp. 61–76). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Garber, M. (2018). Is this the next step for the #MeToo movment. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/enternainment/archive/2018/01/beyond-metoo-can-times-up-effect-real-change/549482
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Goulden, M., Mason, M. A., & Frasch, K. (2011). Keeping women in the science pipeline. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 141–162.
  • Green, M. (2013). Foreword. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. x). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hamilton, M., & Pinnegar, S. (1998). Conclusion: The value and promise of self-study. In M. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 235–261). London: Routledge.
  • Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2014). Interpretation and gender within the zone of inconclusivity. In M. Taylor & L. Coia (Eds.), Gender, feminism, and queer theory in the self-study of teacher education practices (pp. 45–60). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
  • hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jackson, T. (2001). The art and craft of ‘gently Socratic’ inquiry. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 459–465). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Kalu, F. (2016). Fiction as research practice: Short stories, novellas, and novels. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 130–133.
  • Knowles, J. G., & Cole, A. L. (2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Kosnik, C., Samaras, A. P., & Freese, A. R. (2006). Beginning with trusted friends: Venturing out to work collaboratively in our institutions. In L. Fitzgerald, M. Heston, & D. Tidwell (Eds.), Collaboration and community: Pushing boundaries Proceedings of the sixth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices, (pp. 152–156). Cedar Falls, IA: University of Northern Iowa.
  • Kuzmic, J. (2014). Disturbing masculinities: Epistemology, outlaw emotions, and the gendered self in self-study research. In M. Taylor & L. Coia (Eds.), Gender, feminism, and queer theory in the self-study of teacher education practices (pp. 77–92). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Leavy, P. (2013). Fiction as research practice: Short stories, novellas, and novels. Walnut, CA: Left Coast Press Inc.
  • Lee, O. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ reflection through interactive online journal writing. Physical Educator, 67(3), 128–139.
  • Loughran, J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modeling. London: Falmer Press.
  • Luke, C., & Gore, J. (2013). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lunenberg, M., & Samaras, A. (2011). Developing a pedagogy for teaching self-study research: Lessons learned across the Atlantic. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 841–850.
  • Lundborg, P., Plug, E., & Rasmussen, A. R. (2017). “Can Women Have Children and a Career? IV Evidence from IVF Treatments.”. American Economic Review, 107(6): 1611–37.
  • Macintyre, L. M., & Buck, L. (2007). Professional development risks and opportunities embodied within self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 3(2), 189–205.
  • Makaiau, A. S., Ching-Sze Wang, J., Rangoonaden, K., Leng, L., & DeWoody, H. (2016). Critical friendship, mindfulness, and the philosophy for children Hawai‘i approach to teaching and learning: Findings from an international online collaborative journaling project for teacher educators. In K. Rangoonaden & S. Bullock (Eds.), Mindfulness and critical friendship: A new perspective on professional development for educators (pp. 59–76). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Makaiau, A. S., Ching-Sze Wang, J., Rangoonaden, K., & Leng, L. (2017). Empowering global P4C research and practice through self-study: The philosophy for children Hawai‘i international journaling and self-study project. In M. Gregory, J. Haynes, & K. Murris (Eds.), International handbook of philosophy for children (pp. 227–235). London: Routledge.
  • Makaiau, A. S., Rangoonaden, K., Ching-Sze Wang, J., & Leng, L. (2018). Developing an inquiry stance in diverse teacher candidates: A self-study by four culturally, ethnically, and linguistically diverse teacher educators. In J. Sharkey & M. M. Percey (Eds.), Self-study of language and literacy teacher education practices across culturally and linguistically diverse contexts (pp. 99–113). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
  • Makaiau, A. S., Leng, L., & Fukui, S. (2015). Journaling and self-study in an international research collective. Studying Teacher Education, 11(1), 64–80.
  • Makaiau, A. S., & Miller, C. (2012). The philosopher’s pedagogy. Educational Perspectives, 44, 8–19.
  • Mason, M. A. (2008). Do babies matter in science? Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Do-Babies-Matter-in-Science-/45796
  • Mason, M. A. (2017). The pyramid problem. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Pyramid-Problem/126614
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Mitchell, C. (2006). In my own handwriting: Textual evidence and self-study. In C. Kosnik, C. Beck, A. R. Freese, & A. P. Samaras (Eds.), Making a difference in teacher education through self-study: Studies of personal, professional, and program renewal (pp. 117–130). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. London: Routledge.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • O’Brien, A. J., Alfano, C., & Magnusson, E. (2007). Improving cross-cultural communication through collaborative technologies. In Y. de Kort, W. Ijsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Persuasive technology (pp. 125–131). London: Springer.
  • Pritchard, R. M. O. (2010). Attitudes to gender equality issues in British and German academia. Higher Education Management & Policy, 22(2), 10.
  • Probert, B. (2005). ‘I just couldn’t fit in’: Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender, Work, and Organization, 12(1), 50–72.
  • Sadovnik, A., & Semel, S. (2002). Founding mothers and others: Women educational leaders during the progressive era. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Samaras, A., Hicks, M., & Garvey Berger, J. (2004). Self-study through personal history. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practice (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Schwarz, T. D., & Dunn, J. (2014). Familial reality engendering feminism: The impact of a matriarchal upbringing on thinking about teaching and learning. In M. Taylor & L. Coia (Eds.), Gender, feminism, and queer theory in the self-study of teacher education practices (pp. 93–110). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Spalding, E., & Wilson, A. (2002). Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1393–1421.
  • Strom, K., Abi-Hanna, R., Abrams, L., Dacey, C., & Dauplaise, J. (2014). Exploring and connecting lines of flight in a self-study community. In M. Taylor & L. Coia (Eds.), Gender, feminism, and queer theory in the self-study of teacher education practices (pp. 31–43). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Strong-Wilson, T. (2005). White female teacher arrives in narrative community with trunk and cat: Using self-study to investigate tales of traveling white teachers. In C. Mitchell, S. Weber, & K. O'Reilly Scanlon  (Eds.), Just who do we think we are? Methodologies for autobiography and self-study in teaching (pp. 218-230). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Taylor, M., & Coia, L. (2014). Gender, feminism, and queer theory in the self-study of teacher education practices. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Velez, E., Sizemore-Barber, A., & Chan, H. (2018). Feminists from three generations talk #MeToo. Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/conversations/2018/1/31/16952380/me-too-second-third-wave-feminism-backlash
  • Walljasper, J. (2010). All that we share. New York, NY: The New Press.
  • Yos, T. (2012). Raising the bar: Love, the community of inquiry, and the flourishing life. Educational Perspectives, 44, 52–57.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.