Publication Cover
Studying Teacher Education
A journal of self-study of teacher education practices
Latest Articles
60
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Navigating Epistemological Barriers for Inclusive Assessment: A Collaborative Self-Study

&
Received 06 Nov 2023, Accepted 17 Apr 2024, Published online: 16 May 2024

References

  • Appleget, C., Shimek, C., Myers, J., & Hogue, B. C. (2020). A collaborative self-study with critical friendships: Culturally proactive pedagogies in literacy methods courses. Studying Teacher Education, 16(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1781613
  • Auhl, G., & Bain, A. (2021). Do pre-service teachers develop a schema for inclusive classroom practice? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(4), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1777530
  • Bass, L., Anderson-Patton, V., & Allender, J. (2002). Self-study as a way of teaching and learning: A research collaborative re-analysis of self-study teaching portfolios. In J. Loughran & T. Russell, (Eds.), Improving teacher education practice through self-study (pp. 56–69). Taylor & Francis.
  • Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
  • Carrington, S., Saggers, B., Webster, A., Harper-Hill, K., & Nickerson, J. (2020). What universal design for learning principles, guidelines, and checkpoints are evidence in educators’ descriptions of their practice when supporting students on the autism spectrum? International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101583
  • Chen, B., Bastedo, K., & Howard, W. (2018). Exploring design elements for online STEM courses: Active learning, engagement & assessment design. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 22(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1369
  • Chu, M. W., Craig, H. L., Yeworiew, L. B., & Xu, Y. (2020). Teachers’ unpreparedness to accommodate student needs. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 35(3), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573520916610
  • Codding, D., Alkhateeb, B., Mouz, C., & Pollock, L. (2021). From professional development to pedagogy: Examining how computer science teachers conceptualize and apply culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 29(4), 497. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10315325
  • Conrad, D. A., & Blackman, S. (Eds.). (2018). Responding to learner diversity and learning difficulties. Information Age Publishing, Inc.
  • Correa, D. S., & Talone, V. G. (2021). An outline of a pragmatic theory on reflexivity: Exploring the pathways of the concept through social theory. Sociedade e Estado, 36(2), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020003
  • Craddock, G., & McNutt, L. (2017). Universal design as a transformative agent in education for all learners. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 242, 977–984.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2018). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Davis, L. J. (2013). The disability studies reader. Routledge.
  • DeLuca, C., & Lam, C. Y. (2014). Preparing teachers for assessment within diverse classrooms: An analysis of teacher candidates’ conceptualizations. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(3), 3–24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078652.pdf
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Henry Regnery.
  • Donovan, L., Time, D. G., Besser, T. D., & Gonzalez, E. (2021). The whole is greater than the sum of the parts: A self-study of equity and inclusion in online teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 17(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1897975
  • Emery, A., Louick, R. A., & Sabrowsky, J. (2022). Moving beyond the ableist roots of educational psychology: Audit of the field and a path forward. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1517–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09673-6
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
  • Feucht, F. C., Brownlee, J. L., & Schraw, G. (2017). Moving beyond reflection: Reflexivity and epistemic cognition in teaching and teacher education. Educational Psychology, 52(4), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1350180
  • Fives, H., Barners, N., Buehl, M. M., Mascadri, J., & Ziegler, N. (2017). Teachers’ epistemic cognition in classroom assessment. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1323218
  • Forlin, C. (2012). What is needed now for effective inclusive teacher education? In C. Forlin (Ed.), Future directions for inclusive teacher education: An international perspective (pp. 173–182). Routledge.
  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. Basic Books.
  • Garrett, M. D. (2022). Defining inclusionary education: A review of recent literature. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 13(2), 129–138.
  • Gay, G. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347320
  • Goodley, D. (2014). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. SAGE.
  • Hickey, E. (2015). Accommodations, access, large scale assessment: Possibilities for universal design. Accessible Instructional Design, 2, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-769320150000002004
  • Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990203500201
  • Hofer, B. K. (2017). Shaping the epistemology of teacher practice through reflection and reflexivity. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1355247
  • Hordvik, M., Fletcher, T., Haugen, A. L., Moller, L., & Engebretsen, B. (2021). Using collaborative self-study and rhizomatics to explore the ongoing nature of becoming teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103318
  • Izci, K. (2018). Turkish science teacher candidates understandings of equitable assessment and their plans about it. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.436744
  • Jordan, A., Schwartz, E., & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2009). Preparing teachers for inclusive classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.010
  • Jordan, A., & Stanovich, P. (2003). Teachers’ personal epistemological beliefs about students with disabilities as indicators of effective teaching practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2003.00184.x
  • Keating, N., Zybutz, T., & Rouse, K. (2012). Inclusive assessment at point of design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(3), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.703022
  • Kershner, R. (2016). Including psychology in inclusive pedagogy: Enriching the dialogue? International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(2), 112–139. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2016.2109
  • Knowles, C. (2014). Vulnerability: Self-study’s contribution to social justice education. Perspectives in Education, 32(2), 89–101.
  • Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
  • Krischler, M., Powell, J. J. W., & Cate, I. M. P. (2019). What is meant by inclusion? On the effects of different definitions on attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(5), 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1580837
  • Kumar, R., Zusho, A., & Bondie, R. (2018). Weaving cultural relevance and achievement motivation into inclusive classroom cultures. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1432361
  • LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Springer.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
  • Lin, P. Y., & Lin, Y. C. (2015). Identifying Canadian teacher candidates’ needs for training in the use of inclusive classroom assessment. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(8), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.970669
  • Lin, P. Y., & Lin, Y. C. (2019). Understanding how teachers practice inclusive classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.002
  • Loraine, M. (2016). Beginning teachers and inclusive education: Frustrations, dilemmas and growth. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(4), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1081635
  • Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106296217
  • Loughran, J. (2014). Enhancing teacher professional learning through collaborative self-study. Routledge.
  • Lowrey, K. A., Hollingshead, A., Howery, K., & Bishop, J. B. (2017). More than one way: Stories of UDL and inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(4), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917711668
  • Lubbe, W., & Botha, C. S. (2020). The dimensions of reflective practice: A teacher educator’s and nurse educator’s perspective. Reflective Practice, 21(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1738369
  • Mathis, C., Daane, A. R., Rodriguez, B., Hernandez, J., & Huynh, T. (2023). How instructors can view knowledge to implement culturally relevant pedagogy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), 010105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010105
  • Matthews, M. R. (2007). Models in science and in science education: An introduction. Science Education, 88(1), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9089-3
  • Matthews, M. R. (2009). Teaching the philosophical and worldview components of science. Science & Education, 18(6–7), 697–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9132-4
  • Nieminen, J. H. (2022). Assessment for inclusion: Rethinking inclusive assessment in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(4), 841–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2021395
  • Olan, E., & Edge, C. (2019). Collaborative meaning-making and dialogic interactions in critical friends as co-authors. Studying Teacher Education, 15(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2019.1580011
  • Opertti, R., Brady, J., & Duncombe, L. (2012). Interregional discussions around inclusive curriculum and teachers in light of the 48th International Conference on Education. In C. Forlin (Ed.), Future directions for inclusive teacher education: An international perspective (pp. 183–191). Routledge.
  • Peercy, M. M., & Troyan, F. J. (2017). Making transparent the challenges of developing a practice-based pedagogy of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.005
  • Popham, W. J. (2022). Formative assessment: Stalled by too few right-size reports [Special issue]. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(Special Issue), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1196705
  • Proudfoot, K. (2022). Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
  • Ragpot, L. (2011). Assessing student learning by way of drama and visual art: A semiotic mix in a course on cognitive development. Education As Change, 15(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.643625
  • Ro, H. K., & Broido, E. M. (2020). Hearing and responding to marginalized voices: Tangible guidance for comprehensive inclusive assessment. New Directions for Student Services, 2020(169), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20348
  • Sage, R. (Ed.). (2009). Meeting the needs of students with diverse backgrounds. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Samaras, A. P., Gudjonsdottir, H., McMurrer, J. R., & Dalmau, M. C. (2012). Self-study of a professional organization in pursuit of a shared enterprise. Studying Teacher Education, 8(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2012.719127
  • Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge.
  • Sheehy, K., Budiyanto, K. H., Rofiah, K., & Rofiah, K. (2017). Indonesian teachers’ epistemological beliefs and inclusive education. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 23(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629517717613
  • Suskie, L. A. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Anker Publishing.
  • Titchkosky, T. (2003). Disability, self, and society. University of Toronto Press.
  • UNESCO. (1994). The salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education.
  • Warne, R. T., Yoon, M., & Price, C. J. (2014). Exploring the various interpretations of “test bias”. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority, 20(4), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036503
  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
  • Yough, M., Tan, D., Fedesco, H. N., & Cho, H. J. (2023). Learning of assessment in teacher education: The role of epistemic beliefs. Educational & Developmental Psychologist, 49(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2121160

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.