Flowering phenology in Solidago altissima: adaptive strategies against temporal variation in temperature

References

• Arroyo MT, Armesto JJ, Primack RB. 1985. Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of Central Chile. II. Effect of temperature on visitation rates and pollination possibilities. Plant Syst Evol. 149:187–203. 10.1007/BF00983305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augspurger CK. 1981. Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub: experimental studies on effects of pollinators and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violaceae). Ecology. 62(3):775–778. 10.2307/1937745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody AK. 1997. Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Ecology. 78(6):1624–1631. 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1624:EOPHAS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen D. 1966. Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol. 12:119–129. 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90188-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbet SA, Fussell M, Ake R, Fraser A, Gunson C, Savage A, Smith K. 1993. Temperature and the pollinating activity of social bees. Ecol Entomol. 18:17–30. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1993.tb01075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL. 1991. Early flowering in Cynoglossum officinale L. constraint or adaptation? Funct Ecol. 5(6):750–756. 10.2307/2389537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzinga JA, Atlan A, Biere A, Gigord L, Weis AE, Bernasconi G. 2007. Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol. 22(8):432–439. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest J, Thomson J. 2010. Consequences of variation in flowering time within and among individuals of Mertansia fusiformis (Boraginiceae), an early spring wildflower. Am J Bot. 97:38–48. 10.3732/ajb.0900083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert FS. 1985. Diurnal activity patterns in hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae). Ecol Entomol. 10:385–392. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00736.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross RS, Werner PA. 1983. Relationships among flowering phenology, insect visitors, and seed-set of individuals: experimental studies on four co-occurring species of goldenrod (Solidago: Compositae). Ecol Soc Am. 53(1):95–117.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin RE. 2006. The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am Nat. 167(3):315–328. 10.1086/499377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MTJ. 2007. Genotype-by-environment interactions leads to variable selection on life-history strategy in common evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). J Evolution Biol. 20(1):190–200. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01201.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo G. 1993. Relationships between flowering time and fruit set of the entomophilous alpine shrub, Rhododendron aureum (Ericaceae), inhabiting snow patches. Am J Bot. 80(11):1300–1304. 10.2307/2445714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey EP, Roach DA, Herr D, Kincaid S, Perrott R. 2003. Multigenerational effects on flowering and fruiting phenology in Plantago lanceolata. Ecology. 84(9):2462–2475. 10.1890/02-0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NOAA]: NWS Duluth winter climate stats and records [Internet]. 2012. Duluth: National Oceanic Atmospheric Association; [updated 2011 Jan 25; cited 2012 Dec 29]. Available from: http://www.crh.noaa.gov/dlh/?n=duluthwinterclimate#miscclimate
   Google Scholar
• Pors B, Werner PA. 1989. Individual flowering time in a goldenrod (solidago canadensis): field experiment shows genotype more important than environment. Am J Bot. 76(11):1681–1688. 10.2307/2444406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafferty NE, Ives AR. 2011. Effects of experimental shifts in flowering phenology on plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett. 14(1):69–74. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01557.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki A, De Jong G. 1999. Density dependence and unpredictable selection in a heterogeneous environment: compromise and polymorphism in the ESS reaction norm. Evolution. 53(5):1329–1342. 10.2307/2640880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semple JC, Cook RE. 2006. Solidago. In: Flora of North America. Vol. 20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 107–157.
   Google Scholar
• Staggemeier VG, Diniz-Filho JAF, Morellato LPC. 2010. The shared influence of phylogeny and ecology on the reproductive patterns of Myrteae (Myrtaceae). J Ecol. 98(6):1409–1421. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarayre M, Bowman G, Schermann-Legionnet A, Barat M, Atlan A. 2007. Flowering phenology of Ulex europaeus: ecological consequences of variation within and among populations. Evol Ecol. 21(3):395–409. 10.1007/s10682-006-9109-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totland Ø. 2001. Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. Ecology. 82(8):2233–2244. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2233:EDPLAS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicens N, Bosch J. 2000. Weather-dependent pollinator activity in an apple orchard, with special reference to Osmia cornuta and Apis melifera (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae and Apidae). Environ Entomol. 29(3):413–420. 10.1603/0046-225X-29.3.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner PA, Bradbury IK, Gross RS. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 45. Solidago Canadensis L. Can J Plant Sci. 60:1393–1409. 10.4141/cjps80-194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widén B. 1991. Phenotypic selection on flowering phenology in Senecio integrifolius, a perennial herb. Oikos. 61(2):205–215. 10.2307/3545338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright SJ, Calderon O. 1995. Phylogenetic patterns among tropical flowering phenologies. J Ecol. 83(6):937–948. 10.2307/2261176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar