Incorporation of nanobubbles in spaceflight food production systems

References

• Abu-Shahba MS, Mansour MM, Mohamed HI, Sofy MR. 2021. Comparative cultivation and biochemical analysis of iceberg lettuce grown in sand soil and hydroponics with or without microbubbles and macrobubbles. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 21(1):389–403. doi:10.1007/s42729-020-00368-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Ng WJ, Liu Y. 2011. Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere. 84(9):1175–1180. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed AKA, Shi X, Hua L, Manzueta L, Qing W, Marhaba T, Zhang W. 2018a. Influences of air, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide nanobubbles on seed germination and plant growth. J Agric Food Chem. 66:5117–5124. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed AKA, Sun C, Hua L, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Marhaba T. 2018b. Generation of nanobubbles by ceramic membrane filters: the dependence of bubble size and zeta potential on surface coating, pore size and injected gas pressure. Chemosphere. 203:327–335. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alheshibri M, Qian J, Jehannin M, Craig VSJ. 2016. A history of nanobubbles. Langmuir. 32(43):11086–11100. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias S, Ruiz X, Casademunt J, Ramírez-Piscina L, González-Cinca R. 2009. Experimental study of a microchannel bubble injector for microgravity applications. Microgravity Sci Technol. 21:107–111. doi:10.1007/s12217-008-9060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson AJ, Apul OG, Schneider O, Garcia-Segura S, Westerhoff P. 2019. Nanobubble Technologies Offer Opportunities to Improve Water Treatment. Acc Chem Res. 52(5):1196–1205. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attard P. 2014. The stability of nanobubbles. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 223:893–914. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2013-01817-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizoglu U, Yilmaz N, Simsek O, Ibal JC, Tagele SB, Shin J-H. 2021. The fate of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in soilless agriculture: future perspectives. Biotech. 11(3):382. doi:10.1007/s13205-021-02941-2.
   Google Scholar
• Babu KS, Amamcharla JK. 2022. Generation methods, stability, detection techniques, and applications of bulk nanobubbles in agro-food industries: a review and future perspective. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 0:1–20. doi:10.1080/10408398.2022.2067119.
   Google Scholar
• Buckey JC. 2006. Space physiology. New York: Oxford Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=RYnxmAEACAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Carducci A, Caponi E, Ciurli A, Verani M. 2015. Possible internalization of an enterovirus in hydroponically grown lettuce. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 12(7):8214. doi:10.3390/ijerph120708214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerrón-Calle GA, Luna Magdaleno A, Graf JC, Apul OG, Garcia-Segura S. 2022. Elucidating CO2 nanobubble interfacial reactivity and impacts on water chemistry. J Colloid Interface Sci. 607:720–728. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.09.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho C-H, Shin H-J, Singh B, Kim K, Park M-H. 2023. Assessment of sub-200-nm nanobubbles with ultra-high stability in water. Appl Water Sci. 13:149. doi:10.1007/s13201-023-01950-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper M, Perchonok M, Douglas GL. 2017 December. Initial assessment of the nutritional quality of the space food system over three years of ambient storage. Npj Microgravity. 3. doi:10.1038/s41526-017-0022-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Micco V, Aronne G, Colla G, Fortezza R, de Pascale S. 2009 December. Agro-biology for bioregenerative life support systems in long-term space missions: general constraints and the Italian efforts. J Plant Interact. 4:241–252. doi:10.1080/17429140903161348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawi F. 2023. The role of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) and their feasibility in hydroponics and vertical farming. Metabolites. 13(2):247. doi:10.3390/metabo13020247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas GL, Wheeler RM, Fritsche RF. 2021 August. Sustaining astronauts: resource limitations, technology needs, and parallels between spaceflight food systems and those on earth. Sustainability (Switzerland). 13:9424. doi:10.3390/su13169424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas GL, Zwart SR, Smith SM. 2020 September. Space food for thought: challenges and considerations for food and nutrition on exploration missions. J Nutr. 150:2242–2244. doi:10.1093/jn/nxaa188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowdy R. 2020 August. Space Station 20th: food on ISS. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/feature/space-station-20th-food-on-iss.
   Google Scholar
• Du YD, Niu WQ, Gu XB, Zhang Q, Cui BJ, Zhao Y. 2018 November. Crop yield and water use efficiency under aerated irrigation: a meta-analysis. Agric Water Manag. 210:158–164. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebina K, Shi K, Hirao M, Hashimoto J, Kawato Y, Kaneshiro S, Morimoto T, Koizumi K, Yoshikawa H. 2013. Oxygen and air nanobubble water solution promote the growth of plants, fishes, and mice. PLoS ONE. 8:e65339. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellery A. 2021. Supplementing closed ecological life support systems with in-situ resources on the moon. Life. 11(8). doi:10.3390/life11080770.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewert MK, Chen TT, Powell CD. 2022. Life support baseline values and assumptions document. Retrieved from http://www.sti.nasa.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Fan K, Huang Z, Lin H, Shen L, Gao C, Zhou G, Hu J, Yang H, Xu F. 2022. Effects of micro-/nanobubble on membrane antifouling performance and the mechanism insights. J Cleaner Prod. 376:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierer N. 2017. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 15. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortuna KJ, Holtappels D, Venneman J, Baeyen S, Vallino M, Verwilt P, Rediers H, De Coninck B, Maes M, Van Vaerenbergh J, et al. 2023. Back to the roots: agrobacterium-specific phages show potential to disinfect nutrient solution from hydroponic greenhouses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 89(4). doi:10.1128/AEM.00215-23/SUPPL_FILE/AEM.00215-23-S0001.PDF.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frasetya B, Harisman K, Ramdaniah NAH. 2021. The effect of hydroponics systems on the growth of lettuce. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 1098(4):042115. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1098/4/042115.
   Google Scholar
• Graham T, Wheeler R. 2016 June. Root restriction: a tool for improving volume utilization efficiency in bioregenerative life-support systems. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 9:62–68. doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2016.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grooms L. 2020 August. Nanobubbles grow “space crops”.AgUpdate. Retrieved from https://agupdate.com/agriview/news/business/nanobubbles-grow-space-crops/article_faee850a-b348-5903-a024-295449e684db.html.
   Google Scholar
• Guo W, Ngo H-H, Li J. 2012. A mini-review on membrane fouling. Biores Technol. 122:27–34. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Z, Kurokawa H, Matsui H, He C, Wang K, Wei Y, Dodbiba G, Otsuki A, Fujita T. 2022. Stability and free radical production for CO2 and H2 in air nanobubbles in ethanol aqueous solution. Nanomaterials. 12:237. doi:10.3390/nano12020237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson L. 2023, January 5. 15 healthiest vegetables: nutrition and health benefits. Medical News Today. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323319.
   Google Scholar
• Iijima M, Yamashita K, Hirooka Y, Ueda Y, Yamane K, Kamimura C. 2020. Ultrafine bubbles effectively enhance soybean seedling growth under nutrient deficit stress. Plant Prod Sci. 23(3):366–373. doi:10.1080/1343943X.2020.1725391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeura H, Tsukada K, Tamaki M. 2017. Effect of microbubbles in deep flow hydroponic culture on spinach growth. J Plant Nutr. 40(16):2358–2364. doi:10.1080/01904167.2017.1346663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Wang W, Yu G, Deng S. 2021. Contribution of Nanobubbles for PFAS Adsorption on graphene and OH- and NH2-functionalized graphene: comparing simulations with experimental results. Environ Sci Technol. 55:13254–13263. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c03022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CM, Boles HO, Spencer LSE, Poulet L, Romeyn M, Bunchek JM, … Wheeler RM. 2021 November. Supplemental food production with plants: a review of NASA research. Front Astron Space Sci. 8. doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.734343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kai K, Kasa S, Sakamoto M, Aoki N, Watabe G, Yuasa T, Iwaya-Inoue M, Ishibashi Y. 2016. Role of reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase in gibberellin biosynthesis during barley seed germination. Plant Signal Behav. 11:e1180492. doi:10.1080/15592324.2016.1180492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaschubek D. 2021 August. Optimized crop growth area composition for long duration spaceflight. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 30:55–65. doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2021.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan S, Purohit A, Vadsaria N. 2020. Hydroponics: current and future state of the art in farming. J Plant Nutr. 44(10):1515–1538. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1860217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi N, Yamaji K. 2021. Leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. ‘L-121’) growth in hydroponics with different nutrient solutions used to generate ultrafine bubbles. J Plant Nutr. 45(6):816–827. doi:10.1080/01904167.2021.2006227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni S, Gandhi D, Mehta PJ. 2022 January. Nutraceuticals for reducing radiation effects during space travel. Handbook of Space Pharmaceuticals. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05526-4_54.
   Google Scholar
• Kyzas GZ, Bomis G, Kosheleva RI, Efthimiadou EK, Favvas EP, Kostoglou M, Mitropoulos AC. 2019. Nanobubbles effect on heavy metal ions adsorption by activated carbon. Chem Eng J. 356:91–97. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Lee J. 2015. Beneficial bacteria and fungi in hydroponic systems: types and characteristics of hydroponic food production methods. Sci Hortic. 195:206–215. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine LH, Kasahara H, Kopka J, Erban A, Fehrl I, Kaplan F, Zhao W, Littell RC, Guy C, Wheeler R, et al. 2008. Physiologic and metabolic responses of wheat seedlings to elevated and super-elevated carbon dioxide. Adv Space Res. 42(12):1917–1928. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Cave R. 2019. Nanobubbles in hydroponics. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 36:39. doi:10.3390/proceedings2019036039.
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Kawagoe Y, Makino Y, Oshita S. 2013. Effects of nanobubbles on the physicochemical properties of water: the basis for peculiar properties of water containing nanobubbles. Chem Eng Sci. 93:250–256. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2013.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Oshita S, Kawabata S, Makino Y, Yoshimoto T. 2016. Identification of ROS produced by nanobubbles and their positive and negative effects on vegetable seed germination. Langmuir. 32(43):11295–11302. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Oshita S, Kawabata S, Thuyet DQ. 2017. Nanobubble water’s promotion effect of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) sprouts supported by RNA-Seq analysis. Langmuir. 33:12478–12486. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Oshita S, Makino Y. 2014. Stimulating effect of nanobubbles on the reactive oxygen species generation inside barley seeds as studied by the microscope spectrophotometer, In: Proceedings]. Int. Conf. of Agric. Eng., Zurich. 06–10.
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Oshita S, Makino Y, Wang Q, Kawagoe Y, Uchida T. 2016b. Oxidative capacity of nanobubbles and its effect on seed germination. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 4:1347–1353. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhou Y, Wang T, Pan J, Zhou B, Muhammad T, Zhou C, Li Y. 2019. Micro-nano bubble water oxygation: synergistically improving irrigation water use efficiency, crop yield and quality. J Cleaner Prod. 222:835–843. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Chai C, Wu W, Qi P, Liu X, Hao J. 2023. Hydrogels as the plant culture substrates: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 305. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdaleno AL, Cerrón-calle GA, Santos AJ, Lanza MRV, Apul OG, Garcia-segura S. 2023. Unlocking the potential of nanobubbles: achieving exceptional Gas efficiency in electrogeneration of hydrogen peroxide. Small. 2304547:1–10. doi:10.1002/smll.202304547.
   Google Scholar
• Manos DP, Xydis G. 2019. Hydroponics: are we moving towards that direction only because of the environment? a discussion on forecasting and a systems review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26(13):12662–12672. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04933-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa G, Dufour N, Carver J, Hummerick M, Wheeler R, Morrow R, Smith T. 2017a. VEG-01: veggie hardware validation testing on the international space station. Open Agriculture. 2(1):33–41. doi:10.1515/opag-2017-0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa GD, Romeyn M, Fritsche R. 2017b. Future food production system development pulling from space biology crop growth testing in veggie. Seattle, WA: American Society for Gravitational and Space Research. Oct 25-21.
   Google Scholar
• Massa GD, Wheeler RM, Morrow RC, Levine HG. 2016. Growth chambers on the international space station for large plants. Acta Hortic. 1134:215–221. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1134.29.
   Google Scholar
• Massa GD, Wheeler RM, Stutte GW, Richards JT, Spencer LE, Hummerick ME, … Technology AF. 2015. Selection of leafy green vegetable varieties for a pick-and- eat diet supplement on ISS.
   Google Scholar
• Meegoda, J.N., Aluthgun Hewage, S., Batagoda, J.H., 2018. Stability of nanobubbles. Environ Eng Sci 35, 1216–1227. doi:10.1089/ees.2018.0203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meegoda JN, Hewage SA, Batagoda JH. 2019. Application of the diffused double layer theory to nanobubbles. Langmuir. 35:10. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailidi ED, Bomis G, Varoutoglou A, Kyzas GZ, Mitrikas G, Mitropoulos AC, Efthimiadou EK, Favvas EP. 2020. Bulk nanobubbles: production and investigation of their formation/stability mechanism. J Colloid Interface Sci. 564:371–380. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monje O, Stutte G, Chapman D. 2005. Microgravity does not alter plant stand gas exchange of wheat at moderate light levels and saturating CO2 concentration. Planta. 222(2):336–345. doi:10.1007/s00425-005-1529-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller K, Linkies A, Vreeburg RAM, Fry SC, Krieger-Liszkay A, Leubner-Metzger G. 2009. In vivo cell wall loosening by hydroxyl radicals during cress seed germination and elongation growth. Plant Physiol. 150:1855–1865. doi:10.1104/pp.109.139204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen M, Knowling M, Tran NN, Burgess A, Fisk I, Watt M, Escribà-Gelonch M, This H, Culton J, Hessel V. 2023. Space farming: horticulture systems on spacecraft and outlook to planetary space exploration. Plant Physiol Biochem. 194:708–721. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.12.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirmalkar N, Pacek AW, Barigou M. 2018. On the existence and stability of bulk nanobubbles. Langmuir. 34:10964–10973. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshita, S., Boerzhijin, S., Kameya, H., Yoshimura, M., Sotome, I., 2023. Promotion effects of ultrafine bubbles/nanobubbles on seed germination. Nanomaterials 13. doi:10.3390/nano13101677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshita S, Kamijo Y, Pham TQA, Yoshimura M, Sotome I, Kameya H, Fujita T, Liu S. 2020. Number concentration of ultrafine bubble being effective in promoting barley seed germination. 混相流(Miscible flow). 34:194–204.
   Google Scholar
• Owen-Going N, Sutton JC, Grodzinski B. 2003. Relationships of Pythium isolates and sweet pepper plants in single-plant hydroponic units. Can J Plant Pathol. 25(2):155–167. doi:10.1080/07060660309507064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal P, Anantharaman H. 2022. CO2 nanobubbles utility for enhanced plant growth and productivity: recent advances in agriculture. J CO2 Util. 61:102008. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J-S, Kurata K. 2009. Application of microbubbles to hydroponics solution promotes lettuce growth. HortTechnology. 19:212–215. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.19.1.212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, Van Der Putten WH. 2013. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 11(11):789–799. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon JRT, Lohse D, Ducker WA, Craig VSJ. 2012. A deliberation on nanobubbles at surfaces and in bulk. ChemPhysChem. 13(8):2179–2187. doi:10.1002/cphc.201100900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seridou P, Kalogerakis N. 2021. Disinfection applications of ozone micro- and nanobubbles. Environmental Science: Nano. 8(12):3493–3510. doi:10.1039/D1EN00700A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma H, Nirmalkar N. 2022. Enhanced gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient by bulk nanobubbles in water. Materials Today: proceedings, International Chemical Engineering Conference 2021 (100 Glorious Years of Chemical Engineering & Technology). 57:1838–1841. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.029.
   Google Scholar
• Shin D, Park JB, Kim YJ, Kim SJ, Kang JH, Lee B, Cho SP, Hong BH, Novoselov KS. 2015. Growth dynamics and gas transport mechanism of nanobubbles in graphene liquid cells. Nat Commun. 6(1):1–6. doi:10.1038/ncomms7068.
   Google Scholar
• Shiroodi S, Schwarz MH, Nitin N, et al. 2021. Efficacy of nanobubbles alone or in combination with neutral electrolyzed water in removing escherichia coli O157:H7, vibrio parahaemolyticus, and listeria innocua biofilms. Food Bioprocess Technol. 14:287–297. doi:10.1007/s11947-020-02572-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siregar IZ, Muharam KF, Purawanto YA, Sudrajat DJ. 2020. Seed germination characteristics in different storage time of Gmelina arborea treated with ultrafine bubbles priming. Biodiversitas J Bio Divers. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg S, Ming DW, Henninger DL. 2002. Plant production systems for microgravity: critical issues in water, air, and solute transport through unsaturated porous media. In NASA Technical Report Server (No. 20020039552). Retrieved October 20, 2023, from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20020039552/downloads/20020039552.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stromberg J. 2015 August. NASA astronauts just ate food grown in space for the first time. Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/2015/8/10/9126949/nasa-food-space-station
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi M, Chiba K, Li P. 2007. Free-radical generation from collapsing microbubbles in the absence of a dynamic stimulus. J Phys Chem B. 111:1343–1347. doi:10.1021/jp0669254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi M, Shirai Y, Sugawa S. 2021. Free-radical generation from bulk nanobubbles in aqueous electrolyte solutions: ESR spin-trap observation of microbubble-treated water. Langmuir. 37:5005–5011. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan BH, An H, Ohl C-D. 2020. How bulk nanobubbles might survive. Phys Rev Lett. 124:134503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.134503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thi Phan, K.K., Truong, T., Wang, Y., Bhandari, B., 2020. Nanobubbles: fundamental characteristics and applications in food processing. Trends Food Sci Technol 95, 118–130. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres LJ, Jenson R, Weislogel M. 2020. Capillary Hydroponic Plant Watering System for Spacecraft. 2020 International Conference on Environmental Systems. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Uchida T, Oshita S, Ohmori M, Tsuno T, Soejima K, Shinozaki S, Take Y, Mitsuda K. 2011. Transmission electron microscopic observations of nanobubbles and their capture of impurities in wastewater. Nanoscale Res Lett. 6:295. doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowski K, Sobieszuk P. 2018. Influence of liquid flowrate on size of nanobubbles generated by porous-membrane modules. Chem Process Eng. 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• van Delden SH, SharathKumar M, Butturini M, Graamans LJA, Heuvelink E, Kacira M, Kaiser E, Klamer RS, Klerkx L, Kootstra G, et al. 2021. Current status and future challenges in implementing and upscaling vertical farming systems. Nature Food. 2(12):944–956. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00402-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang S, Sun J, Dai H, Zhang B, Xiang W, Hu Z, Li P, Yang J, Zhang W. 2021. Nanobubbles promote nutrient utilization and plant growth in rice by upregulating nutrient uptake genes and stimulating growth hormone production. Sci Total Environ. 800:149627. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins P, Hughes J, Gamage TV, Knoerzer K, Ferlazzo ML, Banati RB. 2022 February. Long term food stability for extended space missions: a review. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 32:79–95. doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2021.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler RM. 2003 January. Carbon balance in bioregenerative life support systems: some effects of system closure, waste management, and crop harvest index. Adv Space Res. 31:169–175. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00742-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Lyu T, Yue B, Tonoli E, Verderio EAM, Ma Y, Pan G. 2019. Enhancement of tomato plant growth and productivity in organic farming by agri-nanotechnology using nanobubble oxygation. J Agric Food Chem. 67(39):10823–10831. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b04117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaparatne S, Doherty ZE, Magdaleno AL, Matula EE, MacRae JD, Garcia-Segura S, Apul OG. 2022 May. Effect of air nanobubbles on oxygen transfer, oxygen uptake, and diversity of aerobic microbial consortium in activated sludge reactors. Bioresour Technol. 351:1–10. doi:10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2022.127090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim T, Yaparatne S, Graf J, Garcia-Segura S, Apul O. 2022. Electrostatic forces and higher order curvature terms of Young–Laplace equation on nanobubble stability in water. npj Clean Water. 5:1–3. doi:10.1038/s41545-022-00163-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z-H, Wang S, Cheng L, Ma H, Gao X, Brennan CS, Yan J-K. 2022. Micro-nano-bubble technology and its applications in food industry: a critical review. Food Rev Int. 1–23. doi:10.1080/87559129.2021.2023172.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Bastida F, Zhou B, Sun Y, Gu T, Li S, Li Y. 2020. Soil fertility and crop production are fostered by micro-nano bubble irrigation with associated changes in soil bacterial community. Soil Biol Biochem. 141:107663. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Han Z, He C, Feng Q, Wang K, Wang Y, Luo N, Dodbiba G, Wei Y, Otsuki A, et al. 2021. Long-Term stability of different kinds of Gas nanobubbles in deionized and salt water. Materials (Basel). 14(7):1808. doi:10.3390/ma14071808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Zhou B, Xu F, Muhammad T, Li Y. 2019. Appropriate dissolved oxygen concentration and application stage of micro-nano bubble water oxygation in greenhouse crop plantation. Agric Water Manag. 223:105713. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, An H, Alheshibri M, Liu L, Terpstra PMJ, Liu G, Craig VSJ. 2016. Cleaning with bulk nanobubbles. Langmuir. 32:11203–11211. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, W.B., Tesař, V., Bandulasena, H.C.H., 2011. Towards energy efficient nanobubble generation with fluidic oscillation. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 16, 350–356. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2011.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar