Limitations and duties: elite athletes’ perceptions of compliance with anti-doping rules

References

• Anti Doping Danmark. 2015. Rapport om doping i dansk cykelsport (Report on doping in Danish cycling.) [in Danish]. Accessed June 30, 2019. https://www.dr.dk/NR/rdonlyres/AEE12F96-7118-4022-82C5-7C11D45A1478/6120027/Rapport_om_doping_dansk_cykelsport_19982015.pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. B., R. Morris, P. Dimeo, and L. Robinson. 2017. “Precipitating or Prohibiting Factor: Coaches’ Perceptions of Their Role and Actions in Anti-Doping.” International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 12 (5): 577–587. doi:10.1177/1747954117727653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altukhov, S., and J. Nauright. 2018. “The New Sporting Cold War: Implications of the Russian Doping Allegations for International Relations and Sport.” Sport in Society 21 (8): 1120–1136. doi:10.1080/17430437.2018.1442194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, S. H., J. Mckenna, S. Robinson, and A. Atkin. 2007. International Literature Review: Attitudes, Behaviours, Knowledge and Education – Drugs in Sport: Past, Present and future. Leeds Metropolitan University Carnegie Research Institute. Leeds, UK: Prepared for World anti-Doping Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, S. H. 2015. “Anti-Doping Education for Athletes.” In Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport, edited by V. Møller, I. Waddington, and J. M. Hoberman, 229–238. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, S. H., and J. McKenna. 2012. “Reviewing Coaches’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs regarding Doping in Sport.” International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 7 (1): 167–176. doi:10.1260/1747-9541.7.1.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 2013. The Legitimation of Power. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2015. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, A. V., and J. Gleaves. 2013. “What Do the Humanities (Really) Know about Doping? Questions, Answers and Cross-Disciplinary Strategies.” Performance Enhancement & Health 2 (4): 216–225. doi:10.1016/j.peh.2014.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• De Hon, O., and M. van Bottenburg. 2017. “True Dopers or Negligent Athletes? an Analysis of anti-Doping Rule Violations Reported to the World anti-Doping Agency 2010–2012.” Substance Use & Misuse 52 (14): 1932–1936. doi:10.1080/10826084.2017.1322105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hon, O., I. Eijs, and A. Havenga. 2011. “Dutch Elite Athletes and anti-Doping Policies.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 45 (4): 341–342. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.90.
   Google Scholar
• Devriendt, T., D. Chokoshvili, and P. Borry. 2019. “The Athlete Biological Passport: Challenges and Possibilities.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 11 (2): 315–324. doi:10.1080/19406940.2019.1612459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikic, N., M. McNamee, H. Günter, S. S. Markovic, and B. Vajgic. 2013. “Sports Physicians, Ethics and Antidoping Governance: Between Assistance and Negligence.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 47 (11): 701–704. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimeo, P. 2010. “Understanding and Managing Drugs in Sport.” The Shield: Research Journal of Physical Education & Sports Science 5: 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M., J. O. Thomas, W. Swift, L. Burns, and R. P. Mattick. 2010. “Drug Testing in Sport: The Attitudes and Experiences of Elite Athletes.” International Journal of Drug Policy 21 (4): 330–332. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efverström, A., N. Ahmadi, D. Hoff, and Å. Bäckström. 2016. “Anti-Doping and Legitimacy: An International Survey of Elite Athletes’ Perceptions.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 8 (3): 491–514. doi:10.1080/19406940.2016.1170716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, A.-M., and M. Overbye. 2013. “Urine Doping Controls: The Athletes’ Perspective.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 6 (2): 227–240. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.801361.
   Google Scholar
• Engelberg, T., and S. Moston. 2015. “Inside the Locker Room: A Qualitative Study of Coaches’ anti-Doping Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes.” Sport in Society 19 (7): 942–956. doi:10.1080/17430437.2015.1096244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C. M., and T. R. Tyler. 2013. Why Do People Care about Procedural Fairness? The Importance of Membership Monitoring. Distributive and Procedural Justice: Research and Social Applications. New York, NY: New York University, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D. V., E. Å. Skille, and M. Thurston. 2009. “Das Meldesystem und die anti-Doping-Bestimmungen aus der Sicht der Athleten: eine Befragung norwegischer Athleten” [Elite Athletes’ Perspectives on Providing Whereabouts Information: A Survey of Athletes in the Norwegian Registered Testing Pool] (in German).” Sport und Gesellschaft 6 (1): 30–46. doi:10.1515/sug-2009-0103.
   Google Scholar
• Henne, K. E. 2015. Testing for Athlete Citizenship: Regulating Doping and Sex in Sport. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., J. Jackson, B. Bradford, A. Myhill, and P. Quinton. 2010. “Procedural Justice, Trust, and Institutional Legitimacy.” Policing 4 (3): 203–210. doi:10.1093/police/paq027.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. 2004. “Civil Rights, Doping Control and the World anti-Doping Code.” Sport in Society 7 (3): 420–437. doi:10.1080/1743042000291712.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. 2014. “Achieving Compliance in International anti-Doping Policy: An Analysis of the 2009 World anti-Doping Code.” Sport Management Review 17 (3): 265–276. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2013.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. 2015. “The Future of anti-Doping Policy.” In Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport, edited by V. Møller, I. Waddington, and J. M. Hoberman, 249–259. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., B. Bradford, M. Hough, A. Myhill, P. Quinton, and T. R. Tyler. 2012. “Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions.” British Journal of Criminology 52 (6): 1051–1071. doi:10.1093/bjc/azs032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalleh, G., R. J. Donovan, and I. Jobling. 2014. “Predicting Attitude towards Performance Enhancing Substance Use: A Comprehensive Test of the Sport Drug Control Model with Elite Australian Athletes.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 17 (6): 574–579. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreft, L. 2011. “Elite Sportspersons and Commodity Control: Anti-Doping as Quality Assurance.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 3 (2): 151–161. doi:10.1080/19406940.2011.577795.
   Google Scholar
• Kornbeck, J. 2016. “Anti-Doping Governace and Transparency: A European Perspective.” The International Sports Law Journal 16 (1–2): 118–122. doi:10.1007/s40318-016-0098-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapadat, J. C., and A. C. Lindsay. 1999. “Transcription in Research and Practice: From Standardization of Technique to Interpretive Positionings.” Qualitative Inquiry 5 (1): 64–86. doi:10.1177/107780049900500104.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M., A. Sacks, and T. R. Tyler. 2009. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs.” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (3): 354–375. doi:10.1177/0002764209338797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazanov, J., S. H. Backhouse, J. Connor, D. Hemphill, and F. Quirk. 2014. “Athlete Support Personnel and anti-Doping: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Ethical Stance.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 24 (5): 846–856. doi:10.1111/sms.12084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazanov, J., D. Hemphill, J. Connor, F. Quirk, and S. H. Backhouse. 2015. “Australian Athlete Support Personnel Lived Experience of anti-Doping.” Sport Management Review 18 (2): 218–230. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazanov, J., T. Huybers, and J. Connor. 2011. “Qualitative Evidence of a Primary Intervention Point for Elite Athlete Doping.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 14 (2): 106–110. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2010.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, V. 2014. “Who Guards the Guardians?” The International Journal of the History of Sport 31 (8): 934–950. doi:10.1080/09523367.2013.826652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, V., and P. Dimeo. 2014. “Anti-Doping – the End of Sport.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 6 (2): 259–272. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.798740.
   Google Scholar
• Moston, S., and T. Engelberg. 2017. Detecting Doping in Sport. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., and A. Cherney. 2012. “Understanding Cooperation with Police in a Diverse Society.” British Journal of Criminology 52 (1): 181. doi:10.1093/bjc/azr065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., and C. W. Telep. 2017. “Procedural Justice and Legal Compliance.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13 (1): 5–28. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbye, M. 2018. “An (un)Desirable Trade of Harms? How Elite Athletes Might React to Medically Supervised ‘Doping’ and Their Considerations of Side-Effects in This Situation.” International Journal of Drug Policy 55 (May): 14–30. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Overbye, M., A.-M. Elbe, M. L. Knudsen, and G. Pfister. 2015. “Athletes’ Perceptions of anti-Doping Sanctions: The Ban from Sport versus Social, Financial and Self-Imposed Sanctions.” Sport in Society 18 (3): 364–384. doi:10.1080/17430437.2014.982539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbye, M., and U. Wagner. 2014. “Experiences, Attitudes and Trust: An Inquiry into Elite Athletes’ Perception of the Whereabouts Reporting System.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 6 (3): 407–428. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.791712.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. 2015. “Doping and anti-Doping: The Excesses of Enterprise and the Tyranny of Transparency.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 7 (4): 637–653. doi:10.1080/19406940.2015.1063529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sas-Nowosielski, K., and L. Świątkowska. 2007. “The Knowledge of the World anti-Doping Code among Polish Athletes and Their Attitudes toward Doping and anti-Doping Policy.” Human Movement 8 (1): 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. J. 2009. “The Context of Performance Enhancement: An Athlete’s Perspective.” In Performance-Enhancing Technologies in Sports: Ethical, Conceptual, and Scientific Issues, edited by T. Murray, K. J. Maschke, and A. A. Wasunna, 28–43. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singler, A. 2015. “Doping Prevention – Demands and Reality: Why Education of Athletes Is Not Enough.” In Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport, edited by V. Møller, I. Waddington, and J. M. Hoberman, 239–249. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9780203795347.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, J., and T. Engelberg. 2018. “New Problems, New Challenges: Embracing Innovative Approaches to Sport Research.” Sport in Society 21 (2): 179–184. doi:10.1080/17430437.2018.1406178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, B., and A. C. T. Smith. 2008. “Drug Use in Sport: Implications for Public Policy.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 32 (3): 278–298. doi:10.1177/0193723508319716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., and T. R. Tyler. 2003. “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.” Law Society Review 37 (3): 513–548. doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3703002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 2006a. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57 (1): 375–400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 2006b. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., and Y. J. Huo. 2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., and J. Jackson. 2014. “Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation, and Engagement.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 20 (1): 78. doi:10.1037/a0034514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, D., O. de Hon, and I. van Hilvoorde. 2014. “Doping Control, Providing Whereabouts and the Importance of Privacy for Elite Athletes.” International Journal of Drug Policy 25 (2): 212–218. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.12.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WADA. 2014. “Edwin Moses: The Importance of Education.” Play True Magazine 2: 31–33.
   Google Scholar
• WADA. 2015. “The World Anti-Doping Code 2015”. Accessed 30 November 2018. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/wada_anti-doping_code_2018_english_final.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• WADA. 2018. “Intelligence and investigations.” Accessed 30 November 2018. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/intelligence-and-investigations/
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, I. 2010. “Surveillance and Control in Sport: A Sociologist Looks at the WADA Whereabouts System.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 2 (3): 255–274. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.507210.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C., and R. Piekkari. 2006. “Crossing Language Boundaries: Qualitative Interviewing in International Business.” Management International Review 46 (4): 417–437. doi:10.1007/s11575-006-0099-1.
   Google Scholar