Publication Cover
Sport in Society
Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics
Volume 27, 2024 - Issue 7
76
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Fair play in sport: the Brazilian pedagogical construction of antidoping as a civilizing element

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1057-1073 | Received 24 Mar 2022, Accepted 15 Nov 2023, Published online: 22 Nov 2023

References

  • Abcd. 2016. Brazilian Anti-Doping Code. Accessed March 22, 2022. http://abcd.gov.br/arquivos/legislcao/Cdigo_Brasileiro_Antidopagem.pdf.
  • Berbecaru, C., M. Stanescu, and A. Micle. 2020. “How Efficient Are the Web-Based Learning Methods in Antidoping Education of Romanian Elite Athletes?” eLearning & Software for Education 3: 346–354.
  • Brazil. 2016. Decree 8.829, August 3, 2016. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://www.in.gov.br/web/guest/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/21290155/do1-2016-08-04 -decree-n-8-829-of-3-of-August-of-2016-21290028.
  • Brazil. 2018. Decree 9.299, March 5, 2018. Accessed March 22, 2022. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/decreto/D9299.htm.
  • Codella, R., B. Glad, L. Luzi, and La Torre, A. 2019. “An Italian Campaign to Promote Anti-Doping Culture in High-School Students.” Frontiers in Psichology 10: 534.
  • Connolly, J. 2015. “Civilising Processes and Doping in Professional Cycling.” Current Sociology 63 (7): 1037–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115576765
  • Connolly, J. 2018. “Figurational Research and Doping in Professional Cycling.” In Figurational Research in Sport, Leisure and Health, eite by Malcolm D. and Velija P., London: Routledge.
  • Coubertin, P. 2000. “Olympism: Selected Writings: Pierre de Coubertin International Committee.”
  • Demeslay, J. 2013. L’institution mondiale du dopage: sociologie d’un processus d’harmonisation. Paris: Petra.
  • Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Praeger.
  • Elias, N. 1982. Power & Civility (The Civilizing Process, Vol. 2). New York: Pantheon.
  • Elias, N. 1983. Court Society. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Elias, N. 1996. The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Elias, N. 2000. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. New York: Blackwell.
  • Elias, N. 1991. The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Elias, N. 2012. What is Sociology? Dublin: UCD Press.
  • Elias, N., and E. Dunning. 1986. Quest for Excitement: Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Hallward, L., and L. R. Duncan. 2018. “A Qualitative Exploration of Athletes’ Past Experiences with Doping Prevention Education.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 31 (2): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2018.1448017
  • Hamilton, T., and D. Coyle. 2013. The Secret Race: Inside the Hidden World of the Tour de France. Bantam.
  • Hanstad, D. V. 2008. “Drug Scandal and Organizational Change within the International Ski Federation. A Figurational Approach.” European Sport Management Quarterly 8 (4): 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740802461645
  • Hanstad, D. V., and E. Skille. 2008. “Politicians, Bureaucrats and a Voluntary Sports Organization – the Power Play of Norwegian Policy in the Case of anti-Doping.” Sport in Society 11 (5): 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430802196553
  • Hanstad, D. V., A. Smith, and I. Waddington. 2008. “The Establishment of the World AntiDoping Agency: A Study of the Management of Organizational Change and Unplanned Outcomes.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 43 (3): 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690208100552
  • Hauw, D. 2017. “Antidoping Education Using a Lifelong Situated Activity-Based Approach: Evidence, Conception, and Challenges.” Quest 69 (2): 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1220320
  • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Macovei, V., and L. Mihailescu. 2021. “Methodological Arguments Support in Maintaing the Development of an Antidoping Competence in the Formal Education of High School Sports Program Students.” Journal of Physical Education & Sport 21 (6): 3586–3592.
  • Marcus, G. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1): 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
  • Mottram, D., N. Chester, and J. Gibson. 2008. “Evaluation of a Tutor Network System for a National Education Programme on Drug-Free Sport.” Sport in Society 11 (5): 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430802196579
  • Tavares, O. 2002. “Doping: argumentos em discussão.” Movimento (ESEFID/UFRGS) 8 (1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.2636
  • Vasques, D. G., F. P. Mariante Neto, and M. P. Stigger. 2021b. “The Independence of Brazilian ­anti-Doping: In the Coexistence of the State and Sports Federations.” “e.” Journal of Physical Education 32 (1): 3261.
  • Vasques, D. G., M. Myskiw, P. Trabal, and M. P. Stigger. 2021a. “Anti-Doping Faced with the Demands of the World Agency: An Ethnography of ‘Compliance’ in Action.” Movimento 27: e 27035.
  • Wada. 1999. Lausanne Declaration on Doping in Sport. Adopted by the World Conference on Doping in Sport: Lausanne. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/lausanne_declaration_on_doping_in_sport.pdf.
  • Wada. 2015. World Anti-Doping Code. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/wada-2015-world-anti-doping-code.pdf
  • Wada. 2016. Anti-doping testing figures. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/2016_anti-doping_testing_figures.pdf.
  • Waddington, I. 2010. “Surveillance and Control in Sport: A Sociologist Looks at the WADA Whereabouts System.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 2 (3): 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2010.507210
  • Waddington, I. 2016. “Theorising Unintended Consequences of Anti-Doping Policy.” Performance Enhancement & Health 4 (3-4): 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2016.03.004

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.