Towards autonomous motion control in minimally invasive robotic surgery

References

• Targarona EM, Balague C, Knook MM, et al. Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infection. Br J Surgery. 2000;87(5):536–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roumm AR, Pizzi L, Goldfarb NI, et al. Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Innov. 2005;12(3):261–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Karaliotas C, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jul;20(7):1099–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta S. Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Sep;44(9):1741–1745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2005 Dec;242(6):890–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel HRH, Linares A, Joseph JV. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Surg Oncol. 2009 Sep;18(3):242–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell AG, Heniford BT. Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2005 Aug;190(2):239–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanly EJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4):19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Lord AC, et al. Consumer demand for surgical innovation: a systematic review of public perception of NOTES. Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):774–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthart G, Salisbury JK Jr. The Intuitive™ Telesurgery System: overview and application. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2000 Apr 24–28; San Francisco (CA). p. 618–621.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, Cundy TP, et al. da Vinci robot-assisted keyhole neurosurgery: a cadaver study on feasibility and safety. Neurosurg Rev. 2015 Apr;38(2):367–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber G-P, White MA, Autorino R, et al. Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1279–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaouk JH, Haber G-P, Autorino R, et al. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1033–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickhoff A, Van Dam J, Jakobs R, et al. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (The NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial (‘PACE Study’). Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;102(2):261–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg D, Storne E, Belson A. Use of a flexible robotic transgastric natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) platform in a cadaver to test access, navigation, maneuverability, and stability. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9): 2323–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott DJ, Becke C, Rothstein R, et al. Design of an endoluminal NOTES robotic system. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007. IROS 2007; 2007 Oct 29; San Diego (CA). p. 410–416.
   Google Scholar
• TransEnterix enters next phase of development of SurgiBot system. [Online]. [cited 2016 Feb 12]. Available from: http://www.transenterix.com/news-item/transenterix-enters-next-phase-development-surgibot-system/.
   Google Scholar
• Nakadate R, Arata J, Hashizume M. Next-generation robotic surgery – from the aspect of surgical robots developed by industry. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Feb;24(1):2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardou B, Nageotte F, Zanne P, et al. Improvements in the control of a flexible endoscopic system. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2012 May 14–18; St. Paul (MN). p. 3725–3732.
   Google Scholar
• Garbey M, Bass BL, Collet C, et al. Editor. Design of a robotized flexible endoscope for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. In: Computational Surgery and Dual Training. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Hu D, Hannaford B, et al. Toward real-time endoscopically-guided robotic navigation based on a 3D virtual surgical field model. Proceedings of SPIE, Medical Imaging; 2015 Feb 21–26; Orlando (FL). p. 94150C.
   Google Scholar
• Phee SJ, Low SC, Huynh VA, et al. Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009; 2009 Sep 3–6; Minneapolis (MN). p. 1192–1195.
   Google Scholar
• Haghighipanah M, Li Y, Miyasaka M, et al. Improving position precision of a servo-controlled elastic cable driven surgical robot using unscented Kalman filter. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2015 Sep 28–Oct 2; Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Hu D, Gong Y, Hannaford B, et al. Semi-autonomous simulated brain tumor ablation with raven ii surgical robot using behavior tree. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2015 May 25–30; Seattle (WA). p. 3868–3875.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadurai S, Kosari SN, King H, et al. Application of unscented Kalman filter to a cable driven surgical robot: a simulation study. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2012 May 14–18; St. Paul (MN). p. 1495–1500.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu PWY, Phee SJ, Wang Z, et al. Feasibility of full-thickness gastric resection using master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot and closure by overstitch: a preclinical study. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):319–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phee SJ, Kencana AP, Huynh VA, et al. Design of a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng C: J Mech Eng Sci. 2010 Jan;224(7):1495–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Phee SJ, Wong J, et al. Development of a robotic platform for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Intervention. 2012 Dec;1(1):40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Do TN, Tjahjowidodo T, Lau MWS, et al. Dynamic friction-based force feedback for tendon-sheath mechanism in NOTES system. Int J Comput Electrical Eng. 2014;6(3):252–258.
   Google Scholar
• Do TN, Tjahjowidodo T, Lau MWS, et al. An investigation of friction-based tendon sheath model appropriate for control purposes. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2014 Jan;42(1–2):97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do TN, Tjahjowidodo T, Lau MWS, et al. Hysteresis modeling and position control of tendon-sheath mechanism in flexible endoscopic systems. Mechatronics. 2014 Feb;24(1):12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Wang Z, Phee SJ. Modeling and motion compensation of a bidirectional tendon-sheath actuated system for robotic endoscopic surgery. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Apr;119(2):77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do TN, Tjahjowidodo T, Lau MWS, et al. Adaptive control for enhancing tracking performances of flexible tendon-sheath mechanism in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Mechatronics. 2015 Jun;28:67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do TN, Tjahjowidodo T, Lau MWS, et al. Real-time enhancement of tracking performances for cable-conduit mechanisms-driven flexible robots. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2016 Feb;37:197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can S, Fiolka A, Mayer H, et al. The mechatronic support system ‘HVSPS’ and the way to NOTES. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008 Jan;17(6):341–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can S, Staub C, Knoll A, et al. Design, development and evaluation of a highly versatile robot platform for minimally invasive single-port surgery. 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob); 2012 Jun 24–27; Rome. p. 817–822.
   Google Scholar
• Can S, Jensen B, Dean-Leon E, et al. Kinematics, control and workspace analysis of a bowden wire actuated manipulator for minimally invasive single-port surgery. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO); 2012 Dec 11–14; Guangzhou. p. 848–853.
   Google Scholar
• Garg A, Vikram CS, Gupta S, et al. Design and development of in vivo robot for biopsy. Mech Based Des Struct Mach. 2014 Jul;42(3):278–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutar M, Pathak P, Mehta N, et al. Inverse kinematics and control of 4-degree-of-freedom wire-actuated in vivo robot. Proc Instit Mech Eng I: J Syst Control Eng. 2015 Feb;229(2):77–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seow CM, Chin WJ, Nelson CA, et al. Articulated manipulator with multiple instruments for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. J Med Device. 2013;7(4):041004.
   Google Scholar
• Shen T, Nelson CA, Warburton K, et al. Design and analysis of a novel articulated drive mechanism for multifunctional NOTES robot. J Mech Robot. 2015;7(1):011004.
   Google Scholar
• Sànchez LA, Petroni G, Piccigallo M, et al. Real-time control and evaluation of a teleoperated miniature arm for single port laparoscopy. 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC; 2011 Aug 30–Sep 3; Boston (MA). p. 7049–7053.
   Google Scholar
• Shang J, Noonan DP, Payne C, et al. An articulated universal joint based flexible access robot for minimally invasive surgery. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2011 May 9–13; Shanghai. p. 1147–1152.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Kobayashi Y, Noguchi T, et al. Development of a 6-DOF manipulator driven by flexible shaft for minimally invasive surgical application. 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2013 Jul 3–7; Osaka. p. 6261–6264.
   Google Scholar
• Xu K, Goldman RE, Ding J, et al. System design of an insertable robotic effector platform for single port access (SPA) surgery. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009. IROS 2009; 2009 Oct 11–15; St. Louis (MI). p. 5546–5552.
   Google Scholar
• Quaglia C, Petroni G, Niccolini M, et al. Design of a compact robotic manipulator for single-port laparoscopy. J Mech Des. 2014;136(10):105001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J, Noonan DP, Vitiello V, et al. A novel flexible hyper-redundant surgical robot: prototype evaluation using a single incision flexible access pelvic application as a clinical exemplar. Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):658–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok K-W, Hung Tsoi K, Vitiello V, et al. Dimensionality reduction in controlling articulated snake robot for endoscopy under dynamic active constraints. IEEE Trans Robot. 2013 Feb;29(1):15–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Sekiguchi Y, Noguchi T, et al. Development of a robotic system with six-degrees-of-freedom robotic tool manipulators for single-port surgery: robotic manipulators for single-port surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2015 Jun;11(2):235–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Kobayashi Y, Zhang B, et al. Design of an insertable surgical robot with multi-level endoscopic control for single port access surgery. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO); 2013 Dec 12–14; Shenzhen. p. 750–755.
   Google Scholar
• Ding J, Goldman RE, Xu K, et al. Design and coordination kinematics of an insertable robotic effectors platform for single-port access surgery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2013 Oct;18(5):1612–1624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajo A, Goldman RE, Wang L, et al. Integration and preliminary evaluation of an insertable robotic effectors platform for single port access surgery. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2012 May 14–18; St. Paul (MA). p. 3381–3387.
   Google Scholar
• Bajo A, Goldman RE, Simaan N. Configuration and joint feedback for enhanced performance of multi-segment continuum robots. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2011 May 9–13; Shanghai. p. 2905–2912.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman RE, Bajo A, Simaan N. Compliant motion control for continuum robots with intrinsic actuation sensing. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2011 May 9–13; Shanghai. p. 1126–1132.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman RE, Bajo A, Simaan N. Compliant motion control for multisegment continuum robots with actuation force sensing. IEEE Trans Robotics. 2014 Aug;30(4):890–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu K, Zhao J, Fu M. Development of the SJTU Unfoldable Robotic System (SURS) for single port laparoscopy. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2015 Oct;20(5):2133–2145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman AC, Wood NA, Farritor S, et al. Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):119–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortman TD, Mondry JM, Farritor SM, et al. Single-site colectomy with miniature in vivo robotic platform. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Apr;60(4):926–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderi N, Najarian S, Hosseinali A, et al. Modeling and dynamic analysis of the worm-like part of an innovative robot applicable in colonoscopy. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2013 Sep;9(3):371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuti G, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, et al. Robotic magnetic steering and locomotion of capsule endoscope for diagnostic and surgical endoluminal procedures. Robotica. 2010 Mar;28(02):199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini S, Mehrtash M, Khamesee MB. Design, fabrication and control of a magnetic capsule-robot for the human esophagus. Microsys Technol. 2011 Jun;17(5–7):1145–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawks JA, Kunowski J, Platt SR. In vivo demonstration of surgical task assistance using miniature robots. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Oct;59(10):2866–2873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt SR, Hawks JA, Rentschler ME. Vision and task assistance using modular wireless in vivo surgical robots. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(6):1700–1710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S, Yan G-Z, Ke Q, et al. A wirelessly powered expanding-extending robotic capsule endoscope for human intestine. Int J Precision Eng Manuf. 2015 Jun;16(6):1075–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S, Yan G, Wang Z, et al. Characteristics of locomotion efficiency of an expanding-extending robotic endoscope in the intestinal environment. Proc Inst Mech Eng H: J Eng Med. 2015 Jul;229(7):515–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliker LJ, Wang X, Schoen JA, et al. Micropatterned treads for in vivo robotic mobility. J Med Device. 2010;4(4):041006.
   Google Scholar
• Sliker LJ, Kern MD, Schoen JA, et al. Surgical evaluation of a novel tethered robotic capsule endoscope using micro-patterned treads. Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2862–2869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trovato G, Shikanai M, Ukawa G, et al. Development of a colon endoscope robot that adjusts its locomotion through the use of reinforcement learning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010 Jul;5(4):317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Balicki M, Kang J, et al. Development and preliminary data of novel integrated optical micro-force sensing tools for retinal microsurgery. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009. ICRA’09; 2009 May 12–17; Kobe. p. 1897–1902.
   Google Scholar
• Cagneau B, Zemiti N, Bellot D, et al. Physiological motion compensation in robotized surgery using force feedback control. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2007 Apr 10–14; Rome. p. 1881–1886.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira P, Liu C, Zemiti N, et al. Soft tissue force control using active observers and viscoelastic interaction model. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2012 May 14–18; Minneapolis (MN). p. 4660–4666.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira P, Zemiti N, Liu C, et al. Viscoelastic model based force control for soft tissue interaction and its application in physiological motion compensation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014 Sep;116(2):52–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassahun Y, Yu B, Tibebu AT, et al. Surgical robotics beyond enhanced dexterity instrumentation: a survey of machine learning techniques and their role in intelligent and autonomous surgical actions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;11(4):553–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranzfelder M, Staub C, Fiolka A, et al. Toward increased autonomy in the surgical OR: needs, requests, and expectations. Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1681–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustris GP, Hiridis SC, Deliparaschos KM, et al. Evolution of autonomous and semi-autonomous robotic surgical systems: a review of the literature. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2011 Dec;7(4):375–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar