The use of micro-electro mechanical systems in vascular monitoring: implications for clinical use

References

• Bourassa MG. The history of cardiac catheterization. Can J Cardiol. 2005;21(12):1011–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schannwell CM, Steiner S, Strauer BE. Diagnostics in pulmonary hypertension. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;58Suppl 5(Pt 2):591–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romagnoli S, Ricci Z, Quattrone D, et al. Accuracy of invasive arterial pressure monitoring in cardiovascular patients: an observational study. Crit Care;. 2014;18(6):644–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson PB, Abraham WT, Bourge RC, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring guide management to reduce decompensation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;7(6):935–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery hemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9766):658–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centuria SD. Microsystem design. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2001. p. 570–577.
   Google Scholar
• Madou M. Fundamentals of microfabrication. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson M. Microfabrication and manufacturing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir R. BioMEMS: state-of- the- art in detection, opportunities’ and prospects. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2004;56(11):1565–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan JY. Reliability considerations for the BioMEMS designer. Proc IEEE. 2004;92(1):174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliterman SS. Fundamentals of BioMEMS and medical microdevices. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• James T, Manoor MS, Ivanov DV. BioMEMS, advancing the frontiers of medicine. Sensors. 2008;8:6077–6107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hag H, Esaschi M. Biomedical microsystems for minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment. Proc. IEEE. 2004;92(1):98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks RS, Cullen DS, Karube I, et al. Handbook of biosensors and biochips. Vol. 2. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2007; p. 757–777.
   Google Scholar
• Folch A. Introduction to bio-MEMS. Various pagings. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang G. Design challenges for implantable pressure monitoring system. Front Neurosci. 2010;4(29):1–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvin Barlian A, Park W-T, Mallon JR, et al. Review: semiconductor piezoresistance for microsystems. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2009;97(3):513–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starra P, Bartelsc K, Agrawalb M, et al. Evolution of micromachined pressure transducerrs for cardiovascular applications. Sensors Actuators A: Physical. 2015;225(225):8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan QY, Zhang L, Xiao D, et al. An accurate, flexible and small optical fiber sensor: a novel technological breakthrough for real-time analysis of dynamic blood flow data in vivo. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Huang J. Design and application of a high sensitivity piezoresistive pressure sensor for low pressure conditions. Sensors (Basel). 2015;15(9):22692–22704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neal CB, Malshe AP, Singh SB, et al. “Challenges in the packaging of MEMS,” in advanced packaging materials: processes, properties and interfaces. Proc Int Symp. 1999;22:41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen I, Glott T. Development of clinically relevant implantable pressure sensors: perspectives and challenges. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14(9):17686–17702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalvesten E, Smith L, Tenerz L, et al. The first surface micromachined pressure sensor for cardiovascular pressure measurements. In: MEMS 98. proceedings., The eleventh annual international workshop on Micro electro mechanical systems. Heidelberg: IEEE; 1998 Jan 25–29; p. 574–579.
   Google Scholar
• Kristo B, Liao JC, Neves HP, et al. Microelectromechanical systems in urology. Urology. 2003;61(5):883–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Roy S. Microelectromechanical systems and nephrology: the next frontier in renal replacement technology. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2013;20(6):516–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Am K, Rolett EL. Heart failure: when form fails to follow function. Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 24:449–454. pii: ehv548.
   Google Scholar
• Genet M, Lee LC, Baillargeon B, et al. Modeling pathologies of diastolic and systolic heart failure. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(1):112–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padhukasahasram B, Reddy CK, Li Y, et al. Joint impact of clinical and behavioral variables on the risk of unplanned readmission and death after a heart failure hospitalization. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e012955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray JJ. Clinical practice. Systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(3):228–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahnke JS, Abraham WT, Adamson PB, et al. Heart failure and respiratory hospitalizations are reduced in patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with the use of an implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitoring device. J Card Fail. 2015;21(3):240–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccone MM, Aquilino A, Cortese F, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of a disease and care management model in the primary health care system for patients with heart failure and diabetes(Project Leonardo). Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010;6:297–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abraham WT. Disease management: remote monitoring in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators, resynchronization devices, and hemodynamic monitors. Europace. 2013;15(Suppl 1):i40–i46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, et al. CHAMPION Trial Study Group. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamicmonitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9766):658–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson PUB, Abraham WT, Aaron M, et al. CHAMPION trial rationale and design: the long-term safety and clinical efficacy of a wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring system. J Card Fail. 2011;17(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh JP, Barbash IM, Waksman R. Overview of the 2011 food and drug administration circulatory system devices panel of the medical devices advisory committee meeting on the CardioMEMS champion heart failure monitoring system. JAm Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1571–1576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CardioMEMS HF system. [cited 2016 Jan 18]. Available from: http://www.sjm.com/cardiomems.
   Google Scholar
• William T, Philip A, Robert B, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery hemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. 2011;377(9766):658–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo MR, Stevenson LW, Adamson P, et al. Interventions linked to decreased heart failure hospitalizations during ambulatory pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 May;4(5):333–344. pii: S2213-1779(15)00782-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu AT, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Owens DK, et al. Cost-effectiveness of implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in chronic heart failure. JCHF. 2016;4(5):368–375. pii: S2213-1779(15)00838-0.
   Google Scholar
• Kuivaniemi H, Chris D, Platsoucas, M, et al. Aortic aneursyms.An immune disease with a strong genetic component. Circulation. 2008;117:242–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner R, De Rango P, Verzini F, et al. Are intrasac pressure measurements useful after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms? J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(2):534–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrikhande G, Khan S, Hussain H, et al. Significance of initial aortic aneurysm pressure sensor readings varies with aortic endograft design. World J Surg. 2010;34(12):2969–2972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwers LM, Seder CW, Bove PG. A novel treatment approach to a type IIendoleak at endograft implantation using components of an endosensor monitoring device. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010;44(7):568–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsa CJ, Daneshmand MA, Lima B, et al. Utility ofremote wireless pressure sensing for endovascular leak detection after endovascular thoracic aneurysm repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(2):446–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira PG, Miller CW, Mendes RF, et al. Correlation between intrasacpressure measurements of a pressure sensor and an angiographic catheter during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Clinics. 2008;63(1):59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe H, Segall JA, Liem TK, et al. Aortic aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair using an implantable remote sensor: initial experience and short-term follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2008 May;18(5):957–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakris GL, Nadim MK, Haller H, et al. Baroreflex activation therapy provides durable benefit in patients with resistant hypertension: results of long-term follow-up in the Rheos Pivotal Trial. J Am Soc. 2012;6(2):152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe UC, Brandt MC, Wachter R, et al. Minimally invasive system for baroreflex activation therapy chronically lowers blood pressure with pacemaker-like safety profile: results from the Barostim neo trail. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2012;6(4):270–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar