Current and emerging robotic assisted intervention for Notes

References

• Döbrönte Z, Wittmann T, Karácsony G. Rapid development of malignant metastases in the abdominal wall after laparoscopy. Endoscopy. 1978;10:127–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasari BV, McKay D, Gardiner K. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for small bowel crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1:CD006956.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, et al. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD003145.
   Google Scholar
• Vestweber B, Galetin T, Lammerting K, et al. Singleincision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:434–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boni L, Dionigi G, Cassinotti E, et al. Single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3233–3236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler D, Kirat H, Remzi F. Single-port laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: initial operative experience. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2175–2178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelosi MA, Pelosi MAIII. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992;37:588–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol. 2008;54(5):1020–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1419–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts KE. True single-port appendectomy: first experience with the “puppeteer technique”. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1825–1830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA. Laparoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:188–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M, et al. Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg. 2009;144:173–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearl JP, Ponsky JL. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1293–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente SG, DeMaria EJ, Reynolds JD, et al. New developments in surgery: natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Arch Surg. 2007;142:295–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:329–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, et al. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg. 2007;142:823–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, et al. Robotic NOTES (natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience. Urology. 2008;71:996–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Surg. 2004;60(1):114–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao G, Reddy N. Transgastric appendectomy in humans. Oral presentation at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) conference; 26–29 April 2006. Dallas, Tex, USA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Swanstr¨om LL. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy. 2009;41(1):82–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S´anchez-Margallo FM, Asencio JM, Tejonero MC, et al. Technical feasibility of totally natural orifice cholecystectomy in a swine model. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(6):361–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumbs AA, Fowler D, Milone L, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: early evolution of the technique. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):908–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallemagne B, Marescaux J. The ANUBIS™ project. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19:257–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Donno A, Zorn L, Zanne P Introducing STRAS: A new flexible robotic system for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013. p.1213–1220
   Google Scholar
• Phee SJ, Low SC, Sun ZL, et al. Robotic system for no-scar gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2008;4:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phee SJ, Ho KY, Lomanto D, et al. Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepatic resection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slave translumenal endoscopic robot (MASTER). Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2293–2298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phee SJ, Low SC, Huynh VA, et al. Master and slave translumenal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;4:1192–1195.
   Google Scholar
• Lomanto D, Wijerathne S, Ho LK, et al. Flexible endoscopic robot. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KY, Phee SJ, Shabbir A, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:593–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Phee SJ, Lomanto D, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot: an animal survival study. Endoscopy. 2012;44:690–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu PW, Phee SJ, Wang Z, et al. Feasibility of full-thickness gastric resection using master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot and closure by overstitch: a preclinical study. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:319–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Ang RY, Lim EW, et al. Enhancement of a master-slave robotic system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010;40:223–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phee SJ, Reddy N, Chiu PW, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection is effective in treating patients with early-stage gastric neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1117–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Sun Z, Phee SJ. Haptic feedback and control of a flexible surgical endoscopic robot. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013;112:260–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abott DJ, Becke C, Rothstein RI, et al. (2007) Design of an endolumenal NOTES robotic system. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems,2007. p. 410–416
   Google Scholar
• Aron M, Haber GP, Desai MM, et al. Flexible robotics: a new paradigm. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17:151–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein RI, Ailinger RA, Peine W. Computer-assisted endoscopic robot system for advanced therapeutic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(5):P113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauche H, Hiernaux M, Chau A. Endomina: the endolumenal universal robotized triangulation system: description and preliminary results in isolated pig stomach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:AB204–AB205.
   Google Scholar
• Xu K, Zhao J, Shih AJ. Development of an endoscopic continuum robot to enable transgastric surgical obesity treatment. in International Conference On Intelligent Robotics And Applications (icira) montreal, quebec, canada. Przeglad Lekarski. 2012;69:589–600.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao J, Zheng X, Zheng M, et al. An endoscopic continuum testbed for finalizing system characteristics of a surgical robot for notes procedures. in Proc. IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mechatronics; 2013; Wollongong, Australia, 2013. P. 63–70
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki N, Hattori A, Tanoue K, et al. Scorpion shaped endoscopic surgical robot for NOTES and SPS with augmented reality functions. In: Liao H, Edwards PJE, Pan X, Fan Y, Yang G-Z (eds) Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality; 2010. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 541–550.
   Google Scholar
• Poon CCY, Yang H, Lau KC, et al. A bioinspired flexible robot with hybrid actuation mechanisms for endoscopic surgery. The Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robot; 12-15 July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lau KC, Hu Y, Poon CCY, et al. Design and development of a task specific surgical robot for endoscopic submucosal dissection. IEEE International Symposium on Optomechatronic technologies; 2014 Seattle, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Lehman AC, Dumpert J, Wood NA, et al. Natural orifice cholecystectomy using a miniature robot. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt SR, Hawks JA, Rentschler ME. Vision and task assistance using modular wireless in vivo surgical robots. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(6):1700–1710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentschler ME, Dumpert J, Platt SR, et al. Natural orifice surgery with an endolumenal mobile robot. Surg Endosc. 2006;21:1212–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentschler ME, Platt SR, Dumpert J, et al. Miniature in vivo robots for remote and harsh environments. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008;12(1):66–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehman AC, Berg KA, Dumpert J, et al. Surgery with cooperative robots. Comp Aided Surg. 2008;2:95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Bergs RA, Eberhart R, et al. Trocar-less instrumentation for laparoscopy: magnetic positioning of intra-abdominal camera and retractor. Ann Surg. 2007;245(3):379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeltser IS, Bergs R, Fernandez R, et al. Single trocar laparoscopic nephrectomy using magnetic anchoring and guidance system in the porcine model. J Urol. 2007;178(1):288–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, et al. Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments,”. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2308–2316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tognarelli S, Salerno M, Tortora G, et al. A miniaturized robotic platform for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: in vivo validation. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3477–3484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada K, Susilo E, Menciassi A, et al. Wireless reconfigurable modules for robotic endoluminal surgery. in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2009; Kobe, Japan, 2009. p. 2699–2704
   Google Scholar
• Harada K, Russo S, Ranzani T, et al. Design of Scout Robot as a robotic module for symbiotic multi-robot organisms. in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science; 2011; Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Amir D, Howie C, Alon W, et al. Percutaneous intrapericardial interventions using a highly articulated robotic probe. In: The first IEEE/RAS-EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics; 2006. p. 7–12
   Google Scholar
• Amir D, Howie C, Alon W, et al. Highly articulated robotic probe for minimally invasive surgery. In proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation; 2006, Orlando, Florida. IEEE Eng Med Biol Society Annu Conf. 2006;2006:4167–4172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swain P. The shapelock system adapted to intragastric and transgastric surgery. Endoscopy. 2007;39:466–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanstrom LL, Kozarek R, Pasricha PJ, et al. Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery. Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(8):1129–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanström L, Swain P, Denk P. Development and validation of a new generation of flexible endoscope for NOTES. Surg Innov. 2009;16:104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaula AL, Kozarek RA, Birkett DH, et al. A novel system for performing endolumenal antireflux surgery and other endosurgical procedures. M2286; 2006. Los Angeles: Digestive Disease Week (DDW); 2006. p. 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, et al. Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model [with video]. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:428–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain P, Rothe C, Bergstrom M, et al. Development and testing of a new platform for retroflexed flexible transgastric surgery: cholecystectomy, fundoplication, gastric restriction and diaphragmatic repair. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(5):725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan S, Thompson K, Talamini M, et al. Clinical experience with a multifunctional, flexible surgery system for endolumenal, single-port, and NOTES procedures. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Weiss GD, et al. Incisionless revision of post-Roux-en-Y bypass stomal and pouch dilation: multicenter registry results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(3):290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagi A, Matsumiya K, Dohi T. Slider linkage lock mechanism using air pressure for rigid-flexible outer sheath for endoscopic surgery. Proc 1st Asian Symp Comput Aided Surg. 2005;7(2):194–197. Tsukuba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Yagi A, Matsumiya K, Masamune K, et al. Rigid-flexible outer sheath model using slider linkage locking mechanism and air pressure for endoscopic surgery. Proc. of 9th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2006. p. 503–510.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo S, Masamune K, Kuwana K, et al. Nonmetallic rigidflexible outer sheath with pneumatic shapelocking mechanism and double curvature structure. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv –MICCAI 2012. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2011;6891:169–177.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo S, Yamanaka N, Sato I, et al. MRICompatible rigid and flexible outer sheath device with pneumatic locking mechanism for minimally invasive surgery. Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality - MIAR 2008. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2008;5128:210–219.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo S, Masamune K, Kuwana K, et al. Nonmetallic guide sheath with negative pressure shapelocking mechanism for minimally invasive image-guided surgery. Proc Inf Communications Technol (PICT). 2012;3:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo S, Ohdaira T, Kuwana K, et al. Developing essential rigid-flexible outer sheath to enable novel multi-piercing surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv –MICCAI 2012. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2012;7510:26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo S, Iijima K, Tokumiya T, et al. Variable stiffness outer sheath with “dragon skin” structure and negative pneumatic shape-locking. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(5):857–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Cheng D, Kim S, et al. Design of a tubular snakelike manipulator with stiffening capability by layer jamming. in Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst.; 2012; Portugal. p. 4251–4256
   Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Cheng S, Kim S, et al. A stiffness adjustable hyperredundant manipulator using a variable neutralline mechanism for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Trans Robot. 2014;29(4):1031–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianchetti M, Ranzani T, Gerboni G, et al. STIFF-FLOP surgical manipulator: mechanical design and experimental characterization of the single module. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2013; 3576–3581
   Google Scholar
• Cianchetti M, Ranzani T, Gerboni G, et al. Soft robotics technologies to address shortcomings in today’s minimally invasive surgery: the STIFF-FLOP approach. Soft Robotics. 2014;1(2):122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranzani T, Gerboni G, Cianchetti M, et al. A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. IOP Bioinspir Biomim. 2015;10(3):035008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang J, Noonan DP, Payne C, et al. An articulated universal joint based flexible access robot for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2011; 1147–1152
   Google Scholar
• Thakkar S, Awad M, Gurram KC, et al. A novel, new robotic platform for natural orifice distal pancreatectomy. Surg Innov. 2015;22:274–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seow CM, Chin WJ, Nelson CA, et al. Articulated manipulator with multiple instruments for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. ASME J Med Devices. 2013;7:041004.
   Google Scholar
• Shen T, Nelson C, Warburton K, et al. Design and analysis of a novel articulated drive mechanism for multifunctional NOTES Robot. ASME J Mech Robotics. 2015;7(1):011004.
   Google Scholar
• Spaun GO, Zheng B, Swanstrom LL. A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2720–2727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda K, Sumiyama K, Tajiri H, et al. Evaluation of a new multitasking platform for endoscope full-thickness resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(1):117–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CC, Ryou M, Soper NJ, et al. Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endolumenal and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(1):121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaun GO, Zheng B, Martinec DV, et al. Bimanual coordination in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: comparing the conventional dual-channel endoscope, the R-scope, and a novel direct-drive system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(6):e39–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bardaro SJ, Swanstrom LL. Develeopment of advanced endoscopes for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Minimally Invasive Ther. 2006;15(6):378–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Khashab M, Raju. Insertability and safety of a shapelocking device for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:817–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju GS, Pasricha PJ. ShapeLock: a rapid access port for redeployment of a colonoscope into the proximal colon to facilitate multiple polypectomies in a single session. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:768–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita H, Matsumiya K, Masamune K, et al. Miniature bending manipulator for fetoscopic intrauterine laser therapy in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Surg Endosc. 2007;22(2):430–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo S, Hughes M, Yang GZ. Novel balloon surface scanning device for intraoperative breast endomicroscopy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(7):2313–2326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Sekiguchi Y, Noguchi T, et al. Development of a robotic system with six-degrees-offreedom robotic tool manipulators for single-port surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2015;11:235–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo S, Hughes M, Seneci C, et al. Towards intraoperative breast endomicroscopy with a novel surface scanning device. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62(12):2941–2952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nageotte F, Zanne P, Doignon C, et al. Stitching planning in laparoscopic surgery: towards robot-assisted suturing. Int J Rob Res. 2009;28(10):1303–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerveri P, Zazzarini CC, Patete P, et al. A micro-optical system for endoscopy based on mechanical compensation paradigm using miniature piezo-actuation. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36:684–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petterssona A, Davisb S, Grayb JO, et al. Design of a magnetorheological robot gripper for handling of delicate food products with varying shapes. J Food Eng. 2010;98(3):332–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert BE, Floreano D. Variable stiffness material based on rigid low -melting-point-alloy microstructures embedded in soft poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS). Rsc Advances. 2013;3(46):24671–24679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan WL, Lu T, Majidi C. Soft-matter composites with electrically tunable elastic rigidity. Smart Materials and Structures. 2013;22(8):085005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng N, Ishigami G, Hawthorne S, et al. Design and Analysis of a Soft Mobile Robot Composed of Multiple Thermally Activated Joints Driven by a Single Actuator. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Anchorage Convention District. Anchorage, Alaska, USA: May 2010. p. 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng N, Gopinath A, Wang L, et al. Thermally tunable, self-healing composites for soft robotic applications. Macromol Mater Eng. 2014;299:1279–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang GK, Wang SX, Lin JM, et al. Prototype design of flexi-hand for single incision laparoscopic surgery. The hamlyn symposium on medical Robot. Magma (New York, N.Y.). 2014;27:53–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kesner SB, Howe RD Force control of flexible catheter robots for beating heart surgery. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2011.p. 1589–1594
   Google Scholar
• Becker BC, Voros S, Maclachlan RA, et al. Active guidance of a handheld micromanipulator using visual servoing. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009. p. 339–344
   Google Scholar
• Melo R, Barreto JP, Falcão G. A new solution for camera calibration and real-time image distortion correction in medical endoscopyinitial technical evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59:634–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Um SH, Kim CD, Ryu HS, et al. Feasibility of obtaining quantitative 3-dimensional information using conventional endoscope: a pilot study. Clin Endosc. 2012;45:182–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puerto-Souza GA, Mariottini GL. A fast and accurate featurematching algorithm for minimally-invasive endoscopic images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013;32:1201–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang PL, Stoyanov D, Davison AJ, et al. Real-time dense stereo reconstruction using convex optimisation with a cost-volume for image-guided robotic surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16:42–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vercauteren T, Perchant A, Malandain G, et al. Robust mosaicing with correction of motion distortions and tissue deformations for in vivo fibered microscopy. Medical Image Analysis. 2006;10:673–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirota DJ, Ishii M, Hager GD. Vision-based navigation in imageguided interventions. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;13:297–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tearney GJ, Brezinski ME, Bouma BE, et al. In vivo endoscopic optical biopsy with optical coherence tomography. Science. 1997;276(5321):2037–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz M. Confocal laser endomicroscopy: applications in clinical and translational science—a comprehensive review. ISRN Pathology. 2012; 2012:387145.
   Google Scholar
• Park YL, Chang Ryu S, Black RJ, et al. Exoskeletal force-sensing end-effectors with embedded optical fiber-bragg-grating sensors. IEEE Trans Robot. 2009;25(6):1319–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountney P, Giannarou S, Elson D, et al. Optical biopsy mapping for minimally invasive cancer screening. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Aided Intervention, London, UK, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2009; 5761:483–490.
   Google Scholar
• Dogramadzi S, Allen CR, Bell GD, et al. Computer controlled colonoscopy. IEEE Proc Instrumentation Measurement Technology. 1998;1:210–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sadjadi H, Hashtrudi-Zaad K, Fichtinger G. Fusion of electromagnetic trackers to improve needle deflection estimation: simulation study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(10):2706–2715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesthuis RJ, Janssen S, Misra S On using an array of fiber bragg grating sensors for closed-loop control of flexible minimally invasive surgical instruments. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2013. p. 2545–2551
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Qian J, Shen L, et al. FBG sensor devices for spatial shape detection of intelligent colonoscope. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19:834–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu SC, Dupont PE FBG-based shape sensing tubes for continuum robots. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2014, p.3531–3537
   Google Scholar
• Ginhoux R, Gangloff J, de Mathelin M, et al. Active filtering of physiological motion in robotized surgery using predictive control. IEEE Trans Rob. 2005;21(1):67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen SG, Perrin DP, Vasilyev NV, et al. Force tracking with feed-forward motion estimation for beating heart surgery. IEEE Trans Rob. 2010;26:888–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar