A comprehensive review of endoscopic ultrasound core biopsy needles

References

• Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, Mcgrath K, et al. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:966–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itoi T, Takei K, Sofuni A, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and MIB-1 in tissue specimens obtained from endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Oncol Rep. 2005;13:229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brais RJ, Davies SE, O’donovan M, et al. Direct histological processing of EUS biopsies enables rapid molecular biomarker analysis for interventional pancreatic cancer trials. Pancreatology. 2012;12:8–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedia P, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Technical advances in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition for pancreatic cancers: how can we get the best results with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration? Clin Endosc. 2013;46(5):552–562.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hébert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu S, et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705–1710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, et al. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1289–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecka RS, Sharma M. Rapid on-site evaluation of EUS-FNA by cytopathologist: an experience of a tertiary hospital. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41:1075–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugge WR, De Witt J, Klapman JB, et al. Techniques for cytologic sampling of pancreatic and bile duct lesions: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines. Cytojournal. 2014;11(Suppl 1):2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopelman Y, Marmor S, Ashkenazi I, et al. Value of EUS-FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours. Cytopathology. 2011;22:174–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright ER, Bakis G, Srinivasan R, et al. Intraprocedural tissue diagnosis during ERCP employing a new cytology preparation of forceps biopsy (Smash protocol). Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:294–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanga LR, Maygarden SJ. Utility of fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy with touch preparation in the diagnosis of renal lesions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:182–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins BT, Murad FM, Wang JF, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:518–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena M, Eusebi LH, Pellicano R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound core needle for diagnosing of solid pancreatic lesions: is rapid on-site evaluation really necessary? Minerva Med. 2017;108:547–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, et al. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1040–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Grimm IS, Ali B, et al. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E363–E375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh DH, Choi K, Gu S, et al. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:94–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, et al. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy. 2017;49:989–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas T, Kaye PV, Ragunath K, et al. Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:584–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamadnejad M, Mullady D, Early DS, et al. Increasing number of passes beyond 4 does not increase sensitivity of detection of pancreatic malignancy by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1071–1078.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema LM, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:485–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadaf S, Loya A, Akhtar N, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the pancreas: a clinicopathological study of nine cases. Cytopathology. 2017;28:536–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runge TM, Hart PA, Sasatomi E, et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using new, flexible EUS core biopsy needles: report of 2 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1311–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Frulloni L, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Pancreas. 2011;40:352–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detlefsen S, Mortensen MB, Pless TK, et al. Laparoscopic and percutaneous core needle biopsy plays a central role for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis in a single-center study from Denmark. Pancreas. 2015;44:845–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano K, Fukushima N, Tada M, et al. Diagnostic utility of biopsy specimens for autoimmune pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:765–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detlefsen S, Joergensen MT, Mortensen MB. Microscopic findings in EUS-guided fine needle (SharkCore) biopsies with type 1 and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. Pathol Int. 2017;67(10):514–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travenol Laboratories. Tru-Cut biopsy needles. Deerfield (IL): Travenol Laboratories, Inc.; 1980. Document 8-19-2-314AA.
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj B, Pillay S. ‘Tru-Cut’ needle biopsy of the liver: importance of the correct technique. Postgrad Med J. 1991;67:170–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binmoeller KF, Thul R, Rathod V, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided, 18-gauge, fine needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas using a 2.8 mm channel convex array echoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:121–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates, Brian, inventor. Interlego Ag, Cook Incorporated. Flexible biopsy needle. US patent 10/337,109. July 8, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy VR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration vs fine-needle biopsy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017;13:496–499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhutani M, Koduru P, Lanke G, et al. The emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsy for the evaluation of solid pancreatic masses. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2015;61:51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JZ, Zhang Q, McGill CS, et al. Modeling of the plane needle cutting edge rake and inclination angles for biopsy. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2010;132(051005):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Han P, Che D, Pallav K, et al. Models of the cutting edge geometry of medical needles with applications to needle design. Int J Mech Sci. 2012;65:157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JZ, Mclaughlin PW, Shih AJ. Novel needle cutting edge geometry for end-cut biopsy. Med Phys. 2012;39:99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo YS, Lee KH, Noh DH, et al. 22G versus 25G biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52(12):1435–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrogenis G, Weynand B, Sibille A, et al. 25-gauge histology needle versus 22-gauge cytology needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E63–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamabe A, Irisawa A, Shibukawa G, et al. An experimental study to assess the best maneuver when using a reverse side-bevel histology needle for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E56–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alatawi A, Beuvon F, Grabar S, et al. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. United European Gastroenterol J. 2015;3:343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sey MS, Al-Haddad M, Imperiale TF, et al. EUS-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal disease: a comparison of diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:347–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Hasan MK, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: initial assessment. Dig Endosc. 2016;29(3):338–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, et al. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology: results of a randomised trial. Gut. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mukai S, Itoi T, Katanuma A, et al. An animal experimental study to assess the core tissue acquisition ability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided histology needles. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Dimaio CJ, Kolb JM, Benias PC, et al. Initial experience with a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore): results of a large North American multicenter study. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E974–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayar MK, Paranandi B, Dawwas MF, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1017–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelfatah MM, Grimm IS, Gangarosa LM, et al. Cohort study comparing the diagnostic yields of 2 different EUS fine-needle biopsy needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;S0016-5107(17)32242-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman AR, Thompson CC, Odze R, et al. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa T, Mohamed R, Heitman SJ, et al. Diagnostic yield of small histological cores obtained with a new EUS-guided fine needle biopsy system. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:5143–5149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000 Feb 29. Identifier NCT02766842,Evaluation of a New EUS Guided Biopsy Needle (SharkCore) Comparing to Standard EUS Needle (ProCore); 2016 May 6 [cited 2017 Sept 5]; [about 4 screens]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02766842
   Google Scholar
• Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, et al. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, et al. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:1056–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanbiervliet G, Napoléon B, Paul MCS, et al. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hucl T, Wee E, Anuradha S, et al. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:792–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BG, et al. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42:751–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt BL, Adler DG, Hilden K, et al. A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCore and EchoTip 22-gauge needle types. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41:1069–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzosa M, Villa N, El-Serag HB, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4:28–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, et al. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(6):1034–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar