548
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Value proposition of robotic total knee arthroplasty: what can robotic technology deliver in 2018 and beyond?

, , , , &
Pages 619-630 | Received 28 Mar 2018, Accepted 20 Aug 2018, Published online: 07 Sep 2018

References

  • van der List JP, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, et al. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:3482–3495.
  • Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31: 2353–2363.
  • Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, et al. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12:727–735.
  • Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.
  • Sakellariou VI, Poultsides LA, Ma Y, et al. Risk assessment for chronic pain and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2016;39:55–62.
  • Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2015;97–B:793–801.
  • King J, Dl S, Dc S, et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1497–1503.
  • Murphy L, Helmick CG. The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: a population-health perspective: a population-based review of the fourth most common cause of hospitalization in U.S. Adults Orthop Nurs. 2012;31:85–91.
  • Leopold SS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1749–1758.
  • Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:2415.
  • Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, et al. Causes and predictors of patient’s dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:263–271.
  • Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, et al. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35–43.
  • Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:262–267.
  • Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, et al. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:893–900.
  • Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, et al. Revision rates after total joint replacement: CUMULATIVE RESULTS FROM WORLDWIDE JOINT REGISTER DATASETS. Bone Joint J. 2011;93–B:293–297.
  • Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, et al. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:315–318.
  • Bronshteyn YS. Value-based healthcare. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1490–1491.
  • Liow MHL, Goh GS-H, Wong MK, et al. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2942–2951.
  • Liow MHL, Xia Z, Wong MK, et al. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:2373–2377.
  • Song E-K, Seon J-K, Park S-J, et al. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1069–1076.
  • Park SE, Lee CT. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1054–1059.
  • Yim J-H, Song E-K, Khan MS, et al. A comparison of classical and anatomical total knee alignment methods in robotic total knee arthroplasty: classical and anatomical knee alignment methods in TKA. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:932–937.
  • Kim K-I, Kim D-K, Juh H-S, et al. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2016;22:446–452.
  • Yang HY, Seon JK, Shin YJ, et al. Robotic total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining implant: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9:169.
  • Liow MHL, Chin PL, Tay KJD, et al. Early experiences with robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the DigiMatchTM ROBODOC® surgical system. Singapore Med J. 2014;55:529–534.
  • Song E-K, Seon J-K, Yim J-H, et al. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:118–126.
  • Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, et al. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee. 2002;9:173–180.
  • Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, et al. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:573–579.
  • Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A, et al. Patient satisfaction outcomes after robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a short-term evaluation. J Knee Surg. 2017;30:849–853.
  • Sodhi N. The learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(1):17-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608809.
  • Marchand RC, Khlopas A, Sodhi N, et al. Difficult cases in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a case series. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(1):27-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608839.
  • Suero EM, Plaskos C, Dixon PL, et al. Adjustable cutting blocks improve alignment and surgical time in computer assisted total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(9):1736-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1752-1.
  • Koenig JA, Suero EM, Plaskos C. Surgical accuracy and efficiency of computer-navigated TKA with a robotic cutting guide – report on the first 100 cases. Orthop Proc. 2012;94–B. Available from: https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/abs/10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XLIV.CAOS2011-103
  • Liow MHL, Goh GS-H, Wong MK, et al. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;25:2942–2951.
  • Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated soft tissue protection. Surg Technol Int. 2017;30:441–446,
  • Sultan AA, Piuzzi N, Khlopas A, et al. Utilization of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty for soft tissue protection. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14(12):925-927. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1392237.
  • Pietrzak J, Konan S, Kayani B, et al. Reduced iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-surgeon comparison. Orthop Res Soc. New Orleans, LA. 2018.
  • Chun YS, Kim KI, Cho YJ, et al. Causes and patterns of aborting a robot-assisted arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:621–625.
  • Sodhi N. Patient satisfaction outcomes after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a short-term evaluation. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(9):849-853. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607450.
  • Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:45–51.
  • Bhandari M, Smith J, Miller LE, et al. Clinical and economic burden of revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;5:89–94.
  • Epstein S, Sparer EH, Tran BN, et al. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons and interventionalists. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:e174947.
  • Abdollahzade F, Mohammadi F, Dianat I, et al. Working posture and its predictors in operating room nurses. Heal Promot Perspect. 2016;6:17–22.
  • Alqahtani SM, Alzahrani MM, Tanzer M. Adult reconstructive surgery: a high-risk profession for work-related injuries. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1194–1198.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.