95
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Repeatability assessment of biometric measurements with different refractive states and age using a swept-source biometer

, , , &
Pages 63-69 | Received 10 Sep 2018, Accepted 06 Dec 2018, Published online: 18 Dec 2018

References

  • Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472–485.
  • Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(1):13–17.
  • Sahin A, Hamrah P. Clinically relevant biometry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(1):47–53.
  • Olsen T. Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(1):84–87.
  • Shen PY, Zheng YF, Ding XH, et al. Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(2):180–187.
  • Lim LS, Chua S, Tan PT, et al. Eye size and shape in newborn children and their relation to axial length and refraction at 3 years [Article]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(4):414–423.
  • Read SA, Collins MJ, Woodman EC, et al. Axial length changes during accommodation in myopes and emmetropes. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(9):656–662.
  • Read SA, Collins MJ, Iskander DR. Diurnal variation of axial length, intraocular pressure, and anterior eye biometrics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(7):2911–2918.
  • Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, et al. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(10):2224–2232.
  • Ferrer-Blasco T, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Monsálvez-Romín D, et al. Ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Int Ophthalmol. 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0813-y
  • McBrien NA, Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986;6(2):145–149.
  • Shneor E, Millodot M, Avraham O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the L80 autorefractometer. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(1):66–71.
  • Emerson JH, Tompkins K. Taking measurements: white-to-white measurement. In: Carl Zeiss Meditec I, editor. IOLMaster: a practical operation guide. p. 26. Available from: https://www.doctor-hill.com/physicians/docs/IOLMaster_Practical_Operation_Guide.pdf
  • Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(6):367–375.
  • McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(12):2598–2604.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310.
  • Rozema JJ, Wouters K, Mathysen DG, et al. Overview of the repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of the biometry values provided by various ophthalmic devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;158(6):1111–1120 e1.
  • Haigis W. IOL power calculations. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(2):400–401.
  • Kummelil M, Das S, Thakkar M, et al. Repeatability and agreement of four biometers for measuring various anterior segment parameters. J Vis Sci. 2015;1(2):9–14.
  • Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, et al. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):76–83.
  • Kurian M, Negalur N, Das S, et al. Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(4):577–581.
  • Garza-Leon M, Fuentes-de la Fuente HA, Garcia-Trevino AV. Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens. Int Ophthalmol. 2016;37(5):1133–1138.
  • Ferrer-Blasco T, Dominguez-Vicent A, Esteve-Taboada JJ, et al. Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(2):343–349.
  • Kiraly L, Stange J, Kunert KS, et al. Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness and keratometry measurements between four different devices. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:6181405.
  • Sel S, Stange J, Kaiser D, et al. Repeatability and agreement of scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(5):318–322.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.