Identifying the benefits and risks of emerging integration methods for upper limb prosthetic devices in the United States: an environmental scan

References

• Cordella F, Ciancio AL, Sacchetti R, et al. Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, et al. Estimating the Prevalence of Limb Loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95(8):875–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Incidence, acute care length of stay, and discharge to rehabilitation of traumatic amputee patients: an epidemiologic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petri RP, Aguila E. The military upper extremity amputee. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2002;13(1):17–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Prevalence and characteristics of phantom limb pain and residual limb pain in the long term after upper limb amputation. Int J Rehabi Res. 2010;33(3):279–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishbaugh D, Dillingham TR, Howard RS, et al. Amputee soldiers and their return to active duty. Mil Med. 1995;160(2):82–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote CE, MacKinnon J, Robbins C, et al. Long-term health and quality of life experiences of Vietnam veterans with combat-related limb loss. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(12):2853–2861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demet K, Martinet N, Guillemin F, et al. Health related quality of life and related factors in 539 persons with amputation of upper and lower limb. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(9):480–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey SL, Lura DJ, Highsmith MJ, et al. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: systematic literature review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):247–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kung TA, Bueno RA, Alkhalefah GK, et al. Innovations in prosthetic interfaces for the upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):1515–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Huang HH, Winslow A, et al. Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berning K, Cohick S, Johnson R, et al. Comparison of body-powered voluntary opening and voluntary closing prehensor for activities of daily life. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(2):253–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohnishi K, Weir RF, Kuiken TA. Neural machine interfaces for controlling multifunctional powered upper-limb prostheses. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;4(1):43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31(3):236–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TW, Hagen AD, Wood MB. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(4):619–622.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik L, Meucci MR, Lieberman-Klinger S, et al. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(4):710–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peay HL, Hollin I, Fischer R, et al. A community-engaged approach to quantifying caregiver preferences for the benefits and risks of emerging therapies for duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Ther. 2014;36(5):624–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2017). Plan for issuance of patient-focused drug development guidance under 21st Century Cures Act Title III Section 3002. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/UCM563618.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson FR, Zhou M. Patient preferences in regulatory benefit-risk assessments: A US Perspective. Value Health. 2016;19(6):741–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weernink MGM, Janus S, van Til JA, et al. A systematic review to identify the use of preference elicitation methods in healthcare decision making. Pharm Med. 2014;28(4):175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Devices and Radiological Health and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (2016). Patient preference information – voluntary submission, review in premarket approval applications, humanitarian device exemption applications, and de novo requests, and inclusion in decision summaries and device labeling. Available from: https://www-fda-gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm446680.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bridges JFP, Onukwugha E, Johnson FR, et al. Patient preference methods – A patient centered evaluation paradigm. ISPOR Connections. 2007;13(6):4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Graham P, Evitts T, Thomas-MacLean R. Environmental scans. Can Family Physician. 2008;54(7):1022–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowel R, Moore ND, Nowrojee S, et al. The utility of the environmental scan for public health practice: lessons from an urban program to increase cancer screening. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(4):527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayan M, Lo S, Richter S, et al. Community-based participatory research: ameliorating conflict when community and research practices meet. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(2):259–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 53–80.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson P, Wijk U, Björkman A, et al. A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14(6):439–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier A, Yang J. Design, control, and sensory feedback of externally powered hand prostheses: a literature review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2013;41(2):161–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirulla AI, Bragonzoni L, Zaffagnini S, et al. Virtual simulation of an osseointegrated trans-humeral prosthesis: a falling scenario. Injury. 2018;49(4):784–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson S, Caine-Winterberger K, Brånemark R. Osseointegration amputation prostheses on the upper limbs: methods, prosthetics and rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(2):190–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillander J, Hagberg K, Hagberg L, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants for limb prostheses attachments: infectious complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(10):2781–2788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl SM, Christie BP, Kelly B, et al. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12(1):53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheesborough JE, Smith LH, Kuiken TA, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation and advanced prosthetic arms. Semin Plast Surg. 2015;29(1):62–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl SM, Chestek CA, Kelly B, et al. Factors associated with interest in novel interfaces for upper limb prosthesis control. PLoS One. 2017;12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciancio AL, Cordella F, Barone R, et al. Control of prosthetic hands via the peripheral nervous system. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendelken S, Page DM, Davis T, et al. Restoration of motor control and proprioceptive and cutaneous sensation in humans with prior upper-limb amputation via multiple Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays (USEAs) implanted in residual peripheral arm nerves. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill DR, Lockhart J, Troyk PR, et al. Development of an implantable myoelectric sensor for advanced prosthesis control. Artif Organs. 2011;35(3):249–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker JJ, Scheme E, Englehart K, et al. Continuous detection and decoding of dexterous finger flexions with implantable myoelectric sensors. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18(4):424–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargrove LJ, Englehart K, Hudgins B. A comparison of surface and intramuscular myoelectric signal classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:847–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, et al. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006;442:164–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins DJ, Heard DCY, Donovan WH. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper limb loss and their reported research priorities. J Prosthet Orthot. 1996;8:2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disability Rehabi Assistive Technol. 2007;2(6):346–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, et al. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):719–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen EM, Benz HL, Tsai J, et al. Identifying and prioritizing concerns associated with prosthetic devices for use in a benefit-risk assessment: a mixed-methods approach. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15(5):385–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Muderis M, Lu W, Tetsworth K, et al. Single-stage osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower limb amputees: the Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-2 (OGAAP-2) for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aszmann OC, Vujaklija I, Roche AD, et al. Elective amputation and bionic substitution restore functional hand use after critical soft tissue injuries. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Catalan M, Håkansson B, Brånemark R. An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor controlof artificial limbs. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(257):257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aszmann OC, Roche AD, Salminger S, et al. Bionic reconstruction to restore hand function after brachial plexus injury: a case series of three patients. Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2183–2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollin IL, Young C, Hanson C, et al. Developing a patient-centered benefit-risk survey: a community-engaged approach. Value in Health. 2016;15(6):751–757.
   Google Scholar