Mechanical circulatory support for the right ventricle in combination with a left ventricular assist device

References

• Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1080–1086. PubMed PMID: 28942782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirklin JK, Xie R, Cowger J, et al. Second annual report from the ISHLT mechanically assisted circulatory support registry. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(6):685–691. PubMed PMID: 29550146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda K, Takayama H, Colombo PC, et al. Late right heart failure during support with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices adversely affects post-transplant outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(5):667–674. PubMed PMID: 25577566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loforte A, Grigioni F, Marinelli G. The risk of right ventricular failure with current continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14(12):969–983. PubMed PMID: 29172742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MB, Goldstein J, Milano C, et al. Benefits of a novel percutaneous ventricular assist device for right heart failure: the prospective RECOVER RIGHT study of the Impella RP device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1549–1560. PubMed PMID: 26681124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Einhorn BN, Cohen HA. Current status of percutaneous right ventricular assist devices: first-in-man use of a novel dual lumen cannula. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88(3):390–396. PubMed PMID: 26895620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstam MA, Kiernan MS, Bernstein D, et al. Evaluation and management of right-sided heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(20):e578–e622. PubMed PMID: 29650544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukucka M, Stepanenko A, Potapov E, et al. Impact of tricuspid valve annulus dilation on mid-term survival after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31(9):967–971. PubMed PMID: 22884383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milano C, Pagani FD, Slaughter MS, et al. Clinical outcomes after implantation of a centrifugal flow left ventricular assist device and concurrent cardiac valve procedures. Circulation. 2014;130(11 Suppl 1):S3–11. PubMed PMID: 25200052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piacentino V 3rd, Ganapathi AM, Stafford-Smith M, et al. Utility of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures for patients undergoing implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(5):1217–1221. PubMed PMID: 22938779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapov EV, Stepanenko A, Dandel M, et al. Tricuspid incompetence and geometry of the right ventricle as predictors of right ventricular function after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27(12):1275–1281. PubMed PMID: 19059106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke MA, Givertz MM. Assessment and management of heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. Circulation. 2014;129(10):1161–1166. PubMed PMID: 24615964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitto JD, Pya Y, Zimpfer D, et al. Long-term evaluation of a fully magnetically levitated circulatory support device for advanced heart failure-two-year results from the HeartMate 3 CE mark study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(1):90–97. PubMed PMID: 30052304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra MR, Goldstein DJ, Uriel N, et al. Two-year outcomes with a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1386–1395. PubMed PMID: 29526139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel ND, Weiss ES, Schaffer J, et al. Right heart dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation: a comparison of the pulsatile HeartMate I and axial-flow HeartMate II devices. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(3):832–840. discussion −40. PubMed PMID: 18721570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers JG, Pagani FD, Tatooles AJ, et al. Intrapericardial left ventricular assist device for advanced heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(5):451–460. PubMed PMID: 28146651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(23):2241–2251. PubMed PMID: 19920051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kormos RL, Teuteberg JJ, Pagani FD, et al. Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(5):1316–1324. PubMed PMID: 20132950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atluri P, Goldstone AB, Fairman AS, et al. Predicting right ventricular failure in the modern, continuous flow left ventricular assist device era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(3):857–863. discussion 63–4. PubMed PMID: 23791165; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4111251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman OII, Akin S, Muslem R, et al. Derivation and validation of a novel right-sided heart failure model after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: the EUROMACS (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support) right-sided heart failure risk score. Circulation. 2018;137(9):891–906. PubMed PMID: 28847897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JR 3rd, Frederick JR, Hiesinger W, et al. Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(4):971–977. PubMed PMID: 19327526; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3232461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland JC Jr., Naftel DC, Reece TB, et al. Survival after biventricular assist device implantation: an analysis of the interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support database. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30(8):862–869. PubMed PMID: 21621423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, et al. The fourth INTERMACS annual report: 4,000 implants and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31(2):117–126. PubMed PMID: 22305376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshioka D, Takayama H, Garan RA, et al. Contemporary outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device for severe right heart failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device insertion. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;24(6):828–834. PubMed PMID: 28329284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorsandi M, Schroder J, Daneshmand M, et al. Outcomes of extra-corporeal right ventricular assist with durable left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018. PubMed PMID: 30582926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasin T, Marmor Y, Kremers W, et al. Readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(2):153–163. PubMed PMID: 23219299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapelios CJ, Charitos C, Kaldara E, et al. Late-onset right ventricular dysfunction after mechanical support by a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1604–1610. PubMed PMID: 26163154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda K, Takayama H, Colombo PC, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of late right heart failure during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(8):1024–1032. PubMed PMID: 25935438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich JD, Gosev I, Patel CB, et al. The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with late right-sided heart failure in patients supported with an axial-flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(1):50–58. PubMed PMID: 27746085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng A, Williamitis CA, Slaughter MS. Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3(6):573–581. PubMed PMID: 25512897; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4250555.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takeda K, Naka Y, Yang JA, et al. Timing of temporary right ventricular assist device insertion for severe right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. Asaio J. 2013;59(6):564–569. PubMed PMID: 24088902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek S, Sims DB, Markham DW, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function in left ventricular assist device candidates. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(2):379–389. PubMed PMID: 24642920; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3961845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan MS, Grandin EW, Brinkley M Jr., et al. Early right ventricular assist device use in patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: incidence and risk factors from the interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10(10). PubMed PMID: 29021348; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5717751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitta D, Kinugawa K, Imamura T, et al. A useful scoring system for predicting right ventricular assist device requirement among patients with a paracorporeal left ventricular assist device. Int Heart J. 2018;59(5):983–990. PubMed PMID: 30158383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang PC, Haft JW, Romano MA, et al. Cluster analysis of preoperative echocardiographic findings and outcomes following left ventricular device implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PubMed PMID: 30739772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos AP, Kelkar A, Weinberger JF, et al. Validation of clinical scores for right ventricular failure prediction after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1595–1603. PubMed PMID: 26123950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen RJ, Halbreiner MS, Zhang L, et al. Mechanical circulatory support for the right ventricle in the setting of a left ventricular assist device. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;11(6):587–593. PubMed PMID: 25019691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur NK, Esposito ML, Bader Y, et al. Mechanical circulatory support devices for acute right ventricular failure. Circulation. 2017;136(3):314–326. PubMed PMID: 28716832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschka H, Holthaus AJ, Sindermann JR, et al. Can perioperative right ventricular support prevent postoperative right heart failure in patients with biventricular dysfunction undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(3):619–626. PubMed PMID: 27321789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer Q, Kirsch M. Liberal right ventricular assist device extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device placement. Asaio J. 2018;64(6):741–747. PubMed PMID: 29210774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar JF, Swartz MF, Schiralli MP, et al. Survival after left ventricular assist device with and without temporary right ventricular support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(6):2155–2159. PubMed PMID: 24035303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito S, Sakaguchi T, Miyagawa S, et al. Recovery of right heart function with temporary right ventricular assist using a centrifugal pump in patients with severe biventricular failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31(8):858–864. PubMed PMID: 22609185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisenko O, Wylie G, Payne J, et al. Thoratec CentriMag for temporary treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock or severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Asaio J. 2014;60(5):487–497. PubMed PMID: 25010916; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4154791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidenfrost J, Prasad S, Itoh A, et al. Right ventricular assist device with membrane oxygenator support for right ventricular failure following implantable left ventricular assist device placement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(1):73–77. PubMed PMID: 25877948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Morris DL, Tang D, et al. Outcomes of patients with right ventricular failure requiring short-term hemodynamic support with the Impella RP device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(12):1448–1458. PubMed PMID: 30241890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur NK, Paruchuri V, Jagannathan A, et al. Mechanical circulatory support for right ventricular failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1(2):127–134. PubMed PMID: 24621838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmack B, Weymann A, Popov AF, et al. Concurrent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and percutaneous temporary RVAD support via CardiacAssist Protek-Duo TandemHeart to preempt right heart failure. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2016;22:53–57. . PubMed PMID: 27145697; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4913730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichandran AK, Baran DA, Stelling K, et al. Outcomes with the Tandem Protek Duo dual-lumen percutaneous right ventricular assist device. Asaio J. 2018;64(4):570–572. PubMed PMID: 29095736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noly PE, Kirsch M, Quessard A, et al. Temporary right ventricular support following left ventricle assist device implantation: a comparison of two techniques. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(1):49–55. PubMed PMID: 24659551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Sirat AS, Moritz A, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as perioperative right ventricular support in patients with biventricular failure undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39(6):939–944. discussion 44. PubMed PMID: 21071240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riebandt J, Haberl T, Wiedemann D, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(3):590–595. PubMed PMID: 29045747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimov JH, Sunagawa G, Horvath D, et al. Limitations to chronic right ventricular assist device support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(2):651–658. PubMed PMID: 27106620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito S, Sakaguchi T, Miyagawa S, et al. Jarvik 2000 biventricular assist device conversion from old pin-shaped bearing pumps to new conical bearing pumps. J Artif Organs. 2013;16(1):105–109. PubMed PMID: 23100054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshioka D, Toda K, Yoshikawa Y, et al. Over 1200-day support with dual Jarvik 2000 biventricular assist device. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(6):1083–1084. PubMed PMID: 25228243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner P, Wirth TJ, Liebermann A, et al. First biventricular Jarvik 2000 implants (Retroauricular version) via a median sternotomy. Exp Clin Transplant. 2016;14(2):215–223. PubMed PMID: 26867583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah P, Ha R, Singh R, et al. Multicenter experience with durable biventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(9):1093–1101. PubMed PMID: 30173824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehab S, Macdonald PS, Keogh AM, et al. Long-term biventricular Heartware ventricular assist device support–case series of right atrial and right ventricular implantation outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(4):466–473. PubMed PMID: 26849954.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tran HA, Pollema TL, Silva Enciso J, et al. Durable biventricular support using right atrial placement of the Heartware HVAD. Asaio J. 2018;64(3):323–327. PubMed PMID: 28841580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulert-Grehn JJ, Lanmuller P, Schonrath F, et al. Two implantable continuous-flow ventricular assist devices in a biventricular configuration: technique and results. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27(6):938–942. PubMed PMID: 30113626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torregrossa G, Morshuis M, Varghese R, et al. Results with SynCardia total artificial heart beyond 1 year. Asaio J. 2014;60(6):626–634. PubMed PMID: 25158888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook JA, Shah KB, Quader MA, et al. The total artificial heart. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(12):2172–2180. PubMed PMID: 26793338; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4703693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch M, Mazzucotelli JP, Roussel JC, et al. Survival after biventricular mechanical circulatory support: does the type of device matter? J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31(5):501–508. PubMed PMID: 22243702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda K, Naka Y, Yang JA, et al. Outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device support for severe right heart failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(2):141–148. PubMed PMID: 23932442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coromilas EJ, Takeda K, Ando M, et al. Comparison of percutaneous and surgical right ventricular assist device support after durable left ventricular assist device insertion. J Card Fail. 2019;25(2):105–113. PubMed PMID: 30582967; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6377854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartfay SE, Dellgren G, Liden H, et al. Are biventricular assist devices underused as a bridge to heart transplantation in patients with a high risk of postimplant right ventricular failure? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153(2):360–7 e1. PubMed PMID: 27955912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz S, Unthan K, Sedlaczek M, et al. Prototype development of an implantable compliance chamber for a total artificial heart. Artif Organs. 2017;41(2):122–129. PubMed PMID: 27582339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinheyer M, Timms DL, Greatrex NA, et al. Pulsatile operation of the BiVACOR TAH - motor design, control and hemodynamics. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5659–5662. PubMed PMID: 25571279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hosoda K, Ishii K, Isoyama T, et al. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the pump parameters in the helical flow pump. J Artif Organs. 2014;17(1):9–15. PubMed PMID: 24318404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath DJ, Karimov JH, Byram NA, et al. Advantages of integrating pressure-regulating devices into mechanical circulatory support pumps. Asaio J. 2019;65(1):e1–e3. PubMed PMID: 29538013; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6128778.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuchibhotla S, Esposito ML, Breton C, et al. Acute biventricular mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(10). PubMed PMID: 29054842; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5721869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda K, Garan AR, Ando M, et al. Minimally invasive CentriMag ventricular assist device support integrated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock patients: a comparison with conventional CentriMag biventricular support configuration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52(6):1055–1061. PubMed PMID: 28651347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda K, Garan AR, Topkara VK, et al. Novel minimally invasive surgical approach using an external ventricular assist device and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in refractory cardiogenic shock. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51(3):591–596. PubMed PMID: 27818380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappalardo F, Scandroglio AM, Latib A. Full percutaneous biventricular support with two Impella pumps: the Bi-Pella approach. ESC Heart Fail. 2018;5(3):368–371. PubMed PMID: 29465166; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5933967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitto JD, Molitoris U, Haverich A, et al. Implantation of a centrifugal pump as a left ventricular assist device through a novel, minimized approach: upper hemisternotomy combined with anterolateral thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(2):511–513. PubMed PMID: 21903225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohite PN, Sabashnikov A, Raj B, et al. Minimally invasive left ventricular assist device implantation: a comparative study. Artif Organs. 2018;42(12):1125–1131. PubMed PMID: 30443997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wert L, Chatterjee A, Dogan G, et al. Minimally invasive surgery improves outcome of left ventricular assist device surgery in cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 15):S1696–S702. PubMed PMID: 30034841; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6035957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pieri M, Pappalardo F. Impella RP in the treatment of right ventricular failure: what we know and where we go. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32(5):2339–2343. PubMed PMID: 30093192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar