Clinical efficiency and safety of the oticon medical neuro cochlear implant system: a multicenter prospective longitudinal study

References

• Guevara N, Sterkers O, Bébéar JP, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the Digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;119(8):501–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todt I, Rademacher G, Grupe G, et al. Cochlear implants and 1.5 T MRI scans: the effect of diametrically bipolar magnets and screw fixation on pain. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;47(1):11. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cogan SF. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008;10(1):275–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Lella FA, Bacciu E, Pasanisi V, et al. Main Peak Interleaved Sampling (MPIS) strategy: effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(1):102–107. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashishth A, Fulcheri A, Prasad SC, et al. Cochlear implantation in cochlear ossification: retrospective review of etiologies, surgical considerations, and auditory outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(1):17–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen Y, Miroir M, Kazmitcheff G, et al. Cochlear implant insertion forces in microdissected human cochlea to evaluate a prototype array. Audiol Neurotol. 2012;17(5):290–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bento RF, Danieli F, de Matos Magalhães AT, et al. Residual hearing preservation with the Evo® cochlear implant electrode array: preliminary results. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;20(4):353–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara N, Bozorg-Grayeli A, Bébéar JP, et al. The Voice Track multiband single-channel modified Wiener-filter noise reduction system for cochlear implants: patients’ outcomes and subjective appraisal. Int J Audiology. 2016;55(8):431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozorg-Grayeli A, Guevara N, Bébéar JP, et al. Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(9):2363–2371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;95(2):1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano C, Friedmann DR, Fang Y, et al. Performance plateau in prelingually and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(3):334–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa ST, Ruckenstein MJ. Comparing the performance plateau in adult cochlear implant patients using HINT and AzBio. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(4):598–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwolan TA, Henion K, Segel P, et al. The role of age on cochlear implant performance, use, and health utility: A multicenter clinical trial. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(9):1560–1568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Vidal V, Parietti-Winkler C, Guevara N, et al. The Oticon Medical Neuro Zti cochlear implant and the Neuro 2 sound processor: multicentric evaluation of outcomes in adults and children. Int J Audiol. 2020;59(2):153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen NL, Hoffman RA, Stroschein M. Medical or surgical complications related to the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988;97(Suppl 2):8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen S, Anthonsen K, Stangerup SE, et al. Unexpected findings and surgical complications in 505 consecutive cochlear implantations: A proposal for reporting consensus. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(5):540–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinetti A, Gharbia DB, Mancini J, et al. Cochlear implant complications in 403 patients: comparative study of adults and children and review of the literature. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131(3):177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen H, Walshe P, Glynn F, et al. Occurrence of major complications after cochlear implant surgery in Ireland. Cochlear Implants Int. 2018;19(6):297–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaillancourt V, Laroche C, Mayer C, et al. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. Int J Audiol. 2005;44(6):358–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JB, Dau T. The Danish hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol. 2011;50(3):202–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli SD, Wong LLN. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(6):356–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House WF. Cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1976;85(Suppl 27):1–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FR, Chien WW, Li L, et al. Cochlear implantation in older adults. Med. 2012;91(5):229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theunissen M, Swanepoel DW, Hanekom J. Sentence recognition in noise: variables in compilation and interpretation of tests. Int J Audiol. 2009;48(11):743–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yund EW, Woods DL. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception. Ear Hear. 2010;31(6):769–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majdani O, Schuman TA, Haynes DS, et al. Time of cochlear implant surgery in academic settings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(2):254–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett ML, Sweeney AD, Haynes DS, et al. The utility of a predictive model for cochlear implant operating time. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(2):e104–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puram SV, Kozin ED, Sethi RK, et al. Influence of trainee participation on operative times for adult and pediatric cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2015;16(3):175–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oticon Medical. 2019 Reliability Report. [cited 2020 Jun 25]. Available from: https://wdh01.azureedge.net/-/media/medical/main/files/for-professionals/ci/reliability-report/212099uk_pbr_reliability-report_2019_version_b_2019-09_low-final_2019-09-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Luxford WM. Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;124(2):125–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson GE, Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Dis. 1962;27(1):62–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bierer JA, Spindler E, Bierer SM, et al. An examination of sources of variability across the consonant-nucleus-consonant test in cochlear implant listeners. Trends Hear. 2016;30(20):2331216516646556.
   Google Scholar
• Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Litvak LM, et al. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear. 2012;33(1):112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar