Computer-assisted surgery in medical and dental applications

References

• Ivanov M, Ciurea AV. Neuronavigation principles surgical technique. J Med Life. 2009;2(1):29–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malham GM, Wells-Quinn T. What should my hospital buy next? -guidelines for the acquisition and application of imaging, navigation, and robotics for spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(1):155–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:92–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor JL, Bloom DA, William T. Bovie and electrosurgery. Surgery. 1996;119(4):390–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle WK. Low end interactive image-directed neurosurgery update on rudimentary augmented reality used in epilepsy surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;29:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mezger U, Jendrewski C, Bartels M. Navigation in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398(4):501–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enchev Y. Neuronavigation: geneology, reality, and prospects. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(3):E11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganslandt O, Behari S, Gralla J, et al. Neuronavigation: concept, techniques and applications. Neurol India. 2002;50(3):244–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman M, Murad GJA, Mocco J. Early history of the stereotactic apparatus in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(3):E12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeds NE, Kieffer SA. Evolution of diagnostic neuroradiology from 1904 to 1999. Radiology. 2000;217(2):309–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandy WE. Ventriculography following the injection of air into the cerebral ventricles. Ann Surg. 1918;68(1):5–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunert P. From the idea to its realization: the evolution of minimally invasive techniques in neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:171369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enchev YP, Popov RV, Romansky KV, et al. Cranial neuronavigation–a step forward or a step aside in modern neurosurgery. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2008;50(2):5–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conti Nibali M, Rossi M, Sciortino T, et al. Preoperative surgical planning of glioma: limitations and reliability of fMRI and DTI tractography. J Neurosurg Sci. 2019;63(2):127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R. Implementation of fiber tract navigation. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(1 Suppl):306–317. discussion 317–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salma A, Makiese O, Sammet S, et al. Effect of registration mode on neuronavigation precision: an exploration of the role of random error. Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(4):172–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir RR, Freiman M, Joskowicz L, et al. Surface-based facial scan registration in neuronavigation procedures: a clinical study. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(6):1201–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meola A, Cutolo F, Carbone M, et al. Augmented reality in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40(4):537–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King AP, Edwards PJ, Maurer Jr. CR, et al. A system for microscope-assisted guided interventions. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1999;72(2–4):107–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockro RA, Tsai YT, Ng I, et al. Dex-ray: augmented reality neurosurgical navigation with a handheld video probe. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(4):795–807. discussion 807–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iseki H, Masutani Y, Iwahara M, et al. Volumegraph (overlaid three-dimensional image-guided navigation). clinical application of augmented reality in neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;68(1–4):18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue D, Cho B, Mori M, et al. Preliminary study on the clinical application of augmented reality neuronavigation. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2013;74(2):71–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cabrilo I, Bijlenga P, Schaller K. Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: technique assessment and considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156(9):1769–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masutani Y, Dohi T, Yamane F, et al. Augmented reality visualization system for intravascular neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3(5):239–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cabrilo I, Bijlenga P, Schaller K. Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral aneurysms: a technical report. Neurosurgery. 2014;10(Suppl 2):252–260. discussion 260–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cabrilo I, Schaller K, Bijlenga P. Augmented reality-assisted bypass surgery: embracing minimal invasiveness. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(4):596–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovo EE, Quintana JC, Puebla MC, et al. A novel, inexpensive method of image coregistration for applications in image-guided surgery using augmented reality. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(4):366–371. discussion 371–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurimoto M, Hayashi N, Kamiyama H, et al. Impact of neuronavigation and image-guided extensive resection for adult patients with supratentorial malignant astrocytomas: a single-institution retrospective study. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004;47(5):278–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wirtz CR, Albert FK, Schwaderer M, et al. The benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery. Neurol Res. 2000;22(4):354–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz C, Waldeck S, Mauer UM. Intraoperative image guidance in neurosurgery: development, current indications, and future trends. Radiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:197364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maciunas RJ. Computer-assisted neurosurgery. Clin Neurosurg. 2006;53:267–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tursynov N, Grigolashvili M, Kauynbekova S, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of neuronavigation in surgical treatment of glial tumors. Georgian Med News. 2017;262:14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ferroli P, Tringali G, Acerbi F, et al. Advanced 3-dimensional planning in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl 1):54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung T-Y, Jung S, Kim I-Y, et al. Application of neuronavigation system to brain tumor surgery with clinical experience of 420 cases. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006;49(4):210–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wadley J, Dorward N, Kitchen N, et al. Pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance in modern neurosurgery: a review of 300 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81(4):217–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleologos TS, Wadley JP, Kitchen ND, et al. Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(1):40–47. discussion 47–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omay SB, Barnett GH. Surgical navigation for meningioma surgery. J Neurooncol. 2010;99(3):357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajmera S, Motiwala M, Khan NR, et al. Image guidance for ventricular shunt surgery: an analysis of hospital charges. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(4):E765–E770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem U, Kumar VA, Madewell JE, et al. Neurosurgical applications of MRI guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). Cancer Imaging. 2019;19(1):65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jethwa PR, Barrese JC, Gowda A, et al. Magnetic resonance thermometry-guided laser-induced thermal therapy for intracranial neoplasms: initial experience. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(133–144):144–145.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt R, Gamble A, Black K, et al. Complication avoidance in laser interstitial thermal therapy: lessons learned. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(4):1238–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzmaier H-J, Eickmeyer F, von Tempelhoff W, et al. MR-guided laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: preliminary results in 16 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2006;59(2):208–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee C, Snelling B, Berger MH, et al. The role of magnetic resonance-guided laser ablation in neurooncology. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(2):192–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier A, McNichols RJ, Stafford RJ, et al. Laser thermal therapy: real-time MRI-guided and computer-controlled procedures for metastatic brain tumors. Lasers Surg Med. 2011;43(10):943–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmathulla G, Recinos PF, Valerio JE, et al. Laser interstitial thermal therapy for focal cerebral radiation necrosis: a case report and literature review. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012;90(3):192–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao MS, Hargreaves EL, Khan AJ, et al., Magnetic resonance-guided laser ablation improves local control for postradiosurgery recurrence and/or radiation necrosis. Neurosurgery discussion 667. 2014;74(6): 658–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang JY, Wu C, Tracy J, et al. Laser interstitial thermal therapy for medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2016;57(2):325–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems PWA, van der Sprenkel JWB, Tulleken CAF, et al. Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours. J Neurol. 2006;253(9):1123–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard IJ, Kersten-Oertel M, Petrecca K, et al. Brain shift in neuronavigation of brain tumors: A review. Med Image Anal. 2017;35:403–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancho-Puchades M, Alfaro FH, Naenni N, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted implant planning and placement in partially edentulous patients. part 2: patient related outcome measures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(4):e99–e110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider D, Sancho-Puchades M, Schober F, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted implant planning and placement in partially edentulous patients. part 3: time and cost analyses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(3):e71–e82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider D, Sancho-Puchades M, Mir-Marí J, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted implant planning and placement in partially edentulous patients. part 4: accuracy of implant placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(4):e111–e122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber DA, Belser UC. Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1995;16:798–802.
   Google Scholar
• Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(2):119–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT) part I. on subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(2):265–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(3):461–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeschi PW, Schmidt N, Guevara-Rojas G, et al. Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17(1):317–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozemre MO, Gulsahi A. Comparison of the accuracy of full head cone beam CT images obtained using a large field of view and stitched images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018;47(7):20170454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Lambrichts I, Sun Y, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). part II: on 3D model accuracy. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(2):270–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Pişkin B, et al. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. part II: reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(6):907–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Kang SH, Lee EH, et al. Accuracy and validity of stitching sectional cone beam computed tomographic images. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(4):1071–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is digital guided implant surgery accurate and reliable? Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(3):381–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiatkroekkrai P, Takolpuckdee C, Subbalekha K, et al.. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(3):377–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):328–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(3):313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, et al. Predictability of a three dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Deto Maxillo Facial Radiol. 1999;28(2):105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, et al. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17(5):663–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, et al. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(Suppl 11):69–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, et al. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):527–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida EO, Pellizzer EP, Goiatto MC, et al. Computer-guided surgery in implantology: review of basic concepts. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(6):1917–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontology. 2000;73(1):121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Park JM, Yi TK, Koak JY, et al. Comparison of five-axis milling and rapid prototyping for implant surgical templates. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(2):374–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, et al., Comparison of the accuracy of implant position using surgical guides fabricated by additive and subtractive techniques. J Prosthodont. 29(6): 534–541. 2020. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herschdorfer L, Negreiros WM, Gallucci GO, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020. S0022–3913(20)30235–3. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjelvold B, Mahmood DJH, Wennerberg A. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(3):498–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahmaseb A, De Clerk R, Wismeijer D. Computer-guided implant placement: 3D planning software, fixed intraoral reference points, and CAD/CAM technology. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(3):541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, et al. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(6):630–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laederach V, Mukaddam K, Payer M, et al. Deviations of different systems for guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(9):1147–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abduo J, Lau D. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in anterior and posterior sites by clinicians new to implant dentistry: in vitro comparison of fully guided, pilot-guided, and freehand protocols. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6(1):10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell CK, Sahl EF, Kim YJ, et al. Accuracy of implants placed with surgical guides: thermoplastic versus 3D printed. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(1):113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickennig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J, et al. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method- a combined in vivo – in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (part II). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38(7):488–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan PLB, Layton DM, Wise SL. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique. Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(2):87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smitkarn P, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, et al. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(9):949–957. Sep;.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider D, Sancho-Puchades M, Benic GI, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted implant planning and placement in partially edentulous patients. part 1: clinician-related outcome measures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(Suppl):s49–s57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, et al., Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 29(suppl): 25–42. 2014. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, et al. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(11):1191–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(3):181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu LW, You J, Zhang JX, et al. Impact of surgical template on the accuracy of implant placement. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(8):641–646.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin CC, Ishikawa M, Maida T, et al. Stereolithographic surgical guide with a combination of tooth and bone support: accuracy of guided implant surgery in distal extension situation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(9):816–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühl S, Zürcher S, Mahid T, et al. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(7):763–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Chen Z, Chan HL, et al. Does flap opening or not influence the accuracy of semi-guided implant placement in partially edentulous sites? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(6):1253–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, et al. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(2):394–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, et al. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(4):398–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(4):416–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley NE, Kennedy K, McGlumphy EA, et al. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; Mar;28(2):563–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen P, Zhao J, Fan L, et al. Accuracy evaluation of computer-designed surgical guide template in oral implantology. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(10):2189–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzoubi F, Massoomi N, Nattestad A. Accuracy assessment of immediate and delayed implant placements using CAD/CAM surgical guides. J Oral Implantol. 2016;42(5):391–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naziri E, Schramm A, Wilde F. Accuracy of computer-assisted implant placement with insertion templates. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016;5:Doc15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derksen W, Wismeijer D, Flügge T, et al. The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning A prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(10):1005–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, An X, Jeong SM, et al. Accuracy of computer-guided implant placement in anterior regions. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(5):836–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjerven H, Riis UH, Herlofsson BB, et al., In vivo accuracy of implant placement using a full digital planning modality and stereolithographic guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 34(1): 124–132. 2019. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallarico M, Martinolli M, Kim Y, et al. Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using two different surgical templates designed with or without metallic sleeves: a randomized controlled trial. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7(2):41.
   Google Scholar
• Cassetta M, Altieri F, Giansanti M, et al. Is there a learning curve in static computer-assisted implant surgery? a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;23(20):30095.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft B, Frizzera F, de Freitas RM, et al., Impact of fully or partially guided surgery on the position of single implants immediately placed in maxillary incisor sockets: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 22(5): 531–637. 2020. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CC, Wu CZ, Huang MS, et al. Fully digital workflow for planning static guided implant surgery: a prospective accuracy study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrin GL, Rafael SNF, Passoni BB, et al., Clinical and tomographic comparison of dental implants placed by guided virtual surgery versus conventional technique: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 47(1): 120–128. 2020. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga E Jr, Antal M, Major L, et al. Guidance means accuracy: a randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(5):417–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yimarj P, Subbalekha K, Dhanesuan K, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(6):17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, et al. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: part I. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(6):334–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komiyama A, Pettersson A, Hultin M, et al. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(3):308–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassetta M, Pompa G, Di Carlo S, et al. The influence of smoking and surgical technique on the accuracy of mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in complete edentulous upper jaws. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(11):1546–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giacomo GA, da Silva JV, da Silva AM, et al. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. J Periodontol. 2012;83(4):410–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochi M, Kanazawa M, Sato D, et al. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43(11):1563–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira DM, Sotto-Maior BS, Barros CA, et al. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(5):1347–1351. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Wiele G, Teughels W, Vercruyssen M, et al. The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(12):1489–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng W, Liu C, Su Y, et al. Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(6):8442–8449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, et al. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(2):343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Bergé SJ, et al. An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(6):1154–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A. Accuracy of mucosa supported guided dental implant surgery. Clin Case Rep. 2018;6(11):2131–2139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski K, Ryncarz W, Yüksel O, et al. Image analysis of immediate full-arch prosthetic rehabilitations guided by a digital workflow: assessment of the discrepancy between planning and execution. Int J Implant Dent. 2019;5(1):26. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cunha RM, FÁ S, Hadad H, et al. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;25(19):30486–X.
   Google Scholar
• Vinci R, Manacorda M, Abundo R, et al. Accuracy of edentulous computer-aided implant surgery as compared to virtual planning: a retrospective multicenter study. J Clin Med. 202012;9(3):774. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(4):248–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stübinger S, Buitrago-Tellez C, Cantelmi G. Deviations between placed and planned implant positions: an accuracy pilot study of skeletally supported stereolithographic surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(4):540–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonellini G, Saez Vigo R, Novelli G. Double guided surgery in All-on-4® concept: when ostectomy is needed. Int J Dent. 2018 4;2018:2672549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Team JASP. JASP (Version 0.13.1)[Computer software] 2020.
   Google Scholar
• El Kholy K, Lazarin R, Janner SFM, et al. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(11):1067–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Kholy K, Janner SFM, Schimmel M, et al. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):101–107. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol. 2010;81(1):43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, et al., A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 14(2): 293–303. 2012. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Li J, Sinjab K, et al. Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: a cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(12):1186–1194. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):124–135. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doan NV, Du Z, Reher P, et al., Flapless dental implant surgery: a retrospective study of 1,241 consecutive implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 29(3): 650–658. 2014. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bover-Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, et al., Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 33(1): 101–115. 2018. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahmaseb A, De Clerk R, Eckert S, et al. Reference-based digital concept to restore partially edentulous patients following an immediate loading protocol: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(4):707–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahmaseb A, De Clerk R, Aartman I, et al. Digital protocol for reference-based guided surgery and immediate loading: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(5):1258–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laleman I, Bernard L, Vercruyssen M, et al. Guided implant surgery in the edentulous maxilla: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(Suppl):s102–17.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):112–123. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(7):717–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercruyssen M, De Laat A, Coucke W, et al., An RCT comparing patient-centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement. J Clin Periodontol. 41(7): 724–732. 2014. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomó-Coll O, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery a systematic review. Ann Anat. 2019;225:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faeghi Nejad M, Proussaefs P, Lozada J. Combining guided alveolar ridge reduction and guided implant placement for all-on-4 surgery: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(6):662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips K, Wong KM. Space requirements for implant-retained bar-and-clip overdentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001;22(6):516–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernard L, Vercruyssen M, Duyck J, et al., A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided with nonguided implant placement: a 3-year follow-up of implant-centered outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 121(6): 904–910. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques R. Dynamic navigation by innovative registration. Implants – Int Mag Oral Implantology. 2018;2:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Panchal N, Mahmood L, Retana A, et al. Dynamic navigation for dental implant surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019;31(4):539–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS, Lipton DI, et al. Accuracy of a dynamic dental implant navigation system in a private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):205–213. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanelli LV, mandelaris, GA D, et al. Accuracy of novel trace-registration method for dynamic navigation surgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(3):427–435. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, et al. Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):92–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaewsiri D, Panmekiate S, Subbalekha K, et al. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(6):505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(8):882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mediavilla Guzmán A, Riad Deglow E, Á Z-M, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided dynamic navigation compared to computer-aided static navigation for dental implant placement: an in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):2123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorba-García A, Figueiredo R, González-Barnadas A, et al. Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: an in-vitro study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(1):e76–e83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino G, Bellini P, Cavallini PF, et al. Dynamic navigation in dental implantology: the influence of surgical experience on implant placement accuracy and operating time. an in vitro study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):2153. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydemir CA, Arısan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(3):255–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar