Mitral valve surgery: current status and future prospects of the minimally invasive approach

References

• Carpentier AF, Adams DHFF. Carpentier’s reconstructive valve surgery: from valve analysis to valve reconstruction. 1st edition. 2010. Elsevier Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Van Praet KM, Stamm C, Sündermann SH, et al. Minimally invasive surgical mitral valve repair: state of the art review. Interv Cardiol Rev. 2018;13(1):14–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sündermann SH MD, Joerg Seeburger MD PhD, Scherman J MD, et al. Innovations in minimally invasive mitral valve repair. Surg Technol Int. 2012;22:207–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greco E, Santamaria V, Rose D, et al. Is not yet time to properly learn endoscopic mitral valve repair? Cir Cardiovasc. 2020;27(3):100–104.
   Google Scholar
• Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempfert J, Blumenstein JM, Borger MA, et al. Minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-valve implantation: the atrial transcatheter approach for re-operative mitral valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(19):2382–2387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams DH, Rosenhek R, Falk V. Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(16):1958–1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(36):2739–2786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sündermann SH, Falk V, Jacobs S. Mitral valve reconstruction - Surgical techniques and results. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012Nov;142:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Sündermann SH, et al. Minimally invasive approach for infective mitral valve endocarditis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;8(6):702–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli A, Murzi M, Canarutto D, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair through right minithoracotomy in the setting of degenerative mitral regurgitation: early outcomes and long-term follow-up. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(5):422–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welp H, Martens S. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27(1):65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thourani VH, Weintraub WS, Guyton RA, et al. Outcomes and long-term survival for patients undergoing mitral valve repair versus replacement: effect of age and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2003;108(3):298–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruvolo G, Speziale G, Bianchini R, et al. Combined coronary bypass grafting and mitral valve surgery: early and late results. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;43(2):90–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girdauskas E, Pausch J, Harmel E, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55:17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker MA, Parides MK, Perrault LP, et al. Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(1):23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmasi MY, Acharya M, Humayun N, et al. Is valve repair preferable to valve replacement in ischaemic mitral regurgitation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2016;50(1):17–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber M, Miceli A. State of the art for approaching the mitral valve: sternotomy, minimally invasive or total endoscopic robotic? Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2015;48(5):639–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanermen H, Farhat F, Wellens F, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve surgery: from port-access towards a totally endoscopic procedure. J Card Surg. 2000;15:51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Montagner M, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using external clamping — pearls and pitfalls. J Vis Surg. 2020;6:45.
   Google Scholar
• Van Praet KM, Stamm C, Sündermann SH, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery removal of an interatrial intraseptal bronchogenic cyst through a periareolar approach. Innov (Phila). 2018;13(3):230–232. http://journals.lww.com/innovjournal
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Unbehaun A, et al. Reply to Del Giglio, Tamagnini, Biondi, and Di Mauro. J Card Surg. 2020;4–7. DOI:10.1111/jocs.14998.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer A, Van Kampen A, Kiefer P, et al. Minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: propensity matched data from two centers. J Card Surg. 2020. DOI:10.1111/jocs.15177. Online ahead of print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nersesian G, Van Praet KM, Van Kampen A, et al. Surgical treatment of outflow graft kinking complicated by external obstruction with a fibrin mass in a patient with LVAD. J Card Surg. 2020;35(10):2853–2856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan EY, Lumbao DM, Iribarne A, et al. Evolution of cannulation techniques for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Innov (Phila). 2012;7(1):9–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Jacobs S, et al. The MANTA vascular closure device for percutaneous femoral vessel cannulation in minimally invasive surgical mitral valve repair. Innov. 2020;1–4. DOI:10.1177/1556984520956300.
   Google Scholar
• Ender J, Borger MA, Scholz M, et al. Cardiac surgery fast-track treatment in a postanesthetic care unit: six-month results of the leipzig fast-track concept. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(1):61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnell A, Prince M. Anaesthesia for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. BJA Educ. 2018;18(10):323–330. DOI:10.1016/j.bjae.2018.06.004.
   Google Scholar
• Szelkowski LA, Puri NK, Singh R, et al. Current trends in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of the adult cardiac surgery patient. Curr Probl Surg. 2015;52(1):531–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan MJ, Chung T, Glassford NJ, et al. Spectroscopy in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31(4):1155–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Yue J, Li M, et al. Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen endobronchial tube in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grocott HP, Darrow TR, Whiteheart DL, et al. Lung isolation during port-access cardiac surgery: double-lumen endotracheal tube versus single-lumen endotracheal tube with a bronchial blocker. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(6):725–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ender J, Sgouropoulou S. Value of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(6):796–802.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the american society of echocardiography and the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):921–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the american society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30(4):303–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(7):611–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew PG, Bounford K, Plein S, et al. Multimodality imaging for the quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8(3):342–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagendorff A, Doenst T, Falk V. Echocardiographic assessment of functional mitral regurgitation: opening Pandora’s box? ESC Hear Fail. 2019;6(4):678–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins G, Cahalan M. The impact of routine Trans-oesophageal Echocardiography (TOE) in cardiac surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23(3):263–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicoara A, Skubas N, Ad N, et al. Guidelines for the use of transesophageal echocardiography to assist with surgical decision-making in the operating room: a surgery-based approach: from the American society of echocardiography in collaboration with the society of cardiovascular anesthesi. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(6):692–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ender J, Singh R, Nakahira J, et al. Visualization of the circumflex artery in the perioperative setting with transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(1):22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Praet KM, Stamm C, Starck CT, et al. An overview of surgical treatment modalities and emerging transcatheter interventions in the management of tricuspid valve regurgitation. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;16(2):75–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaros N, Höfer D, Holfeld J, et al. Cannulation of the carotid artery for minimally invasive mitral or tricuspid valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110(6):e517–e519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby AD, Sistino JJ. Impact of pre-bypass autologous blood collection on blood transfusion rates. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2019;51(3):140–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albes JM, Stöhr IM, Kaluza M, et al. Physiological coagulation can be maintained in extracorporeal circulation by means of shed blood separation and coating. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(5):1504–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker RA, Nikolic A, Onorati F, et al. 2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery: a tool to better clinical practice. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2020;57(2):207–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranucci M, Johnson I, Willcox T, et al. Goal-directed perfusion to reduce acute kidney injury: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156(5):1918–1927.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srey R, Rance G, Shapeton AD, et al. A quick reference tool for goal-directed perfusion in cardiac surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2019;51(3):172–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siddiqi S, Blackstone EH, Bakaeen FG. Bretschneider and del Nido solutions: are they safe for coronary artery bypass grafting? If so, how should we use them? J Card Surg. 2018;33(5):229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg M, Bengtsson A, Jeppsson A. Coronary surgery without cardiotomy suction and autotransfusion reduces the postoperative systemic inflammatory response. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(1):54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercaemst L. Hemolysis in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass : a review in search of a treatment algorithm. J Extracorpor Technol. 2008;40(3):257–267.
   Google Scholar
• Blackshear P, Dorman F, Steinbach J. Some mechanical effects that influence hemolysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1965;11:112–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ringgaard S, Madsen T, Pedersen E, et al. Quantitative evaluation of flow patterns in perfusion cannulae by a new magnetic resonance imaging method. Perfusion. 1997;12(6):411–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle F, Kurtovic D, Matschke A, et al. Simulation-based training of critical events during cardiopulmonary bypass: importance of a critical events checklist. Perfus (United Kingdom). 2020. DOI:10.1177/0267659120937125
   Google Scholar
• Zang X, Huang HL, Xie B, et al. A comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition and two-dimensional high-definition video systems in totally endoscopic mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(3):788–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins RB, Mehaffey JH, Mullen MM, et al. A propensity matched analysis of robotic, minimally invasive, and conventional mitral valve surgery. Heart. 2018;1970–1975. DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N, et al. Technical challenges in totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(1):146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ailawadi G, Agnihotri AK, Mehall JR, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery i - patient selection, evaluation, and planning. Innov (Phila). 2016;11(4):243–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Der Merwe J, Casselman F, Stockman B, et al. Late redo-port access surgery after port access surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22(1):13–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rival PM, Moore THM, McAleenan A, et al. Transthoracic clamp versus endoaortic balloon occlusion in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2019;56(4):643–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbero C, Krakor R, Bentala M, et al. Comparison of endoaortic and transthoracic aortic clamping in less-invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(3):794–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aybek T, Dogan S, Westphal K, et al. Operation comparing the port-access technique and the transthoracic clamp technique. J Card Surg. 2000;15(1):76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenspurner H, Detter C, Deuse T, et al. Vedio and robotic-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery : a comparison of the port- access and transthoracic clamp techniques. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(2):485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebold A, Skrabal C, Emini R, et al. Improved outcome of minimally invasive mitral surgery with IntraClude aortic balloon occlusion compared to transthoracic clamping. Pap Present 14 ISMICS; May 28–31, 2014, Boston, MA. http://epostersonline.s3.amazonaws.com/ismics2014/ismics201409c0088NORMAL.:2
   Google Scholar
• Casselman F, Aramendi J, Bentala M, et al. Endoaortic clamping does not increase the risk of stroke in minimal access mitral valve surgery: a multicenter experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(4):1334–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atluri P, Goldstone AB, Fox J, et al. Port access cardiac operations can be safely performed with either endoaortic balloon or chitwood clamp. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1579–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi P, Rodriguez E, Clark W, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve surgery : a 12-year, 2-center experience in 1178 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;137(6):1481–1487.
   Google Scholar
• Krapf C, Wohlrab P, Häußinger S, et al. Remote access perfusion for minimally invasive cardiac surgery : to clamp or to in fl ate? †. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44(5):898–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempfert J, Meyer A, Cetinkaya A et al. Propensity matched comparison of endoclamping versus direct aortic clamping for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Pap Present 15 ISMICS; June 3–6, 2015, Berlin, Ger. [cited 2016 Jan 31]. Available from: http://meetings.ismics.org/abstracts/2015/P99.cgi
   Google Scholar
• Ad N, Holmes SD, Shuman DJ, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping and with femoral cannulation is not associated with increased risk of stroke compared with traditional mitral valve surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2015;48(6):868–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umakanthan R, Leacche M, Petracek MR, et al. Safety of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamp. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(5):1544–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, et al. Less-invasive mitral valve operations : trends and outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. ATS. 2019;90(5):1401–1410.e1.
   Google Scholar
• Mazine A, Pellerin M, Dionne P, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery : influence of aortic clamping technique on early outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(6):2116–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aybek T, Dogan S, Westphal K, et al. Operation comparing the port-access technique and the transthoracic clamp technique. J Card Surg. 2000;15(1):76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalewski M, Malvindi PG, Suwalski P, et al. Clinical safety and effectiveness of endoaortic as compared to transthoracic clamp for small thoracotomy mitral valve surgery: meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(2):676–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann A, Meyer R, Lewandowski J, et al. German heart surgery report 2017: the annual updated registry of the german society for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:331–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen AP, Miller CC, Thourani VH, et al. Less invasive mitral surgery versus conventional sternotomy stratified by mitral pathology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.145.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider F, Onnasch JF, Falk V, et al. Cerebral microemboli during minimally invasive and conventional mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(3):1094–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng DCH, Martin J, Lal A, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innov Technol Tech Cardiothorac Vasc Surg. 2011;2:84–103.
   Google Scholar
• Doenst T, Diab M, Sponholz C, et al. The opportunities and limitations of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(46):777–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akansel S, Suendermann SH, Kofler M, et al. A successful minimally invasive mitral valve repair following delayed device embolization in a patient with Pascal device implantation. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;28(2):404–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akansel S, Sündermann SH, Kofler M, et al. Surgical explantation of a partially detached cardioband device. J Card Surg. 2020;35(8):2100–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasic M, Sündermann S, Unbehaun A, et al. Beating heart mitral valve surgery: results in 120 consecutive patients considered unsuitable for conventional mitral valve surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25(4):541–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daemen JHT, Heuts S, Olsthoorn JR, et al. Right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for reoperative mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2018;54:817–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins RB, Mehaffey JH, Kessel SM, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is associated with excellent resource utilization, cost, and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156(2):611–616.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, et al. Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation. 2013;128(5):483–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Oppell UO MF. Chordal replacement for both minimally invasive and conventional mitral valve surgery using premeasured gore-tex loops. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(6):2166–2168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammie JS, Chikwe J, Badhwar V, et al. Isolated mitral valve surgery: the society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106(3):716–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sündermann SH, Czesla M, Kempfert J, et al. Results of mitral valve repair with an adjustable annuloplasty ring 2 years after implantation. Heart Vessels. 2017;32(7):843–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann S, Walther T, Kempfert J, et al. Stentless mitral valve implantation in comparison to conventional mitral valve repair or replacement at five years. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54(1):10–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chikwe J, Toyoda N, Anyanwu AC, et al. Relation of mitral valve surgery volume to repair rate, durability, and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2397–2406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillinov M, Mick S, Suri RM. The specialty of mitral valve repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(19):2407–2409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casselman FP, Van Slycke SDH, Lambrechts DL, et al. Endoscopic mitral valve repair: feasible, reproducible and durable. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:273–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davierwala PM, Seeburger J, Pfannmueller B, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: “The Leipzig experience”. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(6):744–750.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seeburger J, Borger MA, Falk V, et al. Minimal invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation: results of 1339 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:760–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammie JS, Bartus K, Gackowski A, et al. Safety and performance of a novel transventricular beating heart mitral valve repair system: 1-year outcomes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;59(1):199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummert JF, Rahmel A, Bucerius J, et al. Al. Mitral valve repair in patients with end stage cardiomyopathy: who benefits? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:1017–1022. Discussion 1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax JJ, Braun J, Somer ST, et al. Al. Restrictive annuloplasty and coronary revascularization in ischemic mitral regurgitation results in reverse left ventricular remodelling. Circulation. 2004;110(II):103–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon MH, Lee LS, Cevasco M, et al. Recurrence of mitral regurgitation after partial versus complete mitral valve ring annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Sep;146(3):616-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisano F, Alfieri O, Banai S, et al. Clinical update The future of transcatheter mitral valve interventions : competitive or complementary role of repair vs. replacement?. 2015;1651–1659. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv123.
   Google Scholar
• Walczak L, Tautz L, Neugebauer M, et al. Interactive editing of virtual chordae tendineae for the simulation of the mitral valve in a decision support system. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020. DOI:10.1007/s11548-020-02230-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugebauer M, Tautz L, Hüllebrand M, et al. Virtual downsizing for decision support in mitral valve repair. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019;14(2):357–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer A, Kofler M, Montagner M, et al. Reliability and influence on decision making of fully-automated vs. semi-automated software packages for procedural planning in TAVI. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong F, Pham T, Martin C, et al. Finite element analysis of annuloplasty and papillary muscle relocation on a patient-specific mitral regurgitation model. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi A, Rim Y, Jeffrey S, et al. A novel finite element-based patient-specific mitral valve repair: virtual ring annuloplasty. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(1):341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grbic S. et al. Multi-modal validation framework of mitral valve geometry and functional computational models. In:editors, Camara O, Mansi T, Pop M, et al. Statistical atlases and computational models of the heart - imaging and Modelling Challenges. 5th International Workshop, STACOM 2014, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2014, Boston, MA, USA, September 18, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Grbic S, Easley TF, Mansi T, et al., Personalized mitral valve closure computation and uncertainty analysis from 3D echocardiography”.
   Google Scholar
• Pouch AM, Wang H, Takabe M, et al., Fully automatic segmentation of the mitral leafets in 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images using multi-atlas joint label fusion and deformable medial m.
   Google Scholar
• Sotaquira M, Pepi M, Fusini L, et al. Semi-automated segmentation and quantification of mitral annulus and leaflets from transesophageal 3-D echocardiographic images. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Jan;41(1):251-67. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tautz L, et al. Extraction of open-state mitral valve geometry from CT volumes. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13(11):1741–1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnahan P, Ginty O, Moore J, et al. “Interactive-automatic segmentation and modelling of the mitral valve.” International Conference on Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart. Springer, Cham, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Costa E, Martins N, Saad Sultan M, et al. “Mitral Valve Leaflets Segmentation in Echocardiography using Convolutional Neural Networks*.” 2019 IEEE 6th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG), 2019 Feb 22-23: Lisbon, Portugal . p.1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer PE, Sacks MS, Nido PJ, et al. Mass-spring model for simulation of heart valve tissue mechanical behavior. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011. 6. 39(6):1668–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villard P-F, Hammer PE, Perrin DP, et al. Fast image-based mitral valve simulation from individualized geometry. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS.
   Google Scholar
• Vellguth K, et al. Development of a modeling pipeline for the prediction of hemodynamic outcome after virtual mitral valve repair using image-based CFD. Int J Computer Assisted Radiol Surgery (Springer). 2018;13(11):1795-1805. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1821-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar