Reliability and validity of smartphone applications to measure the spinal range of motion: A systematic review

References

• Norkin CC, White DJ Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry: FA Davis; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kapandji AI. The clinical evaluation of the upper limb joints’ function: back to hippocrates. Hand Clin. 2003;19(3):379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsi M, Mirzaei M, Khabiri SS. Universal goniometer and electro-goniometer intra-examiner reliability in measuring the knee range of motion during active knee extension test in patients with chronic low back pain with short hamstring muscle. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2019;11(1):4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid S, Egan B. The validity and reliability of drgoniometer, a smartphone application, for measuring forearm supination. J Hand Ther. 2019;32(1):110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullaney MJ, McHugh MP, Johnson CP, et al. Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26(5):327–333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herrero P, Carrera P, García E, et al. Reliability of goniometric measurements in children with cerebral palsy: a comparative analysis of universal goniometer and electronic inclinometer. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(1):155. A pilot study
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion: review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(12):1867–1872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion—comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):98–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness J, Schram B, Cox AJ, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the iphone® compass application to measure thoracic rotation range of motion (rom) in healthy participants. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin J, Nash M, Whatman C. Assessing dynamic knee joint range of motion using siliconcoach. Phys Ther Sport. 2006;7(4):191–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh JW, Espinosa HG, Grigg J. Evolution of smart devices and human movement apps: recommendations for use in sports science education and practice. 2016;5(2):14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brink Y, Louw QA. Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2012;18(6):1126–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasehagen B, Ellis R, Pope R, et al. Assessing the reliability of ultrasound imaging to examine peripheral nerve excursion: a systematic literature review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018;44(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark R, Locke M, Hill B, et al. Clinimetric properties of lower limb neurological impairment tests for children and young people with a neurological condition: a systematic review. PloS One. 2017;12(7):e0180031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiel F, Persson C, Furness J, et al. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry positioning protocols in assessing body composition: a systematic review of the literature. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(10):1038–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Kobayashi S, Simic M, et al. Non-radiographic methods of measuring global sagittal balance: a systematic review. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017;12(1):30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett E, McCreesh K, Lewis J. Reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of thoracic kyphosis measurement: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2014;19(1):10–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC Statistical methods for rates and proportions. john wiley & sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mukaka MM. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinley JL, Baker R, Wolfe R, et al. The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009;29(3):360–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh JW, Cox A, Anderson S, et al. Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: a systematic review. PloS One. 2019;14(5):e0215806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedekar N, Suryawanshi M, Rairikar S, et al. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(2):161–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidetti L, Placentino U, Baldari C. Reliability and criterion validity of the smartphone inclino meter application to quantify cervical spine mobility. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(10):E1359–E66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolber MJ, Pizzini M, Robinson A, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of measurements used to quantify lumbar spine mobility: an analysis of an iphone® application and gravity based inclinometry. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(2):129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pourahmadi MR, Bagheri R, Taghipour M, et al. A new iphone application for measuring active craniocervical range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain: a reliability and validity study. Spine J. 2018;18(3):447–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourahmadi MR, Taghipour M, Jannati E, et al. Reliability and validity of an iphone® application for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quek J, Brauer SG, Treleaven J, et al. Validity and intra-rater reliability of an android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodríguez-Sanz J, Carrasco-Uribarren A, Cabanillas-Barea S, et al. Validity and reliability of two smartphone applications to measure the lower and upper cervical spine range of motion in subjects with chronic cervical pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(4):619–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenneberg MS, Busstra H, Eskes M, et al. Concurrent validity and interrater reliability of a new smartphone application to assess 3d active cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;34:59–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Boutin N, Dion AM, et al. Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iphone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10(1):69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ullucci PA, Tudini F, Moran MF. Reliability of smartphone inclinometry to measure upper cervical range of motion. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akizuki K, Yamaguchi K, Morita Y, et al. The effect of proficiency level on measurement error of range of motion. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(9):2644–2651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mourcou Q, Fleury A, Franco C, et al. Performance evaluation of smartphone inertial sensors measurement for range of motion. Sensors. 2015;15(9):23168–23187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luinge HJ, Veltink PH, Baten CT. Ambulatory measurement of arm orientation. J Biomech. 2007;40(1):78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar