Hearables, in-ear sensing devices for bio-signal acquisition: a narrative review

References

• Mase M, Micarelli A, Strapazzon G. Hearables: new Perspectives and Pitfalls of In-Ear Devices for Physiological Monitoring. A Scoping Review. Front Physiol. 2020 Oct;11:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney D, Kidmose P, Park C, et al. The in-the-ear recording concept: user-centered and wearable brain monitoring. IEEE Pulse Internet]. 2012;3(6):32–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill N, Curran MT, Gandhi S, et al. One-step, three-factor passthought authentication with custom-fit, in-ear EEG. Front Neurosci Internet]. 2019;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00354
   Google Scholar
• Hammour G, Yarici M, Rosenberg W, et al. Hearables: feasibility and Validation of In-Ear Electrocardiogram. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf Berlin, Germany; 2019;2019:5777–5780.
   Google Scholar
• Bleichner MG, Kidmose P, Voix J. Editorial: ear-Centered Sensing: from Sensing Principles to Research and Clinical Devices. Front Neurosci. 2020 Jan 17;13:1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverdovsky V, Rosenberg W, Nakamura T, et al. Hearables: multimodal physiological in-ear sensing. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6948.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kappel SL, Looney D, Mandic DP, et al. Physiological artifacts in scalp EEG and ear-EEG. Biomed Eng Online. Internet]. 2017;16(1):103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kappel SL, Kidmose P High-density ear-EEG. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS Jeju, Korea (South); 2017 Sep 13; 2394–2397.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew J The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Q, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), Version 2018. User guide. McGill [Internet]; 2018. [cited 2021March]. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf%0Ahttp://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com
   Google Scholar
• Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [Internet]. 2011 cited 2021 Mar 12]. Available from : https://annals.org
   Google Scholar
• Wang CZ, Zheng YP Home-Telecare of the Elderly Living Alone Using an New Designed Ear-wearable Sensor. In: 2008 5TH INTERNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL AND SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL DEVICES AND BIOSENSORS Hong Kong, China; 2008; p. 280–283.
   Google Scholar
• Bestbier A, Fourie PR Development of a vital signs monitoring wireless ear probe. 2018 Accessed March 2021. 1–5. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048389871&doi=10.1109%2FSAIBMEC.2018.8363196&partnerID=40&md5=fd697e6e757c38d06a8b2f448a4c7936
   Google Scholar
• Gil B, Anastasova S, Yang GZ. A smart wireless ear-worn device for cardiovascular and sweat parameter monitoring during physical exercise: design and performance results. SENSORS. 2019;19(7):1616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He DD, Winokur ES, Sodini CG An ear-worn continuous ballistocardiogram (BCG) sensor for cardiovascular monitoring. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc San Diego, CA, USA; 2012;2012:5030–5033.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz DK, de Graaf G, Haartsen JC, et al. HEART RATE MONITORING USING INFRARED THERMOMETRY IN AN EARPIECE. IEEE Sensors [Internet]. 2017;2017:1563–1565.
   Google Scholar
• Martin A, Voix J. In-ear audio wearable: measurement of heart and breathing rates for health and safety monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018;65(6):1256–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Jang DG, Park JW, et al. Wearable sensing of in-ear pressure for heart rate monitoring with a piezoelectric sensor. Sensors (Switzerland). Internet]. 2015;15(9):23402–23417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel S, Hülsbusch M, Hennig T, et al. In-Ear Vital Signs Monitoring Using a Novel Microoptic Reflective Sensor. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed Internet]. 2009;13(6):882–889.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zeng X, Hu W, et al. A machine learning-empowered system for long-term motion-tolerant wearable monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate with ear-ECG/PPG. IEEE Access. Internet]. 2017;5:10547–10561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrana A, Comotti D, Re V, et al. Development of a Wearable In-Ear PPG System for Continuous Monitoring. IEEE Sens J. Internet]. 2020;20(23):14482–14490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venema B, Blazek V, Leonhardt S In-ear photoplethysmography for mobile cardiorespiratory monitoring and alarming. 2015 Accessed March 2021. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961612985&doi=10.1109%2FBSN.2015.7299367&partnerID=40&md5=818749ac94bd56b6a2523222510a7d3c
   Google Scholar
• Passler S, Muller N, Senner V. In-Ear Pulse Rate Measurement: a Valid Alternative to Heart Rate Derived from Electrocardiography? Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(17):3641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da He D, Winokur ES, Sodini CG, et al. An Ear-Worn Vital Signs Monitor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng [Internet]. 2015 Nov;62(11):2547–2552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob NK, Balaban E, Saunders R, et al. An Exploration of Behind-the-Ear ECG Signals from a Single Ear Using Inkjet Printed Conformal Tattoo Electrodes. 2018 Accessed March 2021.2018:1283–1286. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056664533&doi=10.1109%2FEMBC.2018.8512538&partnerID=40&md5=30561e288cac8ccea278feacaa3f6992
   Google Scholar
• Hymczak H, Gołąb A, Mendrala K, et al. Core temperature measurement—principles of correct measurement, problems, and complications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(20):10606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uleberg O, Eidstuen SC, Vangberg G, et al. Temperature measurements in trauma patients: is the ear the key to the core? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Internet]. 2015 Nov 19 cited 2021 Nov 17;23:(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0178-z
   Google Scholar
• Bock M, Hohlfeld U, Von Engeln K, et al. The accuracy of a new infrared ear thermometer in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Can J Anesth. Internet]. 2005 Dec cited 2021 Mar 14;52(10):1083–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ota H, Chao M, Gao Y, et al. 3D printed “earable” smart devices for real-time detection of core body temperature. ACS Sens Internet]. 2017;2(7):990–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogedegbe G, Pickering T. Principles and techniques of blood pressure measurement. Cardiol Clin. Internet]. 2010 Nov cited 2021 Nov 17;28(4):571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukkamala R, Hahn JO, Inan OT, et al. Toward Ubiquitous Blood Pressure Monitoring via Pulse Transit Time: theory and Practice. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Internet]. 2015 Aug 1 cited 2021 Mar 15;62(8):1879–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Berthelot M, Lo B Wireless wearable photoplethysmography sensors for continuous blood pressure monitoring. 2016 Accessed March 2021. 81–88. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011103324&doi=10.1109%2FWH.2016.7764560&partnerID=40&md5=a177791d0451c7b141c62e065a2f290b
   Google Scholar
• Jadooei A, Zaderykhin O, Shulgin VI. Adaptive algorithm for continuous monitoring of blood pressure using a pulse transit time. In: 2013 IEEE 33rd International Scientific Conference Electronics and Nanotechnology, ELNANO 2013 - Conference Proceedings Kiev, Ukraine; 2013; p. 297–301.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly N, Hunniford T, Harper R, et al. Demonstrating the accuracy of an in-hospital ambulatory patient monitoring solution in measuring respiratory rate. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS Osaka, Japan; 2013;6711–6715.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi K, Nishikawa AEPOCER. Development of a point-of-care ear sensor for respiratory rate measurement. Sensors (Switzerland). Internet]. 2018;18(9):(9).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plüddemann A, Thompson M, Henegham C, et al. Pulse oximetry in primary care: primary care diagnostic technology update. Br J Gen Pract. Internet]. 2011 May cited 2021 Nov 17;61(586):358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzan M, Romem A, Koppel R Pulse oximetry: fundamentals and technology update [Internet]. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. Dove Medical Press Ltd; 2014 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. 7. 231–239. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25031547
   Google Scholar
• Wax DB, Rubin P, Neustein S. A comparison of transmittance and reflectance pulse oximetry during vascular surgery. Anesth Analg. Internet]. 2009 cited 2021 Nov 17;109(6):1847–1849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernet V, Doll C, Cannizzaro V, et al. Longtime performance and reliability of two different PtcCO2 and SpO2 sensors in neonates. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(9):872–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger R, Beck-Schimmer B, Theusinger OM, et al. The revised digital transcutaneous PCO2/SpO2 ear sensor is a reliable noninvasive monitoring tool in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(2):243–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venema B, Leonhardt S. In-ear pulse oximetry in high altitude mountaineering. In: Kiss R, and Thurner PJ, editors. Medical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University. Aachen Germany: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2017. 254–259. [cited 2021 March]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018944478&doi=10.2316%2FP.2017.852-044&partnerID=40&md5=d06873983466d0a545c08d69111707e3
   Google Scholar
• Davies HJ, Williams I, Peters NS, et al. In-Ear SpO2: a Tool for Wearable, Unobtrusive Monitoring of Core Blood Oxygen Saturation. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(17):4879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn JW, Ku Y, Kim HC. A novel wearable EEG and ECG recording system for stress assessment. Sensors (Switzerland). Internet]. 2019;19(9):1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zhou D. Deep Arm/Ear-ECG Image Learning for Highly Wearable Biometric Human Identification. Ann Biomed Eng. Internet]. 2018;46(1):122–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik N, Manivannan N, Balachandran W. Evaluation of a Behind-the-Ear ECG Device for Smartphone based Integrated Multiple Smart Sensor System in Health Applications. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2016;7(7):409–418.
   Google Scholar
• Von Rosenberg W, Chanwimalueang T, Goverdovsky V, et al. Hearables: feasibility of recording cardiac rhythms from head and in-ear locations. R Soc Open Sci Internet]. 2017;4(11):171214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen TW, Hsiao T, Liu YT, et al. An ear-lead ecg based smart sensor system with voice biofeedback for daily activity monitoring. 2008 IEEE Reg 10 Conf TENCON 2008 Hyderabad, India; 2008; 1-4: 1631–1636.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zhou D, Zeng X. Hear the heart: daily cardiac health monitoring using Ear-ECG and Machine Learning. 2017. 2018:448–451. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046270733&doi=10.1109%2FUEMCON.2017.8249110&partnerID=40&md5=0d1db26f0183667a8d0536ce27770a44
   Google Scholar
• Winokur ES, Da HD, Sodini CG. A wearable vital signs monitor at the ear for continuous heart rate and pulse transit time measurements. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:2724–2727.
   Google Scholar
• Bleichner MG, Debener SC, Lejeune L. Unobtrusive Ear-Centered EEG Acquisition: cEEGrids for Transparent EEG. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul A, Akinin A, Lee M, et al. Integrated In-Ear Device for Auditory Health Assessment. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Int Conf Berlin, Germany; 2019;2019:56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kappel SL, Kidmose P Real-Life Dry-Contact Ear-EEG. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Int Conf Honolulu, HI, USA; 2018;2018:5470–5474.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett M, Debener S, Verhulst S. Acquisition of subcortical auditory potentials with around-the-ear ceegrid technology in normal and hearing impaired listeners. Front Neurosci Internet]. 2019;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00730
   Google Scholar
• Bleichner MG, Debener S Independent component decomposition of around ear EEG data to detect artifacts. Conf Proc - IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern Bari, Italy; 2019 Oct 1;2019-October:3631–3634.
   Google Scholar
• Goverdovsky V, Looney D, Kidmose P, et al. In-Ear EEG From Viscoelastic Generic Earpieces: robust and Unobtrusive 24/7 Monitoring. IEEE Sens J. 2016;16(1):271–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurable [Internet]. cited 2021 Nov 20. Available from: https://neurable.com/headphones
   Google Scholar
• EEG Headset - Smartfones | mBrainTrain [Internet]. cited 2021 Nov 20]. Available from: https://mbraintrain.com/smartfones
   Google Scholar
• An WW, Shinn-Cunningham B, Gamper H, et al. Decoding music attention from “EEG headphones”: a user-friendly auditory brain-computer interface. ICASSP, IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process - Proc Toronto, ON, Canada; 2021;2021-June:985–989.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Gamper H, Tashev I, et al. Stress monitoring using multimodal bio-sensing headset. 2020. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090239848&doi=10.1145%2F3334480.3382891&partnerID=40&md5=dfbc7769f878805ab97f15e301c1d6d4
   Google Scholar
• Kuatsjah E, Zhang X, Khoshnam M, et al. Two-channel in-ear EEG system for detection of visuomotor tracking state: a preliminary study. Med Eng Phys. 2019;68:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölle D, Meekes J, Bleichner MG. Mobile ear-EEG to study auditory attention in everyday life: auditory attention in everyday life. Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct 1;53(5):2025–2036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Cleeren E, Dan J, et al. Comparison between scalp EEG and behind-the-ear EEG for development of a wearable seizure detection system for patients with focal epilepsy. Sensors (Switzerland). 2018;18:(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandecasteele K, De Cooman T, Dan J, et al. Visual seizure annotation and automated seizure detection using behind-the-ear electroencephalographic channels. Epilepsia. 2020;61(4):766–775 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zibrandtsen IC, Kidmose P, Christensen CB, et al. Ear-EEG detects ictal and interictal abnormalities in focal and generalized epilepsy – a comparison with scalp EEG monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(12):2454–2461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnen L, Chatzichristos C, Jansen K, et al. Accurate detection of typical absence seizures in adults and children using a two-channel electroencephalographic wearable behind the ears. Epilepsia Internet]. 2021 Nov 1 cited 2021 Nov 20;62(11):2741–2752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boe AJ, McGee Koch LL, O’Brien MK, et al. Automating sleep stage classification using wireless, wearable sensors. Npj Digit Med Internet]. 2019 Dec 20 cited 2021 Nov 19;2(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqurashi Y, Nakamura T, Moss J, et al. The efficacy of a novel in-ear electroencephalography (EEG) sensor to measure overnight sleep in healthy participants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Internet]. 2019;199:(9).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen SD, Zibrandtsen IC, Kjaer TW. Ear-EEG-based sleep scoring in epilepsy: a comparison with scalp-EEG. J Sleep Res. 2020 Dec;29(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12921.
   Google Scholar
• Looney D, Goverdovsky V, Rosenzweig I, et al. Wearable In-Ear Encephalography Sensor for Monitoring Sleep. Preliminary Observations from Nap Studies. Ann Am Thorac Soc. Internet]. 2016;13(12):2229–2233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Goverdovsky V, Morrell MJ, et al. Automatic Sleep Monitoring Using Ear-EEG. IEEE J Transl Eng Heal Med. 2017;5:7959059.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Alqurashi YD, Morrell MJ, et al. Hearables: automatic Overnight Sleep Monitoring With Standardized In-Ear EEG Sensor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. Internet]. 2020;67(1):203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha U, Yoo HJ A multimodal drowsiness monitoring ear-module system with closed-loop real-time alarm. 2016 ;536–539.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen KB, Villadsen DB, Otto M, et al. Automatic sleep staging using ear-EEG. Biomed Eng Online Internet]. 2017 Sep 19 cited 2021 Nov 20;16(1):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikkelsen KB, Tabar YR, Kappel SL, et al. Accurate whole-night sleep monitoring with dry-contact ear-EEG. Sci Rep Internet]. 2019 91 Nov 14 cited 2021 Nov 20; 9(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Da Silva Souto CF, Pätzold W, Wolf KI, et al. Flex-Printed Ear-EEG Sensors for Adequate Sleep Staging at Home. Front Digit Heal. 2021 Jun 30;3:66.
   Google Scholar
• Pham N, Dinh T, Raghebi Z, et al. WAKE: a behind-the-ear wearable system for microsleep detection. 2020;404–418.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue JP. Bridging the Brain to the World: a Perspective on Neural Interface Systems. Vol. 60. Neuron. Cell Press; 2008. p. 511–521.
   Google Scholar
• Kaongoen N, Choi J, Jo S. Speech-imagery-based BCI system using ear-EEG. J Neural Eng Internet]. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abd10e
   Google Scholar
• Ahn JW, Ku Y, Kim DY, et al. Wearable in-the-ear EEG system for SSVEP-based brain-computer interface. Electron Lett. 2018;54(7):413+-413+.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te WYY, Nakanishi M, Kappel SL, et al. Developing an online steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain-computer interface system using EarEEG. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf Milan, Italy; 2015;2015:2271–2274.
   Google Scholar
• Kaongoen N, Jo S. An auditory P300-based brain-computer interface using Ear-EEG. 2018. 2018:1–4. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050814945&doi=10.1109%2FIWW-BCI.2018.8311519&partnerID=40&md5=6ba7801c1ef9f9489062efd5a39a25d4
   Google Scholar
• Kaveh R, Doong J, Zhou A, et al. A Wireless, Multielectrode, User-generic Ear EEG Recording System. 2019 IEEE Biomed CIRCUITS Syst Conf (BIOCAS 2019) Nara, Japan; 2019;
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder ED, Walker N, Danko AS. Wearable ear EEG for brain interfacing. Proc. SPIE 10051, Neural Imaging and Sensing, 1005115. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Lee SM, Byeon HJ, et al. CNT/PDMS-based canal-typed ear electrodes for inconspicuous EEG recording. J Neural Eng. 2014;11:(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang KJ, Tung HW, Huang Z, et al. EXGbuds: universal Wearable Assistive Device for Disabled People to Interact with the Environment Seamlessly. 2018;369–370. [cited 2021 March]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85045276596&doi=10.1145%2F3173386.3177836&partnerID=40&md5=b01b09485d943d8483227ae4f452626d
   Google Scholar
• Wang KJ, Zhang L, Luan B, et al. Brain-computer interface combining eye saccade two-electrode EEG signals and voice cues to improve the maneuverability of wheelchair. 2017;1073–1078. [cited 2021 March]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85034818173&doi=10.1109%2FICORR.2017.8009392&partnerID=40&md5=afe291177b6c1ff665059d7c9aef284f
   Google Scholar
• Vidaurre C, Sannelli C, Müller KR, et al. Machine-learning based co-adaptive calibration: a perspective to fight BCI illiteracy Romay, Manuel Graña, Emilio, Corchado, and Sebastian, M. Teresa Garcia.Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 2010; 413–420. cited 2021 Mar 18 Internet
   Google Scholar
• Kappel SL, Rank ML, Toft HO, et al. Dry-Contact Electrode Ear-EEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019;66(1):150–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran MT, Yang JK, Merrill N, et al. Passthoughts authentication with low cost EarEEG. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference Orlando, FL, USA; 2016;2016:1979–1982.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Goverdovsky V, Mandic DP. In-ear EEG biometrics for feasible and readily collectable real-world person authentication. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. Internet]. 2018;13(3):648–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichner MG, Mirkovic B, Debener S. Identifying auditory attention with ear-EEG: cEEGrid versus high-density cap-EEG comparison. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(6):066004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen A, Alqurashi R, Raghebi Z, et al. In-ear biosignal recording system: a wearable for automatic whole-night sleep staging. 2016;19–24. [cited 2021 March]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84979731591&doi=10.1145%2F2935643.2935649&partnerID=40&md5=4133239a23a9c33a2652fc16677309d2
   Google Scholar
• Manohar C, McCrady S, Pavlidis IT, et al. An accelerometer-based earpiece to monitor and quantify physical activity. J Phys Act Heal [Internet]. 2009 cited 2021 Mar 17;6(6):781–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atallah L, Wiik A, Lo B, et al. Gait asymmetry detection in older adults using a light ear-worn sensor. Physiol Meas. Internet]. 2014;35(5):N29–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujikawa T, Tochikubo O, Kura N, et al. Measurement of hemodynamics during postural changes using a new wearable cephalic laser blood flowmeter. Circ J. Internet]. 2009;73(10):1950–1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Ma X, Wei J. Beyond pulse: can the in-ear photoplethysmogram signal understand what you say? 2018;25–30. [cited 2021 March]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061812981&doi=10.1145%2F3277883.3277891&partnerID=40&md5=62ec07744345135ed9d299276c5b82f9
   Google Scholar
• Lueken M, Feng X, Venema B, et al. Photoplethysmography-based in-ear sensor system for identification of increased stress arousal in everyday life. 2017;83–86. [cited 2021 March]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85025428418&doi=10.1109%2FBSN.2017.7936013&partnerID=40&md5=50b6fbe714cbff91c4c6019feaf793e3
   Google Scholar
• Christensen CB, Hietkamp RK, Harte JM, et al. Toward EEG-Assisted Hearing Aids: objective Threshold Estimation Based on Ear-EEG in Subjects With Sensorineural Hearing Loss. TRENDS Hear. 2018;22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen A, Raghebi Z, Banaei-Kashani F, et al. LIBS: a low-cost in-ear bioelectrical sensing solution for healthcare applications. 2016;3:33–35. [cited 2021 March]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84994108562&doi=10.1145%2F2987354.2987363&partnerID=40&md5=acad2fe782a39808795cbc12e966f14e
   Google Scholar