Updates in immunocompatibility of biomaterials: applications for regenerative medicine

References

• Detsch R, Will J, Hum J, et al. Biomaterials. In: Kasper C, Charwat V, Lavrentieva A, eds. Cell culture technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhawat D, Singh A, Bhardwaj A, et al. A short review on polymer, metal and ceramic based implant materials. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Jaipur, India. 2021. IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad K, Bazaka O, Chua M, et al. Metallic biomaterials: current challenges and opportunities. Materials. 2017;10(8):884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baino F, Novajra G, Vitale-Brovarone C. Bioceramics and scaffolds: a winning combination for tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohane DS, Langer R. Polymeric biomaterials in tissue engineering. Pediatr Res. 2008;63(5):487–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hejazi M, Zareshahrabadi Z, Ashayeri S, et al. Characterization and physical and biological properties of tissue conditioner incorporated with Carum copticum L. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:5577760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Chengchen G, Vincent F, et al. Design of biodegradable, implantable devices towards clinical translation. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5(1):61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotaling NA, Tang L, Irvine DJ, et al. Biomaterial strategies for immunomodulation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2015;17(1):317–349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franz S, Rammelt S, Scharnweber D, et al. Immune responses to implants–a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. Biomaterials. 32(28): 6692–6709. 2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung L, Maestas DR, Housseau F, et al. Key players in the immune response to biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;114:184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach DG, Young S, Hartgerink JD. Advances in immunotherapy delivery from implantable and injectable biomaterials. Acta Biomater. 2019;88:15–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammon JM, Jewell CM. Engineering immune tolerance with biomaterials. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(4):1801419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehler RM, Graham JG, Shea LD. Tissue engineering tools for modulation of the immune response. Biotechniques. 2011;51(4):239–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos DP, Águas AP, Barbosa MA, et al. The inflammasome in host response to biomaterials: bridging inflammation and tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2019;83:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani E, Lisignoli G, Borzì RM, et al. Biomaterials: foreign bodies or tuners for the immune response?. Int J Mol Sci. 20(3): 636. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin DD. Overview of the immune response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(2 Suppl 2):S3–S23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descotes J, and Wexler P, Editor. Immune system, in encyclopedia of toxicology (third edition). United States: Academic Press; 2014. p. 1004–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson LB. The immune system. Essays Biochem. 2016;60(3):275–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisielow P. How does the immune system learn to distinguish between good and evil? The first definitive studies of T cell central tolerance and positive selection. Immunogenetics. 2019;71(8–9):513–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Langelaar J, Chen Z, Hu L, et al. B and T cells driving multiple sclerosis: identity, mechanisms and potential triggers. Front Immunol. 2020;11:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaya J-M, Shoenfeld Y, Rojas-Villarraga A, et al. Autoimmunity: from bench to bedside. Bogota, Colombia: El Rosario University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Janeway CA, Travers P, Walport M, et al. Immunobiology: the immune system in health and disease. New York, United States: Garland Science; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Vasselon T, Detmers PA. Toll receptors: a central element in innate immune responses. Infect Immun. 2002;70(3):1033–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol CL, Luster AD. The chemokine system in innate immunity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(5):a016303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulkhaleq LA, Assi MA, Abdullah R, et al. The crucial roles of inflammatory mediators in inflammation: a review. Vet World. 2018;11(5):627–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekdahl KN, Lambris JD, Elwing H, et al. Innate immunity activation on biomaterial surfaces: a mechanistic model and coping strategies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63(12):1042–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner BD, Hoffman A, Schoen F, et al. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. United States: Academic Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(4):343–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christo SN, Diener KR, Bachhuka A, et al. Innate immunity and biomaterials at the nexus: friends or foes. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:342304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenot P, Hu W, Tang L. Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility. Curr Top Med Chem. 2008;8(4):270–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. In: Seminars in immunology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2008. p. 86–100.
   Google Scholar
• Enderle J, Bronzino J. Introduction to biomedical engineering. United States: Academic press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas S, Ninan N, Mohan S, et al. Natural polymers, biopolymers, biomaterials, and their composites, blends, and IPNs. Florida, United States: CRC press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan T, Zhang L, Li K, et al. Collagen hydrogel as an immunomodulatory scaffold in cartilage tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2014;102(2):337–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu C, Deng J, Sun X, et al. Collagen membrane and immune response in guided bone regeneration: recent progress and perspectives. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2017;23(5):421–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echave C, Burgo, M LS, et al. Gelatin as biomaterial for tissue engineering. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(24):3567–3584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Gupta P, Bhattacharjee S, et al. Immunomodulatory injectable silk hydrogels maintaining functional islets and promoting anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization. Biomaterials. 2018;187:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janmey PA, Winer JP, Weisel JW. Fibrin gels and their clinical and bioengineering applications. J Royal Soc Interface. 2009;6(30):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Meng H, Liu Y, et al. Fibrin gel as an injectable biodegradable scaffold and cell carrier for tissue engineering. Sci World J. 2015;2015:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ducheyne P. In: Healy KE, Hutmacher DW, Grainger DW, Kirkpatrick CJ, eds. Comprehensive biomaterials II. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brigham CJ. Chitin and chitosan: sustainable, medically relevant biomaterials. Int j biotechnol wellness ind. 2017;6(2):41–47
   Google Scholar
• Neves NM, Reis RL. Biomaterials from nature for advanced devices and therapies. New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(1):106–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang D, Liang J, Noble PW. Hyaluronan as an immune regulator in human diseases. Physiol Rev. 2011;91(1):221–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmowafy EM, Tiboni M, Soliman ME. Biocompatibility, biodegradation and biomedical applications of poly(lactic acid)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) micro and nanoparticles. J Pharm Invest. 2019;49(4):347–380.
   Google Scholar
• Toskas G, Cherif C, Hund R-D, et al. Chitosan (PEO)/silica hybrid nanofibers as a potential biomaterial for bone regeneration. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;94(2):713–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker MI, Walsh SP, Schwartz Z, et al. A review of polyvinyl alcohol and its uses in cartilage and orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2012;100(5):1451–1457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mondal D, Griffith M, Venkatraman SS. Polycaprolactone-based biomaterials for tissue engineering and drug delivery: current scenario and challenges. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2016;65(5):255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadtler K, Estrellas K, Allen BW, et al. Developing a pro-regenerative biomaterial scaffold microenvironment requires T helper 2 cells. Science. 2016;352(6283):366–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BN, Ratner BD, Goodman SB, et al. Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2012;33(15):3792–3802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedervall T, Lynch I, Foy M, et al. Detailed identification of plasma proteins adsorbed on copolymer nanoparticles. Angew Chem. 2007;46(30):5754–5756.
   Google Scholar
• Karmali PP, Simberg D. Interactions of nanoparticles with plasma proteins: implication on clearance and toxicity of drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(3):343–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyano DF, Goldsmith M, Solfiell DJ, et al. Nanoparticle hydrophobicity dictates immune response. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(9):3965–3967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai X, Wei Y, Zhang X, et al. Attenuating immune response of macrophage by enhancing hydrophilicity of Ti surface. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:712810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viganò S, Perreau M, Pantaleo G, et al. Positive and negative regulation of cellular immune responses in physiologic conditions and diseases. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:485781.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gammon JM, Jewell CM. Engineering immune tolerance with biomaterials. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(4):e1801419–e1801419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakanishi T, Kunisawa J, Hayashi A, et al. Positively charged liposome functions as an efficient immunoadjuvant in inducing immune responses to soluble proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;240(3):793–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials. 2003;24(24):4385–4415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves S, Bayón R, de Viteri VS, et al. Tribocorrosion behavior of calcium-and phosphorous-enriched titanium oxide films and study of osteoblast interactions for dental implants. J Bio Tribocorros. 2015;1(3):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lu X, Wu Z, Xu K, et al. Multifunctional coatings of titanium implants toward promoting osseointegration and preventing infection: recent developments. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021;9. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2021.783816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, et al. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offermanns V, Andersen OZ, Sillassen M, et al. A comparative in vivo study of strontium-functionalized and SLActive™ implant surfaces in early bone healing. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Valverde N, Muriel-Fernández J, Gómez de Diego R, et al. Effect of strontium-coated titanium implants on osseointegration in animal models: a literature systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(6):1389–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albano CS, Moreira Gomes A, da Silva Feltran G, et al. Bisphosphonate-based surface biofunctionalization improves titanium biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020;31(11):109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanael AJ, Oh TH. Biopolymer coatings for biomedical applications. Polymers. 2020;12(12):3061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven CJJM, Bakker NEC, Link DP, et al. Sustained release of ancillary amounts of testosterone and alendronate from PLGA coated pericard membranes and implants to improve bone healing. Plos one. 2021;16(5):e0251864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouirfa H, Bouloussa H, Migonney V, et al. Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications. Acta Biomater. 2019;83:37–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassi ÊJ, de Almeida DC, Moraes-Vieira PMM, et al. Exploring the role of soluble factors associated with immune regulatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2012;8(2):329–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park W, Song KH, Lim J, et al. Biomaterial-based strategies to prime dendritic cell-mediated anti-cancer immune responses. Int Mater Rev. 2020;65(7):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MO, Wan YY, Sanjabi S, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta regulation of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24(1):99–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dinarello CA. Anti-inflammatory agents: present and future. Cell. 2010;140(6):935–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard EM, Kaplan DL. Silk fibroin biomaterials for controlled release drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(6):797–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams K, Milner J, Boudreau MD, et al. Effects of subchronic exposure of silver nanoparticles on intestinal microbiota and gut-associated immune responses in the ileum of Sprague-Dawley rats. Nanotoxicology. 2015;9(3):279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheets K, Wunsch S, Ng C, et al. Shape-dependent cell migration and focal adhesion organization on suspended and aligned nanofiber scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(7):7169–7177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Peppas NA. Hydrogels and scaffolds for immunomodulation. Adv Mater. 2014;26(38):6530–6541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Hardie J, Zhang X, et al. Effects of engineered nanoparticles on the innate immune system. Semin Immunol.;2017;34:24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Saltzman M. Engineering biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery. Chem Eng Prog. 2013;109(3):25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian J Chem. 2019;12(7):908–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomić S, Đokić J, Vasilijić S, et al. Size-dependent effects of gold nanoparticles uptake on maturation and antitumor functions of human dendritic cells in vitro. PloS one. 2014;9(5):e96584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibroe PP, Anselmo AC, Nilsson PH, et al. Bypassing adverse injection reactions to nanoparticles through shape modification and attachment to erythrocytes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12(6):589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Wang G, Griffin JI, et al. Complement proteins bind to nanoparticle protein Corona and undergo dynamic exchange in vivo. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12(4):387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöttler S, Becker G, Winzen S, et al. Protein adsorption is required for stealth effect of poly (ethylene glycol)-and poly (phosphoester)-coated nanocarriers. Nat Nanotechnol. 2016;11(4):372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo T, Giménez-Marqués M, Bellido E, et al. Chitosan-coated mesoporous MIL-100 (Fe) nanoparticles as improved bio-compatible oral nanocarriers. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):43099.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao L, Bu -L-L, Meng Q-F, et al. Antitumor platelet‐mimicking magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27(9):1604774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Bai R, Zhou H, et al. The effect of size and surface ligands of iron oxide nanoparticles on blood compatibility. RSC Adv. 10(13): 7559–7569. 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolci S, Domenici V, Vidili G, et al. Immune compatible cystine-functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as vascular contrast agents in ultrasonography. RSC Adv. 2016;6(4):2712–2723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromen CA, Rahhal TB, Robbins GR, et al. Nanoparticle surface charge impacts distribution, uptake and lymph node trafficking by pulmonary antigen-presenting cells. Nanomedicine: nanotechnology. Biol Med. 2016;12(3):677–687.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Ma P, Wang H, et al. Immune responses to vaccines delivered by encapsulation into and/or adsorption onto cationic lipid-PLGA hybrid nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2016;225:230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogli S, Montis C, Paccosi S, et al. Inorganic nanoparticles as potential regulators of immune response in dendritic cells. Nanomedicine. 2017;12(14):1647–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Khan AR, Ji J, et al. Crosslinked self-assembled nanoparticles for chemo-sonodynamic combination therapy favoring antitumor, antimetastasis management and immune responses. J Control Release. 2018;290:150–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orłowski P, Kowalczyk A, Tomaszewska E, et al. Antiviral activity of tannic acid modified silver nanoparticles: potential to activate immune response in herpes genitalis. Viruses. 2018;10(10):524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatova М, Rashkov I, Manolova N. Drug-loaded electrospun materials in wound-dressing applications and in local cancer treatment. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10(4):469–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin M, Jin J, Saiding Q, et al. In situ inflammatory-regulated drug-loaded hydrogels for promoting pelvic floor repair. J Control Release. 2020;322:375–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AN, Hartgerink JD. Self-assembling multidomain peptide nanofibers for delivery of bioactive molecules and tissue regeneration. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50(4):714–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Silva TL, Leach DG, Azares A, et al. Chemical functionality of multidomain peptide hydrogels governs early host immune response. Biomaterials. 2020;231:119667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenberg U, Liang Y, Kiick KL, et al. Glycosaminoglycan‐based biohybrid hydrogels: a sweet and smart choice for multifunctional biomaterials. Adv Mater. 2016;28(40):8861–8891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer L, Chwalek K, Tsurkan MV, et al. Glycosaminoglycan-based hydrogels with programmable host reactions. Biomaterials. 2020;228:119557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belair DG, Le NN, Murphy WL. Design of growth factor sequestering biomaterials. Chem Comm. 2014;50(99):15651–15668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisovsky A, Zhang DK, Sefton MV. Effect of methacrylic acid beads on the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway and macrophage polarization in a subcutaneous injection mouse model. Biomaterials. 2016;98:203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleton MM, Sefton MV. Injectable and degradable methacrylic acid hydrogel alters macrophage response in skeletal muscle. Biomaterials. 2019;223:119477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sherbiny IM, Yacoub MH. Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: progress and challenges. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2013;2013(3):38.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhari AA, Vig K, Baganizi D, et al. Future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12):1974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapru S, Das S, Mandal M, et al. Nonmulberry silk protein sericin blend hydrogels for skin tissue regeneration-in vitro and in vivo. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;137:545–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira S, da Silva Morais A, Garet E, et al. Self-mineralizing Ca-enriched methacrylated gellan gum beads for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2019;93:74–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amer LD, Saleh LS, Walker C, et al. Inflammation via myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 signaling mediates the fibrotic response to implantable synthetic poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2019;100:105–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong K, Tong L, Liu L, et al. Immunoregulatory and antitumor activity of schizophyllan under ultrasonic treatment. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;80:302–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Ki CS. Inflammatory responses of macrophage-like RAW264. 7 cells in a 3D hydrogel matrix to ultrasonicated schizophyllan. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;229:115555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Chen X, Yuan T, et al. Regulation of the secretion of immunoregulatory factors of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) by collagen-based scaffolds during chondrogenesis. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;70:983–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Chen C, Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, et al. Hydrogel elasticity and microarchitecture regulate dental-derived mesenchymal stem cell-host immune system cross-talk. Acta Biomater. 2017;60:181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XY, Butt AM, Amin MCIM. Enhanced paracellular delivery of vaccine by hydrogel microparticles-mediated reversible tight junction opening for effective oral immunization. J Control Release. 2019;311-312:50–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korupalli C, Pan WY, Yeh CY, et al. Single-injecting, bioinspired nanocomposite hydrogel that can recruit host immune cells in situ to elicit potent and long-lasting humoral immune responses. Biomaterials. 2019;216:119268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan VG, Duong HTT, Thambi T, et al. Modularly engineered injectable hybrid hydrogels based on protein-polymer network as potent immunologic adjuvant in vivo. Biomaterials. 2019;195:100–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabado RL, Balan S, Bhardwaj N. Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy. Cell Res. 2017;27(1):74–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindienst P, Brocker T. Endogenous dendritic cells are required for amplification of T cell responses induced by dendritic cell vaccines in vivo. J Immunol. 2003;170(6):2817–2823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guvendiren M, Lu HD, Burdick JA. Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter. 2012;8(2):260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Shi K, Jia Y, et al. A biodegradable thermosensitive hydrogel vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Appl Mater Today. 2020;19:100608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Huang P, Niu J, et al. Injectable polypeptide hydrogel for dual-delivery of antigen and TLR3 agonist to modulate dendritic cells in vivo and enhance potent cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response against melanoma. Biomaterials. 2018;159:119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong HTT, Thambi T, Yin Y, et al. Degradation-regulated architecture of injectable smart hydrogels enhances humoral immune response and potentiates antitumor activity in human lung carcinoma. Biomaterials. 2020;230:119599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeki Y, Saito M, Kusamori K, et al. Combined encapsulation of a tumor antigen and immune cells using a self-assembling immunostimulatory DNA hydrogel to enhance antigen-specific tumor immunity. J Control Release. 2018;288:189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolova MP, Chavali MS. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: a review. Bioact Mater. 2019;4:271–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl D, Czernuszka J. Collagen-hydroxyapatite composites for hard tissue repair. Eur Cell Mater. 2006;11(1):43–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munhoz M, Hirata HH, Plepis AMG, et al. Use of collagen/chitosan sponges mineralized with hydroxyapatite for the repair of cranial defects in rats. Injury. 2018;49(12):2154–2160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu B, Kurland NE, Bano S, et al. Silk proteins for biomedical applications: bioengineering perspectives. Prog Polym Sci. 2014;39(2):251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao G, Cai R, Wang Y, et al. Bioinspired design of AgNPs embedded silk sericin-based sponges for efficiently combating bacteria and promoting wound healing. Mater Des. 2019;180:107940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Guo G, Meng F, et al. A naturally derived, growth factor-binding polysaccharide for therapeutic angiogenesis. ACS Macro Lett. 2016;5(5):617–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck SJ, Nguyen TH, Maynard HD. Heparin-mimicking polymers: synthesis and biological applications. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(11):3417–3440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Niu Y, Diao H, et al. In situ sequestration of endogenous PDGF-BB with an ECM-mimetic sponge for accelerated wound healing. Biomaterials. 2017;148:54–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua LS, Kim H-W, Lee JH. Signaling of extracellular matrices for tissue regeneration and therapeutics. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13(1):1–12
   Google Scholar
• Rameshbabu AP, Bankoti K, Datta S, et al. Bioinspired 3D porous human placental derived extracellular matrix/silk fibroin sponges for accelerated bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;113:110990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Las Heras K, Santos-Vizcaino E, Garrido T, et al. Soy protein and chitin sponge-like scaffolds: from natural by-products to cell delivery systems for biomedical applications. Green Chem. 2020;22(11): 3445–3460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbilek M, Türkoğlu N, Aktürk S. N-Acetylglucoseamine modified alginate sponges as scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Turk J Biol. 2017;41(5):796–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naskar D, Ghosh AK, Mandal M, et al. Dual growth factor loaded nonmulberry silk fibroin/carbon nanofiber composite 3D scaffolds for in vitro and in vivo bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2017;136:67–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause U, Harris S, Green A, et al. Pharmaceutical modulation of canonical Wnt signaling in multipotent stromal cells for improved osteoinductive therapy. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2010;107(9):4147–4152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough BH, McNeill EP, Palmer D, et al. An allograft generated from adult stem cells and their secreted products efficiently fuses vertebrae in immunocompromised athymic rats and inhibits local immune responses. Spine J. 2017;17(3):418–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu MA. DNA vaccines: an historical perspective and view to the future. Immunol Rev. 2011;239(1):62–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian J, Rui K, Tang X, et al. MicroRNA-9 regulates the differentiation and function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via targeting Runx1. J Immunol. 2015;195(3):1301–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia R, Yan L, Guo J. Enhancing the immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine against Streptococcus mutans by attenuating the inhibition of endogenous miR-9. Vaccine. 2020;38(6):1424–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sencadas V, Correia DM, Areias A, et al. Determination of the parameters affecting electrospun chitosan fiber size distribution and morphology. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87(2):1295–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beheshtkhoo N, Jadidi Kouhbanani MA, Dehghani F, et al. Fabrication and properties of collagen and polyurethane polymeric nanofibers using electrospinning technique for tissue engineering applications. J Environ Treat Tech. 2019;7(4): 802–807
   Google Scholar
• Teo WE, He W, Ramakrishna S. Electrospun scaffold tailored for tissue‐specific extracellular matrix. Biotechnol J Healthcare Nutrit Technol. 2006;1(9):918–929.
   Google Scholar
• Law JX, Liau LL, Saim A, et al. Electrospun collagen nanofibers and their applications in skin tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;14(6):699–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgari Q, Alishahi M, Davani F, et al. Fabrication of amphotericin B-loaded electrospun core–shell nanofibers as a novel dressing for superficial mycoses and cutaneous leishmaniasis. Int J Pharm. 2021;606:120911.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Hao S, Luo T, et al. Keratose/poly (vinyl alcohol) blended nanofibers: fabrication and biocompatibility assessment. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;72:212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentkover SH. The biology of facial fillers. Facial Plast Surg. 2009;25(2):073–085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Wang N, Xue Y, et al. Electrospun tilapia collagen nanofibers accelerating wound healing via inducing keratinocytes proliferation and differentiation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;143:415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhane KA, Ibrahim Z, Martin R, et al. Macroporous nanofiber wraps promote axonal regeneration and functional recovery in nerve repair by limiting fibrosis. Acta Biomater. 2019;88:332–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wistlich L, Kums J, Rossi A, et al. Multimodal bioactivation of hydrophilic electrospun nanofibers enables simultaneous tuning of cell adhesivity and immunomodulatory effects. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27(46):1702903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Leung DYM, Richers BN, et al. Vitamin D inhibits monocyte/macrophage proinflammatory cytokine production by targeting MAPK phosphatase-1. J Immunol. 2012;188(5):2127–2135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Ge L, Wang H, et al. Eluted 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 from radially aligned nanofiber scaffolds enhances cathelicidin production while reducing inflammatory response in human immune system-engrafted mice. Acta Biomater. 2019;97:187–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari U, An X, Rijal N, et al. Embedding magnesium metallic particles in polycaprolactone nanofiber mesh improves applicability for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2019;98:215–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamani R, Pilehvar-Soltanahmadi Y, Alizadeh E, et al. Macrophage repolarization using emu oil-based electrospun nanofibers: possible application in regenerative medicine. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(6):1258–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazantseva J, Ivanov R, Gasik M, et al. Graphene-augmented nanofiber scaffolds demonstrate new features in cells behaviour. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):30150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen J, Pompano RR, Santiago FW, et al. The use of self-adjuvanting nanofiber vaccines to elicit high-affinity B cell responses to peptide antigens without inflammation. Biomaterials. 2013;34(34):8776–8785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si Y, Wen Y, Kelly SH, et al. Intranasal delivery of adjuvant-free peptide nanofibers elicits resident CD8+ T cell responses. J Control Release. 2018;282:120–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora-Solano C, Wen Y, Han H, et al. Active immunotherapy for TNF-mediated inflammation using self-assembled peptide nanofibers. Biomaterials. 2017;149:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Shi F, Li C, et al. Single dose of protein vaccine with peptide nanofibers as adjuvants elicits long-lasting antibody titer. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;4(6):2000–2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Park J, Jiang Y, et al. Rational design of charged peptides that self-assemble into robust nanofibers as immune-functional scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2017;55:183–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar