References
- Dydyk AM, Forro SD, and Hanna A, et al. Sacroiliac joint injury [Updated 2022 Mar 6]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Treasure Island (FL); 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557881/
- Buchanan BK, and Varacallo M, et al. Sacroiliitis [Updated 2022 Feb 12]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL); 2021. PMID: 28846269 Bookshelf ID: NBK448141.
- Cohen SP, Chen Y, Neufeld NJ. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013;13(1):99–116.
- Soto Quijano DA, Otero Loperena E. Sacroiliac joint interventions. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018;29(1):171–183.
- Borowsky CD, Fagen G. Sources of sacroiliac region pain: insights gained from a study comparing standard intra-articular injection with a technique combining intra- and peri-articular injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(11):2048–2056.
- Jee H, Lee J-H, Park KD, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint intra-articular injections in the noninflammatory sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):330–337.
- Soneji N, Bhatia A, Seib R, et al. Comparison of fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance for sacroiliac joint injection in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain Pract. 2016;16(5):537–544.
- Ferrante FM, et al. Radiofrequency sacroiliac joint denervation for sacroiliac syndrome. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26(2):137–142.
- Kim WM, Lee HG, Won Jeong C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(12):1285–1290.
- Singla V, Batra YK, Bharti N, et al. Steroid vs. platelet-rich plasma in ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection for chronic low back pain. Pain Pract. 2017;17(6):782–791.
- Lee JH, Lee SH, Song SH. Clinical effectiveness of botulinum toxin A compared to a mixture of steroid and local anesthetics as a treatment for sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(5):692–700.
- Ou-Yang DC, York PJ, Kleck CJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(23):2027–2036.
- Smith AG, Capobianco R, Cher D, et al. Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2013;7(1):14.
- Ledonio CG, Polly DW Jr., Swiontkowski MF. Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(6):1831–1838.
- Ashman B, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT. Chronic sacroiliac joint pain: fusion versus denervation as treatment options. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2010;1(3):35–44.
- Shamrock AG, Patel A, Alam M, et al. The safety profile of percutaneous minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Global Spine J. 2019;9(8):874–880.
- Whang PG, Darr E, Craig Myer S, et al. Long-term prospective clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive lateral transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants. Med Devices. 2019;12:411–422.
- Lee DW, Patterson DG, Sayed D. Review of current evidence for minimally invasive posterior sacroiliac joint fusion. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(3):514–524.
- Sayed D, Balter K, and Pyles S, et al. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the long-term efficacy and safety of a novel posterior sacroiliac fusion device. J Pain Res. 2021;14:3251–3258.
- Sturesson B, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, et al. iMIA 6 month results. Six month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs. Conservative management. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(3):708–719.
- Whang P, Cher D, Polly D, et al. INSITE 6 month results. Sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants vs. Non-surgical management: 6 month outcomes from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Jan;9:6.
- Dengler J, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, et al. iMIA 1 year results. 1 year results of a randomized controlled trial of conservative management vs. Minimally invasive surgical treatment for sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Physician. 2017;20:537.
- Dengler J, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, et al. iMIA 2 year results: randomized trial of sacroiliac joint arthrodesis compared with conservative management for chronic low back pain attributed to sacroiliac joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(5):400–411.
- Polly DW, Cher DJ, Wine KD, et al. INSITE 1-year results.One year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants vs. non-surgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: 12 month outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:674–691.
- Polly DW, Swofford J, Whang PG, et al. INSITE 2-year results. Two year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion vs. Non-surgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:28.
- Dengler J, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, et al. Randomized trial of sacroiliac joint arthrodesis compared with conservative management for chronic low back pain attributed to the sacroiliac joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101:400–411.
- Polly DW, Swofford J, Whang PG. Two-year outcome from an randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion vs. Non-surgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Int J Spine Surg. 2016 January;10:28.
- Pope JE, Fishman M, Chakravarthy K, et al. A retrospective, multicenter, quantitative analysis of patients’ baseline pain quality (PROMIS-29) entering into pain and spine practices in the United States (ALIGN). Pain Ther. 2021;10:539–550.