Haemodialysis catheters – a review of design and function

References

• Uldall P, Woods F, Merchant N, et al. A double-lumen subclavian cannula (DLSC) for temporary haemodialysis access. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1980;36:93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lewinstein C, Silberman H, Goren G, et al. Experience with coaxial dialysis cannula for temporary vascular access. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1983;29:357–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Twardowski Z. Intravenous catheters for haemodialysis: historical perspective. Int J Artif Organs. 2000;23(2):73–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapson J, Hoenich N, Wilkinson R, et al. Dual lumen subclavian catheters for haemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs. 1985;8(4):195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeles A, Lerner A, Goldstein S, et al. Comparison of coaxial and side-by-side double lumen subclavian catheters with single lumen catheter. Am J Kidney Dis. 1986;7(3):221–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asfar S, Heys S. A modified technique for insertion and subcutaneous tunnelling of a subclavian catheter for haemodialysis. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1985;30(5):314–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schanzer H, Kaplan S, Bosch J, et al. Double-lumen, silicone rubber, indwelling venous catheters. A new modality for angioaccess. Arch Surg. 1986;121(2):229–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwab S, Buller G, McCann R, et al. Prospective evaluation of a dacron cuffed haemodialysis catheter for prolonged use. Am J Kidney Dis. 1988;11(2):166–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schusterman N, Kloss K, Mullen J. Successful use of double-lumen, silicone rubber catheters for permanent haemodialysis access. Kidney Int. 1989;35(3):887–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domoto D, Garvin P. Recurrent venous thrombosis associated with permanent internal jugular vein hemodialysis catheters. ASAIO Trans. 1987;33(3):140–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tal M, Ni N. Selecting optimal hemodialysis catheters: material, design, advanced features, and preferences. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2008;11(3):186–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ling X, Lu H, Loh E, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparison of performance among step-tip, split-tip, and symmetrical-tip haemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(4):1282–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meersch H, Bacquer D, Vandecasteele S, et al. Haemodialysis catheter design and catheter performance: a randomised controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(6):902–908.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trerotola S, Shah H, Johnson M, et al. Randomised comparison of high-flow versus conventional haemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(8):1032–1038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atherikul K, Schwab S, Conlon P. Adequacy of haemodialysis with cuffed central-vein catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:745–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M, Edwards L, Treleaven D, et al. Randomised study of temporary haemodialysis catheters. Int J Artif Organs. 2002;25(1):40–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash S, Mankus R, Sutton J. Survival and hydraulic function of the Ash Split Cath haemodialysis catheter. ASAIO J. 2000;46(2):223.
   Google Scholar
• Mankus R, Ash S, Sutton J. Comparison of blood flow rates and hydraulic resistance between the Mahurkar Catheter, the Tesio Twin Catheter, and the Ash Split Cath. ASAIO J. 1998;44(5):532–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesely T, Ravenscroft A. Haemodialysis catheter tip design: observations on fluid flow and recirculation. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(1):29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Kang S, Choi S, et al. Comparison of the Palindrome vs Step-Tip tunnelled haemodialysis catheter: a prospective randomised trial. Semin Dial. 2012;25(5):587–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash S. Advances in tunnelled central venous catheters for dialysis: design and performance. Semin Dial. 2008;21(6):504–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho S, Song R, Park S, et al. Development of new haemodialysis catheter using numerical analysis and experiments. ASAIO J. 2021;67(7):817–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal M, Peixoto A, Crowley S, et al. Comparison of side hole versus non side hole high flow haemodialysis catheters. Haemodial Int. 2006;10:63–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mareels G, Wachter D, Verdonck P. Computational fluid dynamics – analysis of the Niagara haemodialysis catheter in a right heart model. Artif Org. 2004;28(7):639–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen D, Oliveira D, Qian J, et al. Impact of side-hole geometry on the performance of haemodialysis catheter tips: a computational fluid dynamics assessment. Plos One. 2020;15(8). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0236946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young E, Contreras G, Robert N, et al. Incidence and influencing factors associated with exit site infections in temporary catheters for haemodialysis and apheresis. Nephrol Nurs J. 2005;32(1):41–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Contreras G, Liu P, Elzinga L, et al. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, comparative evaluation of dual- versus triple-lumen catheters for haemodialysis and apheresis in 485 patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(2):315–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijmer M, Vervloet M, Wee P. Prospective follow-up of a novel design haemodialysis catheter; lower infection rates and improved survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:977–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van OM, Abrahams A, Weijmer M, et al. Precurved non-tunnelled catheters for haemodialysis are comparable in terms of infections and malfunction as compared to tunnelled catheters: a retrospective cohort study. J Vasc Access. 2019;20(3):307–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabindranath K, Bansal T, Adams J, et al. Systematic review of antimicrobials for the prevention of haemodialysis catheter-related infections. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:3763–3774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohail M, Vachharajani T, Anvari E. Central venous catheters for haemodialysis – the myth and the evidence. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6:2958–2968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lok C, Huber T, Lee T, et al. KDOQI vascular access guideline workgroup. Clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kid Dis. 2020;75(4):1–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allon M, Brouwer-Maier D, Abreo K, et al. Recommended clinical trial end points for dialysis catheters. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(3):495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoy S, Allon M, Beathard G, et al. Clinical trial end points for haemodialysis vascular access. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(3):490–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar