Design trends in actuated lower-limb prosthetic systems: a narrative review

References

• Zhang X, Liu Y, Zhang F, et al. On Design and Implementation of Neural-Machine Interface for Artificial Legs. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics. 2012;8:418–429. doi: 10.1109/TII.2011.2166770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz S, Valette R, Damonte F, et al. A review of user needs to drive the development of lower limb prostheses. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19(1):119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernigou P. Ambroise Paré IV: the early history of artificial limbs (from robotic to prostheses). Int Orthop. 2013;37:1195–1197. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1884-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windrich M, Grimmer M, Christ O, et al. Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(S3):140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genin JJ, Bastien GJ, Franck B, et al. Effect of speed on the energy cost of walking in unilateral traumatic lower limb amputees. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;103(6):655–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Wang Q. Combining push-off power and nonlinear damping behaviors for a lightweight motor-driven transtibial prosthesis. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2017;22(6):2512–2523. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2017.2766205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Haque MR, Shen X. Obtaining natural Sit-to-Stand motion with a biomimetic controller for powered knee prostheses. J Healthc Eng 2017. 2017;2017:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2017/3850351
   Google Scholar
• Ottobock. Instructions for use (user)| 1B1-2 Meridium. Wien. [Accessed on 2023 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.ottobock.com/en-us/product/1B1-2.
   Google Scholar
• Ottobock. Instructions for use (user)| 1A1-2 Empower. Salt Lake City. [Accessed on 2023 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.ottobock.com/en-us/product/1A1-2.
   Google Scholar
• Össur. POWER KNEE PKA01 Instructions for use. Reykjavík. (2022) [Accessed on 2023 Jun 1]. Available from: https://media.ossur.com/ossur-dam/image/upload/pi-documents-global/Power_Knee_1441_001_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd MK, Rouse EJ. The VSPA foot: a quasi-passive ankle-foot prosthesis with continuously variable stiffness. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(12):2375–2386. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2750113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au SK, Weber J, Herr H. Powered ankle–foot prosthesis improves walking metabolic economy. IEEE Trans Robot. 2009;25(1):51–66. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2008.2008747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azocar AF, Mooney LM, Duval JF, et al. Design and clinical implementation of an open-source bionic leg. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4:941–953. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-00619-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers WC, Mann RW. An electrohydraulic knee-torque controller for a prosthesis simulator. J Biomech Eng. 1977;99(1):3–8. doi: 10.1115/1.3426266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ha KH, Varol HA, Goldfarb M. Volitional control of a prosthetic knee using surface electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58(1):144–151. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2070840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H, Zhang F, Hargrove LJ, et al. Continuous Locomotion-Mode Identification for Prosthetic Legs Based on Neuromuscular–Mechanical Fusion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58(10):2867–2875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S-K, Waycaster G, Shen X. Electromyography-based control of active above-knee prostheses. Control Eng Pract. 2011;19(8):875–882. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Feng Y, Wang Q. Combining vibrotactile feedback with volitional myoelectric control for robotic transtibial prostheses. Front Neurorobot. 2016;10(8). doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2016.00008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietrich C, Nehrdich S, Seifert S, et al. Leg prosthesis with somatosensory feedback reduces phantom limb pain and increases functionality. Front Neurol. 2018;9:270. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charkhkar H, Shell CE, Marasco PD, et al. High-density peripheral nerve cuffs restore natural sensation to individuals with lower-limb amputations. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(5):056002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asif M, Tiwana MI, Khan US, et al. Advancements, trends and future prospects of lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Access. 2021;9:85956–85977. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3086807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lathouwers E, Díaz MA, Maricot A, et al. Therapeutic benefits of lower limb prostheses: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(4). doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01128-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domínguez-Ruiz A, López-Caudana EO, Lugo-González E, et al. Low limb prostheses and complex human prosthetic interaction: a systematic literature review. Front Robot AI. 2023;10:1032748. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1032748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara-Barrios CM, Blanco-Ortega A, Guzmán-Valdivia CH, et al. Literature review and current trends on transfemoral powered prosthetics. Adv Robot. 2018;32(2):51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina D, Vujaklija I, Brånemark R, et al. Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023;7(4):473–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosse S, Hartemann-Heurtier A, Jacqueminet S, et al. Incidence and characteristics of lower limb amputations in people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2009;26(4):391–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, et al. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(8):563–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, et al. Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(1):74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman VT, Ralston H, Todd F. Human walking. Baltimore (USA MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Mueske NM, Õunpuu S, Ryan DD, et al. Impact of gait analysis on pathology identification and surgical recommendations in children with spina bifida. Gait Posture. 2019;67:128–132. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasayama M, Murakami T. Design of a gait rehabilitation system: gait analysis and gait trajectory generation algorithm. 2013 IEEE Int Symp Ind Electron IEEE; Taipei, Taiwan; 2013. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Guan X, Ye J, et al. Gait deviation correction method for gait rehabilitation with a lower limb exoskeleton Robot. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2022;4(3):754–763.
   Google Scholar
• Ingrosso S, Benedetti MG, Leardini A, et al. GAIT analysis in patients operated with a novel total ankle prosthesis. Gait Posture. 2009;30(2):132–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Chun MH, Ahn JS, et al. Comparison of gait analysis between anterior and posterior ankle foot orthosis in hemiplegic patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(8):630–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtaruzzaman M, Shafie AA, Khan MR. Gait analysis: systems, technologies, and importance. J Mech Med Biol. 2016;16(7):1630003. doi: 10.1142/S0219519416300039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanko RM, Laende EK, Strutzenberger G, et al. Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system. J Biomech. 2021;122:110414. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob V, Küderle A, Kluge F, et al. Validation of a sensor-based gait analysis system with a Gold-Standard motion capture system in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Sensors. 2021;21(22):7680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler J, Reiter A, Gattringer H, et al. Simultaneous identification of human body model parameters and gait trajectory from 3D motion capture data. Med Eng Phys. 2020;84:193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham H, Kawanishi M, Narikiyo T A LLE-HMM-based framework for recognizing human gait movement from EMG. 2015 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom IEEE; Seattle, WA, USA; 2015. p. 2997–3002.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Dai Y, Kang T, et al. Research on gait recognition based on lower limb EMG Signal. 2021 IEEE Int Conf Mechatronics Autom IEEE; Takamatsu, Japan; 2021. p. 212–217.
   Google Scholar
• Tortora S, Tonin L, Chisari C, et al. Hybrid human-machine interface for gait decoding through bayesian fusion of EEG and EMG classifiers. Front Neurorobot. 2020;14:582728. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.582728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe A, Samson MM, Hoitsma MJ, et al. The influence of walking speed on parameters of gait symmetry determined from ground reaction forces. Hum Mov Sci. 1996;15:347–367. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(96)00005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi T, Ishida K, Hirose D, et al. Vertical ground reaction force shape is associated with gait parameters, timed up and go, and functional reach in elderly females. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(1):42–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wafai L, Zayegh A, Woulfe J, et al. Identification of foot pathologies based on plantar pressure asymmetry. Sensors. 2015;15(8):20392–20408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Zhu A, Tu Y, et al. Adaptive neural fuzzy reasoning method for recognizing human movement gait phase. Rob Auton Syst. 2022;153:104087. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2022.104087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicon. VICON NEXUS USER GUIDE. Oxford (UK). (2021). [Accessed on 2023 Sep 1] Available from: https://docs.vicon.com/display/Nexus212/PDF+downloads+for+Vicon+Nexus
   Google Scholar
• OptiTrack. MOTIVE V3.0. Corvallis (OR). (2023). [Accessed on 2023 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.optitrack.com/software/motive/
   Google Scholar
• Qualisys. Qualisys Track Manager. Gothenburg Sweden. (2023). [Accessed on 2023 Jul 6]. Available from: https://cdn-content.qualisys.com/2019/10/PI_Qualisys_Track_Manager.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shi B, Wei W. The inverse dynamic method and promoting its precision of calculation. J Nanjing Inst Phys Educ (Natural Sci. 2003;2:6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori M, Farina D, Lloyd DG. Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling to best track joint moments using a balance between muscle excitations derived from electromyograms and optimization. J Biomech. 2014;47(15):3613–3621. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J. The AnyBody modeling system. DHM and Posturography. In: Scataglini S, Paul G, editors. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2019. p. 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Seth A, Hicks JL, Uchida TK, et al. OpenSim: Simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement. In Schneidman D, editor. PLOS Comput Biol. 2018;14(7):e1006223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn A, Sreckovic I, Reiter S, et al. First results concerning the safety, walking, and satisfaction with an innovative, microprocessor-controlled four-axes prosthetic foot. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2018;42(3):350–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innovations F. Kinnex 2.0 Instructions for use. Irvine. [Accessed on 2023 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.freedomkinnex.com/_files/ugd/61b543_71e80179c7584f4d8ee19735e01d734f.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Companies F Raize from Hosmer. Chattanooga. [Accessed on 2023 Mar 11]. Available from: https://pdf.medicalexpo.com/pdf/fillauer/raise/74954-90667-_2.html
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford. Elan. Experience smoother, safer and more natural walking. (OH). [Accessed on 2023 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.blatchfordmobility.com/media/eaknn22w/203266609-elan-product-brochure-iss1-us-aw-web-pages.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford. ElanIC. Do more. Feel good. (OH). [Accessed on 2023 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.blatchfordmobility.com/media/upaoarld/elanic-brochure-iss1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Össur. PROPRIO FOOT Instructions for use. Reykjavík. (2021). [Accessed on 2023 Apr 16]. Available from: https://media.ossur.com/ossur-dam/image/upload/pi-documents-global/Proprio_Foot_1366_001_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alimusaj M, Fradet L, Braatz F, et al. Kinematics and kinetics with an adaptive ankle foot system during stair ambulation of transtibial amputees. Gait Posture. 2009;30(3):356–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitragari G, Mahler DB, Sumpio BJ, et al. Prosthetic options Available for the diabetic lower limb amputee. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2014;31(1):173–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe CW. Four-bar linkage prosthetic knee mechanisms. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 1994;18(3):159–173. doi: 10.3109/03093649409164401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehlin. V-One microprocessor four-bar pneumatic knee prosthesis. New Taipei City. [Accessed on 2023 Mar 11]. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CNFJoR5ByjBDCIv97TKG-HgY79u8fnpR/view
   Google Scholar
• PROTEOR. I-CATALOG: COMPONENTS & MATERIALS. Saint-Apollinaire. p. 9 (2022). [Accessed on 2023 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.proteorusa.com/_files/ugd/21024d_db814f7419234c32bdb700fb8ecded21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PROTEOR USA. Rediscover the versatility of the plié 3. Tempe. (2021). [Accessed on 2023 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.proteorusa.com/_files/ugd/21024d_64e57f4612994631a9ce9b26de8ed371.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ottobock. Instructions For Use (User)| C-Leg 3C98-3, 3C88-3. Wien. [Accessed on 2023 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.ottobock.com/en-us/product/3C88-3~23C98-3
   Google Scholar
• PROTEOR. EXPECT MORE. PROTEOR QUATTRO microprocessor knee. Tempe. [Accessed on 2023 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.freedomquattro.com/overview
   Google Scholar
• Ottobock. Instructions for use (user) | 3B5-3 genium X3. Wien. [Accessed on 2023 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.ottobock.com/en-us/product/3B5-3
   Google Scholar
• Reboocon. INTUY® knee: motorized, lightweight, intuitive, safe. Delft. (2023).[Accessed on 2023 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.rbionics.com/products/prosthetic-knee/
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford. Orion 3 User Guide. Raunheim. [Accessed on 2023 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.blatchfordmobility.com/en-gb/for-professionals/technical-documentation/
   Google Scholar
• Mobrez A, El-Brollossy M, Yehia M, et al. Microprocessor-based hydraulic damping-controlled prosthetic knee for developing countries. 2019 Int Conf Robot Autom Ind IEEE. p. 1–6 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Össur. RHEO KNEE Instructions for use. Reykjavík. (2021). [Accessed on 2023 Jun 1]. Available from: https://media.ossur.com/ossur-dam/image/upload/pi-documents-global/RHEO_KNEE_IFUS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Össur. RHEO KNEE XC Instructions for use. Reykjavík. (2021). Available from: https://media.ossur.com/ossur-dam/image/upload/pi-documents-global/RHEO_KNEE_XC_IFUS.pdf. [Accessed on 2023 Jun 1].
   Google Scholar
• Thiele J, Schöllig C, Bellmann M, et al. Designs and performance of three new microprocessor-controlled knee joints. Biomed Eng/Biomed Tech. 2018;64:119–126. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2017-0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yari P, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH. Functional outcome of hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy: a cross-sectional national descriptive study in the Netherlands. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(12):1127–1133. doi: 10.1177/0269215508095088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragon MP, Orozco GAV, Altamirano AA Bionic hip prosthesis based on polycentric mechanisms. 2013 Pan Am Heal Care Exch IEEE. p. 1–5 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Ottobock. Instructions for use (user)| 7E10 Helix3D. Duderstadt. Available from: https://www.ottobock.com/en-us/product/7E10 [Accessed on 2023 Mar 11].
   Google Scholar
• Ludwigs E, Bellmann M, Schmalz T, et al. Biomechanical differences between two exoprosthetic hip joint systems during level walking. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2010;34(4):449–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailledrat E, Moineau B, Seetha V, et al. Does the new helix 3D hip joint improve walking of hip disarticulated amputees? Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;56(5):411–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartlett HL, King ST, Goldfarb M, et al. A semi-powered ankle prosthesis and unified controller for level and sloped walking. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:320–329. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3049194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanzer EM, Adamczyk PG. Design and validation of a semi-active variable stiffness foot prosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018;26(12):2351–2359. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2877962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedic R, Dindo H. SmartLeg: an intelligent active robotic prosthesis for lower-limb amputees. 2011 XXIII Int Symp Information, Commun Autom Technol IEEE. p. 1–7 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sup F, Bohara A, Goldfarb M. Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. Int J Rob Res. 2008;27(2):263–273. doi: 10.1177/0278364907084588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sup F, Bohara A, Goldfarb M Design and control of a powered knee and ankle prosthesis. Proc 2007 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom IEEE; Rome, Italy; 2007. p. 4134–4139.
   Google Scholar
• Hata N, Hori Y Basic research on power limb using gait information of able-side leg. 7th Int Work Adv Motion Control Proc IEEE; Maribor, Slovenia; 2002. p. 540–545.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt JK, Bellman R, Holgate M, et al. The SPARKy (Spring ankle with Regenerative kinetics) project: design and analysis of a robotic transtibial prosthesis with Regenerative kinetics. 6th Int Conf Multibody Syst Nonlinear Dyn Control Parts A, B, C ASMEDC; Las Vegas, Nevada; 2007. p. 1587–1596.
   Google Scholar
• Fite K, Mitchell J, Sup F, et al. Design and control of an electrically powered knee prosthesis. 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; Noordwijk, Netherlands;2007. p. 902–905.
   Google Scholar
• Herr HM, Grabowski AM. Bionic ankle–foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2012;279(1728):457–464. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convens B, Dong D, Furnemont R, et al. Modeling, design and test-bench validation of a semi-active propulsive ankle prosthesis with a Clutched series elastic actuator. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2019;4(2):1823–1830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt JK, Sugar TG, Holgate M, et al. An active foot-ankle prosthesis with biomechanical energy regeneration. J Med Device. 2010;4(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bergelin BJ, Mattos JO, Wells JG, et al. Concept through preliminary bench testing of a powered lower limb prosthetic device. J Mech Robot. 2010;2(4):041005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergelin BJ, Voglewede PA. Design of an active ankle-foot prosthesis utilizing a four-bar mechanism. J Mech Des. 2012;134(6):061004. doi: 10.1115/1.4006436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong D, Ge W, Convens B, et al. Design, optimization and Energetic evaluation of an efficient Fully powered ankle-foot prosthesis with a series elastic actuator. IEEE Access. 2020;8:61491–61503. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Wang Q, Wang L. On the design of a powered transtibial prosthesis with stiffness adaptable ankle and toe joints. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2014;61(9):4797–4807. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2013.2293691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt GA, Williamson MM Series elastic actuators. Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots; Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Press; 1995. p. 399–406.
   Google Scholar
• Gao F, Liao W-H, Chen B, et al. Design of powered ankle-foot prosthesis driven by parallel elastic actuator. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); Singapore; 2015. p. 374–379.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Villalpando EC, Herr H. Agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis: a preliminary study in level-ground walking. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(3):361. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2008.09.0131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn L, Geeroms J, Jimenez-Fabian R, et al. Ankle-knee prosthesis with active ankle and energy transfer: development of the CYBERLEGs Alpha-prosthesis. Rob Auton Syst. 2015;73:4–15. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2014.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ham R, Vanderborght B, Van Damme M, et al. MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: design and implementation in a biped robot. Rob Auton Syst. 2007;55(10):761–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran M, Gabert L, Hood S, et al. A lightweight robotic leg prosthesis replicating the biomechanics of the knee, ankle, and toe joint. Sci Rob. 2022;7(72):eabo3996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versluys R, Desomer A, Lenaerts G, et al. A pneumatically powered below-knee prosthesis: design specifications and first experiments with an amputee. 2008 2nd IEEE RAS EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatronics IEEE; Scottsdale, AZ, USA; 2008. p. 372–377.
   Google Scholar
• Waycaster G, Wu S-K, Shen X. Design and control of a pneumatic artificial muscle actuated above-knee prosthesis. J Med Device. 2011;5:031003. doi:10.1115/1.4004417
   Google Scholar
• Shen X, Christ D. Design and control of Chemomuscle: a liquid-propellant-powered muscle actuation system. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2011;133(2):021006. doi: 10.1115/1.4003208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open-Source Leg. Available from: https://opensourceleg.com. [Accessed on 2023 Sep 1].
   Google Scholar
• Ueyama Y, Kubo T, Shibata M. Robotic hip-disarticulation prosthesis: evaluation of prosthetic gaits in a non-amputee individual. Adv Robot. 2020;34(1):37–44. doi: 10.1080/01691864.2019.1705908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan M, Chen Y, He B, et al. Study on adaptive adjustment of variable joint stiffness for a semi-active hip prosthesis. Intelligent Robotics and Applications: 15th International Conference, ICIRA 2022; Harbin, China; 2022. p. 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hachisuka K, Dozono K, Ogata H, et al. Total surface bearing below-knee prosthesis: advantages, disadvantages, and clinical implications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(7):783–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh JCH, Lee PVS, Chong SY. Comparative study between patellar-tendon-bearing and pressure cast prosthetic sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(3b):491. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2004.03.0491
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Highsmith J, Highsmith J. Common skin pathology in LE prosthesis users. J Am Acad Physician Assoc. 2007;20(11):33–36. doi: 10.1097/01720610-200711000-00018
   Google Scholar
• Clippinger FW. Use of the temporary quadrilateral socket plaster pylon in the elderly amputee. South Med J. 1963;56(6):588–592. doi: 10.1097/00007611-196306000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin G, Fischer E, Dixon M. Prescription of above-knee and below-knee prostheses. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 1986;10(3):117–124. doi: 10.3109/03093648609164514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritham CH. Biomechanics and shape of the above-knee socket considered in light of the ischial containment concept. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 1990;14(1):9–21. doi: 10.3109/03093649009080311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long IA. Normal Shape-Normal Alignment (NSNA) Above-Knee Prosthesis. Clin Prosthetics Orthot. 1985;9:9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sabolich J. Contoured Adducted Trochanteric-controlled Alignment method (CAT-CAM): introduction and basic principles. Clin Prosthetics Orthot. 1985;9:15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Paterno L, Ibrahimi M, Gruppioni E, et al. Sockets for limb prostheses: a review of existing technologies and Open challenges. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018;65(9):1996–2010. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2775100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie M, Murray L, McGarry A. Transfemoral prosthetic socket designs: a review of the literature. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot. 2022;34(2):e73–e92. doi: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000395
   Google Scholar
• Fatone S, Caldwell R. Northwestern University flexible Subischial vacuum socket for persons with transfemoral amputation. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2017;41(3):246–250. doi: 10.1177/0309364616685230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alley RD, Williams TW III, Albuquerque MJ, et al. Prosthetic sockets stabilized by alternating areas of tissue compression and release. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietzen CJ, Harshberger J, Pidikiti RD. Suction sock suspension for above-knee prostheses. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot. 1991;3(2):90–93. doi: 10.1097/00008526-199100320-00005
   Google Scholar
• Fillauer CE, Pritham CH, Fillauer KD. Evolution and development of the silicone suction socket (3S) for Below-Knee Prostheses. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot. 1989;1(2):92–103. doi: 10.1097/00008526-198901000-00007
   Google Scholar
• Klute GK, Glaister BC, Berge JS. Prosthetic liners for lower limb amputees. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2010;34(2):146–153. doi: 10.3109/03093641003645528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh H, Lemaire ED, Eshraghi A. The evidence-base for elevated vacuum in lower limb prosthetics: literature review and professional feedback. Clin Biomech. 2016;37:108–116. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beil TL, Street GM, Covey SJ. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(6):693–700.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, et al. Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a Comparison between common suction socket and seal-in liner. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(8):1584–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver-Thorn B, Current T, Kuhse B. Preliminary investigation of residual limb plantarflexion and dorsiflexion muscle activity during treadmill walking for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2012;36(4):435–442. doi: 10.1177/0309364612443379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers E. Neurally-controlled ankle-foot prosthesis with non-backdrivable transmission for rock climbing augmentation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Huang S, Ferris DP. Muscle activation patterns during walking from transtibial amputees recorded within the residual limb-prosthetic interface. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9(1):55. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeon SH, Shu T, Rogers EA, et al. Flexible dry electrodes for EMG acquisition within lower extremity prosthetic sockets. 2020 8th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob); New York, NY; 2020. p. 1088–1095.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng E, Wang L, Wei K, et al. A noncontact capacitive sensing system for recognizing locomotion modes of transtibial amputees. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(12):2911–2920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasni F, Hamzaid NA, Muthalif AGA, et al. In-socket sensory system for transfemoral amputees using piezoelectric sensors: an efficacy study. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2016;21(5):2466–2476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayed AM, Hamzaid NA, Tan KYS, et al. Detection of prosthetic knee movement phases via in-socket sensors: a feasibility study. Sci World J 2015. 2015;2015:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2015/923286
   Google Scholar
• Ottobock. Instructions for use (user) | 3C60 Kenevo. Wien. Available from: https://www.ottobock.com/en-us/product/3C60. [Accessed on 2023 Mar 27].
   Google Scholar
• Grimes DL. An active multi-mode above knee prosthesis controller. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Stein JL. Design issues in the stance phase control of above-knee prostheses. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Varol HA, Sup F, Goldfarb M. Multiclass real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(3):542–551. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2034734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AJ, Simon AM, Fey NP, et al. Intent recognition in a powered lower limb prosthesis using time history information. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42(3):631–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeraer L, Aeyels B, Van der Perre G. Development of EMG-based mode and intent recognition algorithms for a computer-controlled above-knee prosthesis. J Biomed Eng. 1990;12(3):178–182. doi: 10.1016/0141-5425(90)90037-N
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Au S, Berniker M, Herr H. Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits. Neural Networks. 2008;21(4):654–666. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H, Kuiken TA, Lipschutz RD. A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(1):65–73. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.2003293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover CD, Fulk GD, Fite KB. The design and initial experimental validation of an active myoelectric transfemoral prosthesis. J Med Device. 2012;6(1):011005. doi: 10.1115/1.4005784
   Google Scholar
• Hoover CD, Fulk GD, Fite KB. Stair ascent with a powered transfemoral prosthesis under direct myoelectric control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2013;18(3):1191–1200. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2012.2200498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer S, Silver-Thorn B, Voglewede P, et al. Within-socket myoelectric prediction of continuous ankle kinematics for control of a powered transtibial prosthesis. J Neural Eng. 2014;11(5):056027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai O, Kelly G, Fei D-Y, et al. A wireless, smart EEG system for volitional control of lower-limb prosthesis. TENCON 2015 - 2015 IEEE Reg 10 Conf IEEE. Macao, China; 2015. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy DP, Bai O, Gorgey AS, et al. Electroencephalogram-based brain–computer interface and lower-limb prosthesis control: a case study. Front Neurol. 2017;8:00696. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Luo L, Pi M, et al. EEG-Based volitional control of prosthetic Legs for walking in different terrains. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2021;18(2):530–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanandish MH, Fey NP, Hoyt K. Lower limb motion estimation using ultrasound imaging: a framework for assistive device control. IEEE J Biomed Heal INFORMATICS. 2019;23(6):2505–2514. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2891997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanandish MH, Fey NP, Hoyt K Prediction of distal lower-limb motion using ultrasound-derived features of proximal skeletal muscle. 2019 IEEE 16th Int Conf Rehabil Robot IEEE; Toronto, ON, Canada; 2019. p. 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanandish MH, Rabe KG, Fey NP, et al. Gait phase identification during level, incline and decline ambulation tasks using portable sonomyographic sensing. 2019 IEEE 16th Int Conf Rehabil Robot IEEE; Toronto, ON, Canada; 2019. p. 988–993.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe KG, Jahanandish MH, Hoyt K, et al. Use of sonomyography for continuous estimation of hip, knee and ankle moments during multiple ambulation tasks. 2020 8th IEEE RAS/EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatronics IEEE; New York, NY, USA; 2020. p. 1134–1139.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe KG, Hassan Jahanandish M, Hoyt K, et al. Use of sonomyographic sensing to estimate knee angular velocity during varying modes of ambulation. 2020 42nd Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE; Montreal, QC, Canada; 2020. p. 3799–3802.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe KG, Lenzi T, Fey NP. Performance of Sonomyographic and electromyographic sensing for Continuous estimation of joint torque during ambulation on multiple terrains. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:2635–2644. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3134189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Kim K, Sharma N. Prediction of ankle dorsiflexion moment by combined ultrasound sonography and Electromyography. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28(1):318–327. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2953588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CR, Srinivasan SS, Yeon SH, et al. Magnetomicrometry. Sci Rob. 2021;6(57):eabg0656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CR, Clark WH, Clarrissimeaux EG, et al. Clinical viability of magnetic bead implants in muscle. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1010276. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1010276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CR, Yeon SH, Clark WH, et al. Untethered muscle tracking using magnetomicrometry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1010275. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1010275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis BL, Ortolano M(, Richards K, et al. Realtime visual feedback diminishes energy consumption of amputee subjects during treadmill locomotion. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot. 2004;16(2):49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Russell Esposito E, Choi HS, Darter BJ, et al. Can real-time visual feedback during gait retraining reduce metabolic demand for individuals with transtibial amputation? In: Grabowski A, editor. PLoS one. 2017;12(2):e0171786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow DH, Cheng CT. Quantitative analysis of the effects of audio biofeedback on weight-bearing characteristics of persons with transtibial amputation during early prosthetic ambulation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(3):255–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baddeley A. Working memory. Curr Biol. 2010;20(4):R136–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Feng Y, Chen B, et al. Improving postural stability among people with lower-limb amputations by tactile sensory substitution. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crea S, Edin BB, Knaepen K, et al. Time-discrete vibrotactile feedback contributes to improved gait symmetry in patients with lower limb amputations: case series. Phys Ther. 2017;97(2):198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini E, Cesini I, D’Abbraccio J, et al. Increased symmetry of lower-limb amputees walking with concurrent bilateral vibrotactile feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:74–84. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3034521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusaw D, Hagberg K, Nolan L, et al. Can vibratory feedback be used to improve postural stability in persons with transtibial limb loss? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(8):1239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cesini I, Spigler G, Prasanna S, et al. Assessment of intuitiveness and comfort of wearable haptic feedback strategies for assisting level and stair walking. Electronics. 2020;9(10):1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokhmanova N, Rombokas E Vibrotactile feedback improves foot placement perception on stairs for lower-limb prosthesis users. 2019 IEEE 16th Int Conf Rehabil Robot IEEE; Toronto, ON, Canada; 2019. p. 1215–1220.
   Google Scholar
• Keri M-I, Shehata AW, Marasco PD, et al. A cost-Effective inertial measurement system for tracking movement and Triggering Kinesthetic feedback in lower-limb prosthesis users. Sensors. 2021;21(5):1844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culjat MO, Fan RE, Grundfest WS Optimization of a tactile feedback system to aid the rehabilitation of lower-limb amputees. 2008 Virtual Rehabil IEEE. p. 63 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fan RE, Culjat MO, King C-H, et al. A haptic feedback system for lower-limb prostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008;16(3):270–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husman MAB, Maqbool HF, Awad MI, et al. A wearable skin stretch haptic feedback device: towards improving balance control in lower limb amputees. 2016 38th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE; Orlando, FL 2016; p. 2120–2123.
   Google Scholar
• Shehata AW, Keri M-I, Gomez M, et al. Skin stretch enhances illusory movement in persons with lower-limb amputation. 2019 IEEE 16th Int Conf Rehabil Robot IEEE; Toronto, ON, Canada; 2019. p. 1233–1238.
   Google Scholar
• Chee L, Valle G, Preatoni G, et al. Cognitive benefits of using non-invasive compared to implantable neural feedback. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):16696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrini FM, Valle G, Bumbasirevic M, et al. Enhancing functional abilities and cognitive integration of the lower limb prosthesis. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(512):eaav8939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz R. Rotationplasty. Semin Surg Oncol. 1997;13(1):34–40. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199701/02)13:1<34:AID-SSU6>3.0.CO;2-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Nes CP. Rotation-plasty for congenital defects of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950;32-B(1):12–16. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.32B1.12
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs B, Kotajarvi BR, Kaufman KR, et al. Functional outcome of patients with rotationplasty about the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;415:52–58. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093896.12372.c1
   Google Scholar
• Al Muderis M, Lu W, Li JJ. Osseointegrated prosthetic limb for the treatment of lower limb amputations. Unfallchirurg. 2017;120:306–311. doi:10.1007/s00113-016-0296-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muderis MA, Aschoff HH, Bosley B, et al. Direct skeletal attachment prosthesis for the amputee athlete: the unknown potential. Sport Eng. 2016;19(3):141–145.
   Google Scholar
• Hobusch GM, Döring K, Brånemark R, et al. Advanced techniques in amputation surgery and prosthetic technology in the lower extremity. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(10):724–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, et al. Transfemoral prosthesis suspension systems. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(9):809–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Ghasemi Jahani SA, Omar O, et al. Osseointegrated prostheses for the rehabilitation of patients with transfemoral amputations: a prospective ten-year cohort study of patient-reported outcomes and complications. J Orthop Transl. 2023;38:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pospiech PT, Wendlandt R, Aschoff H-H, et al. Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2021;45(1):20–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert JS, Rehani M, Stiegelmar R. Osseointegration for Lower-Limb Amputation. JBJS Rev. 2017;5(10):e10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Integrum. Get your life back with the OPRATM implant system. Available from: https://integrum.se/what-we-do/our-products-future-solutions/opra-implant-system/. [Accessed on 2023 Jul 16].
   Google Scholar
• Hoellwarth JS, Tetsworth K, Kendrew J, et al. Periprosthetic osseointegration fractures are infrequent and management is familiar. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(2):162–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haque R, Al-Jawazneh S, Hoellwarth J, et al. Osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of transtibial amputees: the osseointegration group of Australia surgical technique and protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e038346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fracol ME, Janes LE, Ko JH, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation in the lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):541e–550e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargrove LJ, Simon AM, Young AJ, et al. Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1237–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart SE, Kung TA. Novel approaches to reduce symptomatic neuroma pain After limb amputation. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Reports. 2020;8(3):83–91. doi: 10.1007/s40141-020-00276-2
   Google Scholar
• Santosa KB, Oliver JD, Cederna PS, et al. Regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for Prevention and management of Neuromas. Clin Plast Surg. 2020;47(2):311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation treats neuroma and phantom pain in Major limb amputees. Ann Surg. 2019;270(2):238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clites TR, Herr HM, Srinivasan SS, et al. The ewing amputation: the first human implementation of the Agonist-antagonist myoneural interface. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2018;6(11):e1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Troyk PR, DeMichele GA, Kerns DA, et al. IMES: An Implantable Myoelectric Sensor. 2007 29th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE; Lyon, France; 2007. p. 1730–1733.
   Google Scholar
• Salminger S, Sturma A, Hofer C, et al. Long-term implant of intramuscular sensors and nerve transfers for wireless control of robotic arms in above-elbow amputees. Sci Rob. 2019;4(32):eaaw6306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmeister KD, Vujaklija I, Muceli S, et al. Broadband prosthetic interfaces: combining nerve transfers and implantable multichannel EMG Technology to decode spinal motor neuron activity. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:421. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir RF, Troyk PR, DeMichele G, et al. Implantable myoelectric sensors (IMES) for upper-extremity prosthesis control- preliminary work. Proc 25th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (IEEE Cat No03CH37439); Cancun, Mexico. IEEE. p. 1562–1565.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill DR, Lockhart J, Troyk PR, et al. Development of an implantable myoelectric sensor for advanced prosthesis control. Artif Organs. 2011;35(3):249–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Össur. Research and development. Available from: https://www.ossur.com/global/about-ossur/innovation/research-and-development. [Accessed on 2023 Jun 1].
   Google Scholar
• Page DM, George JA, Kluger DT, et al. Motor control and sensory feedback enhance prosthesis embodiment and reduce phantom pain After long-term hand amputation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:352. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Integrum. Upgrade your OPRATM implant system to e-OPRATM. Available from: https://integrum.se/what-we-do/our-products-future-solutions/e-opra/. [Accessed on 2023 Jul 16].
   Google Scholar
• Mastinu E, Doguet P, Botquin Y, et al. Embedded system for prosthetic control using implanted neuromuscular interfaces Accessed via an osseointegrated implant. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2017;11(4):867–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingle AM, Ness JP, Novello J, et al. Proof of concept for a chronic, percutaneous, osseointegrated neural interface for bi-directional prosthetic control with haptic feedback. 2019 9th Int IEEE/EMBS Conf Neural Eng IEEE; San Francisco, CA; 2019. p. 782–786.
   Google Scholar
• Wentink EC, Prinsen EC, Rietman JS, et al. Comparison of muscle activity patterns of transfemoral amputees and control subjects during walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10(1):87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wen Y, Brandt A, Si J, et al. Automatically customizing a powered knee prosthesis with human in the loop using adaptive dynamic programming. 2017 International Symposium on Wearable Robotics and Rehabilitation (WeRob) Houston, TX; 2017. p.1–2
   Google Scholar
• Hernández I, Yu W, Jin Z. Control of active lower limb prosthesis using human-in-the-loop scheme. Cogent Eng. 2022;9(1):2067026. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2022.2067026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunutsor SK, Gillatt D, Blom AW. Systematic review of the safety and efficacy of osseointegration prosthesis after limb amputation. Br J Surg. 2018;105(13):1731–1741. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Muderis M, Khemka A, Lord SJ, et al. Safety of osseointegrated implants for transfemoral amputees. J Bone Jt Surg. 2016;98(11):900–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar