Advantages and limitations of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an overview of the literature

REFERENCES

• O’Connor J, Goodfellow J, Perry N Fixation of the tibial components of the Oxford knee. Orthop Clin North Am [Internet]. 1982;13:65–87. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7063200. 1 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30268-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow J, O’Connor J. The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 1978;60-B:358–369. Available from: https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/0301-620X.60B3.581081.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranawat CS, Shine JJ. Duo-condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 1973;185–195. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197307000-00023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranawat CS, Insall J, Shine J. Duo-condylar knee arthroplasty: hospital for special surgery design. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 1976;76–82. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/975669.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ. The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 1992;147–152. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1563146.
   Google Scholar
• Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 1998;80:983–989. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b6.8177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 1998;80-B:983–989. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B6.0800983.
   Google Scholar
• J W Goodfellow C J Kershaw M K Benson JJO. The Oxford knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:692–701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty 2022 ANNUAL REPORT. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/732916/AOA+2022+AR+Digital/f63ed890-36d0-c4b3-2e0b-7b63e2071b16.
   Google Scholar
• THE NEW ZEALAND JOINT REGISTRY 21 year Report. Available from: https://www.nzoa.org.nz/sites/default/files/DH8426_NZJR_2020_Report_v5_30Sep.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Ninth Annual Report of the AJRR on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty ANNUAL REPORT 2022. Available from: https://connect.registryapps.net/hubfs/PDFs%20and%20PPTs/2022%20AJRR%20Annual%20Report.pdf?hsCtaTracking=e22b6617-7eba-4a95-8113-7aa80eb589d1%7C9509b20f-338c-45c0-aeb2-16a46cffd1d2.
   Google Scholar
• National Joint Registry. 18th Annual Report [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jan 8]. Available from: https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2018th%20Annual%20Report%202021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Japanese Society for Replacement Arthroplasty 2021 Annual report. Available from: https://jsra.info/data/pdf/report-2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, et al. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet [Internet]. 2014;384:1437–1445. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2001;16:970–976. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.25552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takafumi Hiranaka Toshikazu Tanaka Takaaki Fujishiro Ken Kotoura Kensuke Anjiki Naosuke Nagata Daiya Kitazawa Koji Okamoto CT. Is postoperative flexion angle genuinely better in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than in total knee arthroplasty? A comparison between the knees in the same patients. Knee. 2020; In press.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagami R, Inui H, Jo T, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower proportions of surgical site infection compared with total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective nationwide database study. The Knee [Internet]. 2021;28:124–130. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Zhang L, Wang C, et al. The mid-term outcomes of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Front Surg [Internet]. 2023;10:1033830. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1033830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez JC, Saxena A, Arguelles W, et al. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Risk-adjusted Comparison of 30-day Outcomes Using National Data From 2014 to 2018. Arthroplast Today [Internet]. 2022;17:114–119. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang L, Wang Q, Li Q, et al. A Comparative Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty and Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Contrast Media Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2022;2022:7795801. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7795801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun P-F, Jia Y-H. Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized prospective study. Knee [Internet]. 2012;19:103–106. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard DJ, et al. Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: A comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2004;19:590–597. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn JH, Kang DM, Choi KJ. Bilateral simultaneous unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus unilateral total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of the amount of blood loss and transfusion, perioperative complications, hospital stay, and functional recovery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2017;103:1041–1045. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.06.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argenson JN, O’Connor JJ. Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 1992;74:228–232. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.74B2.1544958.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price AJ, Short A, Kellett C, et al. Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 2005;87:1493–1497. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendrick BJL, Longino D, Pandit H, et al. Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement A RETRIEVAL STUDY OF 47 BEARINGS. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 2010;92:367–373. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohammad HR, Campi S, Kennedy JA, et al. Long-term in vivo wear of different bearing types used for the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Bone Joint Res [Internet]. 2019;8:535–543. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.811.BJR-2019-0163.R1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullaji AB, Shetty GM, Kanna R. Postoperative limb alignment and its determinants after minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2011;26:919–925. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, et al. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 1985;192:13–22. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3967412/. &NA; 10.1097/00003086-198501000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji S, Huang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Pre-operative predictive factors of residual varus on the mechanical axis after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Front Surg [Internet]. 2022;9:1054351. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1054351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, et al. Mobile bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee [Internet]. 2010;17:392–397. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker T, Zahn N, Bruckner T, et al. Mid-term results of lateral unicondylar mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study of 363 cases. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2018;100-B:42–49. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0600.R1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gunther TV, Murray DW, Miller R, et al. Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. The Knee [Internet]. 1996;3:33–39. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0968016096002086. 1–2 10.1016/0968-0160(96)00208-6
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy JA, Mohammad HR, Yang I, et al. Oxford domed lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2020;102-B:1033–1040. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1330.R2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hariri M, Hagemann M, Koch K-A, et al. Short- to mid-term results of minimally invasive lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: 133 cases in a non-designer series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg [Internet]. 2023;143:5849–5856. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04841-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitsch RG, Keudell A von, Losina E, et al. Good accuracy of the Phase III Oxford Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Instrumentation. Acta Orthop [Internet]. 2013;84:406–409. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.813801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MPJ, Pilot P, et al. Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2011;19:277–284. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1213-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisowski LA, Verheijen PM, Lisowski AE. Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA): Clinical and radiological results of minimum follow-up of 2 years. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil [Internet]. 2004;6:773–776. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17618193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zhang Q, Guo W, et al. The learning curve for minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM). J Orthop Surg Res [Internet]. 2014;9:81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0081-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZimmerBiomet. Oxford Partial Knee Microplasty Instrumentation Surgical Technique [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 15]. Available from: https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zimmer-biomet/medical-professionals/000-surgical-techniques/knee/oxford-partial-knee-microplasty-instrumentation-surgical-technique.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Koh IJ, Kim JH, Jang SW, et al. Are the Oxford(®) medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty new instruments reducing the bearing dislocation risk while improving components relationships? A case control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2016;102:183–187. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.11.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu Y, Xue H, Ma T, et al. Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2017;25:729–735. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4173-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng JP, Fan JCH, Lau LCM, et al. Can accuracy of component alignment be improved with Oxford UKA Microplasty® instrumentation? J Orthop Surg Res [Internet]. 2020;15:354. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01868-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvand A, Wilson HA, Sabah SA, et al. New instrumentation system for cementless mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves surgical performance particularly for trainees. The Knee [Internet]. 2021;31:46–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2021.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton TW, Pandit HG, Jenkins C, et al. Evidence-Based Indications for Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in a Consecutive Cohort of Thousand Knees. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2017;32:1779–1785. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berend KR, Berend ME, Dalury DF, et al. Consensus Statement on Indications and Contraindications for Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv [Internet]. 2015;24:252–256. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/jsoa.2015.0252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW. Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73 -B:582–586.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson PH, Goodfellow JW. Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 1986;68:608–609. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3733839.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZimmerBiomet. Radiographic Assessment for Medial Oxford Partial Knee Replacement [Internet]. [cited 2021 Sep 25]. Available from: https://www.oxfordpartialknee.net/content/dam/zb-minisites/oxford-partial-knee-hcp/documents/oxford-decision-aid-flyer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kamenaga T, Hiranaka T, Hida Y, et al. CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR OSTEONECROSIS OF THE KNEE. Acta Ortop Bras [Internet]. 2021;29:12–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212901233328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukuoka S, Fukunaga K, Taniura K, et al. Medium-term clinical results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee with four to 15 years of follow-up. Knee [Internet]. 2019;26:1111–1116. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton TW, Pandit HG, Lombardi AV, et al. Radiological decision aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Development and preliminary validation. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2016;98-B:3–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.BJJ-2016-0432.R1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozinn SC, Scott R Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 1989;71:145–150. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2643607. 1 10.2106/00004623-198971010-00023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S, et al. Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 2007;89-B:1602–1607. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.19260.
   Google Scholar
• Munk S, Odgaard A, Madsen F, et al. Preoperative lateral subluxation of the patella is a predictor of poor early outcome of Oxford phase-III medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop [Internet]. 2011;82:582–588. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.618915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, et al. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2011;93-B:622–628. Available from: http://www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/cgi/doi/10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.26214.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton TW, Choudhary R, Jenkins C, et al. Lateral osteophytes do not represent a contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2017;25:652–659. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4313-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Pandit HG, Liddle AD, et al. Comparison of outcomes after UKA in patients with and without chondrocalcinosis: a matched cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2017;25:319–324. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3578-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy J, Kennedy J, Jenkins C, et al. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to medial Oxford UKA: long-term patient-reported outcomes and implant survival in 1000 knees. 2019;27:2259–2265. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5218-6.
   Google Scholar
• Lee M, Chen J, Shi Lu C, et al. No Differences in Outcomes Scores or Survivorship of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Patients Younger or Older than 55 Years of Age at Minimum 10-Year Followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 2019;477:1434–1446. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannan A, Pilling RWD, Mason K, et al. Excellent survival and outcomes with fixed-bearing medial UKA in young patients (≤ 60 years) at minimum 10-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2020;28:3865–3870. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05870-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge J, Liu C, Sun X, et al. Gap balance difference of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty between hanging leg and supine leg position: a prospective cohort study. Int Orthop [Internet]. 2023;47:745–753. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05680-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, et al. Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 2009;91-B:185–189. Available from: http://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21413.
   Google Scholar
• Damm NB, Morlock MM, Bishop NE. Friction coefficient and effective interference at the implant-bone interface. J Biomech [Internet]. 2015;48:3517–3521. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.07.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campi S, Mellon SJ, Ridley D, et al. Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Bone Joint Res [Internet]. 2018;7:226–231. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campi S, Kendrick BJL, Kaptein BL, et al. Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis. The Knee [Internet]. 2021;28:383–390. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stempin R, Kaczmarek W, Stempin K, et al. Midterm Results of Cementless and Cemented Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty with Mobile Meniscal Bearing: A Prospective Cohort Study. Open Orthop J [Internet]. 2017;11:1173–1178. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001711011173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knifsund J, Reito A, Haapakoski J, et al. Short-term survival of cementless Oxford unicondylar knee arthroplasty based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Knee [Internet]. 2019;26:768–773. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campi S, Pandit HG, Dodd CAF, et al. Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2017;25:736–745. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4244-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad HR, Bullock GS, Kennedy JA, et al. Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2021;29:3229–3245. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06091-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad HR, Judge A, Murray DW. The Effect of Age on the Relative Outcomes of Cemented and Cementless Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Based on Data From National Databases. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2023;38:30–36.e1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Jiao X, Li Q, et al. Hybrid Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has lower residual cement extrusion than cemented arthroplasty in treating end-stage unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 30];22:1–10. Available from: https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-021-04720-9. 1 10.1186/s12891-021-04720-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa R, Hiranaka T, Okamoto K, et al. The Medial Eminence Line for Predicting Tibial Fracture Risk after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg [Internet]. 2020;12:166–170. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiranaka T, Yoshikawa R, Yoshida K, et al. Tibial shape and size predicts the risk of tibial plateau fracture after cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients. Bone and Joint Journal [Internet]. 2020;102-B:861–867. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1754.R1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li ZX, Tan AHC. An Early Periprosthetic Fracture of a Cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Risk Factors and Mitigation Strategies. J Orthop Case Rep [Internet]. 2021;11:65–69. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i04.2156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liddle AD, Pandit HG, Jenkins C, et al. Valgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2014;96-B:345–349. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B3.33182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamenaga T, Hiranaka T, Nakanishi Y, et al. Valgus Subsidence of the Tibial Component Caused by Tibial Component Malpositioning in Cementless Oxford Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2019;34. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price AJ, Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 2011;469:174–179. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1506-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisowski LA, Meijer LI, Van Den Bekerom MPJ, et al. Ten- to 15-year results of the Oxford Phase III mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective study from a non-designer group. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2016;98–B. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.BJJ-2016-0474.R1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohammad HR, Strickland L, Hamilton TW, et al. Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review. Acta Orthop [Internet]. 2018;89:101–107. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1367577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Jenkins C, et al. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2015;97-B:1493–1500. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cao Z, Niu C, Gong C, et al. Comparison of Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2019;34:3114–3123.e3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Wang J, Li H, et al. Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020;10:19075. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76124-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan A, Lewis PL, Dyer C, et al. Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 2021;479:1548–1558. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oost I, Koenraadt KLM, van Steenbergen LN, et al. Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop [Internet]. 2020;91:426–432. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1752017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, et al. Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2015;97-B:1506–1511. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gulati A, Chau R, Pandit HG, et al. The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 2009;91:896–902. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21914.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ro K-H, Heo J-W, Lee D-H. Bearing Dislocation and Progression of Osteoarthritis After Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Vary Between Asian and Western Patients: A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 2018;476:946–960. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Liu P, Lu F, et al. Bearing dislocation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in East Asian countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res [Internet]. 2021;16:28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02190-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae J-H, Kim JG, Lee S-Y, et al. Epidemiology of Bearing Dislocations After Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Multicenter Analysis of 67 Bearing Dislocations. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2020;35:265–271. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiranaka T, Suda Y, Kamenaga T, et al. Bearing Separation From the Lateral Wall of the Tibial Component Is a Risk of Anterior Dislocation of the Mobile Bearing in Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2022; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiranaka T, Suda Y, Kamenaga T, et al. Bearings can dislocate with smaller femoral components and thicker bearings in OxfordTM medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2023;103598. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103598.
   Google Scholar
• Kang S-W, Kim K-T, Hwang Y-S, et al. Is Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Appropriate for Asian Patients With the Risk of Bearing Dislocation? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2020;35:1222–1227. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit H, Spiegelberg B, Clavé A, et al. Aetiology of lateral progression of arthritis following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a case-control study. Musculoskelet Surg [Internet]. 2016;100:97–102. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0394-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamenaga T, Hiranaka T, Hida Y, et al. Lateral osteoarthritis progression is associated with a postoperative residual tibiofemoral subluxation in Oxford UKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2021; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06729-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Hiranaka T, Anjiki K, et al. MRI-determined preoperative lateral meniscus degeneration is not associated with adverse mid-term clinical results after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee [Internet]. 2020;27:1279–1284. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiranaka T, Furuhashi R, Takashiba K, et al. Agreement and accuracy of radiographic assessment using a decision aid for medial Oxford partial knee replacement: multicentre study. Knee Surg Relat Res [Internet]. 2022;34:13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00140-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendrick BJL, Rout R, Bottomley NJ, et al. The implications of damage to the lateral femoral condyle on medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 2010;92:374–379. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pandit H, Mancuso F, Jenkins C, et al. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2017;25:669–674. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4075-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad HR, Matharu GS, Judge A, et al. Comparison of the 10-year outcomes of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Acta Orthop [Internet]. 2020;91:76–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1680924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumby SA, Carrington R, Zayontz S, et al. Tibial plateau stress fracture: A complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using 4 guide pinholes. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2003;18:809–812. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00330-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeger JB, Haas D, Jäger S, et al. Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2012;20:1087–1091. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1698-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton TJ, Gill M, Athwal G, et al. Revision of a Medial UKA to a Kinematic Aligned TKA: Comparison of Operative Complexity, Postoperative Alignment, and Outcome Scores to a Primary TKA. J Knee Surg [Internet]. 2021;34:406–414. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker PN, Petheram T, Avery PJ, et al. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 2012;94:e126. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badawy M, Fenstad AM, Bartz-Johannessen CA, et al. Hospital volume and the risk of revision in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries -an observational study of 14,496 cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord [Internet]. 2017;18:388. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1750-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanavalee A, Limtrakul A, Veerasethsiri P, et al. Area of Skin Numbness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Minimally Invasive Approach Make Any Difference From Standard Approach? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2016;31:2499–2503. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faschingbauer M, Renner L, Boettner F. Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article. HSS J [Internet]. 2017;13:12–19. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9514-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker T, Rutkowski L, Innmann M, et al. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty using cobalt-chromium implants in patients with self-reported cutaneous metal hypersensitivity. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2019;101-B:227–232. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B2.BJJ-2018-0778.R1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atilla HA, Çevik HB, Akdoğan M, et al. Self-reported metal hypersensitivity in patients undergoing unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Clin Orthop Trauma [Internet]. 2021;14:17–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schalock PC, Menné T, Johansen JD, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants - diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Dermatitis [Internet]. 2012;66:4–19. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01971.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolopoulos AP, Balfousias T, Khan S, et al. Failure of a Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement due to Metal Allergy. J Long Term Eff Med Implants [Internet]. 2018;28:319–325. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2019030060.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Ambrosi R, Ursino N, Mariani I, et al. Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol [Internet]. 2023;33:1315–1328. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03295-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Ambrosi R, Nuara A, Mariani I, et al. Titanium Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Good to Excellent Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Metal Allergy Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2021;36:140–147.e2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ambrosi R, Loucas R, Loucas M, et al. No Clinical or Radiographic Differences Between Cemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop [Internet]. 2021;55:1195–1201. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43465-021-00486-3.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ambrosi R, Anghilieri FM, Corona K, et al. Similar rates of return to sports and BMI reduction regardless of age, gender and preoperative BMI as seen in matched cohort of hypoallergenic and standard Cobalt Chromium medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2022;30:890–898. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06467-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Su Z. A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res [Internet]. 2018;13:158. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0859-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Galaly A, Kappel A, Nielsen PT, et al. Revision Risk for Total Knee Arthroplasty Converted from Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison with Primary and Revision Arthroplasties, Based on Mid-Term Results from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 2019;101:1999–2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01468.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim JBT, Pang HN, Tay KJD, et al. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee [Internet]. 2019;26:847–852. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.04.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leta TH, Lygre SHL, Skredderstuen A, et al. Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty After Aseptic Revision to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of 768 TKAs and 578 UKAs Revised to TKAs from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (1994 to 2011). J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 2016;98:431–440. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi T, Hiranaka T, Fujishiro T, et al. Restricted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Failed Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Cureus [Internet]. 2023;15:e45104. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei L, Pellegrino P, Calò M, et al. Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art. Ann Transl Med [Internet]. 2016;4:126. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.03.33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackow KA, Bayers-Thering M, Phillips MJ, et al. A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA. Orthopedics [Internet]. 1999;22:698–702. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10418867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet]. 2004;86:682–687. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2007;22:1097–1106. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderl W, Pauzenberger L, Kölblinger R, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2016;24:102–111. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3345-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz-Ruiz P, Matas-Diez JA, Carbo-Laso E, et al. Patient-Specific Instrument Can Improve Functional and Radiographic Results during Learning Curve for Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg [Internet]. 2019;32:180–185. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flury A, Hasler J, Dimitriou D, et al. Midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of 115 consecutive patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. Knee [Internet]. 2019;26:889–896. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, et al. Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 2016;98:627–635. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth MJG, Anthony I, Rowe P, et al. Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res [Internet]. 2017;6:631–639. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0060.R1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauck RC, Blevins JL, Cross MB. Component Placement Accuracy in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Improved with Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Will It Have an Effect on Outcomes? HSS J [Internet]. 2018;14:211–213. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9593-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Begum FA, Kayani B, Morgan SDJ, et al. Robotic technology: current concepts, operative techniques and emerging uses in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev [Internet]. 2020;5:312–318. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Lu F-F, Liu G-J, et al. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review. Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2021;3:15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00071-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar