Advancing clinical understanding of surface electromyography biofeedback: bridging research, teaching, and commercial applications

References

• Everly GS, Lating JM. Biofeedback in the treatment of the stress response. In: Everly George SJ Lating J, editors. A Clinical Guide to the Treatment of the Human Stress Response [Internet]. New York (NY): Springer New York; 2019. p. 367–396. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9098-6_18
   Google Scholar
• Marquez DC, von Tscharner V, Murari K, et al. Development of a multichannel current-EMG system for coherence modulation with visual biofeedback. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(11):13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peper E, Shaffer F. Biofeedback history: an alternative view. Biofeedback. 2010;38(4):142–147. doi: 10.5298/1081-5937-38.4.03
   Google Scholar
• Xiong J. Design of health relaxation system based on biofeedback from finger sensors. In: CICC-ITOE 2010 – 2010 International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communication and 2010 Asia-Pacific Conference on Information Technology and Ocean Engineering; Macao, China; 2010. p. 127–128.
   Google Scholar
• Perera JAPH, Perera PMC, Rathnarajah LM, et al. Biofeedback based computational approach for Working Stress reduction through meditation technique. In: 16th International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer) 2016 - Conf Proc; Negombo, Sri Lanka; 2017. p. 132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Tolin DF, Davies CD, Moskow DM, et al. Biofeedback and neurofeedback for anxiety disorders: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1191:265–289. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9705-0_16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giggins OM, Persson UM, Caulfield B. Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil [Internet]. 2013;10(1):60. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu B, Hu J, Funk M, et al. RESonance: Lightweight, room-scale audio-visual biofeedback for immersive relaxation training. IEEE Access. 2018;6:38336–38347. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Osman H, Dong H, El Saddik A. Ubiquitous biofeedback serious game for stress management. IEEE Access. 2016;4:1274–1286. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2548980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollmann T, Abtahi F, Eghdam A, et al. User-centred design and usability evaluation of a heart rate variability biofeedback game. IEEE Access. 2016;4:5531–5539. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2601882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Zhang H, Pirbhulal S, et al. Assessment of biofeedback training for emotion management through wearable textile physiological monitoring system. IEEE Sensors J. 2015;15(12):7087–7095. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2015.2470638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Parnandi A, Gutierrez-Osuna RB. Leveraging off-the-shelf video games for stress self-regulation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2018;22(1):47–55. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2671788
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merletti R, Farina D. Surface Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2016. doi: 10.1002/9781119082934
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou P, Koutsos E. Microelectronics for muscle fatigue monitoring through surface EMG. In: CMOS Circuits for Biological Sensing and Processing; 2017. p. 133–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ho TY, Chen YJ, Hung WC, et al. The design of EMG measurement system for arm strength training machine. Math Probl Eng. 2015;2015:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2015/356028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R, Cerone GL. Tutorial. Surface EMG detection, conditioning and pre-processing: best practices. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020 54;54:102440. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayan AE, Beevi KTA, Jerome K, et al. High SNR EMG acquisition system for biofeedback applications. In: Proceedings - 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technology (CICT); Ghaziabad, India; 2015. p. 359–363.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama Y, Takano Y, Matsubara M, et al. The sound of smile: auditory biofeedback of facial EMG activity. Disp [Internet]. 2017;47:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayarathne M, Wickramanayake D, Afsheenjinan A, et al. EMG based biofeedback system using a virtual reality method. In: IEEE 10th Int Conf Ind Inf Syst; Peradeniya, Sri Lanka; 2015. p. 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, et al. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):361–374. doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanini I, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rymer WZ, et al. Surface EMG in clinical assessment and neurorehabilitation: barriers limiting its use. Front Neurol. 2020;11:11. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy EA, Morin EL, Hajian G, et al. Tutorial. Surface electromyogram (sEMG) amplitude estimation: best practices. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2023;72:102807. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanini I, Merlo A, Disselhorst-Klug C, et al. Fundamental concepts of bipolar and high-density surface EMG understanding and teaching for clinical, occupational, and sport applications: origin, detection, and main errors. Sensors. 2022;22(11):4150. doi: 10.3390/s22114150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R. Standards for reporting EMG data. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1997;9(1):5.
   Google Scholar
• McManus L, De Vito G, Lowery MM. Analysis and biophysics of surface EMG for physiotherapists and kinesiologists: toward a common language with rehabilitation engineers. Front Neurol. 2020;11:11. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.576729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R, Temporiti F, Gatti R, et al. Translation of surface electromyography to clinical and motor rehabilitation applications: the need for new clinical figures. Transl Neurosci. 2023;14(1):14. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portero P, Dogadov AA, Servière C, et al. Surface electromyography in physiotherapist educational program in France: enhancing learning sEMG in stretching practice. Front Neurol. 2020;11:11. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.584304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R. Metrology in sEMG and movement analysis: the need for training new figures in clinical rehabilitation. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024;5. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1353374
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lirio-Romero C, Torres-Lacomba M, Gómez-Blanco A, et al. Electromyographic biofeedback improves upper extremity function: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. Physiother (United Kingdom). Physiotherapy. 2021;110:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel DA. Teaching essential EMG theory to kinesiologists and physical therapists using analogies visual descriptions, and qualitative analysis of biophysical concepts. Sensors. 2022;22(17):22. doi: 10.3390/s22176555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin-Pardo O, Vourvopoulos A, Neureither M. Electromyography as a suitable input for virtual reality-based biofeedback in stroke rehabilitation. HCI International; Orlando, FL, USA; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Feng S, Tang M, Huang G, et al. EMG biofeedback combined with rehabilitation training may be the best physical therapy for improving upper limb motor function and relieving pain in patients with the post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;13. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1056156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R, Campanini I, Rymer WZ, et al. Editorial: surface electromyography: barriers limiting widespread use of sEMG in clinical assessment and neurorehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2021;12. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.642257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullman SL, Goodin DS, Marquinez AI, et al. Clinical utility of surface EMG: report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55(2):171–177. doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.2.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson AJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Clinical electrophysiology: electrotherapy and electrophysiologic testing. 3rd ed. Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rathi S, Zacharias A, Green RA. Verification of a standardized method for inserting intramuscular electromyography electrodes into teres minor using ultrasound. Clin Anat. 2015;28(6):780–785. doi: 10.1002/ca.22561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc Y, Dimanico U. Electrode Placement in Surface Electromyography (sEMG)”Minimal Crosstalk Area“(MCA). Open Rehabil J. 2010;3(1):110–126. doi: 10.2174/1874943701003010110
   Google Scholar
• Simpson JA. Anatomic guide for the electromyographer: the limbs. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976;39(11):1140–1140. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.39.11.1140-a
   Google Scholar
• Merlo A, Bò MC, Campanini I. Electrode size and placement for surface emg bipolar detection from the brachioradialis muscle: a scoping review. Sensors. 2021;21(21):7322. doi: 10.3390/s21217322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R, Muceli ST. Tutorial. Surface EMG detection in space and time: best practices. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019;49:49. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R, Botter A, Cescon C, et al. Advances in surface EMG: recent progress in clinical research applications. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;38(4):347–379. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v38.i4.20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merlo A, Campanini I. Technical aspects of surface electromyography for clinicians. Open Rehabil J. 2010;3(1):98–109. doi: 10.2174/1874943701003010098
   Google Scholar
• Xu L, Gu H, Zhang Y. Research hotspots of the rehabilitation medicine use of sEMG in recent 12 years: a bibliometric analysis. J Pain Res. 2022;Volume 15:1365–1377. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S364977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzur-Valdivia H, Alvarez-Ruf J. Surface electromyography in clinical practice. a perspective from a developing country. Front Neurol. 2020;11:11. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.578829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente C, Machado ÁS, Kunzler MR, et al. Winter school on sEMG signal processing: an initiative to reduce educational gaps and to promote the engagement of physiotherapists and movement scientists with science. Front Neurol. 2020;11:11. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinescu G, Garcia R. Surface electromyography biofeedback as an adjuvant to dysphagia management: what it is, what it is not, why you need it, and how to get it. Perspect ASHA Spec Interes Groups. 2023:1–12. doi: 10.1044/2023_PERSP-23-00076
   Google Scholar
• Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. J Appl Physiol. 2014;117(11):1215–1230. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00162.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Girolamo M, Celadon N, Appendino S, et al. EMG-based biofeedback system for motor rehabilitation: a pilot study. In: IEEE Biomed Circuits Syst Conf; Turin, Italy; 2017. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• EEG Sales [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.eegsales.com/MyoTrac3/Rehab/sEMG.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hetrick DC, Glazer H, Liu YW, et al. Pelvic floor electromyography in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a case-control study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(1):46–49. doi: 10.1002/nau.20162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincade JE, Dougherty MC, Busby-Whitehead J, et al. Self-monitoring and pelvic floor muscle exercises to treat urinary incontinence. Urol Nurs. 2005;25(5):353–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engman M, Wijma K, Wijma B. Itch and burning pain in women with partial vaginismus with or without vulvar vestibulitis. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007;33(2):171–186. doi: 10.1080/00926230601098506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEG Sales [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.eegsales.com/MyoTrac/Home/Trainer/Thought/Technology/sEMG.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sledge RA. Utilizing EMG biofeedback to modify cortical contributions to postural control. Utilizing EMG biofeedback to modify cortical contributions to postural control. Appalachian State University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ha SM, Kwon OY, Yi CH, et al. Effects of passive correction of scapular position on pain, proprioception, and range of motion in neck-pain patients with bilateral scapular downward-rotation syndrome. Man Ther. 2011;16(6):585–589. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindegård A, Grimby-Ekman A, Wahlström J, et al. Can biofeedback training in combination with ergonomic information reduce pain among young adult computer users with neck and upper extremity symptoms? - a randomized controlled intervention study. Appl Ergon [Internet]. 2024;114:104155. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000368702300193X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Performancehealth [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.performancehealth.com/myotrac-infiniti
   Google Scholar
• Hacad CR, Glazer HI, Zambon JPC, et al. Is there any change in pelvic floor electromyography during the first 6 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy? Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015;40(1):9–15. doi: 10.1007/s10484-015-9271-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero AJ, Menéndez H, Gil L, et al. Effects of whole-body vibration on blood flow and neuromuscular activity in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(4):554–559. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon WL, Khoo JKP, Rickard Liow SJ. Chin Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR): new method for enhancing suprahyoid muscle activity using a shaker-type exercise. Dysphagia [Internet]. 2014;29:243–248. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9502-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womble B, Taub E, Hickson B, et al. Upper extremity motor training of a subject with initially motor complete chronic high tetraplegia using constraint-induced biofeedback therapy. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017;3(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41394-017-0007-x
   Google Scholar
• Thoughttechnology [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://thoughttechnology.com/u-control-semg-60hz-t8825/
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron S, Binik YM, Khalifé S, et al. A randomized comparison of group cognitive–behavioral therapy, surface electromyographic biofeedback, and vestibulectomy in the treatment of dyspareunia resulting from vulvar vestibulitis. Pain. 2001;91(3):297–306. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00449-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• theprogrp [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://theprogrp.com/physical-therapy/products/pathway-mr10-single-channel-semg-system-physical-therapy/
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth A, Hiler R, Michels J. Electromyography (EMG) of the Trapezius muscles during clerical work. murphylibrary.uwlax.edu; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang SMH, So BCL, Lau RWL, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of integrating ergonomics and motor control to conventional treatment for pain and functional recovery of work-related neck–shoulder pain: a randomized trial. Eur J Pain (U Kingd). 2019;23:1141–1152. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saimpont A, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, et al. The comparison between motor imagery and verbal rehearsal on the learning of sequential movements. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid E. Scapular instability and overuse injury in keyboardists. USA: Proquest, Umi Dissertation Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• theprogrp [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://theprogrp.com/physical-therapy/products/pathway-tr10-single-channel-semg-trainer/
   Google Scholar
• Shanb ASA, Youssef EF. Effects of adding biofeedback training to active exercises after total knee arthroplasty. J Musculoskelet Res. 2014;17(1):17. doi: 10.1142/S0218957714500018
   Google Scholar
• theprogrp [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://theprogrp.com/speech-language-pathology/products/pathway-mr-15-single-channel-emg-system-for-speech-language-pathology
   Google Scholar
• theprogrp [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://theprogrp.com/physical-therapy/products/pathway-mr25-dual-channel-semg-physical-therapy/
   Google Scholar
• Tsai C, Engberg S. Is biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) more effective than verbal instruction in teaching pelvic floor muscle utili- zation and continence control? In: Int Cont Soc (ICS) 2002, 32nd Annu Meet Heidelberg, Ger [Internet]; 2002. p. Available from: http://www.ics.org/Abstracts/Publish/40/000138.pdf
   Google Scholar
• theprogrp [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://theprogrp.com/physicians-nurses/products/emyo-200-urology
   Google Scholar
• current technology inc [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.currenttechnologyinc.com/pathway-nmr-sts-series/
   Google Scholar
• Donahoe-Fillmore B, Chorny W, Jayne Brahler C, et al. A comparison of two pelvic floor muscle training programs in females with stress urinary incontinence: a pilot study. J Appl Res Clin Exp Ther. 2011;11:73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman KA, Harry J. Functional gait changes in patients with chronic lower extremity hemiplegia treated with a technology to induce movement (TIM)-type system. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(4):43–54. doi: 10.1310/Y06N-5160-8WVX-9Y60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• theprogrp [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://theprogrp.com/physicians-nurses/products/pathway-cts-2000-pelvic-muscle-rehabilitation-system/
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt JJ, Singh R, Weaver AL, et al. Prospective outcomes of a pelvic floor rehabilitation program including vaginal electrogalvanic stimulation for urinary, defecatory, and pelvic pain symptoms. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(2):108–113. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culligan PJ, Scherer J, Dyer K, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing pelvic floor muscle training to a pilates exercise program for improving pelvic muscle strength. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(4):401–408. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1046-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark L. Effect of transverse abdominus muscle activation on a pelvic floor muscle exercise program in women with stress urinary incontinence [Internet]. Diss. Abstr. Int. Sect. B Sci. Eng. Nova Southeastern. 2008. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-99040-257&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• yarlap [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://yarlap.com/
   Google Scholar
• mtrigger [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.mtrigger.com/
   Google Scholar
• mtrplus [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.mtrplus.com/en/products%0A/biofeedback/sinebravo%0A
   Google Scholar
• Junginger B, Metz M, Baessler K. Comparison of a bladder neck effective pelvic floor rehabilitation program and EMG-Biofeedback augmented pelvic floor muscle training: a randomized controlled trial. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House. 2014;37. https://www.egms.de/static/en/meetings/dkg2021/21dkg68.shtml
   Google Scholar
• mtrplus [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.mtrplus.com/en/products/emg-triggered-stimulation/duobravo
   Google Scholar
• Eraslan U, Kitis A, Demirkan AF, et al. Effect of electromyographic biofeedback training on functional status in zone I-III flexor tendon injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023;39(8):1563–1573. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2043499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• veritymedical [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://veritymedical.com/product/neurotrac-myoplus2/
   Google Scholar
• Gradolewski D, Tojza PM, Jaworski J, et al. Arm EMG wavelet-based denoising system. In: Awrejcewicz J, Szewczyk R Trojnacki M, et al., editors. Mechatronics - Ideas Ind Appl. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 289–296.
   Google Scholar
• Gębska M, Opalko K, Rynio P, et al. Evaluation of bioelectrical activity of masseter muscles in women with myogenic disorders of the stomatognathic system. Trends Sport Sci. 2018;25:43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Zoghi M, Galea MP. EMG-triggered stimulation post spinal cord injury: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract [Internet]. 2018;34:309–315. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1394409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Osborne J, Burkett B. The influence of ‘Slacklining’ on quadriceps rehabilitation, activation and intensity. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(1):62–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boguszewski D, Oko B, Adamczyk JG, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of kinesiotaping in reducing delayed onset muscle soreness of the biceps brachii. Biomed Hum Kinet. 2016;8(1):88–94. doi: 10.1515/bhk-2016-0013
   Google Scholar
• Marsden N, Becker A. Survey of biofeedback interfaces for pelvic floor muscle training. Mensch und Computer; Aachen, Germany; 2016
   Google Scholar
• Dieperink KB, Johansen C, Hansen S, et al. The effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation: RePCa—a randomised study among primary prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(12):3005–3013. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashtiani EM, Shokouhi N, Mohseni M, et al. A novel radiofrequency modulation therapy versus routine physiotherapy modalities in treatment of myofascial pelvic pain syndrome: a pilot randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023;66(3):230–240. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• veritymedical [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://veritymedical.com/product/myoplus-pro/
   Google Scholar
• Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (Iuga)/international Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. 2017;28(2):191–213. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3123-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jórasz K, Truszczyńska-Baszak A, Dąbek A. Posture correction therapy and pelvic floor muscle function assessed by sEMG with intravaginal electrode and manometry in female with urinary incontinence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futaba K, Chen SC, Leung WW, et al. Fecobionics evaluation of biofeedback therapy in patients with fecal incontinence. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022;13(5):e00491. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick S, Thomas J, McMillan J, et al. Swallowing rehabilitation following spinal injury: a case series. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(1):65–75. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1762828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• veritymedical [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://veritymedical.com/product/neurotrac-myoplus4-pro/
   Google Scholar
• Fong SSM, Guo X, Liu KPY, et al. Task-specific balance training improves the sensory organisation of balance control in children with developmental coordination disorder: a randomised controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):6. doi: 10.1038/srep20945
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selvakumar K, Fan TL, Nien FC, et al. Preliminary efficacy of aerobic training among university students with migraine symptoms: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023;18(9):18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• veritymedical [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://veritymedical.com/product/neurotrac-simplex/
   Google Scholar
• Arpa S, Ozcakir S. Does electromyographic biofeedback improve exercise effects in hemiplegic patients? A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(2):109–112. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdardottir T, Steingrimsdottir T, Geirsson RT, et al. Can postpartum pelvic floor muscle training reduce urinary and anal incontinence?: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):.e247.1–.e247.8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekbay Y, Ergin O, Topuz B, et al. The effects of pelvic floor muscle therapy on symptoms, voiding, and pelvic floor muscle activity parameters in children with overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn [Internet]. 2019;38(5):1430–1442. doi: 10.1002/nau.24007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doeltgen SH, Rigney L, Cock C, et al. Effects of cortical anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on swallowing biomechanics. Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2018;30(11):e13434. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benfield JK, Hedstrom A, Everton LF, et al. Randomized controlled feasibility trial of swallow strength and skill training with surface electromyographic biofeedback in acute stroke patients with dysphagia. J Oral Rehabil. 2023;50(6):440–451. doi: 10.1111/joor.13437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erfmann KLC, Macrae PR, Jones RD, et al. Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor skill learning in swallowing. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(11):2276–2284. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1827303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Anjos T, Gabriel F, Dutra Vieira T, et al. Neuromotor treatment of arthrogenic muscle inhibition after knee injury or surgery. Sports Health. 2023;16(3):383–389. doi: 10.1177/19417381231169285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• fysiosupplies [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.fysiosupplies.nl/physioplux-go
   Google Scholar
• damplaid [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.damplaid.gr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/physioplux-catalogue.pdf
   Google Scholar
• mindmedia [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.mindmedia.com/en/products/nexus-10-mkii/
   Google Scholar
• Caikovska K, Lauznis J. Visualisation method of electromyogram in rehabilitation and training of patients with cerebral palsy. Technol Comput Control. 2015;16:45–50. doi: 10.7250/tcc.2015.006
   Google Scholar
• Kundzina A, Lauznis J. The effect of audio-visual biofeedback on muscle relaxation. Technol Comput Control. 2015;16:51–57. doi: 10.7250/tcc.2015.007
   Google Scholar
• Finneran A, O’Sullivan L. Effects of grip type and wrist posture on forearm EMG activity, endurance time and movement accuracy. Int J Ind Ergon. 2013;43(1):91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roßkopf S, Wechsler TF, Tucha S, et al. Effects of facial biofeedback on hypomimia, emotion recognition, and affect in Parkinson’s disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023;30(4):360–369. doi: 10.1017/S1355617723000747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhindsa IS, Gupta R, Agarwal R. Binary particle swarm optimization-based feature selection for predicting the class of the knee angle from EMG signals in lower limb movements. Neurophysiology. 2022;53(2):109–119. doi: 10.1007/s11062-022-09922-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• mindmedia [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.mindmedia.com/en%0A/products/nexus-4/%0A
   Google Scholar
• Bodera P, Stankiewicz W, Kalicki B, et al. The surface electromyography biofeedback in pain management - theoretical assumptions and possibilities of using the method. Prz Elektrotechniczny. 2012;88:115–116.
   Google Scholar
• Odawara M, Hashizume M, Yoshiuchi K, et al. Real-time assessment of the effect of biofeedback therapy with migraine: a Pilot study. Int J Behav Med. 2015;22(6):748–754. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9469-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• enraf-nonius [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.enraf-nonius.com/index.php/enraf-academy/biofeedback-and-myofeedback
   Google Scholar
• Butariu E, Butariu S, Minodora A, et al. Use of Emg biofeedback as a method of muscular training during physical exercise in elders. Util Biofeedback-Ului Emg Ca Metod Antrenăament Muscular În Cadrul Exerc Fiz La Vârstnici. 2009;19:16–20.
   Google Scholar
• medwrench [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.medwrench.com/equipment/14992/enraf-nonius-myomed-632x
   Google Scholar
• Dobben AC, Terra MP, Berghmans B, et al. Functional changes after physiotherapy in fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21(6):515–521. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0049-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierick F, Galtsova E, Lauer C, et al. Clinical and MRI changes of puborectalis and iliococcygeus after a short period of intensive pelvic floor muscles training with or without instrumentation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(8):1661–1671. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3899-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim IK, Hameed MMA, Taher EM, et al. Efficacy of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training in females with pelvic floor dysfunction. Alexandria J Med. 2015;51(2):137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajme.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayuningrum KY, Wulan SMM, Pawana IPA, et al. Interferential current therapy improved constipation and pelvic floor muscle activity in cerebral palsy children. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2022:6452–6463. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.11491
   Google Scholar
• Kokic T, Pavic R, Vuksanic M, et al. Effects of electromyographic biofeedback-assisted exercise on functional recovery and quality of life in patients after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Pers Med [Internet]. 2023;13(12):1716. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklempe Kokic I, Vuksanic M, Kokic T, et al. Effects of electromyographic biofeedback on functional recovery of patients two months after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11):11. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurt M, Savaş D, Tarsuslu Şimşek T, et al. Stimulated biofeedback training for a child with Becker muscular dystrophy and compartment syndrome in the left forearm. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;38(11):1807–1812. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1882017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• enrafnonius [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.enrafnonius.com/index.php?option%0A=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=30&Itemid=253%0A
   Google Scholar
• Kirnap M, Calis M, Turgut AO, et al. The efficacy of EMG-biofeedback training on quadriceps muscle strength in patients after arthroscopic meniscectomy. N Z Med J. 2005;118(1224):118.
   Google Scholar
• Anwer S, Quddus N, Miraj M, et al. Effectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback training on quadriceps muscle strength in osteoarthritis of knee. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2011;29(2):86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2011.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz OO, Senocak O, Sahin E, et al. Efficacy of EMG-biofeedback in knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30(7):887–892. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1070-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Wu WY, Hsiao SM, et al. Efficacy of pelvic floor training with surface electromyography feedback for female stress urinary incontinence. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018;24(6):24. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi RM, Chughtai NG, Kapadia N. Effects of bladder training and pelvic floor muscle training in female patients with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Urol Int. 2018;100(4):420–427. doi: 10.1159/000488769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakıt Yeşilyurt S, Özengin N, Topçuoğlu MA. Comparing the efficacy of the Knack maneuver on pelvic floor muscle function and urinary symptoms using different teaching methods: a prospective, nonrandomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(10):2895–2903. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05213-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paepe H, Renson C, Hoebeke P, et al. The role of pelvic-floor therapy in the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunctions in children. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002;36(4):260–267. doi: 10.1080/003655902320248218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dursun N, Dursun E, Kili Z. Electromyographic biofeedback–controlled exercise versus conservative care for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(12):1692–1695. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.26253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Slieker ten Hove MCPH, Vierhout ME, et al. Relations between pregnancy-related low back pain, pelvic floor activity and pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16(6):468–474. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1292-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Cuadros ME, Albaladejo-Florín MJ, Álava-Rabasa S, et al. Stress and urgency urinary incontinence: clinical-urodynamic correlation and rehabilitation management in daily clinical practice. SN Compr Clin Med. 2022;4(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s42399-022-01231-z
   Google Scholar
• laborie [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.laborie.com/health-care-professionals/products/urology-urogynecology/urostym
   Google Scholar
• Ye ZQ, Cai D, Lan RZ, et al. Biofeedback therapy for chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Asian J Androl. 2003;5(2):155–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu M, Hagglund K, Faisal Aslam M. Pelvic floor rehabilitation with biofeedback and electrical stimulation with Urostym® for treatment of urinary incontinence. Front Womens Healt. 2018;3(4):1–4. doi: 10.15761/FWH.1000152
   Google Scholar
• Ladi-Seyedian SS, Sharifi-Rad L, Kajbafzadeh AM. Pelvic floor electrical stimulation and muscles training: a combined rehabilitative approach for management of non-neuropathic urinary incontinence in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(4):825–830. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladi-Seyedian S, Kajbafzadeh AM, Sharifi-Rad L, et al. Management of non-neuropathic underactive bladder in children with voiding dysfunction by animated biofeedback: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Urol. 2015;85(1):205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.025
   Google Scholar
• Taylor AS, Cabo JJ, Lauderdale C, et al. Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy in children: assessment of symptom scores in responders and non-responders. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(1):254–260. doi: 10.1002/nau.23842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badda P, Batra A, Marwah S, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training with and without biofeedback in treatment of overactive bladder. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(8):2997. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193509
   Google Scholar
• gymna [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://gymna.com/en/products/electrotherapy/gymna-200/gymna-myo-200
   Google Scholar
• El-Moghny SMA, El-Din MS, El Shemy SA. Effectiveness of intra-anal biofeedback and electrical stimulation in the treatment of children with refractory monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: a comparative randomized controlled trial. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22(4):295–304. doi: 10.5213/inj.1836142.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• resilityhealth [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://resilityhealth.com/product/bluetooth-emg-biofeedback-sensor/
   Google Scholar
• somaxis [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://somaxis.com/product/1-cricket/
   Google Scholar
• Todorov AD, Alexander GB. systems for assessing and optimizing muscular performance. U.S. Patent No. 9,295,424. 2016 Mar 29.
   Google Scholar
• Caravan A, Scheffey JO, Briend SJ, et al. Surface electromyographic analysis of differential effects in kettlebell carries for the serratus anterior muscles. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5044. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• liveathos [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://shop.liveathos.com/
   Google Scholar
• Postolache G, Carvalho H, Catarino A, et al. Smart clothes for rehabilitation context: technical and technological issues. In: Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation; 2017. p. 185–219.
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas GS, Mituuti CT, Furkim AM, et al. Biofeedback eletromiográfico no tratamento das disfunções orofaciais neurogênicas: revisão sistemática de literatura. Audiol - Commun Res. 2016;21. doi: 10.1590/2317-6431-2016-1671
   Google Scholar
• Budzynski TH, Stoyva JM, Adler CS, et al. EMG biofeedback and tension headache: a controlled outcome study. Seminpsychiat. 1973;5:397–410.
   Google Scholar
• Kremsdorf RB, Kochanowicz NA, Costell S. Cognitive skills training versus EMG biofeedback in the treatment of tension headaches. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1981;6(1):93–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00998797
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rastogi R, Chaturvedi DK, Verma H, et al. Statistical analysis of EMG and GSR therapy on visual mode and SF-36 scores for chronic TTH. In: 2018 5th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Sect Int Conf Electr Electron Comput Eng UPCON 2018; Gorakhpur, India; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Minguillon J, Perez E, Lopez-Gordo MA, et al. Portable system for real-time detection of stress level. Sensors (Switz). 2018;18(8):18. doi: 10.3390/s18082504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamecho B, Silva H, Guerreiro J, et al. A context-aware application to increase elderly users compliance with physical rehabilitation exercises at home via animatronic biofeedback. J Med Syst. 2015;39(11):39. doi: 10.1007/s10916-015-0296-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yassin M, Abdallah H, Anwer A, et al. Rehabilitation biofeedback using EMG signal based on android platform. In: IEEE 30th Int Symp Comput Med Syst; Thessaloniki, Greece; 2017. p. 475–480.
   Google Scholar
• Yassin MM, Saber AM, Saad MN, et al. Developing a low-cost, smart, handheld electromyography biofeedback system for telerehabilitation with clinical evaluation. Med Nov Technol Devices. 2021;10:100056. doi: 10.1016/j.medntd.2020.100056
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa A, Yassin M, Mahroos A. Patient-friendly visual rehabilitation EMG biofeedback with TENS pain relief module based on android platform. In: 6th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Science (ICBBS ‘17); Singapore; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pale U, Cifrek M, Krois I, et al. Personal electromyographic biofeedback system “MyMyo” Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering (CMBEBIH); Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 2017. p. 114–121.
   Google Scholar
• Tsubouchi Y, Suzuki K. BioTones: A wearable device for EMG auditory biofeedback. In: 2010 Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBC’10; Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2010. p. 6543–6546.
   Google Scholar
• Troka P, Toczko H, Przvstup P, et al. A biofeedback system that uses the game to study electrical muscle activity. In: 11th Int Conf Hum Syst Interact [Internet]; 2018. p. 179–185. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8431367
   Google Scholar
• Yoshihiro M, Akiyo I, Kotaro T. Low-cost 2ch EMG biofeedback device using a stereo microphone port. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci. 2014;5:1–6. doi: 10.11336/jjcrs.5.1
   Google Scholar
• Jitaree S, Phinyomark A, Hu H, et al. Design of EMG biofeedback system for lower- limb exercises of the elderly using video game. In: 3rd Int Conf Sport Exerc Sci; Bangkok, Thailand; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dursun E, Dursun N, Alican D. Effects of biofeedback treatment on gait in children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(2):116–120. doi: 10.1080/09638280310001629679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkaya N, Ardic F, Ozgen M, et al. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback and electrical stimulation following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(3):224–236. doi: 10.1177/0269215511419382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise HH, Fiebert IM, Kates JL. EMG biofeedback as treatment for patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1984;6(2):95–103. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1984.6.2.95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng GYF, Zhang AQ, Li CK. Biofeedback exercise improved the EMG activity ratio of the medial and lateral vasti muscles in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(1):128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip SLM, Ng GYF. Biofeedback supplementation to physiotherapy exercise programme for rehabilitation of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(12):1050–1057. doi: 10.1177/0269215506071259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabler CM, Kitzman PH, Mattacola CG. Targeting quadriceps inhibition with electromyographic biofeedback: a neuroplastic approach. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2013;41(2):125–135. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2013008373
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morales-Sánchez V, Reigal RE, Antunes R, et al. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback in the recovery of the vastus lateralis after knee injury: a single-group case study. Muscles [Internet]. 2023;2(4):361–373. doi: 10.3390/muscles2040028
   Google Scholar
• Lyu M, Chen WH, Ding X, et al. Development of an EMG-controlled knee exoskeleton to assist home rehabilitation in a game context. Front Neurorobot. 2019;13. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2019.00067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj NB, Bin SA, Hashim HA, et al. Effectiveness of electromyography biofeedback in common knee disorders-A review. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 2015;6(3):645–660.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Chen X, Lu Z, et al. Development of an EMG-ACC-based upper limb rehabilitation training system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(3):244–253. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2560906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aung Y, Al-Jumaily A. Neuromotor rehabilitation system with real-time biofeedback. Int J Comput Inf Syst Ind Manag Appl. 2013;5:550–556.
   Google Scholar
• Casellato C, Pedrocchi A, Zorzi G, et al. EMG-based visual-haptic biofeedback: a tool to improve motor control in children with primary dystonia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21(3):474–480. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2222445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Varley M, Shark LK, et al. EMG biofeedback based VR system for hand rotation and grasping rehabilitation. Proceedings of the international conference information visualisation; London, UK; 2010. p. 479–484.
   Google Scholar
• Jovanov IM, Popović DB. EMG based biofeedback with the smarting system. 12th Symposium on Neural Network Applications in Electrical Engineering; Belgrade, Serbia; 2014. p. 163–166.
   Google Scholar
• Converse H, Ferraro T, Jean D, et al. An EMG biofeedback device for video game use in forearm physiotherapy. In: Proc IEEE Sensors; Baltimore, MD, USA; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom R, Przekop A, Sanger TD. Prolonged electromyogram biofeedback improves upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2010;25(12):1480–1484. doi: 10.1177/0883073810369704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla-Fernández B, Gómez-García A, Hernández-Alonso M, et al. Biofeedback with pelvic floor electromyography as complementary treatment in chronic disorders of the inferior urinary tract. Electrodiagnosis New Front Clin Res. 2013:287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Oleksy L, Mika A, Kielnar R. Surface electromiography (Semg) in the assessment and treatment of pelvic floor muscles: the importance of signal normalization and procedure standardization for interpretation and biofeedback. J Nov Physiother. 2017;7(S4). doi: 10.4172/2165-7025.1000341
   Google Scholar
• Herderschee R, Hay-Smith EJC, Herbison GP, et al. Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women: shortened version of a Cochrane systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(4):325–329. doi: 10.1002/nau.22329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SSD, Wang CC. Outpatient biofeedback relaxation of the pelvic floor in treating pediatric dysfunctional voiding: a short-course program is effective. Urol Int. 2005;74(2):118–122. doi: 10.1159/000083281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herndon CDA, Decambre M, Mckenna PH. Interactive computer games for treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1893–1898. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65714-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson I, Palmer LS. Successful treatment for giggle incontinence with biofeedback. J Urol. 2009;182(4S):2062–2066. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dannecker C, Wolf V, Raab R, et al. EMG-biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle training is an effective therapy of stress urinary or mixed incontinence: A 7-year experience with 390 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;273(2):93–97. doi: 10.1007/s00404-005-0011-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu X, Zheng X, Yi X, et al. Electromyographic biofeedback for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic floor dysfunction in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Ther. 2021;38(8):4163–4177. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01831-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellve L, Ahlstrom L, Jonsson A, et al. Myofeedback training and intensive muscular strength training to decrease pain and improve work ability among female workers on long-term sick leave with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011;84(3):335–346. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0568-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma C, Szeto GP, Yan T, et al. Comparing biofeedback with active exercise and passive treatment for the management of work-related neck and shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(6):849–858. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruby LA, Sturma A, Aszmann OC. Surface electromyographic biofeedback as a rehabilitation tool for patients with global brachial plexus injury receiving bionic reconstruction. J Vis Exp. 2019;2019(151). doi: 10.3791/59839
   Google Scholar
• Mironov V, Kastalskiy I, Lobov S, et al. A biofeedback control system of the exoskeleton trainer for lower limbs motor function recovery. NEUROTECHNIX 2017 - Proc 5th Int Congr Neurotechnology, Electron Inf; Funchal, Madeira, Portugal; 2017. p. 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido-Montenegro M, Álvarez-Espinoza E, Vergara-Ruiz S. Use of EMG biofeedback for basic activities of daily living training in stroke patients. Pilot randomized clinical trial. Rev Fac Med. 2016;64(3):477. doi: 10.15446/revfacmed.v64n3.56213
   Google Scholar
• Bin LO, Kim JA, Song SJ, et al. Effect of selective muscle training using visual Emg biofeedback on infraspinatus and posterior deltoid. J Hum Kinet. 2014;44(1):83–90. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello E, Gates DH, Patritti BL, et al. Visual EMG biofeedback to improve ankle function in hemiparetic gait. In: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol - Proc; Shanghai, China; 2005. p. 7703–7706.
   Google Scholar
• Petrofsky JS. The use of electromyogram biofeedback to reduce trendelenburg gait. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;85(5):491–495. doi: 10.1007/s004210100466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchene P. Effects of biofeedback on childbirth pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1989;4(3):117–123. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(89)90004-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson SG, Gale EN. Biofeedback in the treatment of long-term temporomandibular joint pain an outcome study. Biofeedback Self Regul [Internet]. 1977;2(2):161–171. doi: 10.1007/BF00998666
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alajbeg I. Temporomandibular disorders the role of neuromuscular dentistry. Med Sci. 2010;34:33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe A, Kanemura K, Tanabe N, et al. Effect of electromyogram biofeedback on daytime clenching behavior in subjects with masticatory muscle pain. J Prosthodont Res. 2011;55(2):75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieselmann-Penkner K, Janda M, Lorenzoni M, et al. A comparison of the muscular relaxation effect of TENS and EMG-biofeedback in patients with bruxism. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(9):849–853. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00748.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roark AL, Glaros AG, O’Mahony AM. Effects of interocclusal appliances on EMG activity during parafunctional tooth contact. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(6):573–577. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01139.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoŸniak K, Piątkowska D, Lipski M, et al. Surface electromyography in orthodontics – a literature review. Med Sci Monit. 2013;19:416–423. doi: 10.12659/MSM.883927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviles M, Rodríguez-Reséndiz J, Ibrahimi D. Optimizing EMG classification through metaheuristic algorithms. Technologies. 2023;11(4):87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeynali M, Seyedarabi H, Afrouzian R. Classification of EEG signals using Transformer based deep learning and ensemble models. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2023;86:105130. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Luo Z, Hua T, et al. Research on AR-AKF Model Denoising of the EMG Signal. Comput Math Methods Med. 2021;2021:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2021/9409560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong D, Zhang D, Zhao X, et al. Deep learning for EMG-based human-machine interaction: a review. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin. 2021. p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kulwa F, Samuel OW, Asogbon MG, et al. A novel duo-stage driven deep neural network approach for mitigating electrode shift impact on myoelectric pattern recognition systems. In: 2023 IEEE Int Symp Med Meas Appl MeMeA 2023 - Conf Proc; Jeju, Republic of Korea; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Liang P, Zhang X, et al. Toward robust high-density EMG pattern recognition using generative adversarial network and convolutional neural network. In: Int IEEE/EMBS Conf Neural Eng NER; Baltimore, MD, USA; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Li T, Lu C, et al. Increasing exercising efficiency with MATLAB, Edge Impulse and machine learning through surface EMG signals. 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and High-Performance Computing (AIAHPC); Zhuhai, China. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Suma KV, Lakkannavar MC, et al. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for EMG based muscle function analysis. In: 4th Int Conf Circuits, Control Commun Comput I4C 2022; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffar Nia N, Kaplanoglu E, Nasab A. EMG-Based hand gestures classification using machine learning algorithms. In: Conf Proc - IEEE SOUTHEASTCON; Orlando, FL, USA; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparic F, Jorgovanovic N, Hofer C, et al. Nonlinear mapping from EMG to prosthesis closing velocity improves force control with EMG biofeedback. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2023;16(3):379–390. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2023.3293545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielan P, Kciuk M, Piecyk J. Biofeedback therapy application with EEG signal visualization and the optimization of success factor algorithm. Int J Electron Telecommun. 2023;66:607–612.
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla C, Pirovano I, Mira RM, et al. Combined use of emg and eeg techniques for neuromotor assessment in rehabilitative applications: a systematic review. Sensors. 2021;21(21):7014. doi: 10.3390/s21217014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté-Allard U, Campbell E, Phinyomark A, et al. Interpreting deep learning features for myoelectric control: a comparison with handcrafted features. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:8. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wei C, Zhao M, et al. A novel convolutional neural network model to remove muscle artifacts from eeg. In: ICASSP, IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process - Proc. 2021; Toronto, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Khushaba RN, Scheme E, Al-Timemy AH, et al. A long short-term recurrent spatial-temporal fusion for myoelectric pattern recognition. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;178:178. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanghieri M. sEMG-based hand gesture recognition with deep learning. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zhu J. The application of EMG and machine learning in human machine interface. In: ACM Int Conf Proceeding Ser; Harbin, China; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kefalas M, Koch M, Geraedts V, et al. Automated machine learning for the classification of normal and abnormal electromyography data. In: Proc - 2020 IEEE Int Conf Big Data, Big Data 2020; Atlanta, GA, USA; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo AG, Benalcazar ME. Real-time hand gesture recognition with EMG using machine learning. In: 2017 IEEE 2nd Ecuador Tech Chapters Meet ETCM 2017; Salinas, Ecuador; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lu J, Liang P, Rhim JC, et al. EffiE: efficient convolutional neural network for real-time EMG pattern recognition system on edge devices. In: Int IEEE/EMBS Conf Neural Eng NER; Baltimore, MD, USA; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira JDS, Rodrigues K, Pinheiro DJLL, et al. Electromyography biofeedback system with visual and vibratory feedbacks designed for lower limb rehabilitation. J Enabling Technol. 2023;17(1):1–11. doi: 10.1108/JET-05-2022-0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar