Insights into possibilities for grouping and read-across for nanomaterials in EU chemicals legislation

References

• Arts, J. H. E., M. Hadi, A. M. Keene, R. Kreiling, D. Lyon, M. Maier, K. Michel., et al. 2014. “A Critical Appraisal of Existing Concepts for the Grouping of Nanomaterials.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 70 (2): 492–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, J. H. E., M. Hadi, M.-A. Irfan, A. M. Keene, R. Kreiling, D. Lyon, M. Maier., et al. 2015. “A Decision-Making Framework for the Grouping and Testing of Nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping).” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 71 (2): S1–S27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschberger, K., S. Gottardo, V. Amenta, M. Arena, F. Botelho Moniz, H. Bouwmeester, P. Brandhoff., et al. 2015. “Nanomaterials in Food – Current and Future Applications and Regulatory Aspects.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 617: 012032.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, M., A. Kafka, M. Bamler, R. Kühne, G. Schüürmann, L. Sikk, J. Burk., et al. 2017. “An Integrated Data-Driven Strategy for Safe-by-Design Nanoparticles: The FP7 MODERN Project.” In Modelling the Toxicity of Nanoparticles, edited by L. Tran, M. A. Bañares, and R. Rallo, 257–301. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• CEF [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids] 2013. “Toxicological Evaluation of Benzophenone.” Efsa J 11 (4): 3189.
   Google Scholar
• CEF [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids] 2012. “Scientific Opinion on the Safety Evaluation of the Substance, Titanium Nitride, Nanoparticles, for Use in Food Contact Materials.” Efsa J 10 (3): 2641.
   Google Scholar
• CEF [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids] 2014a. “Statement on the Safety Assessment of the Substance Silicon Dioxide, Silanated, FCM Substance No 87 for Use in Food Contact Materials.” Efsa J 12 (6): 3712.
   Google Scholar
• CEF [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids], 2014b. “Scientific Opinion on the Safety Assessment of the Substance (Methacrylic Acid, Ethyl Acrylate, n-Butyl Acrylate, Methyl Methacrylate and Butadiene) Copolymer in Nanoform for Use in Food Contact Materials.” Efsa J 12 (4): 3635.
   Google Scholar
• CEF [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids], 2015a. “Scientific Opinion on the Safety Assessment of the Substance Ethylene Glycol Dipalmitate, CAS No 624-03-3, for Use in Food Contact Materials.” EFSA Journal 13 (2): 4019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEF [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids], 2015b. “Scientific Opinion on the Safety Assessment of the Substance Fatty Acids, C16-18 Saturated, Hexaesters with Dipentaerythritol for Use in Food Contact Materials.” EFSA Journal 13 (2): 4021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEF [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids], 2016a. “Safety Assessment of the Substance Zinc Oxide, Nanoparticles, for Use in Food Contact Materials.” EFSA Journal 14 (3): 4408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEF [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids] 2016b. “Recent Developments in the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food and Their Potential Impact on the Safety Assessment of Substances Used in Food Contact Materials.” Efsa J 14 (1): 4357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers, S., Oomen, A. G., Bleeker, E. A. J., Vandebriel, R. J., Micheletti, C., Cabellos, J., Janer, G. G., et al. 2016. “Towards a Nanospecific Approach for Risk Assessment.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 80: 46–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC 1998. Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work. OJ No. L131, 5.5.1998, p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2002. Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to food supplements OJ L 183, 12.7.2002, p. 51.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2004. Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC. OJ No. L 338, 13.11.2004, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2005. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee. Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: An action plan for Europe 2005-2009. COM(2005) 243 final, Brussels, Belgium. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52005DC0243.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). OJ No. L396, 30.12.2006, p.1.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2008a. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). OJ No. L353, 31.12.2008, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2008b. Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives. OJ No. L354, 31.12.2008, p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2008c. Regulation (EC) No 1332/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food enzymes. OJ No. L354, 31.12.2008, p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2008d. Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on flavourings and certain food ingredients with flavouring properties for use in and on foods. OJ No. L354, 31.12.2008, p. 34.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2009a. Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. OJ No. L309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2009b. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. OJ No. L342, 22.12.2009, p. 59.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2009c. Commission Regulation (EC) No 450/2009 of 29 May 2009 on active and intelligent materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. OJ L 135, 30.5.2009, p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2011. Commission recommendation of 18 October 2011on the definition of nanomaterial. 2011/696/EU. OJ No. L 275, 20.10.2011, p. 38.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2014. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 408/2014 of 23 April 2014 approving synthetic amorphous silicon dioxide as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products for product-type 18. OJ No. L121, 24.4.2014, p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2017. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/795 of 10 May 2017 approving pyrogenic, synthetic amorphous, nano, surface treated silicon dioxide as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 18. OJ No. L120, 11.5.2017, p. 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2018. Commission Regulation (EU) …/…of XXX amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annexes I, III,VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, and XII to address nanoforms of substances, and ANNEX. 1. Document D056122/02 of 26 April 2018. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regcomitology/index.cfm?do=search.documentdetail&Dos_ID=15915&DS_ID=56122&Version=2
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2008. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals; Helsinki: ECHA. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2012a. Background Paper: An introduction to the assessment of read-across in ECHA; Expert workshop on read-across assessment with the active support of Cefic LRI, 2–3 October 2012. Helsinki, ECHA. Available from https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/22816103/ws_raa_20121003_background_paper_an_introduction_to_the_assessment_of_read-across_in_echa_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2012b. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Appendix R8-15 Recommendations for nanomaterials applicable to Chapter R.8 Characterisation of dose [concentration] - response for human health. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-12-G-09-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23047722/appendix_to_r8_clean_en.pdf/49741897-f351-4180-a841-3b1e6dde185a
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2012c. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Appendix R10-2 Recommendations for nanomaterials applicable to Chapter R.10 Characterisation of dose [concentration] - response for environment. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-12-G-10-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23047722/appendix_to_r10_clean_en.pdf/4da90e08-4674-424c-a6b7-b3abdb97691c
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2012d. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Appendix R14-4 Recommendations for nanomaterials applicable to Chapter R.14 Occupational exposure estimation. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-12-G-08-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23047722/appendix_to_r14_clean_en.pdf/20629d45-2c0a-4038-aa51-77d82e22342f
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2013a. Grouping of Substances and Read-Across Approach, Part 1: Introductory Note; Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-13-R-02-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13628/read_across_introductory_note_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2013b. Assessing human health and environmental hazards of nanomaterials – Best practice for REACH Registrants; Second GAARN meeting, Helsinki, 21–22 Jan. 2013. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-13-R-04-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/5399565/best_practices_human_health_environment_nano_en.pdf/8e0adb6a-829c-43aa-84c5-5361f8505996
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2014a. Human health and environmental exposure assessment and risk characterization of nanomaterials – Best practice for REACH registrants. Third GAARN Meeting, Helsinki, 30 September 2013; Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-14-R-10-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/5399565/best_practices_human_health_environment_nano_3rd_en.pdf/a368f6df-fe40-4673-a041-83b63cc9f50b
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2014b. Opinion on a request according to Article 75(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, HeiQ AGS-20. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA/BPC/001/2014. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/21680461/bpc_opinion_heiq_ags-20_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2016a. Topical Scientific Workshop on New Approach Methodologies in Regulatory Science, Helsinki, 19–20 April 2016, Background Document; Helsinki: ECHA. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/22816069/tsws_background_document_en.pdf/53102457-43f9-4709-8e4f-cf2b58458fbf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2016b. Report on the Operation of REACH and CLP 2016. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-16-R-08-EN. Available at: https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13634/operation_reach_clp_2016_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA et al. 2016. Usage of (eco)toxicological data for bridging data gaps between and grouping of nanoforms of the same substance. Elements to consider; Helsinki: ECHA, ED-02-16-228-EN-N. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13630/eco_toxicological_for_bridging_grouping_nanoforms_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2017a. How to prepare registration dossiers that cover nanoforms: best practices. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-17-G-13-EN. Available at: https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13655/how_to_register_nano_en.pdf/f8c046ec-f60b-4349-492b-e915fd9e3ca0
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2017b. Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF); Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-17-R-01-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13628/raaf_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2017c. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Appendix R.6-1 for nanomaterials applicable to the Guidance on QSARs and Grouping of Chemicals. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-17-G-17-EN. Available at: https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23036412/appendix_r6_nanomaterials_en.pdf/71ad76f0-ab4c-fb04-acba-074cf045eaaa
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2017d. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Appendix R7-1 for nanomaterials applicable to Chapter R7a Endpoint specific guidance. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-17-G-16-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/22334053/draft_appendix_r7a_msc_en.pdf/c2b2e297-86b2-a1ee-f02a-72938c83d362
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2017e. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Appendix R7-1 for nanomaterials applicable to Chapter R7b Endpoint specific guidance. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-17-G-15-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/appendix_r7b_nanomaterials_en.pdf/6eca425a-ede1-4c9e-8151-af77973caf32
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2017f. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Appendix R7-2 for nanomaterials applicable to Chapter R7c Endpoint specific guidance. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-17-G-14-EN. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/appendix_r7c_nanomaterials_en.pdf/c2d8e0ce-2ab4-4035-a05f-e2dec924d87a
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2017gg., Functionalities of IUCLID 6; Helsinki: ECHA. Available at: https://iuclid6.echa.europa.eu/documents/21812392/22308501/iuclid_functionalities_en.pdf/559b80ad-cef7-4edb-8c2b-ca52e0d511e2
   Google Scholar
• ECHA 2017hh., Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria – Guidance to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures. Helsinki: ECHA, ECHA-17-G-21-EN. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23036412/clp_en.pdf/58b5dc6d-ac2a-4910-9702-e9e1f5051cc5
   Google Scholar
• EFSA, 2011. “Guidance on the Risk Assessment of the Application of Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies in the Food and Feed Chain.” Efsa J 9 (5): 2140.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA 2016. “Annual Report of the EFSA Scientific Network of Risk Assessment of Nanotechnologies in Food and Feed for 2015; Parma: EFSA, 2016.” EFSA Supporting Publications 13 (1): EN-939.
   Google Scholar
• EU 2011a. Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. OJ No. L12, 15.1.2011, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• EU 2011b. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers. OJ No. L304, 22.11.2011, p. 18.
   Google Scholar
• EU 2012a. Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products. OJ L 167, 27.6.2012, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• EU 2012b. Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances. OJ L 197, 24.7.2012, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• EU 2013. Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on food intended for infants and young children, food for special medical purposes, and total diet replacement for weight control OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, p. 35.
   Google Scholar
• EU 2015a. Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/174 of 5 February 2015 amending and correcting Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. OJ No. L30, 6.2.2015, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• EU 2015b. Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. OJ No. L327, 11.12.2015, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• EU 2016. Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1416 of 24 August 2016 amending and correcting Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. OJ No. L230, 25.8.2016, p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Grafström, R. C., P. Nymark, V. Hongisto, O. Spjuth, R. Ceder, E. Willighagen, B. Hardy, S. Kaski, and P. Kohonen. 2015. “Toward the Replacement of Animal Experiments through the Bioinformatics-Driven Analysis of 'Omics' Data from Human Cell Cultures.” Alternatives to Lab Animals 43 (5): 325–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hund-Rinke, K., C. Nickel, and D. Kühnel. 2017. Considerations about the relationship of nanomaterial’s physical-chemical properties and aquatic toxicity for the purpose of grouping. Report No. TEXTE 102/2017. (UBA-FB) 002572/ENG. Available from: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/considerations-about-the-relationship-of.
   Google Scholar
• Kah, M., S. Beulke, K. Tiede, and T. Hofmann. 2013. “Nanopesticides: state of Knowledge, Environmental Fate and Exposure Modelling.” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 43 (16): 1823–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinstreuer, N. C., K. Sullivan, D. Allen, S. Edwards, D. L. Mendrick, M. Embry, J. Matheson., et al. 2016. “Adverse Outcome Pathways: From Research to Regulation Scientific Workshop Report.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 76: 39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD 2009. Preliminary Review of OECD Test Guidelines for their Applicability to Manufactured Nanomaterials. Paris: OECD, ENV/JM/MONO(2009)21. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=env/jm/mono(2009)21
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2014. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals, Second Edition. Paris: OECD, ENV/JM/MONO(2014)4. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2014)4&doclanguage = en
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2016a. Categorisation of Manufactured Nanomaterials – Workshop Report. Paris: OECD, ENV/JM/MONO(2016)9. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono%282016%299&doclanguage=en
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2016b. Grouping and Read-across for the Hazard Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials, Report from the Expert Meeting. Paris: OECD, ENV/JM/MONO(2016)59. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2016)59&doclanguage=en
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2016c. Approaches on Nano Grouping/Equivalence/Read-across Concepts based on Physical-chemical Properties (GERA-PC) for Regulatory Regimes, Results from the Survey. Paris: OECD, ENV/JM/MONO(2016)3. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/JM/MONO(2016)3&docLanguage=En
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2017a. Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study; OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 412. Paris: OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-412-subacute-inhalation-toxicity-28-day-study_9789264070783-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2017b. Subchronic Inhalation Toxicity: 90-day Study; OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 413. Paris: OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-413-subchronic-inhalation-toxicity-90-day-study_9789264070806-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2017c. Dispersion Stability of Nanomaterials in Simulated Environmental Media; OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 318. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/test-no-318-dispersion-stability-of-nanomaterials-in-simulated-environmental-media-9789264284142-en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oomen, A. O., E. A. J. Bleeker, P. M. J. Bos, F. van Broekhuizen, S. Gottardo, M. Groenewold, D. Hristozov., et al. 2015. “Grouping and Read-across Approaches for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12 (10): 13415–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, K., H. Rauscher, A. Mech, J. Riego Sintes, D. Gilliland, M. González, P. Kearns., et al. 2018. “Physico-Chemical Properties of Manufactured Nanomaterials – Characterisation and Relevant Methods. An Outlook Based on the OECD Testing Programme.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 92: 8–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCCS 2011. Opinion on nano-ETH50 (1,3,5-Triazine, 2,4,6-tris[1,1’-biphenyl]-4-yl-) as a UV filter in cosmetic products. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1429/11. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_070.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2012a. Guidance on the safety assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1484/12. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2012b. Opinion on zinc oxide (nano form) COLIPA S 76. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1489/12. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_103.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2013a. Memorandum on "Relevance and Quality of Data in Safety Dossiers on Nanomaterials". European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1524/13. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_142.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2013b. Opinion on titanium dioxide (nano form) COLIPA n° S75. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1516/13. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_136.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2013c. Opinion on Carbon Black (nano-form). European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1515/13. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2015a. The SCCS Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and their Safety Evaluation, 9th revision. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1564/15. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_190.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2015b. Opinion on Silica, Hydrated Silica, and Silica Surface Modified with Alkyl Silylates (nano form). European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1545/15. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_175.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2015c. Opinion on 2,2’-Methylene-bis-(6-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol) (nano form), Submission III, COLIPA n° S79. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1546/15. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_168.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2015d. Opinion on Hydroxyapatite (nano). European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1566/15. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_191.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2016a. Memorandum on the Use of In Silico Methods for Assessment of Chemical Hazard. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1578/16. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_200.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2016b. Opinion on additional coatings for Titanium Dioxide (nano form) as UV-filter in dermally applied cosmetic products. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1580/16. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_202.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2017a. Checklists for Applicants submitting dossiers on Cosmetic Ingredients to be evaluated by the SCCS. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1588/17. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS 2017b. Opinion on Titanium Dioxide (nano form) as UV-Filter in sprays. European Union: SCCS, SCCS/1583/17. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_206.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCENIHR 2006. Modified Opinion (after public consultation) on The appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies. European Union: SCENIHR, SCENIHR/002/05. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, K., N. M. E. Deleebeeck, M. Messiaen, M. Jackson, E. A. J. Bleeker, D. T. H. M. Sijm, and F. A. van Broekhuizen. 2015. Grouping nanomaterials. A strategy towards grouping and read-across. RIVM Report 2015-0061. ISBN 978-90-6960-280-6. Available from: http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/2015-0061.html.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira do Amaral, R., J. Ansell, N. Aptula, T. Ashikaga, Q. Chaudhry, A. Hirose, J. Jaworska., et al. 2014. In Silico Approaches for Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Ingredients, Report for the International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation. International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation. Available from: www.iccr-cosmetics.org/files/5314/1407/7607/2014-07_In-silico_Approaches_for_Cosmetic_Product_Safety_Assessments.pdf
   Google Scholar