Artificial augmented dataset for the enhancement of nano-QSARs models. A methodology based on topological projections

References

• Bayer, Markus, Marc-André Kaufhold, Björn Buchhold, Marcel Keller, Jörg Dallmeyer, and Christian Reuter. 2023. “Data Augmentation in Natural Language Processing: A Novel Text Generation Approach for Long and Short Text Classifiers.” International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 14 (1): 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-022-01553-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becht, Etienne, Leland McInnes, John Healy, Charles-Antoine Dutertre, Immanuel W. H. Kwok, Lai Guan Ng, Florent Ginhoux, et al. 2018. “Dimensionality Reduction for Visualizing Single-Cell Data Using UMAP.” Nature Biotechnology 37 (1): 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, John, Rui Wang, Li-Yi Wei, and David Maletz. 2010. “Parallel Poisson Disk Sampling with Spectrum Analysis on Surfaces.” ACM Transactions on Graphics 29 (6): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1882261.1866188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, C, et al. 2018. “Gan augmentation: Augmenting training data using generative adversarial networks.”
   Google Scholar
• Bridson, R. 2007. “Fast Poisson Disk Sampling in Arbitrary Dimensions.” ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Sketches. San Diego, California, Association for Computing Machinery: 22–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1278780.1278807
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Jang-Sik, My Kieu Ha, Tung Xuan Trinh, Tae Hyun Yoon, and Hyung-Gi Byun. 2018. “Towards a Generalized Toxicity Prediction Model for Oxide Nanomaterials Using Integrated Data from Different Sources.” Scientific Reports 8 (1): 6110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24483-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Concu, Riccardo, Valeria V. Kleandrova, Alejandro Speck-Planche, and M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro. 2017. “Probing the Toxicity of Nanoparticles: A Unified in Silico Machine Learning Model Based on Perturbation Theory.” Nanotoxicology 11 (7): 891–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2017.1379567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danauskas, S. M., and P. C. Jurs. 2001. “Prediction of C60 Solubilities from Solvent Molecular Structures.” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 41 (2): 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci000140s
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelsbrunner, H., and N. R. Shah. 1992. “Incremental Topological Flipping Works for Regular Triangulations.” Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry. Berlin, Germany, Association for Computing Machinery: 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/142675.142688
   Google Scholar
• Frid-Adar, Maayan, Idit Diamant, Eyal Klang, Michal Amitai, Jacob Goldberger, and Hayit Greenspan. 2018. “GAN-Based Synthetic Medical Image Augmentation for Increased CNN Performance in Liver Lesion Classification.” Neurocomputing 321: 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, M. J, et al. 2016. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01. Wallingford, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Furxhi, I. 2022a. “Health and Environmental Safety of Nanomaterials: O Data, Where Art Thou?” NanoImpact 25: 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furxhi, Irini, Athanasios Arvanitis, Finbarr Murphy, Anna Costa, and Magda Blosi. 2021a. “Data Shepherding in Nanotechnology. The Initiation.” Nanomaterials 11 (6): 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furxhi, Irini, Rossella Bengalli, Giulia Motta, Paride Mantecca, Ozge Kose, Marie Carriere, Ehtsham Ul Haq, et al. 2023a. “Data-Driven Quantitative Intrinsic Hazard Criteria for Nanoproduct Development in a Safe-by-Design Paradigm: A Case Study of Silver Nanoforms.” ACS Applied Nano Materials 6 (5): 3948–3962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c00173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furxhi, Irini, Anna Costa, Socorro Vázquez-Campos, Carlos Fito-López, Danail Hristozov, Juan Antonio Tamayo Ramos, Susanne Resch, et al. 2023b. “Status, Implications and Challenges of European Safe and Sustainable by Design Paradigms Applicable to Nanomaterials and Advanced Materials.” RSC Sustainability 1 (2): 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SU00101B
   Google Scholar
• Furxhi, Irini, Antti Joonas Koivisto, Finbarr Murphy, Sara Trabucco, Benedetta Del Secco, and Athanasios Arvanitis. 2021b. “Data Shepherding in Nanotechnology. The Exposure Field Campaign Template.” Nanomaterials 11 (7): 1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furxhi, I., and F. Murphy. 2020c. “Predicting in Vitro Neurotoxicity Induced by Nanoparticles Using Machine Learning.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21 (15): 5280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furxhi, Irini, Finbarr Murphy, Martin Mullins, Athanasios Arvanitis, and Craig A. Poland. 2020a. “Nanotoxicology Data for in Silico Tools: A Literature Review.” Nanotoxicology 14 (5): 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2020.1729439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furxhi, Irini, Finbarr Murphy, Martin Mullins, Athanasios Arvanitis, and Craig A. Poland. 2020b. “Practices and Trends of Machine Learning Application in Nanotoxicology.” Nanomaterials 10 (1): 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furxhi, Irini, Finbarr Murphy, Martin Mullins, and Craig A. Poland. 2019a. “Machine Learning Prediction of Nanoparticle in Vitro Toxicity: A Comparative Study of Classifiers and Ensemble-Classifiers Using the Copeland Index.” Toxicology Letters 312: 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furxhi, Irini, Alessio Varesano, Hesham Salman, Mahsa Mirzaei, Vittoria Battistello, Ivonne Tonani Tomasoni, Magda Blosi, et al. 2021c. “Data Shepherding in Nanotechnology: An Antimicrobial Functionality Data Capture Template.” Coatings 11 (12): 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11121486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gain, U., and V. Hotti. 2021. “Low-Code AutoML-Augmented Data Pipeline – A Review and Experiments.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1828 (1): 012015.
   Google Scholar
• Gajewicz-Skretna, Agnieszka, Maciej Gromelski, Ewelina Wyrzykowska, Ayako Furuhama, Hiroshi Yamamoto, and Noriyuki Suzuki. 2021. “Aquatic Toxicity (Pre)Screening Strategy for Structurally Diverse Chemicals: Global or Local Classification Tree Models?” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 208: 111738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, S. Larry, Guy Nir, and Septimiu E. Salcudean. 2019. “A New Era: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prostate Cancer.” Nature Reviews. Urology 16 (7): 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0193-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottardo, Stefania, Agnieszka Mech, Jana Drbohlavová, Aleksandra Małyska, Søren Bøwadt, Juan Riego Sintes, Hubert Rauscher, et al. 2021. “Towards Safe and Sustainable Innovation in Nanotechnology: State-of-Play for Smart Nanomaterials.” NanoImpact 21: 100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gräbel, P, et al. 2021. “Guided Representation Learning for the Classification of Hematopoietic Cells.” 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW), 545–551.
   Google Scholar
• Gramatica, P. 2020. “Principles of QSAR Modeling: Comments and Suggestions from Personal Experience.” International Journal of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships ) 5 (3): 61–97. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJQSPR.20200701.oa1
   Google Scholar
• Guyon, Isabelle, Jason Weston, Stephen Barnhill, and Vladimir Vapnik. 2002. “Gene Selection for Cancer Classification Using Support Vector Machines.” Machine Learning 46 (1/3): 389–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012487302797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanwell, Marcus D., Donald E. Curtis, David C. Lonie, Tim Vandermeersch, Eva Zurek, and Geoffrey R. Hutchison. 2012. “Avogadro: An Advanced Semantic Chemical Editor, Visualization, and Analysis Platform.” Journal of Cheminformatics 4 (1): 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-4-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Wenguang, Zekai Xu, Nannan Qin, Dongping Xiong, and Mingyue Ding. 2015. “Surface Reconstruction through Poisson Disk Sampling.” PloS One 10 (4): e0120151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Hung-Jin, Yu-Hsuan Lee, Yung-Ho Hsu, Chia-Te Liao, Yuh-Feng Lin, and Hui-Wen Chiu. 2021. “Current Strategies in Assessment of Nanotoxicity: Alternatives to in Vivo Animal Testing.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences” 22 (8): 4216. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, David E., Hamidreza Ghandehari, and Julio C. Facelli. 2015. “Predicting Cytotoxicity of PAMAM Dendrimers Using Molecular Descriptors.” Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 6: 1886–1896. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.6.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorshidi, H., and U. Aickelin. 2020. Synthetic Over-sampling with the Minority and Majority classes for imbalance problems.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P., and M. Welling. 2019. “An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders.” Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning 12 (4): 307–392. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleandrova, Valeria V., Feng Luan, Humberto González-Díaz, Juan M. Ruso, André Melo, Alejandro Speck-Planche, M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro, et al. 2014a. “Computational Ecotoxicology: Simultaneous Prediction of Ecotoxic Effects of Nanoparticles under Different Experimental Conditions.” Environment International 73: 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleandrova, Valeria V., Feng Luan, Humberto González-Díaz, Juan M. Ruso, Alejandro Speck-Planche, and M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro. 2014b. “Computational Tool for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials: Novel QSTR-Perturbation Model for Simultaneous Prediction of Ecotoxicity and Cytotoxicity of Uncoated and Coated Nanoparticles under Multiple Experimental Conditions.” Environmental Science & Technology 48 (24): 14686–14694. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503861x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, Tze Ker Matthew, Wen Shern Lo, Wei En Zen Lee, Benedict Tan, Xing Zhao Lee, Li Wen Justina Nadia Lee, Jia-Ying Joey Lee, et al. 2021. “Leveraging Advances in Immunopathology and Artificial Intelligence to Analyze in Vitro Tumor Models in Composition and Space.” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 177: 113959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.113959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan, Feng, Valeria V. Kleandrova, Humberto González-Díaz, Juan M. Ruso, André Melo, Alejandro Speck-Planche, M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro, et al. 2014. “Computer-Aided Nanotoxicology: assessing Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles under Diverse Experimental Conditions by Using a Novel QSTR-Perturbation Approach.” Nanoscale 6 (18): 10623–10630. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr01285b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri, A, et al. 2006. “DRAGON Software: An Easy Approach to Molecular Descriptor Calculations.” MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry 56: 237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnes, L, et al. 2018. “UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction.” arXiv
   Google Scholar
• McInnes, Leland, John Healy, Nathaniel Saul, and Lukas Großberger. 2018. “Umap: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction.” Journal of Open Source Software 3 (29): 861. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00861
   Google Scholar
• Mera, David, Veronica Bolon-Canedo, J. M. Cotos, and Amparo Alonso-Betanzos. 2017. “On the Use of Feature Selection to Improve the Detection of Sea Oil Spills in SAR Images.” Computers & Geosciences 100: 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momma, K., and F. Izumi. 2011. “VESTA 3 for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, Volumetric and Morphology Data.” Journal of Applied Crystallography “ 44 (6): 1272–1276. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811038970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustaqim, A. Z, et al. 2021. “The Effect of Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV) Feature Selection Algorithm toward Classifier Performance on Credit Card Fraud Detection.” 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science Technology (ICAICST), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICST53116.2021.9497842
   Google Scholar
• Puzyn, Tomasz, Bakhtiyor Rasulev, Agnieszka Gajewicz, Xiaoke Hu, Thabitha P. Dasari, Andrea Michalkova, Huey-Min Hwang, et al. 2011. “Using nano-QSAR to Predict the Cytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles.” Nature Nanotechnology 6 (3): 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldívar-González, F. I., and J. L. Medina-Franco. 2022. “Approaches for Enhancing the Analysis of Chemical Space for Drug Discovery.” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 17 (7): 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2022.2084608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikhina, T., and N. A. Khovanova. 2017. “Handling Limited Datasets with Neural Networks in Medical Applications: A Small-Data Approach.” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 75: 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2016.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shatkin, J. A., and K. J. Ong. 2016. “Alternative Testing Strategies for Nanomaterials: State of the Science and Considerations for Risk Analysis.” Risk Analysis : An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis “ 36 (8): 1564–1580. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. V, et al. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Computational Nanotoxicology.” Unlocking and Empowering Nanomedicine “ 9 (17): 1901862.
   Google Scholar
• Speck-Planche, Alejandro, Valeria V. Kleandrova, Feng Luan, and Maria Natália D. S. Cordeiro. 2015. “Computational Modeling in Nanomedicine: prediction of Multiple Antibacterial Profiles of Nanoparticles Using a Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Perturbation Model.” Nanomedicine 10 (2): 193–204. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.14.96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropsha, A. 2010. “Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation.” Molecular Informatics “ 29 (6-7): 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201000061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk, G. 1991. “Generating Textures on Arbitrary Surfaces Using Reaction-Diffusion.” Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Association for Computing Machinery: 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1145/122718.122749
   Google Scholar
• van Rijn, Jeaphianne, Antreas Afantitis, Mustafa Culha, Maria Dusinska, Thomas E. Exner, Nina Jeliazkova, Eleonora Marta Longhin, et al. 2022. “European Registry of Materials: global, Unique Identifiers for (Undisclosed) Nanomaterials.” Journal of Cheminformatics 14 (1): 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-022-00614-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, S., and R. Simon. 2006. “Bias in Error Estimation When Using Cross-Validation for Model Selection.” BMC Bioinformatics 7 (1): 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veith, Gilman D., Ovanes G. Mekenyan, Gerald T. Ankley, and Daniel J. Call. 1995. “A QSAR Analysis of Substituent Effects on the Photoinduced Acute Toxicity of PAHs.” Chemosphere 30 (11): 2129–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(95)00076-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisberg, E, et al. 2022. “Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Medicine.” 2022
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Zexian, Yawei Li, Yiming Li, and Yuan Luo. 2022. “Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Data Analysis.” Genome Biology 23 (1): 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02653-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar