Marginal adaptation of different hybrid ceramic inlays after thermal cycling

References

• Aidsman I. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(1):10–92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, et al. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: a 3-year study. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippe M, Monaco C, Volpe L, et al. Different methods for inlay production: effect on internal and marginal adaptation, adjustment time, and contact point. Oper Dent. 2017;42(4):436–444. doi: 10.2341/16-093-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss B, Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent. 2000;3(1):9–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(2):122–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekow ED, Silva NR, Coelho PG. Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvement. J Dent Res. 2011;90(8):937–952. doi: 10.1177/0022034510391795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagropoulou GI, Klifopoulou GL, Vlahou SG, et al. Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs. complete coverage restorations: a systematic review and analysis of studies. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:903–920. doi: 10.1111/joor.12695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark JE. Ceramic-reinforced polymers and polymer-modified ceramics. Polym Eng Sci. 1996;36(24):2905–2920. doi: 10.1002/pen.10692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93:1232–1234. doi: 10.1177/0022034514553976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, et al. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater. 2012;28:529–534. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, et al. Properties of experimental urethane dimethacrylate-based dental resin composite blocks obtained via thermo-polymerization under high pressure. Dent Mater. 2013;29:535–541. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer- infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29:419–426. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer- infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater. 2014;30:564–569. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, et al. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;55:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:705–710. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:587–593. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent. 2007;35:897–902. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebon N, Tapie L, Vennat E, et al. Influence of CAD/CAM tool and material on tool wear and roughness of dental prostheses after milling. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaghloul H, Elkassas DW, Haridy MF. Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:44–52. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chavali R, Nejat AH, Lawson NC. Machinability of CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(2):194–199. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denissen H, Dozic A, van der Zel J, et al. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:506–513. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.110258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad A. Secondary caries and microleakage. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):11–25. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson TD. The clinical significance of marginal fit. Northwest Dent. 2012;91(1):22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bullard R, Leinfelder K, Russel C. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;116:871–874. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Donassollo TA, et al. Influence of thermal stress on marginal integrity of restorative materials. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(2):106–110. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572008000200005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo Y, Tsumita M, Kano T, et al. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of zirconia all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;55:40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, et al. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2014;39:E31–E44. doi: 10.2341/13-070-LIT
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groten M, Axmann D, Pröbster L, et al. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:40–49. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottino MA, Campos F, Ramos NC, et al. Inlays made from a hybrid material: adaptation and bond strength. Oper Dent. 2015;40:E83–E91. doi: 10.2341/13-343-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim HY, et al. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale E, Seker E, Yilmaz B, et al. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:890–895. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131:107–111. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belser UC, MacEntee MI, Richter WA. Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:24–29. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90058-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, et al. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:383–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, et al. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent. 2010;35(3):324–329. doi: 10.2341/09-178-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(6):747–753. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90408-O
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, et al. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC in lab and hot-pressed techniques. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(7):535–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oz FD, Bolay S. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation and fracture strength of different ceramic inlays produced by CEREC omnicam and heat-pressed technique. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2018/5152703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawa eh NA, Mack F, Evans J, et al. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:419–428. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sener-Yamaner ID, Sertgöz A, Toz-Akalın T, et al. Effect of material and fabrication technique on marginal fit and fracture resistance of adhesively luted inlays made of CAD/CAM ceramics and hybrid materials. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31:55–70. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2016.1204144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SH, Yoo YJ, Shin YJ, et al. Marginal and internal fit of nano-composite CAD/CAM restorations. Restor Dent Endod. 2016;41:37–43. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.1.37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uzgur R, Ercan E, Uzgur Z, et al. Cement thickness of inlay restorations made of lithium disilicate, polymer-infiltrated ceramic and nano-ceramic CAD/CAM materials evaluated using 3D x-ray micro- computed tomography. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:456–460. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12521
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rippe MP, Monaco C, Volpe L, et al. Different methods for inlay production: effect on internal and marginal adaptation, adjustment time, and contact point. Oper Dent. 2017;42:436–444. doi: 10.2341/16-093-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolotto T, Onisor I, Krejci I. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:35–43. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0076-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1021–1028. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1325-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, et al. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:384–389. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, et al. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent. 2014;42:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval MJ, Rocca GT, Krejci I, et al. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:2167–2177. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1449-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stappert CF, Chitmongkolsuk S, Silva NR, et al. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1248–1257. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:177–183. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0677-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homsy FR, Özcan M, Khoury M, et al. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;119(5):783–790. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addi S, Hedayati-Khams A, Poya A, et al. Interface gap size of manually and CAD/CAM manufactured ceramic inlay/onlays in vitro. J Dent. 2002;30(1):53–58. doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00059-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Cho BH, Lee JH, et al. Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73:107–113. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.956145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borba M, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, et al. Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2011;27:1119–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, et al. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:551–558. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1916-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoop CD, Land MF. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review. Clinical. 2013;18(5):21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nalcai A, Ulusoy N. Effect of thermocycling on microleakage of resin composites polymerized with LED curing techniques. Quintessence Int. 2007;38:433–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt SL, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater. 1992;8:181–184. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90079-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin A, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, et al. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:295–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Standards Organization. Guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO/TR 11405. Dent Mater. 1994;1994:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89–99. doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of clinically relevant thermocycling on the flexural properties of endodontic post materials. J Dent. 2010;38(5):437–442. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong R, Pintado MR, Ko CC, et al. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthodont. 2001;10:78–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00078.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, et al. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater. 2003;19:575–583. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00107-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar