Semi-Automated evidence synthesis in health psychology: current methods and future prospects

References

• Bagg, M. K., & McAuley, J. H. (2018). Correspondence: Living systematic reviews. Journal of Physiotherapy, 64(2), 133. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. M., Hersh, W. R., Peterson, K., & Yen, P. Y. (2006). Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 206–219. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
   Google Scholar
• Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15(5), 451–474. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90024-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasziou, P., Altman, D. G., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Clarke, M., Julious, S., … Wager, E. (2014). Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. The Lancet, 383(9913), 267–276. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Y. (2017). Neural network methods for natural language processing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 10, 1–309. doi: 10.2200/s00762ed1v01y201703hlt037
   Google Scholar
• Grames, E. M., Stillman, A. N., Tingley, M. W., & Elphick, C. S. (2019). An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co-occurrence networks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (2008). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In H. Green & J. P. T. Higgins (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 187–241). London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. T., & Hennessy, E. A. (2019). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses. Social Science & Medicine, 233, 237–251. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonnalagadda, S. R., Goyal, P., & Huffman, M. D. (2015). Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 78, 4. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0066-7
   Google Scholar
• Kiritchenko, S., de Bruijn, B., Carini, S., Martin, J., & Sim, I. (2010). ExaCT: Automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10, 56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lample, G., Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., Kawakami, K., & Dyer, C. (2016, June). Neural architectures for named rntity recognition. San Diego, California. doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1030.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, K. R., Michie, S., Hekler, E. B., Gibson, B., Spruijt-Metz, D., Ahern, D., … Yi, J. (2017). Behavior change interventions: The potential of ontologies for advancing science and practice. Journal of B, 40(1), 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, E., DeYoung, J., Barzilay, R., & Wallace, B. C. (2019). Inferring which medical treatments work from reports of clinical trials. 2019 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., & Hovy, E. (2016). End-to-end sequence labeling via bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF. Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 1064-1074. doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1101
   Google Scholar
• Maas, A. (2018). Living systematic reviews: A novel approach to create a living evidence base. Journal of Neurotrauma. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6059
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, I. J., Kuiper, J., Banner, E., & Wallace, B. C. (2017). Automating biomedical evidence synthesis: RobotReviewer. Proceedings of the conference. Association for computational linguistics. Meeting, 2017, 7–12. doi:10.18653/v1/P17-4002
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, I. J., Kuiper, J., & Wallace, B. C. (2016). Robotreviewer: Evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(1), 193–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, I. J., Noel-Storr, A., Kuiper, J., Thomas, J., & Wallace, B. C. (2018). Machine learning for identifying randomized controlled trials: An evaluation and practitioner’s guide. Research Synthesis Methods, 9(4), 602–614. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, I. J., & Wallace, B. C. (2019). Toward systematic review automation: A practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., … Wood, C. E. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behaviour change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Thomas, J., Johnston, M., Mac Aonghusa, P., Shawe-Taylor, J., Kelly, M. P., … West, R. (2017). The human behaviour-change project: Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning for evidence synthesis and interpretation. Implementation Science, 12(1), 121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0641-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. Proceedings of the joint conference of the 47th annual meeting of the ACL and the 4th international joint conference on natural language processing of the AFNLP (Volume 2 - ACL-IJCNLP ‘09). doi:10.3115/1690219.1690287
   Google Scholar
• Norris, E., Finnerty, A. N., Hastings, J., Stokes, G., & Michie, S. (2019). A scoping review of ontologies related to human behaviour change. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 164–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, B., Jessy Li, J., Patel, R., Yang, Y., Marshall, I. J., Nenkova, A., & Wallace, B. C. (2018). A corpus with multi-level annotations of patients, interventions and outcomes to support language processing for medical literature. Proceedings of the conference. Association for computational lLinguistics. Meeting, 2018, 197–207.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., & Ananiadou, S. (2015). Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: A systematic review of current approaches. Systematic Reviews, 4, 5. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh, S., Conrad, E., Agarwal, O., Marshall, I., Wallace, B. C., & Nenkova, A. (2019). Browsing health: Information extraction to support new interfaces for accessing medical evidence. Proceedings of the workshop on extracting structured knowledge from scientific publications, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., … Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soboczenski, F., Trikalinos, T. A., Kuiper, J., Bias, R. G., Wallace, B. C., & Marshall, I. J. (2019). Machine learning to help researchers evaluate biases in clinical trials: A prospective, randomized user study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19(1), 96. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0814-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soto, A. J., Przybyla, P., & Ananiadou, S. (2019). Thalia: Semantic search engine for biomedical abstracts. Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 35(10), 1799–1801. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerscales, R. L., Argamon, S., Bai, S., Hupert, J., & Schwartz, A. (2011). Automatic summarization of results from clinical trials. 2011 IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine. doi: 10.1109/bibm.2011.72
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, C., & McCallum, A. (2012). An introduction to conditional random fields. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 4(4), 267–373. doi: 10.1561/2200000013
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., McNaught, J., & Ananiadou, S. (2011). Applications of text mining within systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 2(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Noel-Storr, A., Marshall, I., Wallace, B., McDonald, S., Mavergames, C., … Living Systematic Review Network. (2017). Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 91, 31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., … Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 5998–6008).
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. C., Kuiper, J., Sharma, A., Zhu, M. B., & Marshall, I. J. (2016). Extracting PICO sentences from clinical trial reports using supervised distant supervision. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17, 132. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27746703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. C., Small, K., Brodley, C. E., Lau, J., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2012). Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT symposium on international health informatics - IHI ‘12. doi:10.1145/2110363.2110464
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. C., Small, K., Brodley, C. E., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2010). Active learning for biomedical citation screening. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD ‘10. doi:10.1145/1835804.1835829
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, P., Savović, J., Higgins, J. P., Caldwell, D. M., Reeves, B. C., Shea, B., … Churchill, R. (2016). ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar