The school science attitude survey: a new instrument for measuring attitudes towards school science

References

• Abu-Hilal, Maher M. 2000. “A Structural Model of Attitudes towards School Subjects, Academic Aspiration and Achievement.” Educational Psychology 20 (1): 75–84. doi:10.1080/014434100110399.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, Glen S., and Alan G. Ryan. 1992. “The Development of a New Instrument: ‘Views on Science–Technology–Society’ (VOSTS).” Science Education 76 (5): 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, John, and Sid Bourke. 1992. “Student Views of Primary Schooling.” Research Papers in Education 7 (2): 107–128. doi:10.1080/0267152920070202.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, John, Julie Kos, and Marina Nicholas. 2008. Participation in Science, Mathematics and Technology in Australian Education. 63. Research Monographs. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research. http://research.acer.edu.au/acer_monographs/4/.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Louise, Jennifer DeWitt, Jonathan Osborne, Justin Dillon, Beatrice Willis, and Billy Wong. 2010. ““Doing” Science versus “being” a Scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old Schoolchildren's Constructions of Science through the Lens of Identity.” Science Education 94 (4): 617–639. doi:10.1002/sce.20399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barmby, Patrick, Per M. Kind, and Karen Jones. 2008. “Examining Changing Attitudes in Secondary School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (8): 1075–1093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, David J, David John, and Student Assessment Branch. 1986. “The 1986 British Columbia Science Assessment: General Report.” The Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Bernaards, Coen A., and Robert I. Jennrich. 2005. “Gradient Projection Algorithms and Software for Arbitrary Rotation Criteria in Factor Analysis.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 65: 676–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blalock, Cheryl L., Michael J. Lichtenstein, Steven Owen, Linda Pruski, Carolyn Marshall, and MaryAnne Toepperwein. 2008. “In Pursuit of Validity: A Comprehensive Review of Science Attitude Instruments 1935–2005.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (7): 961–977. doi:10.1080/09500690701344578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, Kenneth K., John R. Olson, Roger J. Calantone, and Eric C. Jackson. 2002. “Print versus Electronic Surveys: A Comparison of Two Data Collection Methodologies.” Journal of Operations Management 20 (4): 357–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonnier, Éric, and Sophie Vayssettes. 2009. “PISA 2009 Presentation Note (France).” PISA 2009. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/46624019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Sufen. 2006. “Development of an Instrument to Assess Views on Nature of Science and Attitudes ` Teaching Science.” Science Education 90 (5): 803–819. doi:10.1002/sce.20147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, May Hung May, and Zhi Hong Wan. 2016. “Unpacking the Paradox of Chinese Science Learners: Insights from Research into Asian Chinese School Students’ Attitudes towards Learning Science, Science Learning Strategies, and Scientific Epistemological Views.” Studies in Science Education 52 (1): 29–62. doi:10.1080/03057267.2015.1112471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooksey, Ray W., and Geoffrey N. Soutar. 2006. “Coefficient Beta and Hierarchical Item Clustering an Analytical Procedure for Establishing and Displaying the Dimensionality and Homogeneity of Summated Scales.” Organizational Research Methods 9 (1): 78–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, Mick P. 2000. “Review: Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (4): 464–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, LeeJ. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaia, Lena, Michael Fitzgerald, and David McKinnon. 2013. “‘Students’ Perceptions of High School Science: What Has Changed Over the Last Decade?” Research in Science Education 43 (4): 1501–1515. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9318-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, Jazlin V., and Uri Zoller. 1993. “Grade 10 Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward Science Teaching and School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (2): 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farenga, Stephen J., and Beverly A. Joyce. 1998. “Science-related Attitudes and Science Course Selection: A Study of High-Ability Boys and Girls.” Roeper Review 20 (4): 247–251. doi:10.1080/02783199809553901.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Barry. 1982. Test of Science Related Attitudes. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research. http://www.ecu.edu/ncspacegrant/docs/RESTEPdocs/TOSRA_BJF_paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Friborg, Oddgeir, Monica Martinussen, and Jan H. Rosenvinge. 2006. “Likert-based vs. Semantic Differential-based Scorings of Positive Psychological Constructs: A Psychometric Comparison of Two Versions of a Scale Measuring Resilience.” Personality and Individual Differences 40 (5): 873–884. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, Ronald D, and Matthias Schonlau. 2002. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature.” Field Methods 14 (4): 347–367.
   Google Scholar
• Fullarton, Sue, Maurice Walker, John Ainley, and Kylie Hillman. 2003. “Patterns of Participation in Year 12.” ACER Research Reports 33. Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth. Australian Council for Educational Research. http://research.acer.edu.au/lsay_research/37.
   Google Scholar
• Funke, Frederik, and Ulf-Dietrich Reips. 2012. “Why Semantic Differentials in Web-based Research Should be Made from Visual Analogue Scales and not from 5-Point Scales.” Field Methods 24 (3): 310–327. doi:10.1177/1525822X12444061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, Donald G., Larry L. Cummings, Randall B. Dunham, and Jon L. Pierce. 1998. “Single-item versus Multiple-item Measurement Scales: An Empirical Comparison.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 58 (6): 898–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, Rani, and David Kaplan. 1998. “A Structural Model of Parent and Teacher Influences on Science Attitudes of Eighth Graders: Evidence from NELS: 88.” Science Education 82 (1): 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman, Louis. 1945. “A Basis for Analyzing Test-Retest Reliability.” Psychometrika 10 (4): 255–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halloun, Ibrahim. 2001. Students Views about Science: A Comparative Survey. Beirut: Educational Research Center, Lebanese University.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, John L. 1965. “A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis.” Psychometrika 30 (2): 179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Edgar W., and N. W. Nelson. 2005. “Important but not for me: Students’ Attitudes towards Secondary School Science in England.” Research in Science & Technological Education 23 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1080/02635140500068435.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, John, Terry Lyons, and Frances Quinn. 2014. “The Continuing Decline of Science and Mathematics Enrolments in Australian High Schools.” Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association 60 (2): 34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo, Siek Toon, and John Ainley. 2005. “Attitudes, Intentions and Participation.” 41. Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth (LSAY). Canberra: Australian Council for Educational Research. http://research.acer.edu.au/lsay_research/45.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, Per, Karen Jones, and Partick Barmby. 2007. “Developing Attitudes towards Science Measures.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (7): 871–893. doi:10.1080/09500690600909091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littman, Alyson J., Emily White, Jessie A. Satia, Deborah J. Bowen, and Alan R. Kristal. 2006. “Reliability and Validity of 2 Single-item Measures of Psychosocial Stress.” Epidemiology 17 (4): 398–403. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000219721.89552.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, Philip. 2014. “Building on Strong Foundations.” Presented at the Australian Business Economists (ABE) Annual Dinner, Sydney, November 25. http://www.rba.gov.au/speeches/2014/sp-dg-251114.html.
   Google Scholar
• Luiselli, James K., Robert F. Putnam, Marcie W. Handler, and Adam B. Feinberg. 2005. “Whole-school Positive Behaviour Support: Effects on Student Discipline Problems and Academic Performance.” Educational Psychology 25 (2–3): 183–198. doi:10.1080/0144341042000301265.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, Terry. 2006. “Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ Experiences of School Science in Their Own Words.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (6): 591–613. doi:10.1080/09500690500339621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, Terry, and Frances Quinn. 2010. “Choosing Science: Understanding the Declines in Senior High School Science Enrolments.” National Centre of Science, ICT and mathematics education for rural and regional Australia (SiMERR Australia), University of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, John, and Barry Walsh. 2013. “Mathematics and Science Combinations NSW HSC 2001-2011 by Gender.” University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Manfreda, Katja Lozar, Zenel Batagelj, and Vasja Vehovar. 2002. “Design of Web Survey Questionnaires: Three Basic Experiments.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7 (3). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00149.x.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Roderick P. 1999. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Misiti, Frank L., Robert L. Shrigley, and Lyle Hanson. 1991. “Science Attitude Scale for Middle School Students.” Science Education 75 (5): 525–540. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Richard W., and Rachel Leigh Hill Foy. 1997. “The Scientific Attitude Inventory: A Revision (SAI II).” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 (4): 327–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, Patricia D., and Norman G. Lederman. 1998. “Student's Attitudes toward School and Classroom Science: Are They Independent Phenomena?” School Science and Mathematics 98 (2): 76–83.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Chief Scientist. 2013. Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in the National Interest: A Strategic Approach. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Jonathan, Shirley Simon, and Sue Collins. 2003. “Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, Charles E, G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oshagbemi, Titus. 1999. “Overall Job Satisfaction: How Good Are Single versus Multiple-item Measures?” Journal of Managerial Psychology 14 (5): 388–403.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Steven V., Mary Anne Toepperwein, Carolyn E. Marshall, Michael J. Lichtenstein, Cheryl L. Blalock, Yan LiuLinda A. Pruski, and Kandi Grimes. 2008. “Finding Pearls: Psychometric Reevaluation of the Simpson–Troost Attitude Questionnaire (STAQ).” Science Education 92 (6): 1076–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, Patrice, and Abdelkrim Hasni. 2014. “Interest, Motivation and Attitude towards Science and Technology at K-12 Levels: A Systematic Review of 12 Years of Educational Research.” Studies in Science Education 50 (1): 85–129. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.881626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rada, Vidal Díaz de, and Juan Antonio Domínguez-Álvarez. 2014. “Response Quality of Self-Administered Questionnaires: A Comparison Between Paper and Web Questionnaires.” Social Science Computer Review 32 (2): 256–269. doi:10.1177/0894439313508516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, William. 1979. “Hierarchical Cluster Analysis and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 14 (1): 57–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, William. 2014a. Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, William. 2014b. “R: Find Two Estimates of Reliability: Cronbach's Alpha And … ” Personality Project. http://personality-project.org/r/html/alpha.html.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, William, and Rocklin. Thomas. 1979. “Very Simple Structure: An Alternative Procedure for Estimating the Optimal Number of Interpretable Factors.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 14 (4): 403–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Michael W., Sven-Axel Månsson, Kristian Daneback, Al Cooper, and Ronny Tikkanen. 2005. “Biases in Internet Sexual Health Samples: Comparison of an Internet Sexuality Survey and a National Sexual Health Survey in Sweden.” Social Science & Medicine 61 (1): 245–252. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio, John, and Roche Brendan. 2012. “Determining the Number of Factors to Retain in an Exploratory Factor Analysis Using Comparison Data of Known Factorial Structure.” Psychological Assessment 24 (2): 282–292. doi:10.1037/a0025697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Alan G., and Glen S. Aikenhead. 1992. “Students’ Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science.” Science Education 76 (6): 559–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, Philip M., Gerhard Sonnert, Zahra Hazari, and Robert Tai. 2012. “Stability and Volatility of STEM Career Interest in High School: A Gender Study.” Science Education 96 (3): 411–427. doi:10.1002/sce.21007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiner, Camilla, and Svein Sjøberg. 2004. Sowing the Seeds of ROSE: Background, Rationale, Questionnaire Development and Data Collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education): A Comparative Study of Students’ Views of Science and Science Education. Oslo: University of Oslo, Faculty of Education, Department of Teacher Education and School Development: Unipub.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Marcelle A., and Michael A. Ranney. 2003. “Developing the Changes in Attitude about the Relevance of Science (CARS) Questionnaire and Assessing Two High School Science Classes.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (8): 757–775. doi:10.1002/tea.10110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Shirley, and Jonathan Osborne. 2010. Students’ Attitudes to Science. In Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say, edited by Jonathan Osborne, and Justin Dillon, 2nd ed., 238–258. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Ronald D., and Kay Michael Troost. 1982. “Influences on Commitment to and Learning of Science among Adolescent Students.” Science Education 66 (5): 763–781.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Ronald D., and J. Steve Oliver. 1985. “Attitude toward Science and Achievement Motivation Profiles of Male and Female Science Students in Grades Six through Ten.” Science Education 69 (4): 511–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Ronald D., and J. Steve Oliver. 1990. “A Summary of Major Influences on Attitude toward and Achievement in Science among Adolescent Students.” Science Education 74 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, Svein, and Camilla Schreiner. 2010. The ROSE Project: An Overview and Key Findings. Norway: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Emma. 2011. “Staying in the Science Stream: Patterns of Participation in A-level Science Subjects in the UK.” Educational Studies 37 (1): 59–71. doi:10.1080/03055691003729161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. 1904. “The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things.” The American Journal of Psychology 15 (1): 72–101.
   Google Scholar
• Starkweather, J. 2012. “Step out of the Past: Stop Using Coefficient Alpha; There Are Better Ways to Calculate Reliability.” University of North Texas. Research and Statistical Support. Retrieved September 23: 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Trumper, Ricardo. 2006. “Factors Affecting Junior High School Students’ Interest in Physics.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 15 (1): 47–58. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-0355-6.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Sarah, and Gren Ireson. 2010. “‘Fifteen Pupils’ Positive Approach to Primary School Science: When Does It Decline?” Educational Studies 36 (2): 119–141. doi:10.1080/03055690903148662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, Wayne F. 1976. “Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations.” Psychometrika 41 (3): 321–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanous, John P., and Arnon E. Reichers. 1996. “Estimating the Reliability of a Single-Item Measure.” Psychological Reports 78 (2): 631–634. doi:10.2466/pr0.1996.78.2.631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanous, John P., and Michael J. Hudy. 2001. “Single-item Reliability: A Replication and Extension.” Organizational Research Methods 4 (4): 361–375. doi:10.1177/109442810144003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Hope. 2009. “A Model of Academic Self-Concept: Perceived Difficulty, Social Comparison and Achievement Among Academically Accelerated Secondary School Students,” PhD, Univeristy of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Kevin B. 2005. “Researching Internet-based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (3). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar