461
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Language teachers’ responses to educational research: addressing the ‘crisis’ of representation

ORCID Icon
Pages 314-328 | Received 26 Jun 2015, Accepted 13 Mar 2016, Published online: 24 Mar 2016

References

  • Ahmed, A., and N. Pervin. 2015. “English-Language Teachers’ Engagement with Research: Findings from Bangladesh.” Professional Development in Education 41 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1080/19415257.2013.861860.
  • Anderson, S. C. 2009. Hegel’s Theory of Recognition: From Oppression to Ethical Liberal Modernity. New York: Continuum.
  • Atkinson, R. C., and G. B. Jackson, eds. 1992. Research and Education Reform: Roles for the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Ball, A. F. 2012. “To Know is not Enough: Knowledge, Power, and the Zone of Generativity.” Educational Researcher 41 (8): 283–293. doi:10.3102/0013189X12465334.
  • Bennett, A. 1995. “Introduction.” In Readers and Reading, edited by A. Bennett, 1–19. London: Longman.
  • Biesta, G. J. J. 2010. “Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (5): 491–503. doi:10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.
  • Borg, S. 2009. “English Language Teachers’ Conceptions of Research.” Applied Linguistics 30 (3): 358–388. doi:10.1093/applin/amp007.
  • Borg, S. 2010. “Language Teacher Research Engagement.” Language Teaching 43 (4): 391–429. doi:10.1017/S0261444810000170.
  • Broekkamp, H., and B. van Hout-Wolters. 2007. “The Gap Between Educational Research and Practice: A Literature Review, Symposium, and Questionnaire.” Educational Research and Evaluation 13 (3): 203–220. doi:10.1080/13803610701626127.
  • Cain, T. 2015. “Teachers’ Engagement with Published Research: Addressing the Knowledge Problem.” The Curriculum Journal 26 (3): 488–509. doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1020820.
  • Carlile, P. R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555–568. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.
  • CUREE (Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education). 2015. About us. http://www.curee.co.uk/about-us.
  • Davies, T. O., S. M. Nutley, and P. C. Smith. 2000. What Works: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in the Social Services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. 2005. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fenwick, T., and L. Farrell. 2012. “Introduction: Knowledge mobilization.” In Knowledge Mobilization and Educational Research: Politics, Languages and Responsibilities, edited by T. Fenwick and L. Farrell, 1–13. London: Routledge.
  • Fish, S. 1980. Is There a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Fraser, N. 2007. “Identity, Exclusion, and Critique: A Response to Four Critics.” European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3): 305–338. doi:10.1177/1474885107077319.
  • Freund, E. 2003. The Return of the Reader. New York: Routledge.
  • Gadamer, H.-G. 2001. Gadamer in Conversation: Reflections and Commentary. Translated and edited by R. E. Palmer. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Gadamer, H.-G. 2006. “Classical and Philosophical Hermeneutics.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (1): 29–56. doi:10.1177/0263276406063228.
  • Gadamer, H-G. [1975] 2013. Truth and Method. New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Giddens, A. 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Graff, G. 2004. “How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Stanley.” In Postmodern Sophistry: Stanley Fish and the Critical Enterprise, edited by G. A. Olson and L. Worsham, 27–41. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Greene, M. 1994. “Postmodernism and the Crisis of Representation.” English Education 26 (4): 206–219. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40172842.
  • Hall, S. 2013. “The Work of Representation.” In Representation, edited by S. Hall, J. Evans, and S. Nixon, 1–59. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
  • Hammersley, M. 1997. “Educational Research and Teaching: A Response to David Hargreaves’ TTA Lecture.” British Educational Research Journal 23 (2): 141–161. doi: 10.1080/0141192970230203
  • Hammersley, M. 2007. “Introduction.” In Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice, edited by M. Hammersley, x–xix. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
  • Hargreaves, D. 1996. “ Teaching as a Research-Based Profession: Possibilities and Prospects. Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture, London.” http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/TTA%20Hargreaves%20lecture.pdf.
  • Hargreaves, D. 1999. “The Knowledge-Creating School.” British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2): 122–144. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00107
  • Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hemsley-Brown, J., and C. Sharp. 2003. “The Use of Research to Improve Professional Practice: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Oxford Review of Education 29 (4): 449–471. doi:10.1080/0305498032000153025.
  • Johnson, J. M. 2002. “In-Depth Interviewing.” In Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method, edited by J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein, 103–119. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kazepides, T. 2012. “Education as Dialogue.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (9): 913–925. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00762.x.
  • Kennedy, M. M. 1997. “The Connection Between Research and Practice.” Educational Researcher 26 (7): 4–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X026007004
  • Klein, S. S., and M. K. Gwaltney. 1991. “Charting the Educational Dissemination System: Where We Are and Where We Go from Here.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 12 (3): 241–265.
  • KNAER. 2015. http://www.knaer-recrae.ca/.
  • Knowledge Mobilization. 2015. http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/society-societe/community-communite/index-eng.aspx.
  • Luke, C. 2000. “Cyber-Schooling and Technological Change: Multiliteracies for New Times.” In Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 69–91. New York: Routledge.
  • Marzano, R. J. 2003. What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  • McBride, C. 2013. Recognition. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. 1990. “Representation.” In Critical Terms for Literary Study, edited by F. Lentricchia and T. McLaughlin, 11–22. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mitchell, D. 2008. What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education: Using Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies. New York: Routledge.
  • Nutley, S. 2013. “Reflections on the Mobilisation of Education Research.” In The Impact of Research in Education: An International Perspective, edited by B. Levin, J. Qi, H. Edelstein, and J. Sohn, 243–262. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Nutley, S. M., I. Walter, and H. T. O. Davies. 2007. Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Nutley, S. M., I. Walter, and H. T. O. Davies. 2009. “Promoting Evidence-Based Practice: Models and Mechanisms from Cross-Sector Review.” Research on Social Work Practice 19 (5): 552–559. doi:10.1177/1049731509335496.
  • OERE (Ontario Education Research Exchange). 2015. http://oere.oise.utoronto.ca/.
  • Parr, M., and T. Campbell. 2015. “ Mobilizing Research into Practice in Meaningful Ways.” https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/WW_MobilizePractice.pdf.
  • Randi, J. 2007. “This Issue.” Theory into Practice 46 (4): 261–263. doi:10.1080/00405840701593824.
  • Randi, J., and L. Corno. 2007. “Theory into Practice: A Matter of Transfer.” Theory into Practice 46 (4): 334–342. doi:10.1080/00405840701593923.
  • Rehfeld, A. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation.” The Journal of Politics 68 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.x.
  • Rehfeld, A. 2008. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosenau, P. M. 1992. Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Sanderson, I. 2003. “Is it ‘What Works’ that Matters? Evaluation and Evidence-Based Policy-Making.” Research Papers in Education 18 (4): 331–345. doi:10.1080/0267152032000176846.
  • Schwandt, T. A. 2007. The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Simons, H. 2003. “Evidence-Based Practice: Panacea or Over Promise?” Research Papers in Education 18 (4): 303–311. doi:10.1080/0267152032000176828.
  • Smith, D. E. 1999. Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  • SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council). 2010. “ SSHRC’s Knowledge Mobilization Strategy, 2009–11.” http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/about-au_sujet/publications/KMbPI_FinalE.pdf.
  • Strauss, M. 2003. “The Role of Recognition in the Formation of Self-Understanding.” In Recognition, Responsibility, and Rights: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, edited by R. N. Fiore and H. L. Nelson, 37–51. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Stribling, S. M., E. K. DeMulder, and M. Day. 2011. “Reading the World: Supporting Teachers’ Professional Development Using Community-Based Critical Literacy Practices.” Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education 6 (1): 21–33. doi:10.9741/2161-2978.1051.
  • Taylor, C. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism, edited by A. Gutmann, 25–73. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tirrell, L. 1993. “Definition and Power: Toward Authority Without Privilege.” Hypatia 8 (4): 1–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1993.tb00273.x
  • Tseng, V. 2012. “The Uses of Research in Policy and Practice.” Social Policy Report 26 (2): 1–23. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED536954.pdf.
  • Urbinati, N., and M. E. Warren. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533.
  • Vanderlinde, R., and J. van Braak. 2010. “The Gap Between Educational Research and Practice: Views of Teachers, School Leaders, Intermediaries and Researchers.” British Educational Research Journal 36 (2): 299–316. doi:10.1080/01411920902919257.
  • Walshaw, M., and W. Duncan. 2015. “Hermeneutics as a Methodological Resource for Understanding Empathy in On-Line Learning Environments.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 38 (3): 304–319. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.914166.
  • Walter, I., S. Nutley, and H. Davies. 2005. “What Works to Promote Evidence-Based Practice? A Cross-Sector Review.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 1 (3): 335–364. doi:10.1332/1744264054851612.
  • Willinsky, J. 2006. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Willis, J. W. 2007. Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wiseman, A. W. 2010. “The Uses of Evidence for Educational Policymaking: Global Contexts and International Trends.” Review of Research in Education 34: 1–24. doi:10.3102/0091732X09350472.
  • WWC (What Works Clearinghouse). 2015. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/default.aspx.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.