Interdisciplinary interactions within a small-scale research initiative investigating animation creation as a means of teaching and learning

References

• Becher, T. 1994. “The Significance of Disciplinary Differences.” Studies in Higher Education 19 (2): 151–161. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERA (British Educational Research Association). 2011. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. London: BERA.
   Google Scholar
• Bevins, S. C., and G. Price. 2014. “Collaboration between Academics and Teachers: A Complex Relationship.” Educational Action Research 22 (2): 270–284. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2013.869181
   Google Scholar
• Bignold, W., and F. Su. 2013. “The Role of the Narrator in Narrative Inquiry in Education: Construction and Co-Construction in Two Case Studies.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 36 (4): 400–414. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2013.773508
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Boix Mansilla, V., W. C. Miller, and H. Gardner. 2000. “On Disciplinary Lenses and Interdisciplinary Work.” In Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Challenges of Implementation, edited by S. Wineburg and P. Grossman, 17–38. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, J. G. 2000. “Interdisciplinary Research: A Philosophy, Art Form, Artifact or Antidote?” Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 35 (1): 58–66. doi: 10.1007/BF02911166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chettiparamb, A. 2007. Interdisciplinarity: A Literature Review. Southampton: HEA Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Group, Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hattery, L. H. 1986. “Interdisciplinary Research Management.” In Interdisciplinary Analysis and Research, edited by D. E. Chubin, A. L. Porter, F. A. Rossini, and T. Connolly, 13–28. Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond.
   Google Scholar
• Hoban, G. 2005. “From Claymation to Slowmation.” Teaching Science 51 (2): 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. A. 2014. In Defense of Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, T., M. Bergmann, and F. Keil. 2012. “Transdisciplinarity: Between Mainstreaming and Marginalization.” Ecological Economics 79: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2001. “Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 7 (6): 679–692. doi: 10.1177/107780040100700601
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2010. “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein and C. Mitcham, 15–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krasny, M. E., A. Oshry, and A. U. Ferguson. 2016. “How to Tackle Wicked Problems.” Accessed January 30, 2017. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/education/2016/06/how-to-tackle-wicked-problems/.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. 2001. Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching among College and University Faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, C. 2013. Making Interdisciplinary Research Work – A Review of the Literature. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., A. Bruce, J. Tait, and L. Meagher. 2015. Interdisciplinary Research Journeys: Practical Strategies for Capturing Creativity. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. 1966. The Savage Mind.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, J., F. W. Lancaster, and B. Allen. 1997. “Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48 (10): 893–916. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, S. M., and J. A. Reich. 2006. “Cultural Competence in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: A Method for Respecting Diversity in Research Partnerships.” American Journal of Community Psychology 38 (1–2): 51–62. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9064-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F., and R. Szostak. 2017. Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Szostak, R. 2004. Classifying Science: Phenomena, Data, Theory, Method, Practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, J. 2016. “Learning Science through Creating Simple Animations in both Primary and Secondary Schools.” School Science Review 97 (361): 117–124.
   Google Scholar
• Zierhofer, W., and P. Burger. 2007. “Disentangling Transdisciplinarity: An Analysis of Knowledge Integration in Problem-Oriented Research.” Science Studies 20 (1): 51–74.
   Google Scholar