Adapting narrative methodology to explore emerging fields

References

• Baker, F. W. 2011. “Media Literacy : 21st Century Learning.” Library Media Connection.
   Google Scholar
• Bawden, D. 2008. “Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy.” In Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, edited by C. Lankshear and M. Knobel, 17–32. New York: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr077.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsma, L., D. Considine, S. H. Culver, R. Hobbs, A. Jensen, F. Rogow, E. Y. Rosen, C. Scheibe, S. Sellers-Clark, and E. Thoman. 2007. “Core Principles of Media Literacy Education in the United States.” www.NAMLE.net.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. 1998. “Media Literacy Perspectives.” Journal of Communication 48 (1): 44–57. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02736.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., and F. M. Connelly. 2000. Narrative Inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Approaches. 3rd ed.Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C., and G. C. Rakes. 2003. “The Influence of Principals’ Technology Training on the Integration of Technology into Schools.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36 (1): 29–49. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782401
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. 2010. “Comparing Frameworks for 21st Century Skills.” In 21st Century Skills, edited by J. A. Bellanca and R. Brandt, 51–73. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. 2004. “Media Literacy, General Semantics and K-12 Education.” ETC.: A Review of General Semantics 61 (1): 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. 2006. “Multiple Visions of Multimedia Literacy: Emerging Areas of Synthesis.” In International Handbook of Literacy and Technology. Vol. 2, edited by M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer and D. Reinking, 15–28. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2006. “Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21 Century.” Chicago, IL. http://digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Koltay, T. 2011. “The Media and the Literacies: Media Literacy, Information Literacy, Digital Literacy.” Media, Culture, & Society 33 (2): 211–221. doi: 10.1177/0163443710393382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. 1995. “Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 1 (3): 275–289. doi: 10.1177/107780049500100301
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, K. R., and T. Khwaja. 2016. “Living and Leading in a Digital Age: A Narrative Study of the Attitudes and Perceptions of School Leaders about Media Literacy.” Journal of Media Literacy Education 8 (2): 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, K. 1997. “Authenticity in Constructivist Inquiry: Methodological Considerations Without Prescription.” Qualitative Inquiry 3 (1): 93–115. doi: 10.1177/107780049700300105
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, L. C., M. Sartoris, D. D. Bickel, and H. E. Garnier. 2009. “Leadership for Literacy Coaching: The Principal’s Role in Launching a New Coaching Program.” Educational Administration Quarterly 45 (5): 655–693. doi:10.1177/0013161X09347341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. 2005. “Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 52 (2): 250–260. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkeen, A. 2003. “What can Policy Makers do to Encourage Integration of Information and Communications Technology? Evidence from the Irish School System.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 12 (2): 277–293. doi:10.1080/14759390300200158.
   Google Scholar
• Pelgrum, W. J. 1993. “Attitudes of School Principals and Teachers Towards Computers: Does it Matter What They Think?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 19: 199–212. doi: 10.1016/0191-491X(93)90007-E
   Google Scholar
• Polizzi, G. 2011. “Measuring School Principals’ Support for ICT Integration in Palermo, Italy.” Journal of Media Literacy Education 3 (2): 113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Project Tomorrow. 2012. “Personalizing the Classroom Experience: Teachers, Librarians and Administrators Connect the Dots with Digital Learning.” Irvine, CA. http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/SU11_PersonalizedClassroom_EducatorsReport.html.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., and C. H. Major. 2013. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Serhan, D. 2007. “School Principals’ Attitudes Towards the Use of Technology: United Arab Emirates Technology Workshop.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 6 (2): 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., and A. Coffey. 2008. Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: Possibilities and Challenges. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., G. Crow, and H. Pain. 2011. “Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: A Narrative Review.” Qualitative Research 11 (5): 587–604. doi: 10.1177/1468794111413227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar