The method of empathy-based stories

References

• Annala, J., M. Mäkinen, P. Svärd, K. Silius, and T. Miilumäki. 2012. “Online Community Environment Promoting Engagement in Higher Education.” Studies for the Learning Society 2–3: 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. S. 2002. “Narrative Research in TESOL: Narrative Inquiry: More Than Just Telling Stories.” TESOL Quarterly 36 (2): 207–213. doi: 10.2307/3588331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1984. The Social Construction of Reality: a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bold, C. 2012. Using Narrative in Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. 2004. “Life as Narrative.” Social Research 71 (3): 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, S. E. 2005. “Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Voices.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 651–680. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cortazzi, M., and L. Jin. 2012. “Approaching Narrative Analysis with 19 Questions.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, edited by S. Delamont, 474–488. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., T. Soderlund, J. Cole, E. Gadol, M. Kute, M. Myers, and J. Weihing. 2004. “Cognitions Associated with Attempts to Empathize: How Do We Imagine the Perspective of Another?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (12): 1625–1635. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond, R. F. 1950. “Personality and Empathy.” Journal of Consulting Psychology 14: 343–350. doi: 10.1037/h0061674
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2012. “Gathering Narrative Data.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, edited by S. Delamont, 281–298. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Eskola, A. 1988. “Non-active Role-Playing: Some Experiences.” In Blind Alleys in Social Psychology: a Search for Ways Out, edited by A. Eskola, A. Kihlström, D. Kivinen, K. Weckroth, and O.-H. Ylijoki, 239–311. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Eskola, J. 1991. Eläytymismenetelmän käyttö sosiaalitutkimuksessa: tekninen opas aloittelijoille [The Use of the Method of Empathy-Based Stories in Social Research: a Technical Guide for Beginners]. Tampere: University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Eskola, J. 1997a. Eläytymismenetelmäopas [A Guide to Method of Empathy-Based Stories]. Tampere: TAJU.
   Google Scholar
• Eskola, J. 1997b. “How Students Evaluate the Quality of University Teaching.” In Adult Education Without Barriers, edited by K. Kurtakko, O. Kivinen, and J. Eskola, 172–175. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.
   Google Scholar
• Eskola, J. 1998. Eläytymismenetelmä sosiaalitutkimuksen tiedonhankintamenetelmänä [The Method of Empathy-Based Stories as a Method of Acquiring Data in Social Research]. Tampere: TAJU.
   Google Scholar
• Eskola, J., and J. Suoranta. 1998. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen [Introduction to Qualitative Research]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Eskola, J., and A. Wallin. 2015. “Eläytymismenetelmä: perusteet ja mahdollisuudet.” [The Ground and Possibilities of MEBS]. In Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin I: metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu: virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle [Windows to Research Methods I: Choosing the Method and Collecting the Data: Incentives for Beginning Researchers], edited by R. Valli, and J. Aaltola, 56–69. 4th revised ed. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Fonteyn, M. E., B. Kuipers, and S. J. Grobe. 1993. “A Description of Think Aloud Method and Protocol Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 3 (4): 430–441. doi: 10.1177/104973239300300403
   Google Scholar
• Gerace, A., A. Day, S. Casey, and P. Mohr. 2013. “An Exploratory Investigation of the Process of Perspective Taking in Interpersonal Situations.” Journal of Relationships Research 4 (e6): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1999. An Invitation to Social Construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, M., and K. J. Gergen, eds. 2003. Social Construction: A Reader. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, G. P. 1978. “Role-playing and Role Performance in Social Psychological Research.” In The Social Context of Method, edited by M. Brenner, P. Marsh, and M. Brenner, 91–121. London: Croomhelm.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, G. P. 1979. “The Effective use of Role-Playing in Social Psychological Research.” In Emerging Strategies in Social Psychological Research, edited by G. P. Ginsburg, 117–154. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., and M. Koro-Ljungberg. 2005. “The Erosion of a Method: Examples From Grounded Theory.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 18 (6): 729–750. doi: 10.1080/09518390500298204
   Google Scholar
• Hakala, L., T. Kujala, and A. Vuolio. 2009. “Physical Competence as a Part of School Readiness Based on the Texts Written by School Starters’ Parents.” In Arts Contact Points Between Cultures: 1st International Journal of Intercultural Arts Education Conference: Post-Conference Book, edited by H. Ruismäki, and I. Ruokonen, 85–96. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Halttunen, K. 2003. “Scaffolding Performance in IR Instruction: Exploring Learning Experiences and Performance in Two Learning Environments.” Journal of Information Science 29 (5): 375–390. doi: 10.1177/01655515030295004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helenius, J. 2010. “Tarinoita itsetunnosta. Oppituntimateriaali yläkouluille.” [Stories About Self-esteem. Class Material for Upper Comprehensive School] The Mannerheim League for Child Welfare. Accessed 25 September 2018. https://docplayer.fi/7073393-Tarinoita-itsetunnosta-oppituntimateriaali-ylakouluille.html.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, T. E., and R. S. Wells. 1986. “Social Construct Availability and Accessibility as a Function of Social Life Phase: Emphasizing the “How” Versus the “Can” of Social Cognition.” Social Cognition 4 (2): 201–226. doi: 10.1521/soco.1986.4.2.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyrkäs, K., K. Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, and K. Kivimäki. 2005. “First-line Managers’ Views of the Long-Term Effects of Clinical Supervision: How Does Clinical Supervision Support and Develop Leadership in Health Care?” Journal of Nursing Management 13: 209–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00522.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ikonen, M. 2013. “Trust Development and Dynamics at Dyadic Level: A Narrative Approach to Studying Processes of Interpersonal Trust in Leader-follower Relationships.” PhD Thesis, University of Eastern Finland, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. 1982. Groupthink. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Juntunen, A., and J. Saarti. 2000. “Library as the Student’s Cornerstone or Obstacle: Evaluating the Method of Empathy-Based Stories.” Libri 50: 235–240. doi: 10.1515/LIBR.2000.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, S., and P. Eriksson. 2013. “He is a Firm, Strong-Minded and Empowering Leader, But is She? Gendered Positioning of Female and Male CEOs.” Gender, Work and Organization 20 (1): 71–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, M., and A. Haahti. 2015. “Visitor Discourses on Experiences: Reasons for Festival Success and Failure.” International Journal of Event and Festival Management 6 (3): 251–268. doi: 10.1108/IJEFM-01-2015-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontkanen, S., P. Dillon, S. Kärkkäinen, J. Kukkonen, T. Valtonen, and P. Väisänen. 2015. “A Second Life Experiment in Sex Education with Pre-service Teachers and its Contribution to the Development of Their Proto-TPACK.” Journal of Educational Enquiry 14 (3): 17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M., and R. Bussing. 2013. “Methodological Modifications in a Longitudinal Qualitative Research Design.” Field Methods 25 (4): 423–440. doi: 10.1177/1525822X12472877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski-Heikkinen, A., K. Määttä, and S. Uusiautti. 2014. “‘Professional, Approachable, and Fair’ – Students’ Perceptions of the Vocational Education Teacher’s Authority.” International Journal of Human Sciences 11 (2): 446–463. doi: 10.14687/ijhs.v11i2.2927
   Google Scholar
• Krumpal, I. 2013. “Determinants of Social Desirability Bias in Sensitive Surveys: a Literature Review.” Quality and Quantity 47 (4): 2025–2047. doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kultalahti, S. 2015. “‘It’s So Nice to be at Work!’ Adopting Different Perspectives in Understanding Generation Y at Work.” PhD Thesis, University of Vaasa, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W., and J. Waletzky. 1997. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 3–38. Reprinted from Essays on the verbal and visual arts, edited by J. Helm. (1967), Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 12–44. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar
   Google Scholar
• Lieblich, A., R. Tuval-Mashiach, and T. Zilber. 2011. “A New Model for Classification of Approaches to Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation.” In: Narrative research. SAGE Research Methods. doi:10.4135/9781412985253.
   Google Scholar
• Mixon, D. 1972. “Instead of Deception.” Journal of Social Behaviour 2: 145–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1972.tb00309.x
   Google Scholar
• Mixon, D. 1974. “If You Won't Deceive, What Can You Do?” In Reconstructing Social Psychology, edited by N. Armistead, 72–85. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mixon, D. 1979. “Understanding Shocking and Puzzling Conduct.” In Emerging Strategies in Social Psychological Research, edited by G. P. Ginsburg, 155–176. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Moisander, J., and S. Pesonen. 2002. “Narratives of Sustainable Ways of Living: Constructing the Self and the Other as a Green Consumer.” Management Decision 40 (4): 329–342. doi: 10.1108/00251740210426321
   Google Scholar
• Mustonen, P. 2006. “Postmodern Tourism – Alternative Approaches.” PhD Thesis, University of Turku, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Paaso, E., S. Uusiautti, and K. Määttä. 2013. “‘Peace to Learn’— A Discourse Analysis of Pupils’ Perceptions.” Journal of Classroom Interaction 48 (1): 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2001. Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. 2007. “Validity Issues in Narrative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 13 (4): 471–486. doi: 10.1177/1077800406297670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posti-Ahokas, H. 2013. “Empathy-based Stories Capturing the Voice of Female Secondary School Students in Tanzania.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (10): 1277–1292. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2012.731533
   Google Scholar
• Rautiainen, K.-H. 2015. “Class Teacher Students’ Empathy Stories About Giving a Music Lesson.” Problems in Music Pedagogy 14 (1): 31–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2007. Visual Methodologies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saaranen-Kauppinen, A., E. Rovio, A. Wallin, and J. Eskola. 2011. “‘Kaino löysi parin, mutta jatkaa liikunnan harrastamista edelleen’ – Sosiaaliset suhteet ja liikunta-aktiivisuus” [Tony Found a Partner, but Still Continued to be Physically Active” – Social Relationships and Physical Activity Levels.] Liikunta & Tiede 48 (6): 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., and S. Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. 2004. “Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects.” Education for Information 22: 63–75. doi: 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, J., K. Chamberlain, and A. Dupuis. 2011. “Timelining: Visualising Experience.” Qualitative Research 11 (5): 552–569. doi: 10.1177/1468794111413235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlasky, S., and B. Alpert. 2007. Ways of Writing Qualitative Research: From Deconstructing Reality to Its Constuction as a Text. Tel Aviv: Mofet (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Spector-Mersel, G. 2010. “Narrative Research: Time for a Paradigm.” Narrative Inquiry 20 (1): 204–224. doi: 10.1075/ni.20.1.10spe
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, V. 2011. “Asperger-erityisoppilaan sosiaalinen integraatio.” [Asperger-students’ Social Integration] PhD Thesis. Tampere: University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Uusiautti, S., S. Harjula, T. Pennanen, and K. Määttä. 2014. “Novice Teachers’ Well-Being at Work.” Journal of Educational and Social Research 4 (3): 117–186.
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, P. G. M., G. van Gils, J. Bouts, and J. J. Hox. 2000. “A Comparison of Randomized Response, Computer-Assisted Self-Interview, and Face-to-Face Diret Questioning. Eliciting Sensitive Information in the Context of Welfare and Unemployment Benefit.” Sociologial Methods & Research 28: 505–537. doi: 10.1177/0049124100028004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin, A., J. Helenius, A. Saaranen-Kauppinen, and J. Eskola. 2015. “Eläytymismenetelmän ensimmäiset kolme vuosikymmentä: menetelmällisestä erikoisuudesta vakiintuneeksi tutkimusmetodiksi.” [The First Three Decades of MEBS: From a Methodological Curiosity to a Settled Research Method]. Kasvatus 46 (3): 247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Wallin, A., A. Saaranen-Kauppinen, S. Rosenberg, and J. Eskola. 2014. “Liikun, siis jaan? Nuorten käsitykset liikuntapäiväkirjan jakamisesta sosiaalisessa mediassa.” [Young People’s Conceptions of Motives for Sharing an Exercise Diary on Social Media.] Liikunta & Tiede 51 (6): 78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B. 2016. “The Social and Historical Construction of Social Constructionism: Prof. KJ Gergen in Dialogue.” Culture & Psychology 22 (4): 565–573. doi: 10.1177/1354067X16663007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar