Dialectic dialogue: reflections on adopting a dialectic stance

References

• Bazeley, P., and L. Kemp. 2012. “Mosaics, Triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for Integrated Analysis in Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (1): 55–72. doi: 10.1177/1558689811419514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. 1995. “Standing for Something.” The Journal of Philosophy 92 (5): 235–260. doi: 10.2307/2940917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and D. L. Miller. 2000. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory Into Practice 39 (3): 124–130. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cronenberg, S. 2016. “Music at the Middle: Principles that Guide Middle Level General Music Teachers.” PhD diss., Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 1857495335).
   Google Scholar
• Cronenberg, S. 2018. “Paradigm Parley: A Framework for the Dialectic Stance.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689818777925.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2009. Revision: Autoethnographic Reflections on Life and Work. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., T. E. Adams, and A. P. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Historical Social Research 36 (4): 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., and A. P. Bochner. 2000. “Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.), edited by N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln, 733–768. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., and J. F. Molina-Azorin. 2017. “The Journal of Mixed Methods Research Starts a New Decade: Principles for Bringing in the New and Divesting of the Old Language of the Field.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (1): 3–10. doi: 10.1177/1558689816682092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 2007. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 2015. “Preserving Distinctions Within the Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Merger.” In The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry, edited by S. N. Hesse-Biber, and R. B. Johnson, 606–615. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., and J. N. Hall. 2010. “Dialectics and Pragmatism: Being of Consequence.” In Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, (2nd ed.), edited by A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddlie, 119–143. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Headley, M. G. 2016. “What is Symbolic Mathematics Language Literacy? A Multilevel Mixed Methods Study of Adolescents in a Middle School.” PhD diss., Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10308492).
   Google Scholar
• Howes, L. M. 2017. “Developing the Methodology for an Applied, Interdisciplinary Research Project: Documenting the Journal Toward Philosophical Clarity.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (4): 450–468. doi:10.1177/1558689815622018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. 2008. “Living with Tensions: The Dialectic Approach.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2 (3): 203–207. doi:10.1177/1558689808318043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B. 2012. “Dialectical Pluralism and Mixed Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6): 751–754. doi:10.1177/0002764212442494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B. 2017. “Dialectical Pluralism: A Metaparadigm Whose Time has Come.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (2): 156–173. doi: 10.1177/1558689815607692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal, I., J. Engebretson, L. Cohen, M. E. Fernandez-Esquer, G. Lopez, T. Wangyal, and A. Chaoul. 2018. “An Exploration of the Effects of Tibetan Yoga on Patients’ Psychological Well-Being and Experience of Lymphoma: An Experimental Embedded Mixed Methods Study.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 12 (1): 31–54. doi:10.1177/1558689816645005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2011. “Paradigms or Toolkits? Philosophical and Methodological Positions as Heuristics for Mixed Methods Research.” Mid-Western Educational Researcher 24 (2): 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A., and D. Loomis. 2003. “Mixed Method Design: An Alternative Approach.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by C. Teddlie, and A. Tashakkori, 241–271. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mirchandani, K., L. F. Vosko, U. Soni-Sinha, J. A. Perry, A. M. Noack, R. J. Hall, and M. Gellatly. 2018. “Methodological K/Nots: Designing Research on Enforcement of Labor Standards.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 12 (2): 133–147. doi:10.1177/1558689816651793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. 2010. “Simultaneous and Sequential Qualitative Mixed Method Designs.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (6): 483–491. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastasi, B. K., J. H. Hitchcock, and L. M. Brown. 2010. “An Inclusive Framework for Conceptualizing Mixed Methods Design Typologies: Moving Toward Fully Integrated Synergistic Research Models.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), edited by A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddlie, 305–338. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• NMSA. (National Middle School Association). 2010. This We Believe: Keys to Educating Young Adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Plano Clark, V. L., and K. Sanders. 2015. “The Use of Visual Displays in Mixed Methods Research: Strategies for Effectively Integrating the Quantitative and Qualitative Components of a Study.” In Use of Visual Displays in Research and Testing: Coding, Interpreting, and Reporting Data, edited by M. McCrudden, G. Schaw, and C. Buckendahl, 177–206. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., and B. L. Wilson. 1985. “Numbers and Words.” Evaluation Review 9 (5): 627–643. doi:10.1177/0193841X8500900505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar