Using visual and textual metaphors to explore teachers’ professional roles and identities

References

• Alsup, Janet. 2006. Teacher Identity Discourses: Negotiating Personal and Professional Spaces. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M., and G. W. H. Smith. 1992. Analyzing Visual Data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M. 2007. Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J., and F. Smith. 2012. “What’s in Focus? A Critical Discussion of Photography, Children and Young People.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15 (2): 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, Thomas. 2001. Touching Eternity: The Enduring Outcomes of Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, Thomas, and Elliot Eisner. 2012. “Arts-based Educational Research.” In Complementary Methods for Research in Education, edited by Green, Camilli, and Elmore, 95–110. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Beltman, S., C. Glass, J. Dinham, B. Chalk, and B. Nguyen. 2015. “Drawing Identity: Beginning Pre-service Teachers’ Professional Identities.” Issues in Educational Research 25 (3): 225–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berci, M. E. 2007. “The Autobiographical Metaphor: An Invaluable Approach to Teacher Development.” Journal of Educational Thought 41 (1): 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. 2009. “Qualitative Bild-und Videointerpretation Die dokumentarische Methode [Quality Image and Video Interpretation and the Documentary Method].” Historical Social Research 34 (2): 296–321.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. P. 2003. Practice Makes Practice: A Critical Study of Learning to Teach. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. 2009. “‘Creative’ Visual Methods in Media Research: Possibilities, Problems and Proposals.” Media Culture Society 31 (4): 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, David. 2003. “A Classification System for Metaphors about Teaching.” Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance 74: 23–31..
   Google Scholar
• Danielewicz, J. 2001. Teaching Selves: Identity, Pedagogy, and Teacher Education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1933. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, F., and A. Fitzgerald. 2006. “Guiding Principles for a Reflexive Approach to Teaching Organisation Studies.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 3 (1): 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. 2012. “Beyond the Throwaway Society: Ordinary Domestic Practice and a Sociological Approach to Household Food Waste.” Sociology 46 (1): 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., and S. R. Sirin. 2007. “Theorizing Hyphenated Selves: Researching Youth Development in and Across Contentious Political Contexts.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 1 (1): 16–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fischman, G. 2000. Imagining Teachers: Rethinking Gender Dynamics in Teacher Education. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. 2008. “Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations.” In Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by Raymond W. Gibbs, 462–482. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H., S. Riley, L. Archer, and K. Gleeson. 2005. “Editorial: Imag(in)ing Visual Methodologies.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 2 (3): 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Galman, S. 2009. “The Truthful Messenger: Visual Methods and Representation in Qualitative Research in Education.” Qualitative Research 9 (2): 197–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh, T. G. 2011. “Children-produced Drawings: An Interpretive and Analytical Tool for Researchers.” In Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods, edited by E. Margolis and L. Pauwels, 214–240. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, J. 2011. I is an other; The Secret Life of Metaphor and how it Shapes the Way We See the Wosrld. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Gillis, C., and C. Johnson. 2002. “Metaphor as Renewal: Re-imagining Our Professional Selves.” English Journal, July, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, W., Mike Russell, and Damian Bebell. 2003. “Drawing on Education: Using Drawings to Study and Change Education and Schooling.” Harvard Educational Review 2 (12): 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, H. 2011. “Critical Reflection: Reflecting on Learning to be Reflective.” Reflective Practice 12 (6): 829–839.
   Google Scholar
• Ivie, S. D. 2003. On The Wings of Metaphor. San Francisco: Caddo Gap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kindon, S. 2002. “Participatory Video in Geographic Research: A Feminist Practice of Looking?” Paper presented at the Institute of British Geographers and Royal Geographical Society Annual Conference, Queen’s University, December.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H., A. Baer, E. Laurier, S. Petschke, and B. Schnettler. 2008. “Visual Methods.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 (3): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkman. 2009. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, R., and S. Mitchell. 2007. “Caged Birds and Cloning Machines: How Student Imagery ‘Speaks’ to Us about Cultures of Schooling and Student Participation.” Improving Schools 10 (1): 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow, L. H., and Damien Bebell. 2003. “Drawing Conclusions: Using Student Drawings to Inform Teaching and Learning in a University Setting.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, April.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., H. Demetriou, J. Rudduck, and K. Myers. 2003. Consulting Pupils: A Toolkit for Teachers. Cambridge, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, E., and Luc Pauwels, eds. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Massengill, D., M. Mahlios, and A. Barry. 2005. “Metaphors and Sense of Teaching: How these Constructs Influence Teachers.” Teacher Education 16 (3): 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Mey, Günter, and Marc Dietrich. 2017. “From Text to Image—Shaping a Visual Grounded Theory Methodology [61 paragraphs].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum: Qualitative Social Research] 17 (2): Art. 2. doi:10.17169/fqs-17.2.2535.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath, C. 2012. “Drawing as a Visual Medium.” Human Development 55: 193–198. doi:10.1159/000342182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Kyle. 2015. “Dear Critics: Addressing Concerns and Justifying the Benefits of Research Method.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 16 (3). doi:10.17169/fqs-16.3.2434.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M., and H. Vinha. 2016. “Creative Interactions with Data: Using Visual and Metaphorical Devices in Repeated Focus Groups.” Qualitative Research 16 (1): 9–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oevrmann, U. 2014. “Ein Pressefoto als Ausdrucksgestalt der archaischen Rachelogik eines Hegemons. Bildanalyse mit den Verfahren der objektiven Hermeneutik [A Press Photo as an Expressive Form of the Archair Rachelogic of a Hegemon. Image Analysis Using the Methods of Objective Hermeneutics].” In Hilary’s Hand. To the Political Iconography of the Present, edited by Michael Kauppert and Irene Leser, 31–58. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Patchen, T., and T. Crawford. 2011. “From Gardeners to Tour Guides: The Epistemological Struggle Revealed in Teacher-generated Metaphors of Teaching.” Journal of Teacher Education 62 (3): 286–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peez, G. 2006. “Fotoanalyse nach Verfahrensprinzipien der Objektiven Hermeneutik [Photo Analysis According to the Principles of Objective Hermeneutics].” In Image Interpretation and Image Understanding, edited by W. Marotzki and H. Niesyto, 121–122. GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2004. “Performance, Self-representation and Narrative: Interviewing with Video.” In Seeing is Believing? Approaches to Visual Research Studies in Qualitative Methodology, edited by Christopher J. Pole, 61–77. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, H., and J. Frankham. 2007. “Seeing Voices and Hearing Pictures: Image as Discourse and the Framing of Image-based Research.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 28 (3): 373–387.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, S., J. W. Hicks, and M. Davis. 1997. Metaphorical Ways of Knowing: The Imaginative Nature of Thought and Expression. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English (NCTM).
   Google Scholar
• Richard, V. M., and M. Lahman. 2015. “Photo-elicitation: Reflexivity on Method, Analysis, and Graphic Portraits.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 38 (1): 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. 2006. “Post-modern Image-based Research: An Innovative Data Collection Method for Illuminating Preservice Teachers’ Developing Perceptions in Field-based Courses.” The Qualitative Report 11 (1): 37–54. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol11/iss1/3.
   Google Scholar
• Rosaen, C., and S. Florio-Ruane. 2008. “The Metaphors by Which We Teach: Experience, Metaphor, and Culture in Teacher Education.” In Handbook of Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts, edited by M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, and D. J. McIntyre, 706–731. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis and the Association of Teacher Educators (ATE).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saban, A., B. N. Kocbeder, and A. Saban. 2007. “Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching and Learning Revealed Through Metaphor Analysis.” Learning and Instruction 17 (2): 123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, Trudy. 1997. “Using Drawings and Interviews to Promote Reflection on Student Teaching.” PhD dissertation, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Schiro, Michael. 2013. Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., and A. Prusak. 2005. “Telling Identities: In Search of an Analytic Tool for Investigating Learning as a Culturally Shaped Activity.” Educational Researcher 34 (4): 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., and M. Mahlios. 2011. “Literacy Metaphors of Pre-service Teachers: Do they Change After Instruction? Which Metaphors are Stable? How do they Connect to Theories?.” Journal of Education for Teaching 37 (1): 77–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannehill, D., and A. MacPhail. 2014. “What Examining Teaching Metaphors Tells Us about Preservice Teachers’ Developing Beliefs about Teaching and Learning.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 19 (2): 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theron, L., C. Mitchell, A. Smith, and J. Stuart. 2011. Picturing Research: Drawing as Visual Methodology. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelock, A., Damien Bebell, and Walt Haney. 2000. “What Can Student Drawings Tell Us about High Stakes Testing in Massachusetts?” http://wwwcsteep.bc.edu/ drawoned/mcas/mcaspaper.htmlS.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., G. Crow, and H. Pain. 2011. “Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: A Narrative Review.” Qualitative Research 11 (5): 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, W. J., A. M. Dickinson, A. Meah, and F. Short. 2016. “Reflections on the Use of Visual Methods in a Qualitative Study of Domestic Kitchen Practices.” Sociology 50 (3): 470–485.
   Google Scholar