Lessons learned from a design-based research implementation: a researcher’s methodological account

References

• Anderson, Terry, and Julie Shattuck. 2012. “Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?” Educational Researcher 41 (1): 16–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, Sasha, and Kurt Squire. 2004. “Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Philip. 2004. “On the Theoretical Breadth of Design-Based Research in Education.” Educational Psychologist 39 (4): 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Ann L. 1992. “Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2 (2): 141–178.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, Paul. 2001. “Supporting the Improvement of Learning and Teaching in Social and Institutional Context.” Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-Five Years of Progress 78: 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, Paul, Jere Confrey, Andrea DiSessa, Richard Lehrer, and Leona Schauble. 2003. “Design Experiments in Educational Research.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 9–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001009.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. 6th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Allan. 1992. “Toward a Design Science of Education.” In New Directions in Educational Technology, edited by E. Scanclon and T. O'Shea, 15–22. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Allan, Diana Joseph, and Katerine Bielaczyc. 2004. “Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (1): 15–42. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, Chris, Brian Nelson, Diane Jass Ketelhut, Jody Clarke, and Cassie Bowman. 2004. “Design-Based Research Strategies for Studying Situated Learning in a Multi-User Virtual Environment.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences, edited by Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, and N. Enyedy, 158–165. Santa Monica, California: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. “Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, Christopher Plekss. 2002. “Creating Context: Design-Based Research in Creating and Understanding CSCL.” In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, edited by G. Stahl, 453–462. Boulder, Colorado: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Krefting, Laura. 1991. “Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness.” American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45 (3): 214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays, Nicholas, and Catherine Pope. 1995. “Qualitative Research: Rigour and Qualitative Research.” BMJ 311 (6997): 109–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney, Susan, and Thomas C. Reeves. 2018. Conducting Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mearns, Tessa L., Do Coyle, and Rick de Graaff. 2014. “Aspirations and Assumptions: A Researcher’s Account of Pupil Involvement in School-Based Research.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 37 (4): 442–457. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.925440.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, Samuel. 1994. “The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments.” Educational Researcher 23 (2): 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, D. Kevin. 2012. “Designs That Fly: What the History of Aeronautics Tells us about the Future of Design-Based Research in Education.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 35 (2): 119–140. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.683573.
   Google Scholar
• Orngreen, Rikke. 2015. “Reflections on Design-Based Research.” In IFIP Working Conference on Human Work Interaction Design, edited by J. A. Nocera, B. R. Barricelli, A. Lopes, P. Campos, and T. Clemmensen, 20–38. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour. 1987. “Information Technology and Education: Computer Criticism vs. Technocentric Thinking.” Educational Researcher 16 (1): 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour. 1993. The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour, and Idit Harel. 1991. “Situating Constructionism.” Constructionism 36 (2): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Parmaxi, Antigoni, Kostantinos Papadamou, Michael Sirivianos, and Makis Stamatelatos. 2017. “E-safety in Web 2.0 Learning Environments: A Research Synthesis and Implications for Researchers and Practitioners.” In International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, edited by P. Zaphiris and A. Ioannou, 249–261. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parmaxi, Antigoni, and Panayiotis Zaphiris. 2014a. “The Evolvement of Constructionism: An Overview of the Literature.” In International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, edited by P. Zaphiris and A. Ioannou, 452–461. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parmaxi, Antigoni, and Panayiotis Zaphiris. 2014b. “Affordances of Social Technologies as Social Microworlds.” In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, edited by M. Jones and P. Palanque, 2113–2118. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Parmaxi, Antigoni, and Panayiotis Zaphiris. 2015a. “Developing a Framework for Social Technologies in Learning via Design-Based Research.” Educational Media International 52 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1080/09523987.2015.1005424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmaxi, Antigoni, and Panayiotis Zaphiris. 2015b. “Specifying the Dynamics of Social Technologies as Social Microworlds.” Behaviour & Information Technology 34 (4): 413–424. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2015.1004650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmaxi, Antigoni, and Panayiotis Zaphiris. 2017. “Web 2.0 in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: A Research Synthesis and Implications for Instructional Design and Educational Practice.” Interactive Learning Environments 25 (6): 704–716. doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1172243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmaxi, Antigoni, Panayiotis Zaphiris, and Andri Ioannou. 2016. “Enacting Artifact-Based Activities for Social Technologies in Language Learning Using a Design-Based Research Approach.” Computers in Human Behavior 63: 556–567. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmaxi, Antigoni, Panayiotis Zaphiris, Eleni Michailidou, Salomi Papadima-Sophocleous, and Andri Ioannou. 2013. “Introducing new Perspectives in the use of Social Technologies in Learning: Social Constructionism.” In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, edited by P. Kotze, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, and M. Winckler, 554–570. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, Thomas. 2006. “Design Research from a Technology Perspective.” In Educational Design Research, edited by J. V. d. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen, 64–78. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, Mitchel. 2014. “Give P’s a Chance: Projects, Peers, Passion, Play.” In Constructionism and Creativity: Proceedings of the Third International Constructionism Conference, edited by G. Futschek and C. Kynigos, 13–20. Vienna: Austrian Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rüschoff, Bernd, and Markus Ritter. 2001. “Technology-enhanced Language Learning: Construction of Knowledge and Template-Based Learning in the Foreign Language Classroom.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 14 (3–4): 219–232. doi:10.1076/call.14.3.219.5789.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, William A., and Philip Bell. 2004. “Design-Based Research Methods for Studying Learning in Context: Introduction.” Educational Psychologist 39 (4): 199–201. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, Gerry, Timothy Koschmann, and Dan Suthers. 2006. “CSCL: An Historical Perspective.” In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. K. Sawyer, 409–426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Based on a Chapter.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, Robert E. 1995. The art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tabak, Iris. 2004. “Reconstructing Context: Negotiating the Tension Between Exogenous and Endogenous Educational Design.” Educational Psychologist 39 (4): 225–233. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, Harry. 2012. “Triangulation, Respondent Validation, and Democratic Participation in Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (2): 111–123. doi:10.1177/1558689812437185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Feng, and Michael J. Hannafin. 2005. “Design-Based Research and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (4): 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar