Research methodology in critical mathematics education

References

• Aguilar, Mario Sánchez, and Juan Gabriel Molina Zavaleta. 2012. “On the Links Between Mathematics Education and Democracy: A Literature Review.” Pythagoras 33 (2): 1–15. doi: 10.4102/pythagoras.v33i2.164
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, D. F. 2010. “Are there Viable Connections between Mathematics, Mathematical Proof and Democracy?” Last Modified May 15. http://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome25/D. F. Almeida Are There Viable Connections.docx.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Annica, and Paola Valero. 2016. “Negotiating Critical Pedagogical Discourses: Stories of Contexts, Mathematics and Agency.” In Critical Mathematics Education, edited by Paul Ernest, 119–226. Charlote, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Avcı, Bülent. 2017. “Critical Mathematics Education in Neoliberal Era.” Ph.D., Faculty of Education, Charles Sturt University.
   Google Scholar
• Avcı, Bülent. 2018. Critical Mathematics Education: Can Democratic Mathematics Education Survive Under Neoliberal Regime? Boston, USA: Brill-Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Wilfred, and Stephen Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesters, Sarah Davey. 2012. The Socratic Classroom: Reflective Thinking Through Collaborative Inquiry. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Darder, Antonia. 2002. Reinventing Paulo Freire: A Pedagogy of Love. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Darder, Antonia. 2012. Culture and Power in the Classroom: Educational Foundations for the Schooling of Bicultural Students. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Darder, Antonia. 2015. Freire and Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Lissovoy, Noah. 2015. Education and Emancipation in the Neoliberal Era: Being, Teaching, and Power. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenstein, Marilyn. 1983. “Critical Mathematics in Education: An Application of Paulo Freire's Epistemology.” Journal of Education 165 (4): 315–339. doi: 10.1177/002205748316500403
   Google Scholar
• Frankenstein, Marilyn. 2005. “Reading the World with Math: Goals for a Critical Mathematical Literacy Curriculum.” In Rethinking Mathematics: Teaching Social Justice by Numbers, edited by E. Gutstein and B. Peterson, 19–28. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenstein, Marilyn. 2010. “Critical Mathematics Education: An application of Paulo Freire’s epistemology.” Last Modified June 12, Accessed June 12. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Q9xVO8G4uskJ:people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/pome25/Marilyn Frankenstein Critical Mathematics Education.doc+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 2000. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 2013. Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gandin, Luis Armando, and Michel W Apple. 2002. “Thin Versus Thick Democracy in Education: Porto Alegre and the Creation of Alternatives to neo-Liberalism.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 12 (2): 99–116. doi: 10.1080/09620210200200085
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, Henry. 1988. Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning, Critical Studies in Education Series. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, Henry. 2012. “Can Democratic Education Survive in a Neoliberal Society?”. May 2015. http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/12126-can-democratic-education-survive-in-a-neoliberal-society - startOfPageId12126.
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, Susan, Marie Brennan, Mark McFadden, and Jane Mitchell. 2003. Secondary Schooling in a Changing World. Australia: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, Eric. 2006. Reading and Writing the World with Mathematics: Toward a Pedagogy for Social Justice, Critical Social Thought. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1972. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Theory and Practice. Translated by John Viertel. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by McCarthy Thomas. Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by McCarthy Thomas. Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hannaford, Colin. 1998. “Mathematics Teaching is a Democratic Education.” ZDM 30 (6): 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, Kathryn, and Gary L. Anderson. 2005. The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hursh, David. 2007. “Marketing Education: The Rise of Standardized Testing, Accountability, Competition, and Markets in Public Education.” In Neoliberalism and Education Reform, edited by E. Wayne Ross and Rich Gibson, 15–34. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyslop-Margison, Emery J, and M. Ayaz Naseem. 2007. Scientism and Education. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hyslop-Margison, Emery J, and James Thayer. 2009. Teaching Democracy: Citizenship Education as Critical Pedagogy. Boston: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, Stephen. 2008. “Critical Theory and Participatory Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by Peter Reason and Hilary Bradbury, 121–138. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, Stephen. 2009. “Action Research as a Practice-Based Practice.” Educational Action Research 17 (3): 463–474. doi: 10.1080/09650790903093284
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, Stephen. 2010. “Exploring the Relevance of Critical Theory for Action Research: Emancipatory Action Research in the Footsteps of Jürgen Habermas.” In Handbook of Action Research, edited by Peter Reason, and Hilary Bradbury, 94–105. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, Stephen, Robin McTaggart, and Rhonda Nixon. 2014. The Action Research Planner. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Alfie. 1999. The Schools our Children Deserve: Moving Beyond Traditional Classrooms and ‘Tougher Standards’. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Alfie. 2000. The Case Against Standardized Testing: Raising the Scores, Ruining the Schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Leistyna, Pepi. 2007. “Neoliberal Nonsense.” In Critical Pedagogy: Where are We Now?, edited by P. McLaren and J. L. Kincheloe, 97–123. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Vol. 75. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, Peter, and James M. Giarelli. 1995. Critical Theory and Educational Research. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, Raymond Allen, and Carlos Alberto Torres. 2002. Reading Freire and Habermas: Critical Pedagogy and Transformative Social Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, Nel. 2003. Happiness and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlowski, Paul. 2012. Teaching About Hegemony: Race, Class and Democracy in the 21st Century. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, Gerald J. 2009. Teacher Action Research: Building Knowledge Democracies. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, Peter. 2009. Standardized Minds: The High Price of America's Testing Culture and What we can do to Change it. Cambridge: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles: Saga.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Mercedes K. 2015. Common Core Dilemma—Who Owns Our Schools? New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Mercedes K. 2016. School Choice: The end of Public Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, Ole. 1994. Towards a Philosophy of Critical Mathematics Education. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, Ole. 2011. An Invitation to Critical Mathematics Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, Ole. 2014. Critique as Uncertanity. Edited by Bharath Sriraman. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, Ole, and Helle Alrø. 2004. Dialogue and Learning in Mathematics Education: Intention, Reflection, Critique. Vol. 29. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, Ole, and Marcelo Borba. 2004. “Research Methodology and Critical Mathematics Education.” In Researching the Socio-Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education: Issues of Power in Theory and Methodology, edited by P. Valero and R. Zevenbergen, 207–226. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, Ole, and Brian Greer. 2012. Opening the Cage: Critique and Politics of Mathematics Education, New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, John. 2011. Critical Pedagogy for Social Justice. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, William. 2007. “Critical Pedagogy.” In Critical Pedagogy: Where are we now?, edited by Joe L Kincheloe and Peter McLaren, 371–389. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, Ernest T. 2013. Action Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Valero, Paola, and Robyn Zevenbergen. 2004. Researching the Socio-Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education: Issues of Power in Theory and Methodology. Vol. 35. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vithal, Renuka. 1999. “Democracy and Authority: A Complementarity in Mathematics Education.” ZDM 31 (1): 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer, Joel. 2015. What Kind of Citizen? Educating our Children for the Common Good. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Pete. 2017. “Critical Relationships Between Teachers and Learners of School Mathematics.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 25 (4): 515–530. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2017.1285345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar