1,032
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis: the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 518-534 | Received 08 Jan 2021, Accepted 10 Nov 2021, Published online: 07 Feb 2022

References

  • Alake-Tuenter, E., et al., 2012. Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: a literature study and critical review of the American national science education standards. International journal of science education, 34 (17), 2609–2640.
  • Attride-Stirling, J., 2001. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1 (3), 385–405.
  • Bastian, M., Heymann, S., and Jacomy, M., 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI conference on weblogs and social nedia, 3 (1), 361–362.
  • Bell, R.L., and Clair, T.L.S., 2015. Too little, too late: addressing nature of science in early childhood Education. In: K. Trundle and M Saçkes, eds. Research in early childhood science education. Dordrecht: Springer, 125–141.
  • Biesta, G.J., and Burbules, N.C., 2003. Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Braun, V., and Clarke, V. 2020. ‘Thematic analysis | a reflexive approach.’ University of Auckland – School of Psychology. Available from: https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/thematic-analysis.html#. [Accessed 24 November 2020].
  • Bruce, B.C., and Casey, L., 2012. The practice of inquiry: a pedagogical ‘sweet spot’ for digital literacy? Computers in the schools, 29 (1–2), 191–206.
  • Bruun, J., Andersen, I.V.K., and Udby, L., 2021. Network analysis of changes to an integrated science curse curriculum over time. In: O. Levrini, G. Tasquier, T. G. Tamer, L. Branchetti, and M. Levin, eds. Engaging with contemporary challenges through science education research. Cham: Springer, 91–104.
  • Bruun, J., Lindahl, M., and Linder, C., 2019. Network analysis and qualitative discourse analysis of a classroom group discussion. International journal of research & method in education, 42 (3), 317–339.
  • Bruun, J. ‘Networks in physics education research – a theoretical, methodological, and didactical exploration study’ (PhD diss.). University of Copenhagen. Available from: https://www.ind.ku.dk/publikationer/inds_skriftserie/2012-28/.
  • Bybee, R.W., et al., 2006. The BSCS 5E instructional model: origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
  • Campbell, C., et al., 2018. STEM practice in the early years. Creative education, 9 (1), 11–25.
  • Clauset, A., Newman, M.E., and Moore, C., 2004. Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical review, 70 (6), 066111.
  • Cremin, T., et al., 2015. Creative little scientists: exploring pedagogical synergies between inquiry-based and creative approaches in early years science. Education 3-13, 43 (4), 404–419.
  • Csardi, G., and Nepusz, T., 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, complex systems, 1695 (5), 1–9.
  • Darbyshire, D., and Baker, P., 2012. A systematic review and thematic analysis of cinema in medical education. Medical humanities, 38 (1), 28–33.
  • Decristan, J., et al., 2015. Impact of additional guidance in science education on primary students’ conceptual understanding. The journal of educational research, 108 (5), 358–370.
  • Desouza, J.M.S., 2017. Conceptual play and science inquiry: using the 5E instructional model. Pedagogies: an international journal, 12 (4), 340–353.
  • Dewey, J., 2005. Art as experience. New York: Penguin Putnam.
  • Dewey, J., 2013. Logic, the theory of inquiry, 1938. Southern University Press.
  • Dewey, J., 2015. Experience and education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Dobber, M., et al., 2017. Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational research review, 22, 194–214.
  • Eckhoff, A., 2017. Partners in inquiry: a collaborative life science investigation with preservice teachers and kindergarten students. Early childhood education journal, 45 (2), 219–227.
  • Enyedy, N., et al., 2012. Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 7 (3), 347–378.
  • Eshach, H., and Fried, M.N., 2005. Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of science education and technology, 14 (3), 315–336.
  • Feinerer, I., and Hornik, K. 2019. ‘tm: Text Mining Package’. R package version 0.7-7. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm. [Accessed 8 January 2021].
  • Fleer, M., 2009. Supporting scientific conceptual consciousness or learning in ‘A Roundabout Way’ in play-based contexts. International journal of science education, 31 (8), 1069–1089.
  • Foti, N.J., Hughes, J.M., and Rockmore, D.N., 2011. Nonparametric sparsification of complex multiscale networks. PloS One, 6 (2), e16431.
  • Fridberg, M., Thulin, S., and Redfors, A., 2018. Preschool children’s collaborative science learning scaffolded by tablets. Research in science education, 48 (5), 1007–1026.
  • Furtak, E.M., et al., 2012. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82 (3), 300–329.
  • García-Carmona, A., Criado, A.M., and Cruz-Guzmán, M., 2017. Primary pre-service teachers’ skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in science education, 47 (5), 989–1010.
  • Golafshani, N., 2003. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8 (4), 597–607.
  • Grant, M.J., and Booth, A., 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 26 (2), 91–108.
  • Gropen, J., et al., 2017. Foundations of science literacy: efficacy of a preschool professional development program in science on classroom instruction, teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge, and children’s observations and predictions. Early education and development, 28 (5), 607–631.
  • Hamlin, M., and Wisneski, D.B., 2012. Supporting the scientific thinking and inquiry of toddlers and preschoolers through play. YC young children, 67 (3), 82–88.
  • Harlen, W., and Allende, J. 2006. IAP Report of the Working Group on the International Collaboration in the Evaluation of IBSE Programs. Chile, University of Santiago: Fundacion para Biomedicis Avanzados do la Facultad de Medicina.
  • Hattie, J., and Timperley, H., 2007. The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77 (1), 81–112.
  • Heradio, R., et al., 2016. Virtual and remote labs in education: a bibliometric analysis. Computers & education, 98, 14–38.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G., and Chinn, C.A., 2007. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational psychologist, 42 (2), 99–107.
  • Hollingsworth, H.L., and Vandermaas-Peeler, M., 2017. ‘Almost Everything We Do Includes Inquiry’: fostering inquiry-based teaching and learning with preschool teachers. Early child development and care, 187 (1), 152–167.
  • Horntvedt, M.E.T., et al., 2018. Strategies for teaching evidence-based practice in nursing education: a thematic literature review. BMC medical education, 18 (1), 172.
  • Ilhan, N., and Tosun, C., 2016. Kindergarten students’ levels of understanding some science concepts and scientific inquiry processes according to demographic variables (The sampling of Kilis province in Turkey). Cogent education, 3 (1), 1144246. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1144246.
  • Johnson, B., and Christensen, L., 2014. Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., and Turner, L.A., 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1 (2), 112–133.
  • Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R.E., 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41 (2), 75–86.
  • Larimore, R.A., 2020. Preschool science education: a vision for the future. Early childhood education journal, 48, 703–714.
  • Leonard, J., Boakes, N., and Moore, C.M., 2009. Conducting science inquiry in primary classrooms: case studies of two preservice teachers’ inquiry-based practices. Journal of elementary science education, 21 (1), 27–50.
  • Leuchter, M., Saalbach, H., and Hardy, I., 2014. Designing science learning in the first years of schooling. An intervention study with sequenced learning material on the topic of ‘Floating and Sinking’. International journal of science education, 36 (10), 1751–1771.
  • Margett, T.E., and Witherington, D.C., 2011. The nature of preschoolers’ concept of living and artificial objects. Child development, 82 (6), 2067–2082.
  • Martin-Hansen, L., 2012. Defining inquiry – exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. The science teacher, 69 (2), 34–37.
  • McGuigan, L., and Russell, T., 2018. Reflections on guidance to orientate untrained practitioners towards authentic science for children in the early years. The journal of emergent science, 15, 28–36.
  • McNerney, K., and Hall, N., 2017. Developing a framework of scientific enquiry in early childhood: an action research project to support staff development and improve science teaching. Early child development and care, 187 (2), 206–220.
  • Minner, D.D., Levy, A.J., and Century, J., 2010. Inquiry-based science instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of research in science teaching, 47 (4), 474–496.
  • National Research Council, 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies.
  • O’connor, G., et al., 2021. Early childhood science education from 0 to 6: a literature review. Education sciences, 11 (4), 1–24. doi: 10.3390/educsci11040178.
  • Pedaste, M., et al., 2015. Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47–61.
  • Petticrew, M., and Roberts, H., 2008. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Philippou, S., Papademetri-Kachrimani, C., and Louca, L., 2015. ‘The exchange of ideas was mutual, i have to say’: negotiating researcher and teacher ‘Roles’ in an early years educators’ professional development programme on inquiry-based mathematics and science learning. Professional development in education, 41 (2), 382–400.
  • Jan. L. Plass, Roxana Moreno, and Roland Brünken, eds. Cognitive load theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • R Core Team. 2019. ‘R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing’. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 8 January 2021].
  • Rönnebeck, S.B., Bernholt, S., and Ropohl, M., 2016. Searching for a common ground –a literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in science education, 52 (2), 161–197.
  • Ropohl, M., et al., 2018. The concept of competence and its relevance for science, technology, and mathematics education. In: J. Dolin and R Evans, eds. Transforming assessment: through an interplay between practice, research and policy. Cham: Springer, 2–25.
  • RStudio Team. 2020. ‘RStudio: Integrated Development for R’. http://www.rstudio.com/. [Accessed 8 January 2021].
  • Samarapungavan, A., et al., 2009. The development and validation of the science learning assessment (SLA): a measure of kindergarten science learning. Journal of advanced academics, 20 (3), 502–535.
  • Senocak, E., et al., 2013. A study on development of an instrument to determine Turkish kindergarten students’ understandings of scientific concepts and scientific inquiry processes. Educational sciences: theory and practice, 13 (4), 2217–2228.
  • Siry, C., Ziegler, G., and Max, C., 2012. ‘Doing science’ through discourse-in-interaction: young children’s science investigations at the early childhood level. Science education, 96 (2), 311–336.
  • Trundle, K.C., 2015. The inclusion of science in early childhood classrooms. In: K. Trundle and M Saçkes, eds. Research in early childhood science education. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–6.
  • Valverde-Berrocoso, J., et al., 2020. Trends in educational research about e-learning: a systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 12 (12), 5153.
  • Van Hook, S.J., and Huziak-Clark, T.L., 2008. Lift, squeeze, stretch, and twist: research-based inquiry physics experiences (RIPE) of energy for kindergartners. Journal of elementary science education, 20 (3), 1–16.
  • Vartiainen, J., and Kumpulainen, K., 2020. Playing with science: manifestation of scientific play in early science inquiry. European early childhood education research journal, 28 (4), 490–503.
  • Von der Fehr, A. 2016. ‘Exploring social networks of science education actors in Danish science municipalities.’ (PhD diss.), University of Copenhagen.
  • Watts, M., Salehjee, S., and Essex, J., 2017. But is it science? Early child development and care, 187 (2), 274–283.
  • Willig, C., 2013. Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Wu, S.-C., and Lin, F.-L., 2016. Inquiry-based mathematics curriculum design for young children-teaching experiment and reflection. EURASIA journal of mathematics, science & technology education, 12 (4), 843–860.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.