7,958
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Constructivist grounded theory and educational research: constructing theories about teachers’ work when analysing relationships between codes

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 200-210 | Received 19 Jan 2021, Accepted 26 Apr 2022, Published online: 05 Jul 2022

References

  • Bell, D., et al., 2018. STEM Education in the Twenty-first Century: Learning at Work—an Exploration of Design and Technology Teacher Perceptions and Practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28 (3), 721–737. doi:10.1007/s10798-017-9414-3.
  • Blumer, H., 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bryant, A., 2019. The Varieties of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Charmaz, K., 2011. A Constructivist Grounded Theory Analysis of Losing and Regaining a Valued Self, edited by FJ Wertz, K Charmaz, LM McMullen, R Josselson, R Anderson, and E McSpadden, eds. Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis: Phenomenological, Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Research, and Intuitive Inquiry, 165–204. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Charmaz, K., 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Charmaz, K., 2017. The Power of Constructivist Grounded Theory for Critical Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 34–45. doi:10.1177/1077800416657105.
  • Charmaz, K., Harris, S.R., and Irvine, L., 2019. The Social Self and Everyday Life: Understanding the World Through Symbolic Interactionism. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Charon, J.M., 2006. Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, an Interpretation, and Integration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Chew, A.W., 2020. Informed Guessing: Enacting Abductively-Driven Research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43, 189–200. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2019.1626818.
  • Clarke, E., and Visser, J., 2019. Pragmatic Research Methodology in Education: Possibilities and Pitfalls. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42, 455–469. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2018.1524866.
  • Dey, I., 1993. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Forsberg, C. 2016. Students’ perspectives on bullying. PhD diss. Linköping University.
  • Forsberg, C., Thornberg, R., and Samuelsson, M., 2014. Bystanders to Bullying: Fourth-to Seventh-grade Students’ Perspectives on Their Reactions. Research Papers in Education, 29 (5), 557–576. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2013.878375.
  • Glaser, B.G., 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B.G., 1998. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B.G., 2003. The Grounded Theory Perspective II: Description’ s Remodelling of Grounded Theory Methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Hallberg, L.R., 2006. The “Core Category” of Grounded Theory: Making Constant Comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1, 141–148. doi:10.1080/17482620600858399.
  • Holloway, S.M., 2021. The Multiliteracies Project: Preservice and Inservice Teachers Learning by Design in Diverse Content Areas. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 16 (3), 307–325. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2020.1787172.
  • Lindqvist, H., et al., 2017. Resolving Feelings of Professional Inadequacy: Student Teachers’ Coping with Distressful Situations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.019.
  • Lindqvist, H. 2019a. Student teachers’ and beginning teachers’ coping with emotionally challenging situations. PhD diss. Linköping University.
  • Lindqvist, H., 2019b. Student Teachers’ Use of Strategies to Cope with Emotionally Challenging Situations in Teacher Education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45, 540–552. doi:10.1080/02607476.2019.1674565.
  • Lindqvist, H., et al., 2019. Conflicts Viewed Through the Micro-political Lens: Beginning Teachers’ Coping Strategies for Emotionally Challenging Situations. Research Papers in Education, 35, 46–765. doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1633559.
  • McChesney, K., and Aldridge, J.M., 2019. What Gets in the Way? A New Conceptual Model for the Trajectory from Teacher Professional Development to Impact. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 834–852. doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412.
  • Striepe, M., 2020. Combining Concept Mapping with Semi-structured Interviews: Adding Another Dimension to the Research Process. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 44(5), 519–532. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2020.1841746.
  • Taber, K.S., and Student, T.A., 2003. How was it for you?: The Dialogue Between Researcher and Colearner. Westminster Studies in Education, 26, 33–44. doi:10.1080/0140672030260104.
  • Thomas, G., and James, D., 2006. Reinventing Grounded Theory: Some Questions About Theory, Ground and Discovery. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 767–795. doi:10.1080/01411920600989412.
  • Thomas, W.I., and Thomas, D.S., 1928. The Child in America. New York, NY: Alfred A.
  • Thornberg, R., 2012. Informed Grounded Theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56, 243–259. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.581686.
  • Thornberg, R., 2017. Grounded Theory. In: D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith, and L. E Suter, eds. The BERA/SAGE Handbook of Educational Research, Vol. 1. London: Sage, 355–375.
  • Thornberg, R., and Charmaz, K., 2012. “Grounded Theory”. In: S. D. Lapan, M. Quartaroli, and F. Reimer, eds. Qualitative Research: An Introduction to Methods and Designs. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley/Jossey-Bass, 41–67.
  • Thornberg, R., and Charmaz, K., 2014. Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding. In: U. Flick, ed. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage, 153–169.