Non-statistical, substantive generalization: lessons from Q methodology

References

• Amin, Z., 2000. Q methodology–a journey into the subjectivity of human mind. Singapore medical journal, 41 (8), 410–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borges, J.A.R., et al., 2022. Stakeholder viewpoints on facilitation of cross-border cooperation. European planning studies, 30 (4), 627–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevik, L. (2022). The emergent multiphase design: demonstrating a fully integrated approach in the context of language research in education. In: A. Onwuegbuzie and J. Hitchcock, eds., The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research. London: Routledge, 196–212.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.R., 1980. Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.R., 2002. Q technique and questionnaires. Operant subjectivity, 25 (2), 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, J.N., et al., 2020. Investigating student perceptions of a dissection-based undergraduate gross anatomy course using Q methodology. Anatomical sciences education, 13 (2), 149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso, M., and Fraschini, N., 2021. A Q Methodology Study into vision of Italian L2 university students: an Australian perspective. The Modern language journal, 105, 552–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenail, R., 2005. Future directions for qualitative methods. In: D.H. Sprenkle and F. Piercy, eds. Research methods in family therapy. 2nd ed. New York City: Guilford Press, 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K.M.T., 2010. Advanced sampling designs in mixed research. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2nd ed. Sage, 353–377.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. 2010. “Mapping the Developing Landscape of Mixed Methods Research.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 45–68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, S., Webler, T., and Tuler, S.P., 2009. Using Q method for the formative evaluation of public participation processes. Society & natural resources, 23 (1), 92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, T., and Brown, S., 2016. Educator perspectives on the use of alternative assessment methods within taught Masters programmes: an exploratory study using activity theory and Q methodology. Educational review, 68 (4), 379–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., 1983. Interpretive interactionism. In: G Morgan, ed. Beyond methods: strategies for social research. (129-146). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., 2010. Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative inquiry, 16 (6), 419–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., and Giardina, M.D., 2006. Introduction: qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge. In: N.K. Denzin and M. D. Giardina, eds. Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenges. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., and Lincoln, Y., 2012. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, J.M., 2011. Using Q methodology as a mixed methods approach to study beliefs about early childhood education. International journal of multiple research approaches, 5 (2), 223–237.
   Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J.R., 1981. Reliability and validity of Q-Method results: some empirical evidence. Operant subjectivity, 5 (1), 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J., and Rinne, T., 2012. Clarifying a basis for qualitative generalization using approaches that identify shared culture. Qualitative research, 12 (4), 473–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fendler, L., 2006. Why generalisability is not generalisable. Journal of philosophy of education, 40 (4), 437–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobo, G., 2008. Re-conceptualizing generalization: old issues in a new frame. In The SAGE handbook of social research methods, edited by P. Alasuutari, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 193–213.
   Google Scholar
• Gobo, G., 2021. Replicability. Politics and poetics of accountability, validation and legitimation. Frontiers in psychology, 11, Article 608451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, J., and Falk, I., 2019. Generalising from qualitative research (GQR): a New Old approach. The qualitative report, 24 (5), 1012–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., 1990. What’s wrong with ethnography? The myth of theoretical description. Sociology, 24 (4), 597–615.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S., 2010. Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice. Qualitative inquiry, 16 (6), 455–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, J.H., and Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2022. The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research: an introduction. In: A. Onwuegbuzie and J. Hitchcock, eds. The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research. London: Routledge, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., and Gray, R., 2010. A history of philosophical and theoretical issues for mixed methods research. In: A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddlie, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 69–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kampen, J.K., and Tamás, P., 2014. Overly ambitious: contributions and current status of Q methodology. Quality & quantity, 48 (6), 3109–3126.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E.F., 1983. A Feeling for the organism: the life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York City: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Lalayants, M., and Tripodi, T., 2009. A review of generalization methods used in empirical social work literature. International journal of social welfare, 18 (4), 333–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, S., 2009. A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International journal of research & method in education, 32 (1), 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H.M., 2021. Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative psychology, 8 (1), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E.G., 1979. Naturalist inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, T., 2013. Kinds of generalizations in educational and psychological research. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 57 (4), 445–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., and Thomas, D., 2013. Q methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. n.d. Semantics. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/induction [Accessed 21 March 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D.M., 2009. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., and Newman, C., 1994. Conceptual statistics for beginners. 2nd ed.. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., and Ramlo, S., 2010. Using Q methodology and Q factor analysis to facilitate mixed methods research. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 505–530.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A.J., et al., 2009. Mixed data analysis: advanced integration techniques. International journal of multiple research approaches, 3 (1), 13–33.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A.J. 2014. “Introduction - Putting the MIXED Back into Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Educational Research and Beyond: Moving Toward the Radical Middle.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 6 (3): 192–219. http://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.192.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A.J., and Combs, J.P., 2010. Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: a synthesis. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 397–430.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A.J., and Johnson, R.B., 2021. Mapping the emerging landscape of mixed methods. In: A. Onwuegbuzie and B. Johnson, eds. The Routledge reviewer’s guide for mixed methods research analysis. London: Routledge, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S., 2016. Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of mixed methods research, 10, 28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S., 2017. The preferences of Q methodologists at the factor-analytic stage: an examination of practice. Research in the schools, 24 (2), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S., 2020. Divergent viewpoints about the statistical stage of a mixed method: qualitative versus quantitative orientations. International journal of research & method in education, 43 (1), 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S., 2021. Q methodology as mixed analysis. In: A. Onwuegbuzie and B. Johnson, eds. The Routledge reviewer’s guide for mixed methods research analysis. London: Routledge, 199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S., 2022a. Conceptualizing Q methodology as an integrated analysis. In: A. Onwuegbuzie and J. Hitchcock, eds. The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research. London: Routledge, 324–340.
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S., 2022b. A science of subjectivity. In: J. Rhoads, D. Thomas, and S. Ramlo, eds. Cultivating Q methodology: essays honoring Steven R. Brown. Columbia, MO: International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, 182–216.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, I., 2011. Interpretation and social knowledge: On the use of theory in the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridenour, C.S., and Newman, I., 2008. Mixed methods research: exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., 1997. “To be of use”: enhancing the utility of qualitative research. Nursing outlook, 45 (3), 125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillman, L. (2014). Mixed methods and the logic of qualitative inference. Qualitative sociology, 37, 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G., 2004. Odious comparisons: incommensurability, the case study, and “small N's” in sociology. Sociological theory, 22 (3), 371–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W., 1953. The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W., 1983. Against interpretation. Operant subjectivity, 6 (4), 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W., 1986a. William James, Niels Bohr, and complementarity: I—Concepts. The psychological record, 36, 519–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W., 1986b. William James, Niels Bohr, and complementarity: II—Pragmatics of a thought. The psychological record, 36, 529–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W., 1987. William James, Niels Bohr, and complementarity: III - Schrödinger’s Cat. The psychological record, 37, 523-544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W., 1988a. William James, Niels Bohr, and complementarity: V - phenomenology of subjectivity. The psychological record, 38, 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W., 1988b. Quantum theory of subjectivity. Integrative psychiatry, 6 (3), 180–195.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C., 2009. Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.D., and Baas, L.R., 1993. The issue of generalization in Q methodology: “Reliable Schematics” revisited. Operant subjectivity, 16, 18–36.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A.W., et al., 2013. Comparing random sample Q and R methods for understanding natural resource attitudes. Field methods, 25 (1), 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., 2000. Interpretivism and generalisation. Sociology, 34 (2), 209–224.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar