370
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The development of a methodology for enhancing equity within education systems

ORCID Icon &
Pages 99-113 | Received 13 Sep 2022, Accepted 01 May 2023, Published online: 18 Jul 2023

References

  • Ainscow, M., et al., 2012. Developing equitable education systems. London: Routledge.
  • Ainscow, M., Booth, T., and Dyson, A., 2006. Inclusion and the standards agenda: negotiating policy pressures in England. International journal of inclusive education, 10 (4–5), 295–308.
  • Ainscow, M., Chapman, C., and Hadfield, M., 2020. Changing education systems: a research-based approach. London: Routledge.
  • Anderson, T. and Shutack, J., 2012. Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educational researcher, 41 (1), 16–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813.
  • Artiles, A. and Dyson, A., 2005. Inclusion, education and culture in developed and developing countries. In: D. Mitchell, ed. Contextualising inclusive education: evaluating old and new international perspectives. London: Routledge, 37–62.
  • Booth, T., 2003. Embracing the faith, including the community. London: Routledge.
  • Booth, T., Ainscow, M., and Dyson, A., 1997. Understanding inclusion and exclusion in the English competitive education system. International journal of inclusive education, 1 (4), 337–355.
  • Bradbury, H., 2015. The Sage handbook of action research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
  • Braveman, P., 2003. Monitoring equity in health and healthcare: a conceptual framework. Journal of health, population and nutrition, 21 (3), 181–192.
  • Campbell, H. and Vanderhoven, D., 2016. Knowledge that matters: realising the potential of co-production. Manchester: N8 Research Partnership.
  • Carr, W. and Kemmis, S., 1986. Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press.
  • Checkland, P., 1981. Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Cobb, P., et al., 2003. Design experiments in educational research. Educational researcher, 32 (1), 9–13.
  • Connell, J.P. and Kubisch, A.C., 1998. Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects and problems. In: K. Fulbright-Anderson, A.C. Kubisch, and J.P. Connell, eds. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, volume 2: theory, measurement and analysis. Queenstown: The Aspen Institute, 15–44.
  • Design-Based Research Collective, 2003. Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational researcher, 32 (1), 5–8.
  • Dyson, A., et al., 2012. Developing children’s zones for England. London: Save the Children.
  • Dyson, A. and Kerr, K., 2013. Children’s zones: what’s the evidence? London: Save the Children.
  • Ebbutt, D., 1985. Educational action research: some general concerns and specific quibbles. In: G. Burgess, ed. Issues in educational research: qualitative methods. London: The Falmer Press, 152–174.
  • Edwards, A., 2005. Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International journal of educational research, 43 (3), 168–182. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010.
  • Forbes, C. and Kerr, K., 2022. Endogenous assets-mapping: a new approach to conceptualizing assets in order to understand young people’s capabilities and desired educational outcomes in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Cambridge journal of education, 53 (1), 117–133. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2022.2083077.
  • Gutierrez, R. and Lipman, P., 2016. Toward social movement activist research. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 29 (10), 1241–1254. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1192696.
  • Harris, J., Carrington, S., and Ainscow, M., 2017. Promoting equity in schools: collaboration, inquiry and ethical leadership. London: Routledge.
  • Hillage, J., et al., 1998. Excellence in research on schools. London: DfEE.
  • Ishimaru, A., et al., 2022. Transforming the role of RPPs in remaking educational systems. Educational researcher, 51 (7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X221098077.
  • Kerr, K. and Ainscow, M., 2022. Promoting equity in market-driven education systems: lessons from England. Education sciences, 12 (7). doi:10.3390/educsci12070495.
  • Kerr, K. and Dyson, A., 2020. Researching complex extended education initiatives in England: a design-based approach using theory of change. In: S.H. Bae, et al., eds. International developments in research on extended education. Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 115–134.
  • Kerr, K., Dyson, A., and Raffo, C., 2014. Education, disadvantage and place: making the local matter. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Kerr, K. and Raffo, C., 2016. Exploring the relationship between equality, equity and social justice in education. In: D. Beach and A. Dyson, eds. Equity and education in cold climates. London: Tufnell Press, 13–26.
  • Kock, N., 2004. The three threats of action research: a discussion of methodological antidotes in the context of an information systems study. Decision support systems, 37 (2), 265–286.
  • Lawson, H., et al., 2015. Participatory action research. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lewin, K., 1946. Action research and minority problems. Journal of social issues, 2 (4), 34–36.
  • Macpherson, I., et al., 1998. A journey into learning partnership: a university and state system working together for curriculum change. In: B. Atweh, S. Kemmis, and P. Weeks, eds. Action research in practice. London: Routledge, 141–162.
  • McIntyre, D., 2005. Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge journal of education, 35 (3), 357–382.
  • National Education Research Forum, 2001. A research and development strategy for education: developing quality and diversity. Nottingham: NERF Publications.
  • OECD, 2021. Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Oja, S. and Smulyan, L., 1989. Collaborative action research: a developmental approach. London: Falmer.
  • Pawson, R. and Tilley, N., 2004. Realist evaluation. London: Cabinet Office.
  • Penuel, W., Coburn, C., and Gallagher, D., 2013. Negotiating problems of practice in research-practice design partnerships. Yearbook of the national society for the study of education, 112 (2), 237–255.
  • Philippakos, Z., Howell, E., and Pellegrino, A., 2021. Design-based research in education: theory and applications. New York: Guildford Press.
  • Reinholz, D. and Andrews, T., 2020. Change theory and theory of change: what’s the difference anyway? International journal of STEM education, 7 (2). doi:10.1186/s40594-020-0202-3.
  • Rickinson, M. and Edwards, A., 2021. The relational features of evidence use. Cambridge journal of education, 51 (4), 509–526. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2020.1865877.
  • Salokangas, M. and Ainscow, M., 2017. Inside the autonomous school: making sense of a global educational trend. London: Routledge.
  • Sen, A., 2000. Social exclusion: concept, application, and scrutiny. Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank. Social Development Papers No. 1.
  • Termeer, C., Dewulf, A., and Biesbroek, R., 2019. A critical assessment of the wicked problem concept: relevance and usefulness for policy science and practice. Policy and society, 38 (2), 167–179. doi:10.1080/14494035.2019.1617971.
  • Tierney, W.G., 2013. Beyond the ivory tower: the role of the intellectual in eliminating poverty. Educational researcher, 42 (6), 295–303.
  • Tinoca, L., et al., 2022. Design-based research in the educational field: a systematic literature review. Education sciences, 12 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060410.
  • UNESCO, 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
  • Warren, M., et al., 2018. Is collaborative, community-engaged scholarship more rigorous than traditional scholarship? On advocacy, bias, and social science research. Urban education, 53 (4), 445–472.
  • Warren, M., Park, S., and Tieken, M., 2016. The formation of community engaged scholars: a collaborative approach to doctoral training in education research. Harvard educational review, 86 (2), 233–260.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.