Using an ‘Ethnogram’ to visualize talk in the classroom

References

• Asan, O., and Montague, E., 2014. Using video-based observation research methods in primary care health encounters to evaluate complex interactions. Informatics in primary care, 21 (4), 161–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagnoli, A., 2009. Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative research, 9 (5), 547–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, M., 2001. Visual methods in social research. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bertin, J., 1983. The semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. California: Esri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, T.F., 2022. Sensory ecologies: the refinement of movement and the senses in sport. The senses and society, 17 (3), 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen, C., 1997. Foundations for an anthropology of the senses. International social science journal, 49 (153), 401–412.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R.J., et al., 2017. Research methods & methodologies in education. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, M., et al.. 2021. “Streetwise: mapping citizens’ perceived spatial qualities.” In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on enterprise information systems. Vol. 1, 810–818. SciTePress..
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R., and Hockey, J. 2023. ‘Gravel cycling craft and the senses: scenes, sounds, vibrations, fatigue and typifications on off-road tracks’. Senses and society. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.108017458927.2023.2181138.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, A.J., and Agosto, D.E., 2012. Diagrams and relational maps: the use of graphic elicitation techniques with interviewing for data collection, analysis, and display. International journal of qualitative methods, 11 (5), 513–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., Blackwell, A., and Clarkson, P., 2006. Graphic elicitation: using research diagrams as interview stimuli. Qualitative research, 6 (3), 341–366.
   Google Scholar
• Daylight, R., 2012. The difference between semiotics and semiology. Gramma: Journal of theory and criticism, 20, 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I., 1993. Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M., Gamsu, S., and Whewall, S., 2020. Mapping the relational construction of people and places. International journal of social research methodology, 23 (1), 91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E.W., 1997. The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational researcher, 26 (6), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fallucchi, F., et al., 2021. Enriching videos with automatic place recognition in google maps. Multimedia tools and applications 81: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcez, A., Duarte, R., and Eisenberg, Z., 2011. Produção e análise de vídeogravações em pesquisas qualitativas. Educação e pesquisa, 37, 249–261.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J.J., 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Giunchiglia, F., and Walsh, T., 1992. A theory of abstraction. Artificial intelligence, 57 (2-3), 323–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiraud, P., 1964. Semiology. Boston.: London.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J., 2019. Everyday routines as transformative processes: a sporting case. Sociological research online, 24 (2), 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, D., 2005. Empire of the senses: The sensual culture reader. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D., 2009. The sixth sense reader. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, K.S., and Hyle, A.E., 2004. Drawing out emotions: the use of participant-produced drawings in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative research, 4, 361–382.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M., and Łapińska, J., 2023. From cookbooks to ASMR: significance of sound and hearing in culinary recipes. The senses and society, 1–12. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17458927.2023.2181137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H., et al., 2008. Visual analysis. New developments in the interpretative analysis of video and photography. In forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: qualitative social research, 9 (3). https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/visual-analysis-new-developments-interpretative/docview/869615944/se-2.
   Google Scholar
• Leland, C.H., Mennonno, A., and Schools, I.P., 2016. This is how we get along: transmediation as a tool for thinking. The Mid south literacy journal, 1 (2), 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lengler, R., and Eppler, M. 2007. ‘Towards a periodic table of visualization methods for management’. Iasted Proceedings of the conference on graphics and visualization in engineering, Clearwater, FL, USA. Retrieved from http://www.visual-literacy.org/periodic_table/periodic_table.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, T.H.J., 2022. The pursuit of pleasurable work: Craftwork in twenty first century England. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, M., 2022. Who feels it knows it: black bodies and the sensory experience of the dance-Hall. The senses and society, 17 (2), 223–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mohajan, H.K., 2018. Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of economic development, environment and people, 7 (1), 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., 2012. Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: the case of architects at work. Qualitative research, 12 (3), 304–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J.M., 2006. Diagramming qualitative theories. Qualitative health research, 16 (9), 1163–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nätynki, M., Kinnunen, T., and Kolehmainen, M., 2023. Embracing water, healing pine: touch-walking and transcorporeal worldings. The senses and society, 1–18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17458927.2023.2180864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, A., and Pexman, P., 2010. Displaying your findings: A practical guide for creating figures, posters, and presentations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A., and Dickinson, W., 2008. Mixed methods analysis and information visualization: graphical display for effective communication of research results. The qualitative report, 13 (2), 204–225.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Ospina, E. 2019. The rise of social media. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Available from: ‘ https://ourworldindata.org/rise-of-social-media’ [Online Resource] [Accessed 20th April, 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Page, D., and Sidebottom, K., 2022. The sensorium and fleshy schools. British educational research journal, 48 (4), 771–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pain, H., 2012. A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International journal of qualitative methods, 11 (4), 303–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovskaya, M. 2016. Digital place-making: insights from critical cartography and GIS. The digital arts and humanities: Neogeography, social media and big data integrations and applications, pp.153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M.A., et al., 2021. Video ethics in educational research involving children: literature review and critical discussion. Educational philosophy and theory, 53 (9), 863–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson, J., et al., 2021. Two novel approaches to the content analysis of school mathematics textbooks. International journal of research & method in education, 44 (2), 208–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, C.S., 1991. Peirce on signs: Writings on semiotic. Chapel Hill: UNC Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., 2006. Doing visual ethnography. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., et al., 2015. Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., 2015. Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Radnofsky, M.L., 1996. Qualitative models: visually representing complex data in an image/text balance. Qualitative inquiry, 2 (4), 385–410.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G., 2016. Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rutanen, N., et al., 2018. Tensions and challenges concerning ethics on video research with young children – experiences from an international collaboration among seven countries. Video journal of education and pedagogy, 3 (1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, M., 1995. More than words: the generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian journal of education / revue canadienne de l'éducation, 20, 455–475.
   Google Scholar
• Slone, D.J., 2009. Visualizing qualitative information. The qualitative report, 14 (3), 489–497.
   Google Scholar
• Stockemer, D., 2019. Quantitative methods for the social sciences’. 50. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stoller, P., 1989. The taste of ethnographics things: The senses in anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A.L., 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suhor, C., 1984. Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of curriculum studies, 16 (3), 247–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufte, E.R., 2001a. Visual explanations: Images and quantities, evidence and narratives. Connecticut: Graphics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, E.R., 2001b. The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Umoquit, M.J., et al., 2011. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study. Bmc medical research methodology, 11, 1–10. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga-Atkins, T., and O’Brien, M., 2009. From drawings to diagrams: maintaining researcher control during graphic elicitation in qualitative interviews. International journal of research & method in education, 32 (1), 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Verdi, M.P., and Kulhavy, R.W., 2002. Learning with maps and texts: an overview. Educational psychology review, 14, 27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdinelli, S., and Scagnoli, N.I., 2013. Data display in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods, 12 (1), 359–381.
   Google Scholar
• Viola, I., Chen, M., and Isenberg, T., 2020. Visual abstraction. In: M. Chen, H. Hauser, P. Rheingans, and G. Scheuermann, eds. Foundations of data visualization. Cham: Springer, 15–37.
   Google Scholar
• von Engelhardt, J., 2002. The language of graphics: a framework for the analysis of syntax and meaning in maps, charts and diagrams. Unpublished PhD thesis. Amsterdam.: University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R., and Adelman, C., 1975. Interaction analysis in informal classrooms: a critical comment on the flanders’ system. British journal of educational psychology, 45 (1), 73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, K., et al., 2013. ‘That's not quite the way we see it’: the epistemological challenge of visual data. International journal of research & method in education, 36 (1), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Waskul, D.D., and Vannini, P., 2008. Smell, odor, and somatic work: sense-making and sensory management. Social psychology quarterly, 71 (1), 53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, J., 2010. Mapping mixed methods research: methods, measures, and meaning. Journal of mixed methods research, 4 (2), 87–102. doi:10.1177/1558689809358755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, M., 1996. Mental models and computer modelling. Journal of computer assisted learning, 12 (1), 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdebik, J., 2012. Deleuze and the diagram: Aesthetic threads in visual organisation. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar