The ethics and epistemology of researching higher degree by research supervision: an encounter with institutional ethics review

References

• Aldridge, D., 2020. Special issue: ethical questions in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 46 (4), 725–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Council of Graduate Research. n. d. Graduate research good practice principles. https://www.acgr.edu.au/good-practice/graduate-research-good-practice-principles/.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, K., and Wynn, L., 2023. Research ethics committees, ethnographers and imaginations of risk. Ethnography, 24 (4), 537–558. doi:10.1177/1466138120983862.
   Google Scholar
• Brockbank, A., and McGill, I., 1998. Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Spiro, J., and Quinto, S., 2020. The role of research ethics committees: friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46 (4), 747–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buirski, N., 2022. Ways of being’: a model for supportive doctoral supervisory relationships and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 41 (5), 1387–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byram, M., and Stoicheva, M., 2020. Introduction. In: M. Byram, and M. Stoicheva, eds. The doctorate as experience in Europe and beyond: supervision, languages, identities. London, New York: Routledge, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Casci, T., and Adams, E., 2020.. Research Culture: Setting the right tone. eLife, 9 (e55543.), 1–5. doi:10.7554/eLife.5554.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, D.J., et al., 1994. Establishing effective Phd supervision. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, D.L., et al., 2020. The hidden curriculum in doctoral education. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41497-9
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 1993. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. Discourse & Society, 4 (2), 133–168.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, M.H., Phillips, P.A., and Yule, E., 2006. The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives. Ethics & Behavior, 16 (4), 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grealy, L., and Laurie, T., 2019. The ethics of postgraduate supervision: a view from cultural studies. In: J. Aksikas, S. J. Andrews, and D. Hedrick, eds. Cultural studies in the classroom and beyond: critical pedagogies and classroom strategies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 299–323.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B., 2005. Unfinished business: subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 24 (2), 151–163.
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., et al., 2017. Doctoral supervisor development in Australian universities: preparing research supervisors to teach writing. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 11 (1), A88–A103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halász, G., and Ruano-Borbalan, J.-C., 2022. Perspectives on doctoral education. European Journal of Education, 57, 361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and Bansel, P., 2012. The learning alliance: ethics in doctoral supervision. Oxford Review of Education, 38 (4), 377–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and Honey, A., 2005. Unravelling ethics: illuminating the moral dilemmas of research ethics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30 (4), 2141–2162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, T., 2020. Successful supervision and leadership: ensuring high = performance outcomes by using the PASETM model. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Honan, E., et al., 2013. Ethical issues in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 36 (4), 386–399.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., 2005. The development of research supervision: “turning the light on a private space”. International Journal for Academic Development, 10 (1), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., 2009. Research as an intercultural ‘contact zone’. Discourse, 30 (2), 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., and Bottrell, D. Eds., 2019. Resisting neoliberalism in higher education. (Vol. II). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.R., 1976. What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one? Curriculum Inquiry, 6 (2), 135–151. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1179759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., and Nayar, S., 2012. Postgraduate research supervision: a critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17 (1), 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGagh, J., et al. 2016. Review of Australia’s research training system. Available from: https://acola.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/saf13-review-research-training-system-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., 2007. Problematising “good” HDR supervision: a case study of an international pilot of an on-line HDR supervisor professional development program. International Journal of Research Supervision, 1 (1), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Pare, A., 2011. Speaking of writing: supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In: L. McAlpine, and C. Amundsend, eds. Doctoral education: research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators. Cham: Springer, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., and Brew, A., 2002. Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27 (2), 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, M. 2020. Postgraduate research experience survey 2020. Advance Higher Education. Available from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/postgraduate-research-experience-survey-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sikes, P., and Piper, H., 2010. Ethical research, academic freedom and the role of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 33 (3), 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M., 2004. The pedagogy of ‘good’ PhD supervision: a national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Starke-Meyerring, D., 2011. The paradox of writing in doctoral education: student experiences. In: L. McAlpine, and C. Amundsen, eds. Doctoral education: research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators. Cham: Springer, 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tolich, M., 2016. A narrative account of ethics committees and their codes. New Zealand Sociology, 31 (4), 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Universities Australia. 2020. 2020 higher education facts and figures. https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/200917-HE-Facts-and-Figures-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, E., 1973-74. Hiding the hidden curriculum: an interpretation of the language of justification in nineteenth-century educational reform. Curriculum Theory Network, 4 (1), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. 2019. Postgraduate research experience survey 2019. Available from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/postgraduate-research-experience-survey-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., 2012. The good supervisor: supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar