Using semantic iterative keyword sampling for polyonymous concepts in interlingual educational research by example of ‘formative evaluation’ in German

References

• Altheide, D.L. and Schneider, C.J., 2013. Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. and Flint, J., 2001. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Social research update, 33 (1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., 2001. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284 (5), 34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P. and Waldorf, D., 1981. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological methods & research, 10 (2), 141–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P. and Wiliam, D., 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 5 (1), 7–71.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2012. Thematic analysis. In: H. Cooper, ed. APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Vol. 2, research designs. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., 2012. Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2000. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 509–535.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I., 2011. Formative assessment: policy, perspectives and practice. Florida journal of educational administration & policy, 4 (2), 158–180.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, D., 2022. Semantic search: how it works & who it’s for [online]. Available from: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-how-it-works-who-its-for/438960 [Accessed 1 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K., 2018. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cookson, C.J., 2018. Assessment terms half a century in the making and unmaking: from conceptual ingenuity to definitional anarchy. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 43 (6), 930–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruse, A., 2000. Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K.E. and Mulvenon, S.W., 2009. A critical review of research on formative assessment: the limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 14 (7), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, C., 2012. Beyond testing: towards a theory of educational assessment. Classic ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Google, 2023. How Google Search organizes information [online]. Available from: https://www.google.com/search/howsearchworks/how-search-works/organizing-information [Accessed 22 Nov 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Google Search Central, 2023. In-depth guide to how Google Search works [online]. Available from: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/how-search-works [Accessed 30 July 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Grotlüschen, A. and Bonna, F., 2008. German-language literature review. In: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, ed. Teaching, learning and assessment for adults: improving foundation skills. Paris: OECD Publishing, 1–59. [online]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/40046802.pdf [Accessed 26 Aug 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Gübür, K.T., 2021. What is semantic search? How does semantic search affect SEO? [online]. Available from: https://www.holisticseo.digital/theoretical-seo/semantic-search [Accessed 1 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Guha, R., McCool, R., and Miller, E., 2003. Semantic search. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, 20–24 May, Budapest. New York, NY: ACM Press, 700–709.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. and Sims, A., 2010. Understanding morphology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. and Shannon, S.E., 2015. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15 (9), 1277–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiger, M.E. and Varpio, L., 2020. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42 (8), 846–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köller, O., 2005. Formative assessment in classrooms: a review of the empirical German literature. In: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, ed. Formative assessment: improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD Publishing, 265–279. [online]. Available from: http://www.edra.gr/pdf/9605021E.pdf [Accessed 5 Oct 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, O., 2022a. What is semantic search: a deep dive into entity-based search. [online]. Available from: https://searchengineland.com/semantic-search-entity-based-search-388221 [Accessed 30 July 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, O., 2022b. Google MUM update: What can SEOs expect in the future? [online]. Available from: https://searchengineland.com/google-mum-update-seo-future-383551 [Accessed 30 July 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Kracauer, S., 1952. The challenge of qualitative content analysis. Public opinion quarterly, 16 (4), 631–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kromrey, H., 2001. Evaluation von Lehre und Studium – Anforderungen an Methodik und Design [Evaluation of teaching and studies – requirements for methodology and design]. In: C. Spiel, ed. Evaluation univeristärer Lehre – zwischen Qualitätsmanagement und Selbstzweck [Evaluation of university teaching – between quality management and autotelic]. Münster: Waxmann, 21–60.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, U., 2011. Formative Leistungsmessung: Von einer Noten- zu einer Diagnosekultur [Formative performance measurement: from a culture of grades to one of diagnosis]. Schulmanagement, 3, 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J.H., et al., 2000. Classroom assessment: principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction. Toronto: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Middlewood, D. and Cardno, C., eds., 2001. Managing teacher appraisal and performance: a comparative approach. London: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Negi, Y.S. and Kumar, S., 2014. A comparative analysis of keyword- and semantic-based search engines. In: D.P. Mohapatra and S. Patnaik, eds. Intelligent computing, networking, and informatics: proceedings of the international conference on advanced computing, networking, and informatics, 12–14 June, Raipur. New Delhi: Springer, 727–736.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L.S., et al., 2017. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Online Etymology Dictionary, 2023. Upgrade [online]. Available from: https://www.etymonline.com/word/upgrade [Accessed 27 Nov 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2013. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. Synergies for better learning: an international perspective on evaluation and assessment [online]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/education/school/Evaluation_and_Assessment_Synthesis_Report.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W.J., 2008. Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, C., et al., 2021. The 3-D skills model: a randomised controlled pilot study comparing a novel 1–1 near-peer teaching model to a formative OSCE with self-regulated practice. Medical science educator, 31, 1789–1801.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross, M. 2011. Cultivating the arts in education and therapy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S., et al., 2019. An overview of semantic search engines. International journal of research and review, 10 (6), 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R., 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18 (2), 118–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C., 2018. Formatives Assessment als Aspekt professioneller diagnostischer Kompetenz im Kontext des Grundschulunterrichts [Formative assessment as aspect of professional diagnostic competency in primary school education]. In: S. Miller, et al., eds. Profession und Disziplin: Grundschulpädagogik im Diskurs [Profession and discipline: discourse in primary school pedagogy]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 158–163.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C., 2019. Formatives Assessment in der Grundschule: Konzept, Einschätzungen der Lehrkräfte und Zusammenhänge [Formative assessment at the elementary level: concept, considerations and connections]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B., 2016. Google’s search knows about over 130 trillion pages [online]. Available from: https://searchengineland.com/googles-search-indexes-hits-130-trillion-pages-documents-263378 [Accessed 2 May 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M., 1967. The methodology of evaluation. In: R.W. Tyler, R.M. Gagné, and M. Scriven, eds. Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 39–83.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S., 2011. Investitionen in Fortbildung sind Investitionen in die Zukunft: Interview mit dem Kasseler Erziehungswissenschaftler Prof. Dr. Lipowsky [Investments in professional development are investments in the future: interview with Kassel-based educationist Prof. Dr. Lipowsky]. Bildung Bewegt, 13, 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R., 2005. Assessment for learning defined. ETS/Assessment Training Institute's international conference: promoting sound assessment in every classroom, September, Portland, OR [online]. Available from: http://downloads.pearsonassessments.com/ati/downloads/afldefined.pdf [Accessed 19 Sep 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Straumberger, W., 2017. Wirksamkeit von Selbstdiagnose beim Üben [Effectiveness of self-assessment during practice]. In: U. Kortenkamp and A. Kuzle, eds. Beiträge zum mathematikunterricht 2017 [2017 papers on mathematics instruction]. Münster: WTM-Verlag, 957–960.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., 2012. Formative assessment at the crossroads: conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford review of education, 38 (3), 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treve, M., 2021. English for academic purposes (EAP) lecturers’ perceptions of formative assessment integration in the Thai EAP context. Journal of language and linguistic studies, 17 (2), 1096–1113.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund, 2020. Assessing the quality of developmental evaluations at UNFPA. UNFPA Evaluation Office [online]. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/admin-resource/DE_EQA_FINAL.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Waters, J., 2015. Snowball sampling: a cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users. International journal of social research methodology, 18 (4), 367–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, K., Given, L.M., and Scifleet, P., 2018. Qualitative data analysis. In: K. Williamson and G. Johanson, eds. Research methods: information, systems, and contexts. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing, 453–476.
   Google Scholar
• Nota bene: I cannot guarantee the accuracy of the translation of titles, particularly of those that include German polysemes (e.g. ‘Perspektiven’) owing to limited contextual information. A small number of the translated titles were provided by the original author(s).
   Google Scholar