140
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Qualitative research during the COVID19 pandemic: the impact of remote research on the collaborative production of methodological knowledge

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 25 Sep 2023, Accepted 05 Mar 2024, Published online: 28 Apr 2024

References

  • Ahmed, A., and Ali, S., 2023. Lessons learned from adapting a quantitative to an emergent mixed methods research design in Pakistan during COVID-19. International journal of research & method in education, 46 (2), 144–160. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2022.2094358.
  • Archibald, M.M., et al., 2019. Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, 160940691987459. doi:10.1177/1609406919874596.
  • Bagshaw, D., Lepp, M., and Zorn, C.R., 2007. International research collaboration: building teams and managing conflicts. Conflict resolution quarterly, 24, 433–446. doi:10.1002/crq.183.
  • Bergman Blix, S., and Wettergren, Å., 2015. The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field. Qualitative research, 15 (6), 688–704. doi:10.1177/1468794114561348.
  • Braun, V., Clarke, V., and Gray, D., eds. 2017. Collecting qualitative data: a practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781107295094.
  • Brown, S-A., et al., 2023. Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams. American heart journal plus: cardiology research and practice, 32, 100306. doi:10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100306.
  • Buzard, K., Gee, L., and Stoddard, O., 2023. Who you gonna call? Gender inequality in external demands for parental involvement. SSRN Elsevier. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4456100.
  • Carduff, E., Murray, S.A., and Kendall, M., 2015. Methodological developments in qualitative longitudinal research: the advantages and challenges of regular telephone contact with participants in a qualitative longitudinal interview study. BMC research notes, 8, 1–10. doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1107-y.
  • Crean, M., et al., 2023. Social class, COVID-19 and care: schools on the front line in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic. British journal of sociology of education, 44 (3), 452–466. doi:10.1080/01425692.2023.2174077.
  • Crivello, G., and Favara, M., 2021. COVID-19 and the ‘ethics of disruption’: current dilemmas facing longitudinal research in low- and middle-income countries. Methodological innovations, 14 (1), 1–5. doi:10.1177/2059799121994223.
  • Crossley, M., and Holmes, K., 2001. Challenges for educational research: international development, partnerships and capacity building in small states. Oxford review of education, 27 (3), 395–409.
  • Daniels, N., et al., 2019. STEER: factors to consider when designing online focus groups using audio-visual technology in health research. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, 160940691988578. doi:10.1177/1609406919885786.
  • Devine, D., et al., 2020. Children’s school lives: an introduction, Report No.1, University College Dublin.
  • Dodds, S., and Hess, A.C., 2021. Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: lessons for transformative service research. Journal of service management, 32 (2), 203–217. doi:10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153.
  • Dodson, L., and Schmalzbauer, L., 2005. Poor mothers and habits of hiding: participatory methods in poverty research. Journal of marriage and family, 67, 949–959. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00186.x.
  • García, B., Welford, J., and Smith, B., 2016. Using a smartphone app in qualitative research: the good, the bad and the ugly. Qualitative research, 16, 508–525.
  • Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C.R., and Didegah, F., 2012. Mapping world scientific collaboration: authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 63 (2), 323–335. doi:10.1002/asi.21688.
  • Gray, L., et al., 2020. Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: zoom video communications. Qualitative report, 25, 1292–1301.
  • Hanna, P., 2012. Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: a research note. Qualitative research, 12 (2), 239–242. doi:10.1177/1468794111426607. https://www.inter-fnisc.ru/index.php/inter/article/view/5944
  • Holland, J., 2007. Emotions and research. International journal of social research methodology, 10 (3), 195–209. doi:10.1080/13645570701541894.
  • Howlett, M., 2022. Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative research, 22 (3), 387–402. doi:10.1177/1468794120985691.
  • Hubbard, G., Backett-Milburn, K., and Kemmer, D., 2001. Working with emotion: issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. International journal of social research methodology, 4 (2), 119–137.
  • Kaufmann, K., et al., 2019. Mobile methods: doing migration research with the help of smartphones, edited by K. Smets, K. Leurs, and M. Georgiou, eds. The SAGE handbook of media and migration. London, UK: SAGE, 167–179.
  • Kerasidou, A., 2019. The role of trust in global health research collaborations. Bioethics, 33, 495–501. doi:10.1111/bioe.12536.
  • Kim, J.J., et al., 2023. Digitally shaped ethnographic relationships during a global pandemic and beyond. Qualitative research, 23 (3), 809–824. doi:10.1177/14687941211052275.
  • Kosmützky, A., 2018. International team research in comparative higher education: shedding some light on its social side. Journal of comparative and international higher education, 10 (2), 14.
  • Lobe, B., Morgan, D., and Hoffman, K.A., 2020. Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International journal of qualitative methods, 19. doi:10.1177/1609406920937875.
  • Marzi, S., 2023. Participatory video from a distance: co-producing knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic using smartphones. Qualitative research, 23 (3), 509–525. doi:10.1177/14687941211038171.
  • Morrison-Smith, S., and Ruiz, J., 2020. Challenges, and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review. SN applied Sciences, 2, 1096. doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5.
  • Mortari, L., 2015. Reflectivity in research practice: an overview of different perspectives. International journal of qualitative methods, 14 (5), 160940691561804. doi:10.1177/1609406915618045.
  • Newman, P.A., Guta, A., and Black, T., 2021. Ethical considerations for qualitative research methods during the COVID-19 pandemic and other emergency situations: navigating the virtual field. International journal of qualitative methods, 20, 160940692110478. doi:10.1177/16094069211047823.
  • Page, D., 2017. Conceptualising the surveillance of teachers. British journal of sociology of education, 38 (7), 991–1006. doi:10.1080/01425692.2016.1218752.
  • Poth, C., 2019. Realizing the integrative capacity of educational mixed methods research teams: using a complexity-sensitive strategy to boost innovation. International journal of research & method in education, 42 (3), 252–266. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2019.1590813.
  • Rakhudu, M. A., Davhana-Maselesele, M., and Useh, U., 2016. Concept analysis of collaboration in implementing problem-based learning in nursing education. Curationis, 39 (1), e1–e13. doi:10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1586.
  • Ramos-Villagrasa, P.J., et al., 2018. Teams as complex adaptive systems: reviewing 17 years of research. Small group research, 49, 135–176. doi:10.1177/1046496417713849.
  • Richardson, J., Godfrey, B., and Walklate, S., 2021. Rapid, remote and responsive research during COVID-19. Methodological innovations, 14 (1), 205979912110085. doi:10.1177/20597991211008581.
  • Self, B., and Ryazantsev, A.P., 2021. Conducting interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Interaction interview interpretation, 13 (4), 9–27. doi:10.19181/inter.2021.13.4.1.
  • Shamsuddin, A., Sheikh, A., and Keers, R.N., 2021. Conducting research using online workshops during COVID-19: lessons for and beyond the pandemic. International journal of qualitative methods, 20, 160940692110437. doi:10.1177/16094069211043744.
  • Sy, M., et al., 2020. Doing interprofessional research in the COVID-19 era: a discussion paper. Journal of interprofessional care, 34 (5), 600–606. doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1791808.
  • Symonds, J. E., et al., 2020. Experiences of remote teaching and learning in Ireland during the Covid-19 pandemic (March – May 2020). University College Dublin.
  • Todd, L., and Nind, M., 2017. Celebration, reflection and praxis: 40 volumes of the journal. International journal of research & method in education, 40 (1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2017.1273591.
  • Todd, L., and Rose, J., 2022. Researching in COVID times: reflection and action. International journal of research & method in education, 45 (1), 1–2. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2022.2043620.
  • Torrentira, C.M., 2020. Online data collection as adaptation in conducting quantitative and qualitative research during the COVID-19 pandemic. European journal of education studies, 7 (11), 78–87. doi:10.46827/ejes.v7i11.3336.
  • Townsend, E., et al., 2020. Key ethical questions for research during the COVID-19 pandemic. The lancet psychiatry, 7 (5), 381–383.
  • Trainor, A., and Ahlgren Bouchard, K., 2013. Exploring and developing reciprocity in research design. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 26 (8), 986–1003. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.724467.
  • Tremblay, S., et al., 2021. Conducting qualitative research to respond to COVID-19 challenges: reflections for the present and beyond. International journal of qualitative methods, 20, 160940692110096. doi:10.1177/16094069211009679.
  • Turner, P., et al., 2021. An online ‘face to face’ focus group approach for understanding how household energy use and green investment decisions differ by personality traits. International journal of qualitative methods, 20, 160940692110383. doi:10.1177/16094069211038312.
  • UNICEF, 2021. School closure database: country-specific data on the number of days by school closure status and number of student population affected, prepared by the education team of the data and analytics section, division of data, analytics, planning and monitoring, UNICEF. Available from: http://data.unicef.org [Accessed 9 Jan 2024].
  • von Vacano, M., 2019. Reciprocity in research relationships: introduction, edited by T. Stodulka, S. Dinkelaker, and F. Thajib, eds. Affective dimensions of fieldwork and ethnography. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 79–86.
  • Watson, A., and Lupton, D., 2022. Remote fieldwork in homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: video-call ethnography and map drawing methods. International journal of qualitative methods, 21, 160940692210783. doi:10.1177/16094069221078376.
  • Weller, S., 2017. Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: some implications for rapport. International journal of social research methodology, 20 (6), 613–625. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505.
  • Willis, R., et al., 2023. Taking deliberative research online: Lessons from four case studies. Qualitative research, 23 (4), 921–939. doi:10.1177/14687941211063483.
  • Wöhrer, V., et al., 2020. Insights from setting up the first wave of a qualitative longitudinal study. International journal of qualitative methods, 19, 160940692095405. doi:10.1177/1609406920954057.
  • Woldegiyorgis, A.A., Proctor, D., and de Wit, H., 2018. Internationalization of research: key considerations and concerns. Journal of studies in international education, 22 (2), 161–176.
  • Yang, L., et al., 2022. The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature human behaviour, 6, 43–54. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4.